Ame - Asset Management: Roundtable Discussion Report
Ame - Asset Management: Roundtable Discussion Report
Ame - Asset Management: Roundtable Discussion Report
MANAGEMENT
SUMMARY
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 2
OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................... 4
Strategy .....................................................................................................................................................6
Strategy of Asset Data ........................................................................................................................ 13
Technologies to Leverage Asset Management ................................................................................ 17
CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 22
INDUSTRIES REPRESENTED ................................................................................................ 23
Associations represented...................................................................................................................... 23
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... 24
CONTACTS ........................................................................................................................ 24
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Throughout North America, organizations are developing strategies to improve and garner more from their
assets. The word “more” has many connotations: reliability, efficiencies, effectiveness, availability, intelligence,
sustainability and of course safety.
The Asset Management Roundtable results indicate Asset Management is becoming a focused and
disciplined strategic business function for many industries and organizations. The leaders who participated,
whether greenfield or brownfield, are being forced by many internal and external pressures to achieve
“operational improvements”. Purposely, we use the word “improvement” as opposed to “excellence”, the
latter being a destination, while the former is an ongoing journey.
Organizations are adjusting to achieve operational improvements. An example is the shift within the
organizational structure of many companies. The role of “Asset Manager” has become a job title and
departments are forming with responsibility for strategy, planning, development and execution of asset
management programs. Some organizations have formulated their Asset Management group to sit under
finance. Others have formed them under engineering, while still others have taken the route of designating the
role within maintenance/reliability. This attention to the Asset Manager role illustrates that the function is
trying to seek its level and there are many different points of view on what an industry practice on staffing
asset management might be.
The roundtable discussion design is based on the concept of discovering challenges and opportunities being
encountered with respect to an organization’s asset management strategy. Asset Managers are driven to use
strategic asset management plans to build their programs, however, almost all of the session discussions
immediately dove into issues with data and more specifically, asset data. The discussions were difficult to
keep focused on asset management strategy vs. immediate and specific tactical challenges like data. The
tactical issues raised varied based on the participants’ role in their respective organizations, but ostensibly,
many are struggling with tactics, which points to the possibility of missing strategies.
Technology clearly is necessary and can support Asset Management programs. However, technology was not
generally described as an enabler, but rather a roadblock and a less-than-nimble option to solve asset
management challenges. Technology itself is not the lone culprit. In the session discussions, technology
integration issues were a common theme. Departments and individuals seem to be misunderstanding the
requests from each other, and the internal processes are less than optimal. In addition, the technology is often
not optimally utilized.
Many of the issues identified were rooted with people and culture as the foundation of the challenge. One
observation from the roundtable sessions was the identification of how, or not, people and culture are
interwoven into each organization’s asset management program. Seemingly, the challenges of people and
culture created silos within organizations. Most organizations felt that they haven’t adequately addressed
educating their teams to understand the benefits of an integrated asset management program and the culture
required to flourish and sustain these efforts. Further, the participants felt leadership doesn’t fully understand
and embrace the benefits of asset management and/or are not fully committed to supporting asset
management initiatives. Everyone involved in these discussions believes that there is significant work to be
done in the culture arena.
Originally the roundtable agenda had been established as asset management strategy, data and
technology. The benefit of the roundtables to the community is the opportunity to learn from each other and
identify future topics for the agenda of the Asset Management Ecosystem (AME) Conference in Denver on
May 19-21, 2020. Since issues with respect to people and culture became so apparent, these have therefore
been added to the conference agenda as topics for presentation and discussion during AME 2020.
OVERVIEW
This short report is a collaboration of over 60 asset owners in the four cities we visited. They represent a variety
of industries and organizational levels, which should reflect as a comprehensive look at the current temperature
of asset management in the North American market. We covered several issues that the community faces, but
none in deep detail. This report does not and is not intended to offer solutions. The summary report is just a
reflection and documentation of the challenges our Asset Management community is facing.
1. Dive into what asset owners are challenged with in order to understand what content should be
brought to the Asset Management Ecosystem forum.
2. Enable a networking format in several geographies that is “asset owner”-focused, to share
experiences, explore what others are doing, and discuss and prioritize the challenges they face.
The format of these roundtable discussions is designed for each participant to engage in the discussion.
Everyone involved provided insight and details of their challenges.
• Strategy
• Data
• Technology
This bucket breakdown resonated well with the participants. In fact, in our participant survey after the
roundtable we asked the question “Did the breakdown of Strategy / Technology / Data resonate with you?
100% of the contributors answered yes.
However, it became clear after we sat back and looked at the data
from each of the cities, that People/Culture should be a topic bucket and
that “strategy” really lies within each of the buckets. This discussion came
up in our New York roundtable, and we even drew a Venn diagram to
illustrate it, but it didn’t become memorialized until we analyzed the
full data.
Asset
Management
Strategy
People/Culture
Strategy
As the discussions began, it was clear that most organizations struggle with many elements within developing,
implementing and committing to the entry points of asset management. In each city, we heard specifics
around the challenges and hurdles each organization has encountered. The number one issue overall in the
strategy discussion was Culture / HR Strategy / Change Management.
Some of the key inputs include:
• Communication
o Executive awareness and engagement
o Making asset management “sexy”
o Communicating the “WHY” of asset management in a way that resonates
• Process
o The need for simplifying the process so everyone can engage
o Creating a tangible way to implement the strategy [for] the people
o Defining and engaging the process of developing an asset management roadmap
• Strategy
o Formulating a Strategic Asset Management plan
o Complexities of converting analysis to strategy
o Where does AM exist? Who owns it? What is the reporting structure?
o Data needs strategy, not the reverse
o Vision drives mission which drives strategy
Below are the raw results from the “Strategy” portion of the roundtables from each geography:
Breaking Silos
Breaking Silos How to remove silos
Breaking Silos Consistency between departments
Breaking Silos Vertical and horizontal
Breaking Silos How to centralize at an enterprise level, speak the same language and prioritize
Breaking Silos Communication and education
Breaking Silos Communication at the line level
Breaking Silos Holistic decision making, input from different teams
Breaking Silos Profitability tension
Continuous Improvement
Continuous Improvement how to adjust asset management strategy as it begins to mature
Continuous Improvement How is change management involved?
Continuous Improvement Collaboration of EAM plan with ad-hoc demand / production demand
Continuous Improvement Feedback of how the asset was used vs intended?
Continuous Improvement Adapting to production / sales fluctuations, operational need
Data
Data (Asset life) Data consistency, drive lifecycle, manage models * process
Data (Asset life) Risk of not identifying / risk strategy
Data (Asset life) On-demand situations
Vision
Vision Confidentiality? Transparency?
Vision Adopting analytics to focus on the long-term vision
Analytics Strategy
Analytics Strategy Supply chain strategy in regard to management
Analytics Strategy Analytics to change the way the work is done
Analytics Strategy Moving to the "future / digital" way
Analytics Strategy Maintaining data to increase uptime
Supply Chain
Supply Chain Supply chain strategy in regard to management
Culture / HR Strategy
HR Strategy Build asset/data culture change into HR plan
HR Strategy Policy
HR Strategy Driving user acceptance
HR Strategy Training throughout the process
HR Strategy Right-fit people
HR Strategy How do people implement/follow strategy
Risk
Prioritize Risk Risk Integration
Strategy
People / Data / Tech
People / Data / Tech Program format
Methodology
Methodology Doing -- Thinking
Methodology Compliance
Methodology Understanding asset condition
Methodology Situational awareness
Methodology Repair/replace methodology
Methodology What to capture
Methodology Training methodology / strategy
Methodology System view or granular view
Process
Process Move strategy to people
Process Training
Process Roles and responsibilities
Process Creating a learning culture
Process Lack of facility condition assessments
Process Lack of feedback loop
Process Need for simplification
Process How to easily engage standards for asset management
Data Strategy
Data Strategy What to capture
Data Strategy Technology limits
Data Strategy Resiliency planning
Data Strategy Information storing
Asset Registry Adding new
Asset Registry Retiring old
Asset Registry Zero footprint growth
Asset Registry Inform / Influence decision making
Asset Registry Domino planning
Asset Registry 9-year planning
Asset Registry Data standards and management
Asset Registry Asset on-boarding
Asset Registry Information collection
Asset Registry Knowledge transfer
Asset Registry Aging workforce w/institutional knowledge
Asset Registry Qualitative vs Quantitative
Asset Registry Known / Unknown
Capacity
Managing Capacity Finding balance
Technology Strategy
Technology Limited fields / data
Technology DMS is spaghetti mess
Technology When to improve
Reactive Culture
Reactive Culture Hard to change
Reactive Culture Strategy doesn't filter down to the workforce
Reactive Culture People have a hard time seeing themselves involved in the strategy
F.E.A.R.
F.E.A.R. False - Evidence - Appearing - Real
In every subject and conversation in these roundtables, data came up over and over again. It is top of mind
for everyone, and whether it’s how to leverage it, or what a mess it is, every organization believes that data
is the most important element required for making informed asset decisions.
Data challenges, despite efforts to mitigate them, continue to be identified as main pain points within asset
management programs. Data volume, growth, accuracy (or lack thereof), management and governance were
lively debate topics within each of the roundtable sessions.
Some key inputs are:
Data Management
Data Management Monitor, adjust, reviewing data
Data Management How is the day to day management done?
Data Management Accuracy - How to get the data correct
Data Management How to collect? What to collect? How much to collect?
Data Management Which data should be shared / common with other groups and divisions
Data Management Data accuracy / quality / variability / consistency / criticality
Data Management Reliability of data
Data Management Calibration of data
Data Usage
Materials
Integration of Materials Ability to act on data
Asset Lifecycle
Asset Lifecycle 360 view of assets
Asset Lifecycle Visibility of "all" data (plan - construct - issues - etc.)
Asset Lifecycle Who needs what? (Engineering, Maintenance, HR)
Data Strategy
Strategy of What Data to Collect Different skills / different needs
Strategy of What Data to Collect Subjectivity vs objectivity
Strategy of What Data to Collect Varying data requirements
Strategy of What Data to Collect How does technology impact what data we collect
Strategy of What Data to Collect Validating data
Data Retention Legacy vs New Implementations
Limited Asset Data Cannot collect data
Limited Asset Data Hard to build - "not my job"
Limited Asset Data Asset registry
Reporting Data accuracy
Reporting Building valuable reports - helpful for staff
Reporting Eliminating sugar-coded results
Reporting Visibility of acceptations of data
Reporting Handling legacy reporting
Resourcing
Resourcing for Data Lack of processes and accountability
Resourcing for Data Dedicated staff to load and manage
Resourcing for Data Showcasing why we collect - showing value up & down to organization
Subject Matter Experts Need people to interpret / analyze data
Subject Matter Experts Machine learning lacks flow information
Subject Matter Experts Too many people in the wrong areas
Change Management
Change Management Process + Data strategy
Change Management Reporting to enable decisions
Change Management No one asks why data
Change Management Organizational readiness
Change Management Use of data expertise to manage processes / standards
Change Management Control of data changes
Data Apathy
Data Apathy Lack of consequences
Data Apathy Limited accountability
Data Apathy Exceptions to processes and standards
Data Apathy Trust
Data Apathy More work with no perceived value -- All data
Organizational Structure
Organizational Structure Does IT support data management
Organizational Structure Is data management recognized as a SME role?
Below are the raw results from the “Technology” portion of the roundtables from each geographic:
Integration
Different platforms & how they integrate with each other, as well as different
Integration company functions, such as HR, supply chain, finance, etc.
Integration Technology to aggregate the data
Integration Accessibility
Integration Architecture, and how to make this the path of least resistance
Integration legacy systems, how do we handle them as well as the legacy data
Integration Single point of truth, large data volume and multiple sources for the same data
Integration Data migration
Integration Consistency between systems
Integration Operational technology (OT) vs Information Technology (IT) integration
Integration Connectivity
Integration Micro vs Macro
Consumerization of Technology
Consumerization of Technology Technology ROI. Value Statement, and how do we measure the ROI?
Consumerization of Technology Leveraging technology
Consumerization of Technology automating processes (RPA / Drones / AI)
Consumerization of Technology Technology Roadmap
Consumerization of Technology Processing complex data
Consumerization of Technology Interested in a technology roadshow / technology demos
Consumerization of Technology User experience
Consumerization of Technology Driving adoption
Consumerization of Technology rate of change for technology is high
Consumerization of Technology How to make decisions W/ data, how to use the data gathered?
Consumerization of Technology Decision support
Security
Security Security of integrations / Information / Access
Security Cybersecurity
Technology Justification
Technology Justification Decision ownership?
Technology Justification Prioritization of technology
Technology Justification Institutional knowledge
Technology Justification OT vs IT - who is driving decisions
Technology Justification Is IT part of the team or do they operate in a vacuum
Technology Needs Business
Technology Needs Operations
Technology Needs Build to scale
Technology Needs Connect people to the asset
Technology Needs Understanding IT risk
Technology is Irrelevant Under utilization
Technology Roadmap
Technology Roadmap No recipe
Technology Roadmap Qualitative input
Technology Roadmap Process driven
Technology Roadmap Opinion based
Technology Roadmap Uncertainly of system changes - what tech will be used
Technology Roadmap Calculated obsolescence
Technology Band-aid Does not fix systemic issues
Technology Band-aid Lack of goals/vision
Technology Band-aid No roadmap
BIM Strategy Transition assets to BIM
Technology Impact
Tech Impact on People Generational diversity
Lifecycle Modeling
Lifecycle Modeling Calculated obsolescence
Lifecycle Modeling Not considering downstream impact
IT Group
IT Group SLA's
IT Group Alignment w/ business objectives
Technology Architecture
Technology Architecture Doesn't exist
Technology Architecture Not prioritized
Technology Architecture Missing the foundations
Technology Architecture Inconsistent - Process, Maintenance, Financials, Document Management
Technology Architecture Not a project - Ongoing business services and requirement
CONCLUSION
The researcher in all of us will always find exploring topics for the purpose of learning valuable and exciting.
Certainly, for the purpose of bringing the community together, sharing, networking and excavating for the
hidden treasures in asset management, the roundtables proved to be exhilarating!
Strangely, we consider them to be “fun” and “fascinating” and we know a majority of the participants felt the
same way. Moving past emotion and what satisfies our egos, ideally, the roundtable process would be part of
the aggregation and galvanization of the Asset Management community as a whole into one collaborative
entity. Maybe a bridge too far, though, as the more research performed the more unique asset management
issues were uncovered and the more silos identified in the global community. The silos in the community may
be the biggest challenge we face in asset management execution.
An overabundance of information in the community makes it difficult for asset owners to pick a “practice”
without extensive analysis and is actually creating further invention of the wheel vs replication and reuse.
Reinvention is slowing the innovation cycle, slowing the return on investment and even worse, slowing
sustainability of aging infrastructure and vital assets.
The roundtable exercise was enlightening in many ways. We felt the passion of the participants and the
desire to get this right within their organizations. We observed the commitment of those attending to break
free from their endless meeting-filled day, join in for thought provoking discussions with only the hope of
uncovering something they could take away and implement. If nothing else though, the effort proves there are
asset management problems to be solved, people who are passionate about solving them and the need to do
more in the asset management domain. Go2Learn is committed to doing more, and we hope this summary has
enlightened you, provided some observations, and most importantly delivered on the mandate set out. Finally,
we look forward to your submission of a paper, an idea, or the introduction to someone who is also
passionate about asset management. We are looking forward to seeing you at AME 2020!
INDUSTRIES REPRESENTED
• Chemical
• Construction Manufacturing
• Food & Beverage
• Healthcare
• Higher Education
• Mining
• Oil & Gas
• Public Sector (City, State and Federal)
• Transportation & Logistics
• Utilities
o Gas
o Generation (Nuclear, Gas, Hydro, Oil, Coal, Solar, Wind)
o Transmission & Distribution
o Water & Sewer
Associations represented
• ALN (Asset Leadership Network)
• IAM (Institute of Asset Management)
• PEMAC (Plant Engineering and Maintenance Association of Canada)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The following companies were generous in their commitment to supporting this initiative. They have invested
their time, resources and facilities to accommodate these roundtables.
Presentations by:
CONTACTS
Go2Learn: https://www.go-2-learn.com | +1 917 554-3444 | info@go-2-learn.com