The Prognostic Value of The Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio and Maximal Metastatic Tumor Size in Pathological N1a Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
The Prognostic Value of The Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio and Maximal Metastatic Tumor Size in Pathological N1a Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
The Prognostic Value of The Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio and Maximal Metastatic Tumor Size in Pathological N1a Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
CLINICAL STUDY
Abstract
Objective: The presence of central neck lymph node (LN) metastases (defined as pN1a according to
Tumor Node Metastasis classification) in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is known as an independent
risk factor for recurrence. Extent of LN metastasis and the completeness of removal of metastatic LN
must have an impact on prognosis but they are not easy to measure. Moreover, the significance of
the size of metastatic tumors in LNs has not been clarified. This study was to evaluate the impact of
the extent of LN metastasis and size of metastatic tumors on the recurrence in pathological N1a PTC.
Design: This retrospective observational cohort study enrolled 292 PTC patients who underwent total
thyroidectomy with central neck dissection from 1999 to 2005. LN ratio was defined as the number
of metastatic LNs divided by the number of removed LNs, which was regarded as variable reflecting
both extent of LN metastasis and completeness of resection, and LN size as the maximal diameter of
tumor in metastatic LN.
Results: The significant risk factors for recurrence in univariate analysis were large primary tumor
size (defined as larger than 2 cm), high LN ratio (defined as higher than 0.4), and presence of
macrometastasis (defined as larger than 0.2 cm). Age, sex, clinical node status, and microscopic
perithyroidal extension had no effect on recurrence. In multivariate analysis, high LN ratio and
presence of macrometastasis were independent risk factors for recurrence.
Conclusion: LN ratio and size of metastatic nodes had a significant prognostic value in pathological N1a
PTC. We suggest that risk stratification of pathological N1a PTC according to the pattern of LN
metastasis such as LN ratio and size would give valuable information to clinicians.
in pathological N1a PTC patients who underwent during surgery. Clinical N0 (cN0) was defined as the
operation in a single tertiary referral hospital absence of suspicion for LN involvement.
with postoperative radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation All the patients eligible for analysis received central
therapy. neck node dissection (by the inclusion criteria regarding
the number of removed nodes). We divided patients
into two groups according to clinical node status. Thus,
Materials and methods a group of patients with cN1 was defined as ‘therapeutic
dissection group’, and the other group of patients with
Patients cN0 was defined as ‘prophylactic dissection group’.
Pathological N1a (pN1a) was defined as the presence of
Between 1999 and 2005, 602 conventional PTC metastatic LN among four or more removed LNs from
patients who underwent total thyroidectomy, routine central neck and pathological N0 (pN0) was defined as
central neck dissection by a single surgeon (S J H),
the absence of metastasis in pathological examination.
and subsequent RAI ablation therapy according to
LN ratio was defined as the number of metastatic LNs
a protocol established by the Endocrinology Division of
divided by the number of removed LNs. It represented the
the Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) were retrieved
extent of LN involvement and completeness of LN dis-
(15). The median dose of administered radioiodine
section. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC)
was 5.6 GBq. Among them, we only included patients
with four or more removed central LNs and with the curve analysis showed that 0.38 is the appropriate cutoff
maximal diameter of primary tumor O1 cm. Patients point of LN ratio (data are not shown). So, we defined
with lateral neck LN involvement or distant metastasis, low LN ratio as %0.4 and high LN ratio as O0.4.
gross invasion, or resection margin involvement by LN size, which means the maximal tumor diameter
tumor were excluded. Finally, 292 patients were eligible in the metastatic LNs, was classified into two groups
for analysis (Fig. 1). This study was approved by the on the basis of the largest LN among metastatic LN
institutional review board. using the concept of micrometastasis in breast cancer
(8, 9, 16): micrometastasis, %0.2 cm; macrometastasis,
O0.2 cm.
Definitions The patients were classified into three groups by
Clinical node status was defined as follows: clinical N1 the LN ratio and LN size: Low, low LN ratio with
(cN1) was defined as the presence of suspicious central micrometastasis; Intermediate, low LN ratio with
neck LNs identified by preoperative physical exami- macrometastasis or high LN ratio with micrometastasis;
nation, preoperative imaging and/or gross inspection and High, high LN ratio with macrometastasis.
Total thyroidectomy and central neck dissection by single surgeon Pathological examination
and underwent radioactive iodine ablation (n =602)
The entire specimen from the operation was submitted
Primary tumor sized ≤1 cm (n=151)
for histological analysis to find LN metastasis and the
Patient with primary tumor sized larger than 1.0 cm (n =451) maximal tumor diameter in the metastatic LN was
recorded. For this study, an experienced pathologist
Gross invasion and/or positive resection margin (n =73)
(D E S) reviewed the pathological slides and measured
Laternal neck involvement and/or distant metastasis (n =66)
the size of metastatic foci in each LN.
Number of removed lymph nodes less than four (n =10)
www.eje-online.org
Table 1 Univariate analysis of risk factors of recurrence. of these variables on recurrence in each dissection
group. All P values were two sided, with P!0.05
Classification n (%) Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value considered statistically significant.
Age (years)
!45 150 (51) Ref
R45 142 (49) 0.75 (0.39 to 1.45) 0.393
Sex Results
Male 28 (10) Ref
Female 264 (90) 0.60 (0.23 to 1.53) 0.283 Baseline characteristics of patients and LNs
Tumor size (cm)
%2.0 180 (62) Ref A total of 292 patients were evaluated in this study,
O2.0 112 (39) 2.71 (1.38 to 5.29) 0.004 and they were followed for a median of 8 years
Perithyroidal extension (IQR 5.8–10.0). Median age of the patients was 44.4
Absent 116 (40) Ref
Present 176 (60) 1.23 (0.62 to 2.46) 0.558 years (IQR 35.1–54.2) and 264 (90%) patients were
Clinical status female. Median primary tumor size was 1.8 cm (IQR
cN0 184 (63) Ref 1.5–2.5). Of 292 patients, 108 (37%) were therapeutic
cN1 108 (37) 1.84 (0.96 to 3.54) 0.068 dissection group and 184 (63%) were prophylactic dis-
Metastasis to LN
pN0 141 (48) Refa
section group. Among 108 patients in the therapeutic
pN1a 151 (52) 8.22 (2.91 to 23.25) !0.001 dissection group, four had enlarged LNs in preoperative
LN ratio physical examination or preoperative ultrasonography
Low (%0.4) 89 (59) 3.22 (0.97 to 10.71) 0.056 and 104 in intra-operative gross inspection (Fig. 1).
High (O0.4) 62 (41) 17.14 (5.94 to 49.46) !0.001 Using TNM system (a classification system of the
LN size
Micrometastasis 59 (39) 4.12 (1.21 to 14.08) 0.024 AJCC, 6th ed., 2002), 172 (59%) patients were stage I,
(%0.2 cm) seven (2%) were stage II, and 113 (39%) were stage III.
Macrometastasis 92 (61) 11.42 (3.97 to 32.83) !0.001 The median number of resected LN per patient was
(O0.2 cm) 9 (IQR 6–13). Of the 292 patients, 151 (52%) showed
Patient’s group
Low 46 (31) 2.23 (0.50 to 9.95) 0.295
metastases to central neck and the median number of
Intermediate 56 (37) 6.07 (1.87 to 19.70) 0.003 metastatic LN was 3 (IQR 2–5.5). Patients with high LN
High 49 (32) 19.08 (6.51 to 55.93) !0.001 ratio were 62 (41%) and those with low LN ratio were
89 (59%). The mean metastatic LN size was 0.3 cm
CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference; LN ratio, metastatic LNs/removed
LNs; patient group according to the ratio and size of LN.
(IQR 0.2–0.5). Among patients with LN metastasis, 92
a
pN0 is a reference group to compare risk of recurrence in LN ratio, LN size, (61%) showed macrometastasis and 59 (39%) showed
and patient group. micrometastasis. Group Low included 46 (31%), group
Intermediate included 56 (37%), and group High
included 49 (32%) patients (Table 1).
Thirty-six (12%) events of recurrence had occurred
Statistical analysis during the follow-up period. Thirty-three (92%) of them
were lateral neck recurrences, two were recurrences at
Statistics were calculated by R version 2.13 and R operation bed, and one was metastasis to mediastinal
libraries survival, car and Cairo were used to analyze LN. Most of the recurrences (34, 94%) were treated by
the data and draw graphs (R Foundation for Statistical
Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project. Table 2 Multivariate analysis of risk factors of recurrence.
org). We also used SPSS software (version 18.0.1;
Classification Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
SPSS, Inc.) for ROC curve analysis. Continuous variables
were presented as medians with interquartile range Model A
(IQR) and categorical variables were presented as Tumor size O2.0 cm 1.82 (0.93 to 3.60) 0.083
LN ratio Low (%0.4) 2.92 (0.88 to 9.76) 0.081
numbers with percentages. Cox proportional hazard High (O0.4) 14.83 (5.07 to 43.35) !0.001
model was used to evaluate the risk of recurrence. Model B
Univariate analyses were performed on age, sex, tumor Tumor size O2.0 cm 1.91 (0.97 to 3.77) 0.061
size, microscopic extrathyroidal extension (ETE), clinical LN size Micrometastasis 3.74 (1.09 to 12.84) 0.036
(%0.2 cm)
node status, LN size, LN ratio, and patient group. Macrometastasis 9.86 (3.39 to 28.68) !0.001
Multivariate analyses included the variables that were (O0.2 cm)
significant in the univariate analysis. Because LN size, Model C
LN ratio, and patient group were closely related, they Tumor size O2.0 cm 1.82 (0.92 to 3.58) 0.085
Patient Low 2.07 (0.46 to 9.28) 0.341
were separately analyzed in multivariate analysis. group Intermediate 5.31 (1.62 to 17.43) 0.006
Recurrence-free survival curves were constructed High 16.55 (5.58 to 49.11) !0.001
using Kaplan–Meier method and log rank tests were
Model A analyzed tumor size and LN ratio; Model B analyzed tumor size and
used to evaluate differences of recurrence-free survival LN size; Model C analyzed tumor size and patient group; LN ratio, metastatic
between patient groups. We also analyzed the impact LNs/removed LNs; Patient group according to the ratio and size of LN.
www.eje-online.org
Impact of LN ratio and LN size on recurrence Impact of LN ratio and LN size on recurrence
in each dissection group
In univariate analysis of risk factors for recurrence,
primary tumor of O2 cm and pN1a compared with pN0 Of 108 patients in therapeutic dissection group,
were significantly associated with recurrence of PTC. 40 patients (37%) were pN0 even though they had
Age, sex, presence of microscopic perithyroidal exten- cN1 disease. Higher LN ratio and larger LN size were
sion, and clinical node status were not risk factors for also significant risk factors in this group. However, the
Table 3 Impact of LN ratio, LN size, and patient group on recurrence in each dissection group.
Metastasis to LN
pN0 40 (37) Refa 101 (55) Ref
pN1a 68 (63) 3.78 (1.10 to 12.97) 0.035 83 (45) 20.98 (2.78 to 158.30) 0.003
LN ratio
Low (%0.4) 39 (57) 1.15 (0.23 to 5.69) 0.866 50 (60) 10.14 (1.18 to 86.90) 0.034
High (O0.4) 29 (43) 40.80 (2.31 to 28.70) 0.001 33 (40) 40.80 (5.26 to 316.30) !0.001
LN size
Micrometastasis (%0.2 cm) 16 (24) 1.70 (0.28 to 10.15) 0.563 43 (52) 11.54 (1.35 to 98.79) 0.026
Macrometastasis (O0.2 cm) 52 (76) 4.59 (1.32 to 15.98) 0.017 40 (48) 33.76 (4.35 to 262.21) !0.001
Patient group
Low 14 (20) 0.00 (K0.00 to NA) 0.998 32 (39) 9.26 (0.96 to 89.01) 0.054
Intermediate 27 (40) 2.97 (0.07 to 12.43) 0.136 29 (35) 14.46 (1.61 to 129.57) 0.017
High 27 (40) 7.45 (2.07 to 26.79) 0.002 22 (27) 56.72 (7.16 to 449.11) !0.001
CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference; NA, not available; LN ratio, metastatic LNs/removed LNs; Patient group according to the ratio and size of LN.
a
pN0 is a reference group to compare risk of recurrence in LN ratio, LN size, and patient group.
www.eje-online.org
www.eje-online.org
in the same way, but we showed that their prognosis Declaration of interest
was extremely different according to LN ratio and to The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be
metastatic LN size. These results proved the need for perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
new staging systems to predict accurate risk of
recurrence of pN1 patients. This is consistent with the
previous studies which showed that increased number Funding
of central LN metastases and LN size of larger than 3 cm This study was supported by a Grant (2012-289) from the Asan
were associated with poorer prognosis (1, 3, 10, 12, 13, Institute for Life Sciences, Seoul, Korea.
14, 17). Lang et al. (11) also revealed that higher
metastatic central LN ratio (over 33.34%) was an
independent factor for short-term outcomes estimated
by postablative stimulated serum thyroglobulin. References
We believe that our findings may have important
implications for clinicians. Patient’s group considering 1 Leboulleux S, Rubino C, Baudin E, Caillou B, Hartl DM, Bidart JM,
Travagli JP & Schlumberger M. Prognostic factors for persistent
metastatic LN ratio and size together would be a or recurrent disease of papillary thyroid carcinoma with neck
significant surrogate for determining RAI ablation lymph node metastases and/or tumor extension beyond the
dose and intensity of TSH suppression. Patients in thyroid capsule at initial diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology
group Low did not show any statistically significant and Metabolism 2005 90 5723–5729. (doi:10.1210/jc.2005-
increased risk of recurrence compared with pN0 0285)
2 Teixeira G, Teixeira T, Gubert F, Chikota H & Tufano R. The
patients in multivariate analysis, and this suggests incidence of central neck micrometastatic disease in patients with
that lower RAI ablation dose could be applied or papillary thyroid cancer staged preoperatively and intraoperatively
RAI ablation may be omitted in these selected low- as N0. Surgery 2011 150 1161–1167. (doi:10.1016/j.surg.2011.
risk patients. 09.019)
3 Ricarte-Filho J, Ganly I, Rivera M, Katabi N, Fu W, Shaha A,
The surgical management of the central neck in Tuttle RM, Fagin JA & Ghossein R. Papillary thyroid carcinomas
patients without documented metastatic disease with cervical lymph node metastases can be stratified into
remains controversial and some suggested that prophy- clinically relevant prognostic categories using oncogenic BRAF,
lactic central neck dissection leads to an increase in pN1 the number of nodal metastasis, and extra-nodal extension.
disease that seems not to affect prognosis (18, 19, 20). Thyroid 2012 22 575–584. (doi:10.1089/thy.2011.0431)
4 Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ,
In this study, 184 (63%) patients underwent prophy- Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Pacini F, Schlumberger M et al. Revised
lactic central neck dissection and there was no increase American Thyroid Association management guidelines for
in recurrences in cN1 disease compared with cN0 patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer.
disease. We only included patients who underwent Thyroid 2009 19 1167–1214. (doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0110)
5 Lee SR, Kim HO, Son BH, Shin JH & Yoo CH. Prognostic
central neck dissection and could not compare the significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio in patients with
prognosis of prophylactic central neck dissection vs no gastric cancer. World Journal of Surgery 2012 36 1096–1101.
prophylactic central neck dissection in cN0 patients. (doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1520-5)
About half of cN0 patients who underwent prophylactic 6 Tausch C, Taucher S, Dubsky P, Seifert M, Reitsamer R, Kwasny W,
central neck dissection were pN1 disease and their Jakesz R, Fitzal F, Filipcic L, Fridrik M et al. Prognostic value
of number of removed lymph nodes, number of involved
prognosis was also well correlated with LN ratio, size, lymph nodes, and lymph node ratio in 7502 breast cancer
and patient’s group. Our results suggest that discrete patients enrolled onto trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal
pathological LN staging after central neck dissection Cancer Study Group (ABCSG). Annals of Surgical Oncology 2012 19
even prophylactic is an accurate predictor of recur- 1808–1817. (doi:10.1245/s10434-011-2189-y)
7 Wong KP, Poon JT, Fan JK & Law WL. Prognostic value of lymph
rence. Further large studies are needed to evaluate this node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer. Colorectal Disease 2011 13
potential conflict. 1116–1122. (doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02435.x)
Presence of microscopic ETE of tumor results in 8 Huvos AG, Hutter RV & Berg JW. Significance of axillary
upstaging of T1 or T2 tumors to pathological T3 by macrometastases and micrometastases in mammary cancer.
current TNM staging system, but recent studies showed Annals of Surgery 1971 173 44–46. (doi:10.1097/00000658-
197101000-00006)
that microscopic ETE is of less significance than gross 9 Salhab M, Patani N & Mokbel K. Sentinel lymph node
extension and patients’ outcomes were not affected micrometastasis in human breast cancer: an update. Surgical
by microscopic ETE. Our findings along with previous Oncology 2011 20 e195–e206. (doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2011.06.
data suggested that upstaging and administration of 006)
10 Lee YS, Lim YS, Lee JC, Wang SG, Kim IJ & Lee BJ. Clinical
higher dose of RAI ablation due to microscopic ETE does implication of the number of central lymph node metastasis
not improve the prognosis (21, 22). in papillary thyroid carcinoma: preliminary report. World
In conclusion, we found that recurrence-free survival Journal of Surgery 2010 34 2558–2563. (doi:10.1007/s00268-
in pN1a PTC patients was affected by the LN ratio and 010-0749-0)
the size of metastatic LNs. Risk stratification for 11 Lang BH, Wong KP, Wan KY & Lo CY. Significance of metastatic
lymph node ratio on stimulated thyroglobulin levels in papillary
recurrence in pathological N1a patients according to thyroid carcinoma after prophylactic unilateral central neck
LN ratio and size of metastatic LNs would give valuable dissection. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2012 19 1257–1263.
information to clinicians. (doi:10.1245/s10434-011-2105-5)
www.eje-online.org
12 Ito Y, Fukushima M, Kihara M, Takamura Y, Kobayashi K, Miya A American Thyroid Association design and feasibility of a
& Miyauchi A. Investigation of the prognosis of patients with prospective randomized controlled trial of prophylactic central
papillary thyroid carcinoma by tumor size. Endocrine Journal 2012 lymph node dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid
59 457–464. (doi:10.1507/endocrj.EJ12-0013) 2012 22 237–244. (doi:10.1089/thy.2011.0317)
13 Sugitani I, Kasai N, Fujimoto Y & Yanagisawa A. A novel 19 Moreno MA, Edeiken-Monroe BS, Siegel ER, Sherman SI &
classification system for patients with PTC: addition of the new Clayman GL. In papillary thyroid cancer, preoperative central
variables of large (3 cm or greater) nodal metastases and neck ultrasound detects only macroscopic surgical disease, but
reclassification during the follow-up period. Surgery 2004 135 negative findings predict excellent long-term regional control and
139–148. (doi:10.1016/S0039-6060(03)00384-2) survival. Thyroid 2012 22 347–355. (doi:10.1089/thy.2011.
14 Randolph G, Duh QY, Heller KS, Livolsi VA, Mandel SJ, Steward D, 0121)
Tufano RP & Tuttle RM. The prognostic significance of nodal 20 Popadich A, Levin O, Lee JC, Smooke-Praw S, Ro K, Fazel M,
metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma can be stratified based Arora A, Tolley NS, Palazzo F, Learoyd DL et al. A multicenter
on the size and number of metastatic lymph nodes, as well as the cohort study of total thyroidectomy and routine central lymph
presence of extranodal extension ATA surgical affairs committee’s node dissection for cN0 papillary thyroid cancer. Surgery 2011
taskforce on thyroid cancer nodal surgery. Thyroid 2012 11 150 1048–1057. (doi:10.1016/j.surg.2011.09.003)
1144–1152. (doi:10.1089/thy.2012.0043) 21 Nixon IJ, Ganly I, Patel S, Palmer FL, Whitcher MM, Tuttle RM,
15 Yim JH, Kim WB, Kim EY, Kim WG, Kim TY, Ryu JS, Gong G, Shaha AR & Shah JP. The impact of microscopic extrathyroid
Hong SJ & Shong YK. The outcomes of first reoperation for extension on outcome in patients with clinical T1 and T2 well-
locoregionally recurrent/persistent papillary thyroid carcinoma differentiated thyroid cancer. Surgery 2011 150 1242–1249.
in patients who initially underwent total thyroidectomy and (doi:10.1016/j.surg.2011.09.007)
remnant ablation. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 22 Ito Y, Tomoda C, Uruno T, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K,
2011 96 2049–2056. (doi:10.1210/jc.2010-2298) Matsuzuka F, Kuma K & Miyauchi A. Prognostic significance of
16 Sahin AA, Guray M & Hunt KK. Identification and biologic extrathyroid extension of papillary thyroid carcinoma: massive
significance of micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes in but not minimal extension affects the relapse-free survival. World
patients with invasive breast cancer. Archives of Pathology and Journal of Surgery 2006 30 780–786. (doi:10.1007/s00268-005-
Laboratory Medicine 2009 133 869–878. 0270-z)
17 Xiao GZ & Gao L. Central lymph node metastasis: is it a
reliable indicator of lateral node involvement in papillary
thyroid carcinoma? World Journal of Surgery 2010 34 237–241.
(doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0347-1) Received 23 August 2012
18 Carling T, Carty SE, Ciarleglio MM, Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Revised version received 28 October 2012
Kim LT, Kloos RT, Mazzaferri EL, Peduzzi PN, Roman SA et al. Accepted 15 November 2012
www.eje-online.org