A792 PDF
A792 PDF
A792 PDF
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.
1
A 792/A 792M
TABLE 1 Weight [Mass] of Coating RequirementsA 5.2.10 Packaging,
NOTE 1— The coating thickness may be estimated from the coating 5.2.11 Certification, if required, and heat analysis and me-
weight [mass] by using Table X1.1. chanical property report,
Minimum Requirements 5.2.12 Application (show part identification and descrip-
Triple-Spot Test Single-Spot Test tion), and
Inch-Pound Units 5.2.13 Special requirements (if any).
Coating Designation Total Both Sides, oz/ft2 Total Both Sides, oz/ft2
AZ50 0.50 0.43 5.2.13.1 If required, the product may be ordered to a
AZ55 0.55 0.50 specified base metal thickness. See Supplementary Require-
AZ60 0.60 0.52 ment S1.
Minimum Requirements
Triple-Spot Test Single-Spot Test NOTE 1—Typical ordering descriptions are as follows:
SI Units
Steel sheet, 55 % aluminum-zinc alloy-coated, Forming Steel (FS),
Coating Designation Total Both Sides, g/m2 Total Both Sides, g/m2
AZM150 150 130 ASTM A 792 – , coating designation AZ55, chemical treatment, no
AZM165 165 150 oil, minimum 0.035 by 36 in. by coil, 48-in. maximum OD, 24-in. ID,
AZM180 180 155 10 000-lb maximum, for muffler wrappers.
A
The coating designation number is the term by which this product is specified. Steel sheet, 55 % aluminum-zinc alloy-coated, Commercial Steel (CS
Because of the many variables and changing conditions that are characteristic of Type A), ASTM A 792M – , coating designation AZM150, chemical
continuous hot-dip coating lines, the weight [mass] of the coating is not always treatment, no oil, minimum 0.90 by 900 mm by coil, 1200-mm maximum
evenly divided between the two surfaces of a sheet, nor is the coating evenly OD, 600-mm ID, 4500-kg maximum, for building panels.
distributed from edge to edge. However, it can normally be expected that not less
than 40 % of the single-spot test limit will be found on either surface. 6. Chemical Composition
5.2.1 Name of product (steel sheet, 55 % aluminum-zinc 6.1 Base Metal:
alloy coated), 6.1.1 The heat analysis of the base metal shall conform to
5.2.2 Designation of sheet steel {CS (Type A, B, or C), FS, the requirements of Table 2 for CS (Types A, B, and C), FS,
DS, HTS, or SS}. DS, HTS, Table 3 for SS.
5.2.2.1 When a CS type is not specified, Type B will be 6.1.2 Include each of the elements listed in Tables 2 and 3 in
furnished. the report of heat analysis. When the amount of copper, nickel,
5.2.3 Strength grade as required for Structural Steel, chromium, or molybdenum is less than 0.02 %, report the
5.2.4 ASTM designation number and year of issue, such as analysis either as <0.02 % or the actual determined value.
A 792 – for inch-pound units or A 792M – for SI When the amount of vanadium, titanium, or columbium is less
units, than 0.008 %, report the analysis either as <0.008 % or the
5.2.5 Coating designation, actual determined value.
5.2.6 Chemically treated or not chemically treated, 6.2 Coating Composition—The 55 % aluminum-zinc alloy
5.2.7 Oiled or not oiled, coating composition, by weight, is nominally 55 % aluminum,
5.2.8 Dimensions (show thickness, width, flatness require- 1.6 % silicon, and the balance zinc.
ments (if appropriate), and length (if cut length)). The pur-
chaser shall specify the appropriate table of thickness toler- 7. Mechanical Properties
ances in Specification A 924/A 924M that applies to the order, 7.1 Structural Steel sheet shall conform to the mechanical
that is, the table of thickness tolerances for 3⁄8-in. [10-mm] property requirements of Table 4 for the grade specified.
edge distance, or the table of thickness tolerances for 1-in. 7.2 The typical mechanical properties for CS (Types A, B,
[25-mm] edge distance. and C), FS, DS, and HTS are listed in Table 5. These typical
5.2.9 Coil size requirements (specify maximum outside mechanical properties are nonmandatory. They are intended
diameter (OD), acceptable inside diameter (ID), and maximum solely to provide the purchaser with as much information as
weight [mass]), possible to make an informed decision on the steel to be
TABLE 2 Chemical Requirements
Composition, %—Heat Analysis
Element, Maximum, Unless Otherwise Shown
Designation C Mn P S AlA CuB NiB CrB MoB V CbC Ti
D,E
CS Type A 0.10 0.60 0.030 0.035 ... 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.30
CS Type BD,E,F 0.02 to 0.15 0.60 0.030 0.035 ... 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.30
CS Type CD,E 0.08 0.60 0.10 0.035 ... 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.30
FSE 0.02 to 0.10 0.50 0.020 0.030 ... 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.30
DSG 0.06 0.50 0.020 0.025 0.01, min 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.30
HTSH 0.02 to 0.15 0.60 0.040, min 0.035 ... 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.30
A
Where an ellipsis (. . .) appears in the table, there is no requirement, but the analysis result shall be reported.
B
The sum of copper, nickel, chromium, and molybdenum shall not exceed 0.50 % on heat analysis. When one or more of these elements are specified, the sum does
not apply; in which case, only the individual limits on the remaining elements shall apply.
C
For steels having a carbon content of 0.02 % or less, the limit for columbium is 0.045 %, maximum.
D
For CS, specify Type B to avoid carbon levels below 0.02 %.
E
When a deoxidized steel is required for the application, the purchaser has the option to order CS, FS, and HTS to a minimum of 0.01 % total aluminum.
F
CS Type B describes the typical commercial quality product previously included in this specification.
G
The producer has the option to furnish as a stabilized steel.
H
HTS designation is intended for use in elevated temperature applications.
2
A 792/A 792M
TABLE 3 Chemical Requirements
Composition, %—Heat Analysis Element, maximum, Unless Otherwise Shown
Designation C Mn P S CuA NiA CrA MoA V CbB,C Ti
Structural Steel:
Grade 33 [230] 0.20 1.15 0.04 0.040 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.30
Grade 37 [255] 0.20 1.15 0.10 0.040 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.30
Grade 40 [275] 0.25 1.15 0.10 0.040 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.30
Grade 50A,B [340 A,B] 0.40 1.15 0.20 0.040 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.30
Grade 80 [550] 0.20 1.15 0.04 0.040 0.20 0.20 0.15 0.06 0.008 0.008 0.30
A
The sum of copper, nickel, chromium, and molybdenum shall not exceed 0.50 % on heat analysis. When one or more of these elements are specified, the sum does
not apply; in which case, only the individual limits on the remaining elements shall apply.
B
For steels having a carbon content of 0.02 % or less, the limit for columbium is 0.045 %, maximum.
C
The limit for SS Grade 80 is 0.015 %.
TABLE 4 Mechanical Property Requirements, Structural Steel TABLE 5 Typical Ranges of Mechanical
A
Properties
Base Metal (Longitudinal) (Nonmandatory) , B
Inch-Pound Units Longitudinal Direction
Yield A Designation Yield Strength Elongation
Tensile Strength, Elongation rm n
Grade Strength, 2 in. [50
min, ksi in 2 in., min, % ksi MPa ValueC ValueD
min, ksi mm] %
33 33 45 20
37 37 52 18 CS Type A 30/60 [205/410] $20 E E
3
A 792/A 792M
TABLE 6 Coating Bend Test Requirements—Structural Steel
Ratio of the Inside Bend Diameter to
Grade Thickness of the Specimen
(Any Direction)
33 [230] 11⁄2
37 [255] 2
40 [275] 21⁄2
A
50 Class 1, Class 2
[345 Class 1, Class 2]
A
80 [350]
A
Grades not subject to bend test requirements.
SUPPLEMENTARY REQUIREMENTS
The following standardized supplementary requirements are for use when desired by the purchaser.
These additional requirements shall apply only when specified on the order.
S1. Base Metal Thickness S1.3 The applicable tolerances for base metal thickness are
S1.1 The specified minimum thickness shall apply to the shown in Tables 16 and 17, Thickness Tolerance of Cold-
base metal only. Rolled Sheet (Carbon and High-Strength, Low-Alloy Steel), of
S1.2 The coating designation shown on the order indicates Specification A 568/A 568M.
the coating to be applied to the specified minimum base metal
thickness.
4
A 792/A 792M
APPENDIXES
(Nonmandatory Information)
TABLE X1.1 Conversion Factors Between Coating Weight [Mass] and ThicknessA
Coating Weight [Mass] Coating Thickness
oz/ft2 g/m2 mils µm
B
1.0 305.15 3.2 81.28B
0.00328B 1.0 0.010487B 0.26636B
0.3125B 95.360B 1.0 25.4B
0.012303B 3.7543B 0.03937B 1.0
A
One ounce of 55 % Al-Zn alloy coating per square foot of surface corresponds to an average coating thickness of 0.0032 in. [3.2 mils]. All other values in Table X1.1
are based on this relationship and on standard inch-pound to SI conversions.
B
Weight [mass] to thickness conversions are reliable to only two significant figures. Inch-pound to SI conversions are reliable to five significant figures. A greater number
of digits are shown in this table to reduce errors due to rounding when calculating equivalencies for coating weight [mass] or thickness greater than unity.
X3.1 Subcommittee A05.11 has revised the designations more predictive of steel formability than other tests such as the
used to classify the various products available in each hot-dip hardness test which may not compensate adequately for
coated specification. The previous “quality” designations have product variables such as substrate thickness and coating
been replaced with designations and descriptions more closely weight.
related with product characteristics. Many of the former
“quality” specifications described the steel only in terms of X3.3 The new designations also provide the user with the
limited chemical composition, which in some cases was flexibility to restrict the steels applied on any order. For
identical for two or more qualities. The former designations example, a user can restrict the application of ultra low carbon
also did not reflect the availability of new steels which are the steels on an application through the selection of an appropriate
result of the use of new technologies such as vacuum degassing “type” designator.
and steel ladle treatments.
X3.4 There is a limited relationship between the former and
X3.2 The former “quality” designators, defined in very current systems of designation. Some of the reasons for this
broad qualitative terms, did not provide the user with all the limited relationship are: addition of steels not previously
information needed to select the appropriate steel for an described in ASTM specifications, restrictions placed on
application. The new designations are defined with technical ranges of chemical composition, the addition of typical me-
information such as specific chemical composition limits and chanical properties, and the enhanced capability of steel
typical-nonmandatory mechanical properties. These steel char- producers to combine chemical composition and processing
acteristics are important to users concerned with the weldabil- methods to achieve properties tailored to specific applications.
ity and formability of the coated steel products. The typical
mechanical properties included in the new designation system X3.5 The changes in designation are significant which may
are those indicated by the tension test. These properties are create transition issues that will have to be resolved. Continued
5
A 792/A 792M
dialogue between users and producers will have to be main- for a specific application should consult with a steel supplier or
tained to assist the transition to the new system of designations. producer.
A user with concerns about the appropriate coated steel to order
The American Society for Testing and Materials takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection
with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such
patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible
technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your
views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428.