Research Article
Research Article
Research Article
Research Article
The Effects of Momordica balsamina Methanolic Extract on
Kidney Function in STZ-Induced Diabetic Rats: Effects on Selected
Metabolic Markers
Received 30 November 2017; Revised 10 April 2018; Accepted 14 May 2018; Published 13 June 2018
Copyright © 2018 Anelisiwe Siboto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.
Background. Studies suggest that Momordica balsamina (intshungu) possesses hypoglycaemic effects. The effects of Momordica
balsamina on diabetic complications such as DN, however, have not been established. Accordingly, this study seeks to
investigate the effects of M. balsamina on kidney function in STZ-induced diabetic rats. Methods. Methanolic extracts (ME) of
M. balsamina’s leaves were used in this study. Short-term effects of M. balsamina methanolic extract on kidney function and
MAP were studied in STZ-induced diabetic rats treated twice daily with M. balsamina methanolic extract (250 mg/kg), insulin
(175 μg/kg, s.c.), and metformin (500 mg/kg) for 5 weeks. Results. M. balsamina methanolic extract significantly increased Na+
excretion outputs in STZ-induced diabetic rats by comparison to STZ-diabetic control rats. M. balsamina methanolic extract
significantly increased GFR in STZ-diabetic rats with a concomitant decrease in creatinine concentration and also reduced
kidney-to-body ratio, albumin excretion rate (AER), and albumin creatinine ratio (ACR). M. balsamina methanolic extract
significantly reduced MAP in STZ-diabetic animals by comparison with STZ-diabetic control animals. These results suggest that
M. balsamina methanolic extract not only lowers blood glucose but also has beneficial effects on kidney function and blood
pressure. Conclusion. These findings suggest that M. balsamina may have beneficial effects on some processes that are associated
with renal derangement in STZ-induced diabetic rats.
Insulin has been shown to normalise glomerular filtration 2.3. Animals. Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 250–300 g
rate (GFR) and oxidative status which helps delay the onset were used to carry out the study. The animals were bred
and progression of CKD [11]. However, the bolus adminis- and kept in the Biomedical Research Unit of the University
tration of insulin in high doses is associated with sodium of KwaZulu-Natal under normal laboratory conditions
retention which often leads to the development of hyperinsu- (temperature and humidity) in a 12 h day: 12 h night cycle.
linaemic oedema and elevated blood pressure [12]. Other The animals were allowed access to water ad libitum and
antidiabetic agents such as metformin and insulin secreta- 40 g standard rat chow daily (Meadow Feeds, Pietermaritz-
gogues are at times unable to achieve glycaemic targets and burg, South Africa). All animal experiments were reviewed
may thus be unable to prevent the progression to DN. and accepted by the Animal Research Ethics Committee
Therefore, there is a need to further explore other avenues of the University of KwaZulu-Natal (AREC/049/016DM).
as means of alternative treatment, thus achieving a holistic Before the study commenced, the animals were allowed to
therapy for DN. acclimatise for 5 days in the metabolic cages.
Medicinal plants have been used for treatment of DM
and associated complications [13]. Studies in our laboratory 2.3.1. Diabetes Induction. Type 1 diabetes mellitus was
have demonstrated that medicinal plants such as Syzygium induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats by a single intraperito-
aromaticum and Syzygium cordutum confer renoprotection neal injection of 60 mg/kg STZ in freshly prepared 0.1 M cit-
in streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced diabetic rats [14, 15]. rate buffer (pH 6.3). The control group received the vehicle,
Mormodica balsamina (MB), our plant of interest, is citrate buffer, through the same route. Seven days after the
fairly common and widespread in southern Africa and induction of diabetes, rats with a blood glucose concentration
is closely related to M. charantia [16]. M. charantia has greater than 20 mmol·L−1 were considered diabetic.
been shown to improve renal function by normalising
oxidative status [17]. M. balsamina has been shown to 2.4. Experimental Protocol. The short-term effects of
have hypoglycaemic activity [18]. However, the renopro- M. balsamina were studied in separate groups of nondiabetic
tective effects of M. balsamina have not yet been estab- and STZ-induced diabetic male rats (n = 6) housed individu-
lished. We envisage that evaluation of parameters such as ally in Makrolon polycarbonate metabolic cages (Techniplast,
GFR and electrolyte handling will shed some light on the Labotec, South Africa) for 5 weeks. ME (250 mg/kg, p.o.) was
therapeutic effects of M. balsamina regarding kidney func- administered twice daily at 0900 h and 1500 h by means of a
tion. The aim of the study therefore is to investigate the bulbed steel tube. Animals which received DMSO/saline
effects of M. balsamina on kidney function in STZ-induced (3 mL/kg, p.o.) served as controls, while those given metfor-
diabetic rats. min (500 mg/kg, p.o.) and insulin (200 μg/kg, s.c.) served as
positive controls. Blood glucose measurements were made
once every third day over the period of 5 weeks using the tail
2. Materials and Methods prick method. Glucose was determined using the Elite® gluc-
ometer (Elite (Pty) Ltd., Health Care Division, South Africa).
2.1. Drugs and Chemicals. Drugs were sourced from
Urine volume and urinary glucose concentrations, albumin,
standard pharmaceutical suppliers. All chemicals were of
creatinine, urea, Na+, K+, Cl−, body weight, 24-hour water
analytical grade and were purchased from standard
intake, food consumption, and mean arterial pressure
commercial suppliers.
(MAP) were determined once every third day. MAP was mon-
itored using a noninvasive tail cuff method with photoelectric
2.2. Plant Extraction sensors (IITC Model 31 Computerised Blood Pressure
Monitor, Life Sciences, Woodland Hills, California, USA) as
2.2.1. Plant Material. Momordica balsamina was identified previously described [19]. The unit works with IITC hardware
by a botanist in the Department of Botany at the University system to measure blood pressure and heart rate in conscious
of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville. The plant was harvested at rats. The animals were warmed at ±30°C in an enclosed cham-
the University of KwaZulu-Natal in Durban, South Africa. ber (IITC Model 31 Computerised Blood Pressure Monitor,
The leaves were washed three times with water to remove Life Sciences, Wood land Hills, California, USA) for 30
any residual dirt. The leaves were then grinded to a pulp minutes before taking blood pressure readings. All measure-
using an electric grinder. Thereafter, the pulp was subjected ments were conducted at 0900 h. Creatinine and albumin
to either methanolic or aqueous extraction as previously concentration were measured in plasma and urine samples
described [18]. at the Global Clinical and Viral Laboratory, Amanzimtoti,
South Africa. GFR was calculated using a standard formula
2.2.2. Methanolic Extraction (ME). The pulp (1.15 kg) was from measurements of the plasma and urinary concentrations
extracted by cold percolation with methanol (95%, 6.9 L) of creatinine and urine flow rate in the fifth week.
for 24 h. The methanolic extract was recovered from the mix-
ture and methanol was further added to the plant material for 2.5. Plasma and Tissue Collection. At the end of the 5-week
further extraction. This process was repeated three times to experimental period, all animals were anaesthetised via a
maximise the yield (609 g). The three extracts were pooled gas anaesthetic chamber (100 mg/kg) for 3 minutes using
together and the combined extract was concentrated at halothane. Blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture
reduced pressure (22–26 mmHg) at 45–60°C. into single precooled heparinized containers for biochemical
Journal of Diabetes Research 3
Table 1: Comparison of food, water intake, and body weight (b.wt) change of nondiabetic controls, diabetic controls, and diabetic rats treated
with MB, metformin, and insulin during a 5-week study (n = 6 in each group). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Time (weeks)
Parameter Treatment
1 2 3 4 5
NC 11.9 ± 3.4 12.2 ± 1.6 12.3 ± 1.7 13.0 ± 0.4 12.9 ± 0.9
DC 27.6 ± 1.2 25.4 ± 1.4 16.7 ± 0.4 28.0 ± 1.1 24.8 ± 0.3
Food intake (g/100 g) MB 10.0 ± 2.1∗ 10.2 ± 2.6∗ 16.4 ± 1.1 26.47 ± 2.4∗ 18.9 ± 0.6
INS 19.2 ± 2.2∗ 18.8 ± 1.9∗ 11.2 ± 0.8 15.5 ± 3.0∗ 14.2 ± 0.9∗
MTF 28.2 ± 0.6∗ 22.7 ± 0.5 21.8 ± 0.5 19.8 ± 0.7 26.8 ± 1.7
NC 30 ± 8.2 35 ± 1.4 32.5 ± 8.5 45 ± 9.6 51.2 ± 7.2
DC 60 ± 9.6 61.3 ± 12.9 95.0 ± 3.7 91.3 ± 3.4 96 ± 1.0
Water intake (mL/100 g) MB 72.5 ± 2.5 67.0 ± 4.1 73.8 ± 8.3 78.7 ± 9.6 76 ± 1.0
INS 73.0 ± 4.4 76.3 ± 9.4 76.3 ± 0.1 76.4 ± 4.8 74.2 ± 2.3
MTF 68.8 ± 3.1 41.3 ± 7.5 45.6 ± 2.5 45.2 ± 2.3 43.8 ± 1.1
NC 44.7 ± 9.4 69.7 ± 5.9 76 ± 8.6 90.7 ± 11.1 92.5 ± 9.9
DC −72 ± 8.6 −87.2 ± 20 −77.5 ± 9.8 −77.5 ± 12 −80 ± 7.4
% b.wt change/week MB −13.8 ± 8∗ −11.1 ± 5∗ −19.5 ± 6.2∗ −15.3 ± 6.1∗ −40.5 ± 11
∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
INS 18.5 ± 13.9 3.2 ± 15.7 30.0 ± 16.2 38.3 ± 18.1 28.3 ± 3.2∗
MTF −23 ± 7.3 −6 ± 6.8 −32 ± 2.9 −11 ± 17.3 −37 ± 3.2
NC 5.1 ± 0.3 5.1 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.3 5.8 ± 0.5 5.3 ± 0.1
DC 33.1 ± 1.5# 33.1 ± 0# 33.4 ± 0.2# 33.0 ± 0.8# 33.2 ± 0.2#
Glucose (mmol/L) MB 27.2 ± 0.3 29.1 ± 0.3 24.2 ± 1.9∗ 25.6 ± 0.6∗ 26.4 ± 1.0∗
INS 30.7 ± 0.8 23.2 ± 2.6 21.1 ± 2.3∗ 21.9 ± 1.6∗ 17.1 ± 0.9∗
MTF 28.0 ± 2.1 26.0 ± 1.4 25.7 ± 0.5∗ 24.6 ± 0.9∗ 24.8 ± 0.6∗
#
p < 0 05 by comparison with nondiabetic control and ∗ p < 0 05 by comparison with diabetic control.
150 100
140 훼 훼
80 훼
훼 훼 훼 훼
MAP (mmHG)
130
Urine output (mL)
훼
훼 60
120
110 40
100
20
90
0 1 2 3 4 5 0
(Weeks) 0 1 2 3 4 5
NC INS (Weeks)
DC MTF NC INS
MB DC MTF
MB
Figure 1: Mean arterial blood pressure of nondiabetic controls,
diabetic controls, and diabetic rats treated with M. balsamina, Figure 2: Urine output of nondiabetic controls, diabetic controls,
metformin, and insulin over a period of 5 weeks. Values are and diabetic rats treated with M. balsamina, metformin, and
expressed as mean ± SEM. αp < 0 05 by comparison to nondiabetic insulin over a period of 5 weeks. Values are expressed as mean ± S
control; ★p < 0 05 by comparison with diabetic control. EM. αp < 0 05 by comparison to nondiabetic control; ★p < 0 05 by
comparison with diabetic control.
nondiabetic control rats. However, treatment with M. balsa- albumin in comparison with STZ-diabetic control rats. The
mina significantly (p < 0 05) decreased plasma urea concen- effects of metformin and insulin on plasma urea and plasma
tration while significantly (p < 0 05) increasing plasma albumin were similar to M. balsamina. STZ-diabetic control
Journal of Diabetes Research 5
Table 2: Comparison of plasma biochemical parameters and urinary electrolytes of nondiabetic controls, diabetic controls, and diabetic rats
treated with MB, metformin, and insulin during a 5-week study (n = 6 in each group). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Groups
Parameters
NC DC MB INS MTF
+
Urinary Na (mmol/L) 66.8 ± 1.2 42.3 ± 3.5 #
53.7 ± 1.3∗ 38.2 ± 1.2 66.0 ± 2.9∗
Plasma Na+ (mmol/L) 120.3 ± 3.3 134.0 ± 2.0# 121.5 ± 4.2∗ 133.2 ± 1.3 121.7 ± 1.4∗
Urinary K+ (mmol/L) 45.5 ± 1.7 25.5 ± 2.1# 53.7 ± 1.3∗ 38.2 ± 3.3∗ 55.5 ± 4.1∗
∗
+
Plasma K (mmol/L) 9.9 ± 1.3 7.6 ± 0.6 #
7.9 ± 0.3 9.5 ± 0.7 8.4 ± 0.4∗
Urinary urea (mmol/L) 654.3 ± 6.8 117.8 ± 4.8# 315.3 ± 5.8∗ 356 ± 9.9∗ 351 ± 8.0∗
Plasma urea (mmol/L) 4.9 ± 0.3 17.5 ± 1.3# 7.0 ± 0.6∗ 7.6 ± 0.8∗ 6.4 ± 0.9∗
∗
Urinary albumin (g/L) 1.7 ± 0.2 3.5 ± 0.4 #
3.2 ± 0.7 4.2 ± 0.7 4.7 ± 1.1∗
Plasma albumin (g/L) 16.5 ± 1.0 12.3 ± 0.6# 13.2 ± 0,6 14.3 ± 0.7∗ 14.3 ± 1.3∗
∗ ∗
Urinary creatinine (μmol/L) 9.9 ± 0.7 14.9 ± 0.3 #
10.4 ± 0.2 8.1 ± 0.4 10.8 ± 0.2∗
Creatinine (μmol/L) 32.5 ± 1.3 45.8 ± 1.1# 29.8 ± 1.0∗ 34.8 ± 1.9∗ 28.2 ± 0.8∗
Aldosterone (pg/mL) 0.2 ± 0.02 0.4 ± 0.1# 0.3 ± 0.4∗ 0.4 ± 0.2 0.2 ± 0.1∗
#
p < 0 05 by comparison with nondiabetic control; ∗ p < 0 05 by comparison with diabetic control.
Table 4: Comparison albumin excretion rate (AER), albumin creatinine ratio (ACR), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of nondiabetic
controls, diabetic controls, and diabetic rats treated with MB, metformin, and insulin rats after a 5-week study (n = 6 in each group).
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Groups
Parameters
NC DC MB INS MTF
∗ ∗
AER (mg/day) 0.024 ± 0.01 0.29 ± 0.03 #
0.17 ± 0.01 0.15 ± 0.01 0.19 ± 0.03∗
ACR 8.10 ± 013 27.03 ± 1.13# 15.72 ± 1.50∗ 13.48 ± 0.84∗ 19.23 ± 0.28∗
∗ ∗
GFR (mL/min/100 g) 33.5 ± 0.5 24.8 ± 1.3 #
33.7 ± 1.5 37.9 ± 1.3 30.9 ± 2.1∗
#
p < 0 05 by comparison with nondiabetic control; ∗ p < 0 05 by comparison with diabetic control.
streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus type II in neonatal [33] J. W. Baynes, “Role of oxidative stress in development of com-
rats,” Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, vol. 5, no. 9, plications in diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 405–412,
pp. 1779–1787, 2011. 1991.
[18] N. Bhardwaj, V. Gauttam, and A. Kalia, “Evaluation of antidi- [34] A. P. Rolo and C. M. Palmeira, “Diabetes and mitochondrial
abetic activity of Momordica balsamina Linn seeds in function: role of hyperglycemia and oxidative stress,” Toxicol-
experimentally-induced diabetes,” Journal of Chemical and ogy and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 212, no. 2, pp. 167–178,
Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 701–707, 2010. 2006.
[19] H. P. Madlala, F. R. Van Heerden, K. Mubagwa, and C. T. [35] M. Sani, S. Kouhsari, and L. Moradabadi, “Effects of three
Musabayane, “Changes in renal function and oxidative status medicinal plants extracts in experimental diabetes: antioxidant
associated with the hypotensive effects of oleanolic acid and enzymes activities and plasma lipids profiles in comparison
related synthetic derivatives in experimental animals,” PLoS with metformin,” Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research,
One, vol. 10, no. 6, article e0128192, 2015. vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 897–903, 2012.
[20] C. T. Musabayane, N. Mahlalela, F. O. Shode, and J. A. O.
Ojewole, “Effects of Syzygium cordatum (Hochst.) [Myrta-
ceae] leaf extract on plasma glucose and hepatic glycogen
in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” Journal of Ethno-
pharmacology, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 485–490, 2005.
[21] T. L. van Belle, K. T. Coppieters, and M. G. von Herrath, “Type
1 diabetes: etiology, immunology and therapeutic strategies,”
Physiological Reviews, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 79–118, 2011.
[22] W. A. Hsueh and K. Wyne, “Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
system in diabetes and hypertension,” The Journal of Clinical
Hypertension, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 224–237, 2011.
[23] Y. Yang and H. Ma, “Aldosterone,” Research, vol. 1, no. 5,
pp. 89–93, 2009.
[24] S. I. McFarlane and J. R. Sowers, “Aldosterone function in dia-
betes mellitus: effects on cardiovascular and renal disease,” The
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 88, no. 2,
pp. 516–523, 2003.
[25] B. F. Palmer and D. J. Clegg, “Electrolyte and acid–base distur-
bances in patients with diabetes mellitus,” The New England
Journal of Medicine, vol. 373, no. 6, pp. 548–559, 2015.
[26] B. Feldt-Rasmussen, E. R. Mathiesen, T. Deckert et al.,
“Central role for sodium in the pathogenesis of blood pressure
changes independent of angiotensin, aldosterone and cate-
cholamines in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus,”
Diabetologia, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 610–617, 1987.
[27] C. G. Musso, J. Alvarez Gregori, J. R. Jauregui, and J. F. Macías
Núñez, “Creatinine, urea, uric acid, water and electrolytes
renal handling in the healthy oldest old,” World Journal of
Nephrology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 123–126, 2012.
[28] N. Hasona and A. Elasbali, “Evaluation of electrolytes imbal-
ance and dyslipidemia in diabetic patients,” Medical Sciences,
vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–4, 2016.
[29] N. Kashihara, Y. Haruna, V. K. Kondeti, and Y. S. Kanwar,
“Oxidative stress in diabetic nephropathy,” Current Medicinal
Chemistry, vol. 17, no. 34, pp. 4256–4269, 2010.
[30] S. Penckofer, D. Schwertz, and K. Florczak, “Oxidative stress
and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: the role of anti-
oxidants and pro-oxidants,” The Journal of Cardiovascular
Nursing, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 68–85, 2002.
[31] X. Wang, X.-l. Ye, R. Liu et al., “Antioxidant activities of
oleanolic acid in vitro: possible role of Nrf2 and MAP kinases,”
Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 184, no. 3, pp. 328–337,
2010.
[32] M. L. Onozato, A. Tojo, A. Goto, T. Fujita, and C. S. Wilcox,
“Oxidative stress and nitric oxide synthase in rat diabetic
nephropathy: effects of ACEI and ARB,” Kidney International,
vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 186–194, 2002.
MEDIATORS of
INFLAMMATION
BioMed
PPAR Research
Hindawi
Research International
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018
Journal of
Obesity
Evidence-Based
Journal of Stem Cells Complementary and Journal of
Ophthalmology
Hindawi
International
Hindawi
Alternative Medicine
Hindawi Hindawi
Oncology
Hindawi
www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2013
Parkinson’s
Disease
Computational and
Mathematical Methods
in Medicine
Behavioural
Neurology
AIDS
Research and Treatment
Oxidative Medicine and
Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Hindawi Hindawi Hindawi Hindawi
www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018 www.hindawi.com Volume 2018