Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 142 views

    Manpower Performance and Security Policy

    Uploaded by

    KesMercado
    This document outlines policies for managing performance and security at construction sites. It discusses common threats like theft, vandalism, and equipment damage that security should address. It also notes that worker performance impacts project output. The document defines key terms and provides a risk analysis scale. Typical threats include material pilferage, absenteeism, and poor workmanship. It recommends assessing risks and applying mitigation strategies like ignoring low risks, transferring risks to insurance, or directly addressing higher risks. Suggested disciplinary actions for workers are also outlined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Manpower Performance and Security Policy

    Uploaded by

    KesMercado
    142 views2 pages
    This document outlines policies for managing performance and security at construction sites. It discusses common threats like theft, vandalism, and equipment damage that security should address. It also notes that worker performance impacts project output. The document defines key terms and provides a risk analysis scale. Typical threats include material pilferage, absenteeism, and poor workmanship. It recommends assessing risks and applying mitigation strategies like ignoring low risks, transferring risks to insurance, or directly addressing higher risks. Suggested disciplinary actions for workers are also outlined.

    Original Title

    MANPOWER PERFORMANCE AND SECURITY POLICY

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines policies for managing performance and security at construction sites. It discusses common threats like theft, vandalism, and equipment damage that security should address. It also notes that worker performance impacts project output. The document defines key terms and provides a risk analysis scale. Typical threats include material pilferage, absenteeism, and poor workmanship. It recommends assessing risks and applying mitigation strategies like ignoring low risks, transferring risks to insurance, or directly addressing higher risks. Suggested disciplinary actions for workers are also outlined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    142 views2 pages

    Manpower Performance and Security Policy

    Uploaded by

    KesMercado
    This document outlines policies for managing performance and security at construction sites. It discusses common threats like theft, vandalism, and equipment damage that security should address. It also notes that worker performance impacts project output. The document defines key terms and provides a risk analysis scale. Typical threats include material pilferage, absenteeism, and poor workmanship. It recommends assessing risks and applying mitigation strategies like ignoring low risks, transferring risks to insurance, or directly addressing higher risks. Suggested disciplinary actions for workers are also outlined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    MANPOWER SITE PERFORMACE/SECURITY POLICY

    Construction sites are easy targets for the opportunist thief; the high value of plant and equipment can
    lead to quick and easy profit for the successful thief. Depending on locality, each site will have its own
    issues of concern. Construction sites are subject to a number of threats, against which security should
    be applied by the site operator. These include theft, vandalism and deliberate damage to company
    equipment. Manpower performance also dictates the output of the project.

     SCOPE
    - These guidelines are designed to provide site managers and operators with an overview of
    the common considerations of risk assessments and security measures to be taken into
    account on construction sites. It is not intended to be a detailed manual, but should be used
    to help frame thinking about security and to outline the process to follow in preparing risk
    assessments and the necessary mitigation measures to be taken.

     TERMS AND DEFINITIONS


    o Event - Occurrence or a change in a particular set of circumstances
    o Guard Force - The term guard force in this document refers to the people with the
    responsibility for protecting the site. On a larger site this may be a permanent
    contingent of guards.
    o Hazard - An event with negative consequences, brought about through natural,
    environmental or non-malicious human intent (e.g. flooding).
    o Risk - A threat or hazard assessed for likelihood and impact.
    o Threat - An event with negative consequences, brought about through malicious human
    intent.
     RISK ANALYSIS

    Risk Score Categorization Notes


    0-1 White No significant risk
    2-4 Green Low risk
    5-10 yellow Medium risk – should be
    mitigated
    10 + Red High risk – must be mitigated

     TYPICAL Threats for construction site


    o Material Pilferage
    o Absenteeism
    o Laziness/Tardiness
    o Poor workmanship
    o Disrespect to authority (Foreman, Site Supervisor)
    o Being Late
    o Refusal to Instruction during work hours
    o Etc.…,
     MITIGATION
    - Once raw risks are assessed and categorized in order of severity in the raw risk register,
    mitigation should be applied. Broadly, mitigation may take three forms:
    o Ignore / Accept
    o Export / Transfer
    o Address

    Ignoring - a risk is sometimes appropriate, where the cost (in terms of financial or
    resource exposure) of any mitigation exceeds the impact of the event which defines the
    risk. Risks should only be ignored, however, after careful analysis of mitigation cost and
    impact. Ignoring a risk means that no action is taken to counter it but does not mean it
    is forgotten

    Exporting - a risk can be performed through insurance or contracting of a third party to


    deliver mitigation. While this is entirely sensible, for example, where this can be done
    for the expenditure of less resource than if directly mitigated by the operator or
    manager, it is important to remember that this does not export responsibility for, or
    ownership of, the risk, but merely for its management. This presents a risk in itself, in
    that management of the risk falls mainly outside of the control of the operator or
    manager.

    Addressing - a risk is the application of mitigation measures directly by the operator or


    manager. Generally, this will involve the application of people, processes or technology
    to an issue to reduce the impact or the likelihood (or, ideally, both) of a risk, in order to
    bring its rating down to below the operator or manager’s risk appetite. This document
    necessarily concentrates on direct addressing of the risk.

     MITIGATION STRATEGIES
    A. DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS
    a. 1st offense – verbal warning
    b. 2nd offense – written warning
    c. 3rd offense – 3 days suspension without pay
    d. 4th offense – termination

    You might also like