Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 63 views

    Oral Defense Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    IZA MARI VICTORIA F. LECHIDO
    This document contains a rubric for evaluating oral defense presentations of research proposals. The rubric includes 20 criteria organized into 5 categories: scientific thought and engineering goals, creativity and inventiveness, thoroughness, research skills, and oral presentation. Each criterion is scored from 1-5, with 5 indicating strong agreement that the criterion was met. The rubric also includes space for comments and the rater's signature.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Oral Defense Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    IZA MARI VICTORIA F. LECHIDO
    63 views1 page
    This document contains a rubric for evaluating oral defense presentations of research proposals. The rubric includes 20 criteria organized into 5 categories: scientific thought and engineering goals, creativity and inventiveness, thoroughness, research skills, and oral presentation. Each criterion is scored from 1-5, with 5 indicating strong agreement that the criterion was met. The rubric also includes space for comments and the rater's signature.

    Original Title

    oral defense rubrics

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a rubric for evaluating oral defense presentations of research proposals. The rubric includes 20 criteria organized into 5 categories: scientific thought and engineering goals, creativity and inventiveness, thoroughness, research skills, and oral presentation. Each criterion is scored from 1-5, with 5 indicating strong agreement that the criterion was met. The rubric also includes space for comments and the rater's signature.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    63 views1 page

    Oral Defense Rubrics

    Uploaded by

    IZA MARI VICTORIA F. LECHIDO
    This document contains a rubric for evaluating oral defense presentations of research proposals. The rubric includes 20 criteria organized into 5 categories: scientific thought and engineering goals, creativity and inventiveness, thoroughness, research skills, and oral presentation. Each criterion is scored from 1-5, with 5 indicating strong agreement that the criterion was met. The rubric also includes space for comments and the rater's signature.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    Title of Research Proposal _______________________________________________________________

    Proponent/s: ________________________________ ________________________________


    ________________________________ ________________________________
    ________________________________

    RUBRICS FOR ORAL DEFENSE


    5 – STRONGLY AGREE
    4 – AGREE
    3 – UNDECIDED
    2 – DISAGREE
    1 – STRONGLY DISAGREE

    C A T E G O R I E S 1 2 3 4 5
    1. The problem is concise and includes descriptor variables.
    Scientific 2. The objectives are clear and relevant.
    Thought and 3. The procedures are well-defined
    Engineering
    4. The proposed solution is economically feasible.
    Goals
    5. The research has potential contribution/s and is of practical value.
    6. The proposal shows creative ability in the approach to solving the problem.
    Creativity and 7. The proposal presents an innovative design or idea.
    Inventiveness 8. The proposal shows the intelligence and imagination of the researchers in
    finding ways to undertake the project.
    9. The background of the study provides adequate information.
    10. The supporting literature and studies are related to the study at hand.
    Thoroughness 11. The reference list is broad enough to support the study and is in correct
    APA format.
    12. The scope and limitations are acknowledged by the researchers.
    13. The methodology contains effectively, quantifiably, concisely organized
    Research Skills information that allows the experiment to be replicated.
    14. The materials and equipment used are innovatively selected.
    15. The discussion was delivered within 4 minutes.
    16. The discussion was clear and thorough.
    Oral 17. The discussion was aided by a PowerPoint presentation or AV material.
    Presentation 18. The PPT or AV material presented was concise and visually pleasing.
    19. The proponents were confident and showed enthusiasm.
    20. The proponents were able to answer the questions raised by the judges.
    SUBTOTAL
    OVERALL TOTAL

    COMMENTS: _________________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________
    Rater's Signature

    You might also like