Warehouse Design

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)
Volume 4 Issue 4, June 2020 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470
Warehouse Design
Prof. G. S. Patil1, Dr. Prof. M. B. Chougule2
1Assistant
Professor, 2Associate Professor,
1,2Department of Civil, D.K.T.’S Textile and Engineering Institute of Technology, Ichalkaranji, Maharashtra, India
ABSTRACT How to cite this paper: Prof. G. S. Patil |

in this paper comparison is made on the basis of soil strata. Various responses Dr. Prof. M. B. Chougule "Warehouse
are taken for the comparison. STAAD PRO software is used for analysis. PEB Design" Published in
structure is used for analysis in staad pro software. International Journal
of Trend in Scientific
KEYWORDS: PEB, STAAD-PRO, soil strata Research and
Development
(ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-
6470, Volume-4 | IJTSRD31217
Issue-4, June 2020,
pp.805-807, URL:
www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd31217.pdf
Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and

International Journal of Trend in Scientific
Research and Development Journal. This
is an Open Access article distributed
under the terms of
the Creative
Commons Attribution
License (CC BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by
/4.0)
I. INTRODUCTION
PEB structure it is different type of section. Whose cross part hand crafted metal structure to fill the specific needs of
section is not throughout the same. Has section changes client.
according to its bending stresses. This type of section is not
cast in situ it is a prefabricated section and is ordered to II. METHODOLOGY
factory according to site requirement. Mostly PEB section is For analysis purpose different soil conditions whichever is
used not only for economy purpose but also for saving given in IS456 used in STAAD software. As per IS456 the
material. in this paper Tapered I section is used for analysis. Soft, Medium, Hard Strata with Varying foundation supports
This leads to the utilization of non-prismatic rigid frames Based on displacement and weight ratio optimized structure
with slender elements. were found.
Till today for steel structure construction large column are III. DESIGN OF WAREHOUSE WITH PEB
used whose area of cross section is throughout the same. But A. Problem Statement:
if we use some advance software, we can reduce the cost of For analysis purpose twenty and forty-meter PEB structure
structure. And also, we overcome the material losses. Today is modelled with following properties. In this PEB (steel
ETABS, ANSYS STAAD PRO etc. these are the advance structure) structure horizontal distance is 20m and length is
software in market. Forr construction of PEB structure 80m while height is 8m. in this 80 m length column spacing
required very less time because of it is a prefabricated is kept 4 m centre to centre. Slope is 1:10. Material Input and
stections. All the parts of structure are easily erected and Site Data.
also very fast constructed with the help of nut-bolts.
Structural Steel grade – FE345
Because of its prefabricated structure its leads to Wind speed, Vb 39 m/sec
optimization of structure. In its undaunted turn of events, Structure class C
the development business has found, imagined and built up Terrain category 2
various advances, frameworks and items, one of them being Risk coefficient K1 1
the idea of Pre-engineered Buildings. Steel is a material Topography k3 1
which has high Strength per unit mass. Thus it is utilized in Terrain factor k2 0.93
development of structures with large column free space. The Seismic Zone III
logical sounding term pre-built structures appeared during Response reduction factor- 5
the 1960s. The structures were pre-built in light of the fact
Importance factor- 1
that they depend upon standard building plans for set
number arrangements. These structures are for the most
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD31217 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 4 | May-June 2020 Page 805
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Load combinations as per AISC: *Serviceability Combinations
*Strength Combinations 1) 1.0(DL)+0.8(LL+EQX)
1. DL+LL 2) 1.0(DL)+0.8(LL+EQZ)
2 DL+EQX 3) 1.0(DL)+0.8(LL+WLP)
3 DL+EQZ 4) 1.0(DL)+0.8(LL+WLS)
4 DL+0.75(LL+EQX)
* Loadings
5 DL+0.75(LL+EQZ)
Below table shows loading
6 DL+WLP Weight of sheet 0.0456Kn/sq.m
7 DL+WLS Weight of purlin 0.06 Kn/sq.m
8 DL+WPP Total 0.11Kn/Sqm
9 DL+WPS Live Load 57 Kg/m
10 DL+0.75(LL+WLP Roof slope 1:10
11 DL+0.75(LL+WLS) V( Wind speed) 39 m/s
12 DL+0.75(LL+WPP) Vz 36.27 m/s
13 DL+0.75(LL+WPS) PZ 0.79 Kn/sq.m
20M Span 3D Elevation 40M Span 3D Elevation

Fig.1. Section geometries of Pre-engineered building warehouse. (All dimensions are in m)
B. Closure:
As per previous papers for comparison purpose one ratio is consider i.e, length to area ratio. Few research is carried out on
innovative Pre-engineered building column section. It is need to be developing innovative Pre-engineered building column
section to enhance its strength and durability. Paper includes the optimized design of Pre-engineered building structure.
Table 1.
Lateral Deflection Lateral Deflection Vertical Total

Models With Fixed Supports along Length along Width Deflection Tonnage
(mm) (mm) (mm) (Ton)
Warehouse PEB Hard 90.50 18.32 91.42 51.2
structure with 20 m Medium 93.77 17.65 88.83 52.7
Span Soft 89.91 17.11 87.28 53.6
Span Soft 51.68 24.03 240.83 115.8
Span Soft 48.86 23.93 257.42 241.9
Span Soft 82.30 21.41 263.20 593.4
Following below are the Results.

Lateral Deflection Lateral Deflection Vertical Total
Models With Pinned Supports
along Length along Width Deflection Tonnage
(mm) (mm) (mm) (Ton)
Hard 5.32 50.69 88.95 73.4
Warehouse PEB
Medium 5.09 47.85 86.74 75.2
structure with 20 m Span
Soft 4.86 50.69 90.74 79.5
Hard 18.25 28.26 245.39 175.1
Warehouse PEB
Medium 21.17 28.41 226.17 177.5
structure with 40 mSpan
Soft 21.29 27.13 215.55 178.3
Hard 30.06 45.43 369.62 327.2
Warehouse PEB structure
Medium 35.86 43.05 342.13 336.9
with 60 m Span
Soft 33.99 41.71 327.83 342.4
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Hard 57.47 39.31 402.76 765.1
Warehouse PEB
Medium 78.93 42.09 411.83 799.2
structure with 80 m Span
Soft 79.29 42.50 414.20 813.0
The following are the main objectives of this project: 3. For 60M Span of PEB Structure.
1. Analysis of pre engineering building with different soil
strata also different support conditions.
2. Investigate behaviour of Pre Engineering Building
structure for various span such as 80 m, 60 m, 40 m, 20
m and with different soil strata. .
3. To develop design guidelines for pre engineering
building system.
Following below are the Results in Graphical Form.

1. For 20M Span of PEB Structure.
In Terms of Tonnage
100
80
60
In past examinations, investigate is completed uniquely on
40
customary and PEB steel structures. Likewise all
20 examinations are carried on the correlation of the two kinds.
0 har
me
har
me Be that as it may, there is absence of research on various
sof sof
d
diu
d
diu kind of help and soil layers impact on the tightened areas.
t t
m m Likewise, when all is said in done for development and
structure of pre-built structure a most extreme expense is
required, however there was no any ideal plan or types are
20 m Fixed 20 m Pin
accessible to lessen the expense. Henceforth there will be
streamlining of product house structure according to various
2. For 40M Span of PEB Structure. soil layers.
IV. CONCLUSION
1. Based on extreme solidarity to weight proportion,
Column 4 was seen as generally proficient..
2. It was discovered that for the majority of imaginative
sections greatest diversion were seen at the mid length
of the segment.
3. Among nine distinctive imaginative virus framed steel
segment segments, it is seen that clasping mode relies
upon sectional geometry, stiffeners, centroid and
segment length.
REFERENCES
[1] H. Saffari, R. Rahgozar, R. Jahanshahi (2007), “An
efficient method for computation of effective length

Warehouse Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Warehouse Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Warehouse Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)

ABSTRACT How to cite this paper: Prof. G. S. Patil |

Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and

20M Span 3D Elevation 40M Span 3D Elevation

Lateral Deflection Lateral Deflection Vertical Total

Following below are the Results.

Following below are the Results in Graphical Form.

You might also like