Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Video Lesson 2 Reflection - Spagnoli

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Anthony Spagnoli

EDUC 540

Video Lesson #2 Reflection

With over a month between my first and second recorded lesson I can confidently say

some things have changed for the better, while others have stayed the same and still need

some work. Overall the lesson on “Life Over Time” was well received and the students were

engaged. I used direct instruction for most of the class but gave the students to do partner

share as well as partner work throughout the lesson. I am working to get away from using direct

instruction as a crutch, but I am finding it challenging and will continue to work on that.

The essential question for this lesson was simply, “What are living things?” While I did

not get to use my assessment tool (exit slip) because of time management issues, after

reviewing the lesson I can say that the students seemed to have a good sense of what

characteristics living things shared. Part of why I’m confident in that is because of the reaction

to the activities we worked on in the lesson (clock vs turtle, window eye dilation, and dog

stimuli/ reaction). Students were engaged and easily comprehended the activities. I planned

these activities specifically to be small bites of the lesson, which when added together, would

help them understand the concept of living things.

I’ve also had more time to hone my lesson planning skills since last time. Whereas

before I was unsure of how much information to put into a lesson plan (I had been putting way

too much content in for my first month), I have a better understanding of the amount of

content needed for each 50-minute lesson. For this lesson I wanted to put two major points
into my lesson: the relationship to stimuli and reaction, and sexual vs asexual reproduction.

Pairing down the content to two or three things, I have found, easily fills the period and

provides ample room from improvisation and ad hoc changes where needed.

I continue to have solid control of management of the classroom. I give my students

respect and genuinely listen to their questions and respond in kind. In return they show me

respect by listening when I’m talking, doing their work when asked, and returning focus to me

(or someone else) when the time is appropriate. I allow a certain amount of cross talking, but I

am quick to correct it when it becomes disruptive. Typically, a tap on a student’s desk is enough

to correct the problem and doesn’t disrupt my lesson.

While I think my delivery to the students was clear and easy to follow, I wished I had

spent more time with the material myself, so my understanding was slightly deeper. A lot of

this material I am familiar with on a surface level, but students often ask great questions that

require a better understanding. I understand this will come with time too, but I hope to be able

to spend more time in the future digging deeper so I can better respond to student inquiries.

I continue to work on my questioning techniques. I’ve gotten much better at writing

question into my lesson plans and asking them during the lesson. It’s important to have good

questions already thought up because in those quite transition times, I’ve found a question to

ponder is a nice way to make the transition smoother. While I still have the goal to make my

questioning better, I think I’ve started down the right path. My aim is to craft great questions

for every lesson, even if they’re not directly incorporated into each lesson plan.
Finally, one final aspect I would like to put my energy to in the coming months is my

class opening and closing. In this lesson I didn’t think either of them were that strong. I know

that a good opening sets the tone for the class, so I want to ensure I’m always starting on the

right foot. And I want to ensure the closing of the lesson wraps up the content nicely and

students get a quick review of what they’ve learned for reinforcement.

Observation notes:

• Wasn’t as affirmative with class beginning as I could have been


• Friendly demeanor with the class
• Start (do now) wasn’t strong. Just a discussion. Should have prepared a specific “do
now”.
• Used inquisition questioning to ask students to answer each other’s questions as well as
probe questions further
• Used good graphics to show changes in earth over time that prompted good discussion
and questions.
• After intro I reviewed what we were going to go over with the class which was a good
way to prepare the students
• Aligned my teaching with my co-teacher’s lessons better than before
• Did not provide a closeout for the lesson (time management issues)
• Used an interactive “experiment” to show how organisms respond to stimuli

You might also like