AN Assignment On Teacher Made Test (OBG)
AN Assignment On Teacher Made Test (OBG)
AN Assignment On Teacher Made Test (OBG)
ASSIGNMENT ON
TEACHER MADE TEST
(OBG)
SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED BY
Ms. MALAR MS. MANISHA
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR MSc. NURSING 1ST YEAR
HFCON HFCON
NON STANDARDIZED TEST
INRTODUCTION
Carefully constructed teacher-made tests and standardised tests are similar in many ways. Both are
constructed on the basis of carefully planned table of specifications, both have the same type of test items,
and both provide clear directions to the students. Still the two differ. They differ in the quality of test items,
the reliability of test measures, the procedures for administering and scoring and the interpretation of scores.
No doubt, standardised tests are good and better in quality, more reliable and valid. But a classroom teacher
cannot always depend on standardised tests. These may not suit to his local needs, may not be readily
available, may be costly, may have different objectives. In order to fulfil the immediate requirements, the
teacher has to prepare his own tests which are usually objective type in nature .Teacher-made tests are
normally prepared and administered for testing classroom achievement of students, evaluating the method of
teaching adopted by the teacher another curricular programmes of the school. Teacher-made test is one of
the most valuable instrument in the hands of the teacher to solve his purpose. It is designed to solve the
problem or requirements of the class for which it is prepared. It is prepared to measure the outcomes and
content of local curriculum. It is very much flexible so that, it can be adopted to any procedure and material.
It does not require any
sophisticated technique for preparation.
TEACHER MADE TEST
Basically teacher made tests are used to evaluate the progress of the students in school. However, the
specific use of tests may vary from school to school and teacher or teacher.
The test results can be used for students, teachers, and for other administrative purposes.
These tests are very simple to use.
Easy for the students.
Teachers can assess the strengths and weaknesses of students.
Tests are conducted continuously and children get immediate feedback.
Teachers can understand the need for re- teaching concepts and can decide remedial instruction.
Teacher made tests devised by the teachers are to meet their various needs and directives.
Tests are not so carefully and scientifically prepared
The items of teacher made tests are seldom analysed and edited.
The types of behavioural changes covered are often limited in scope.
Features of Teacher-Made Tests:
1. The items of the tests are arranged in order of difficulty.
2. These are prepared by the teachers which can be used for prognosis and diagnosis purposes.
3. The test covers the whole content area and includes a large number of items.
4. The preparation of the items conforms to the blueprint.
5. Test construction is not a single man’s business, rather it is a co-operative endeavour.
6. A teacher-made test does not cover all the steps of a standardised test.
7. Teacher-made tests may also be employed as a tool for formative evaluation.
8. Preparation and administration of these tests are economical.
9. The test is developed by the teacher to ascertain the student’s achievement and proficiency in a given
subject.
10. Teacher-made tests are least used for research purposes.
11. They do not have norms whereas providing norms is quite essential for standardised tests.
TYPES
I. SINGLE CORRECT ANSWER FORM
Single correct answer in items of the single-correct answer variety, all but one of the alternatives is
incorrect, the remaining alternatives is the correct answer. The student is directed to identify the correct
answer.
II. BEST ANSWER FORM
In items of the best answer variety the alternatives differ in their degree of correctness. Some may be
completely incorrect and some correct, but one is clearly more correct than the others. The best alternatives
serve as the answer, while the other alternatives function as distracters. The student is directed to identify the
best answer.
III. MULTIPLE RESPONSE FORM
In items of multiple response variety, two or more of the alternatives are keyed as correct answers, the
remaining alternatives serve as distracters. The student is directly to identify each correct answer.
IV. COMBINED RESPONSE FORM
In items of the combines-response variety, one or more of the alternatives are correct answers. The
remaining alternative serve as distracters. The student is directed to identify the correct answer or answer by
selecting one of the set of letters, each of which represent a combination of alternatives.
V. MULTIPLE TRUE-FALSE
In items the stem is judged for the correctness and incorrectness. The student is directed to identify the
statement as true or false.
VI. NEGATIVE
In items of the negative variety, the student is directed to identify either the alternative that is an incorrect
answer, or the alternative that is the worst answer. Any of the other multiple-choice varieties can be
converted into this negative format.
The following suggestions for designing MCQs are organized into three sections:
i. general strategies,
ii. designing stems, and
iii. designing alternatives.
GENERAL STRATEGIES
Write questions throughout the term.
Multiple-choice question exams are challenging and time-consuming to create. You will find it easier if you
write a few questions each week, perhaps after a lecture when the course material is still fresh in your mind.
Instruct students to select the “best answer” rather than the “correct answer”.
By doing this, you acknowledge the fact that the distractors may have an element of truth to them and
discourage arguments from students who may argue that their answer is correct as well.
Use familiar language.
The question should use the same terminology that was used in the course. Avoid using unfamiliar
expressions or foreign language terms, unless measuring knowledge of such language is one of the goals of
the question. Students are likely to dismiss distractors with unfamiliar terms as incorrect.
Avoid giving verbal association clues from the stem in the key.
If the key uses words that are very similar to words found in the stem, students are more likely to pick it as
the correct answer.
Avoid trick questions.
Questions should be designed so that students who know the material can find the correct answer. Questions
designed to lead students to an incorrect answer, through misleading phrasing or by emphasizing an
otherwise unimportant detail of the solution, violate this principle.
Avoid negative wording.
Students often fail to observe negative wording and it can confuse them. As a result, students who are
familiar with the material often make mistakes on negatively worded questions. In general, avoid having any
negatives in the stem or the options. In the rare cases where you use negatives be sure to emphasize the key
words by putting them in upper case, and bolding or underlining them. For example:
The University of Waterloo does NOT have a building of this name?
a.) B.C. Matthews Hall
b.) Carl A. Pollock Hall
c.) I.L. Neilson Hall
d.) Douglas Wright Engineering Building
DESIGNING STEMS
Express the full problem in the stem.
When creating the item, ask yourself if the students would be able to answer the question without looking at
the options. This makes the purpose of the question clear.
Put all relevant material in the stem.
Do not repeat in each of the alternatives information that can be included in the stem. This makes options
easier to read and understand, and makes it easier for students to answer the question quickly.
Eliminate excessive wording and irrelevant information from the stem.
Irrelevant information in the stem confuses students and leads them to waste time: A number of books have
been published about the University of Waterloo. These books fall into various genres such as photographic
histories, biographies of prominent people involved with the University, and accounts of the history of
individual departments. Among them was a book whose author is known as "Simon the Troll".
What is the title of this book?
a.) Dreaming in Technicolor
b.) Water Under the Bridge
c.) Of Mud and Dreams
d.) Images of Waterloo
Most of the stem is not necessary to answer the question. A better question would be:
What is the title of the book about Waterloo written by “Simon the Troll”?
e.) Dreaming in Technicolor
f.) *Water Under the Bridge
g.) Of Mud and Dreams
h.) Images of Waterloo
DESIGNING ALTERNATIVES
Limit the number of alternatives.
Use between three and five alternatives per question. Research shows that three-choice items are about as
effective as four or five-choice items, mainly because it is difficult to come up with plausible distractors.
Make sure there is only one best answer.
Avoid having two or more options that are correct, but where one is “more” correct than the others. The
distractors should be incorrect answers to the question posed in the stem.
Make the distractors appealing and plausible.
If the distractors are farfetched, students will too easily locate the correct answer, even if they have little
knowledge. When testing for recognition of key terms and ideas keep the distractors similar in length and
type of language as the correct solution. When testing conceptual understanding, distractors should represent
common mistakes made by students.
Waterloo Counselling Services provides workshops about:
a.) cooking skills
b.) hockey refereeing
c.) *study skills
d.) fire safety and prevention
It is unlikely that students would choose options a, b, or d, even if they didn’t know the answer. A better
question would have plausible links between the stem and the distractors:
Waterloo Counselling Services provides workshops about:
a.) preparing for marriage
b.) presentation skills
c.) * study skills
d.) psychotherapy research
Make the choices gramatically consistent with the stem.
Read the stem and each of the choices aloud to make sure that they are grammatically correct.
Place the choices in some meaningful order.
When possible, place the choices in numerical, chronological or conceptual order. A better structured
question is easier to read and respond to:
During what period was James Downey the president of Waterloo?
a.) 1990-1996
b.) 1991-1997
c.) 1992-1998
d.) *1993-1999
Randomly distribute the correct response.
The exam should have roughly the same number of correct answers that are a's, b's, c's, and d's (assuming
there are four choices per question).
Avoid using “all of the above”.
If “all of the above” is an option and students know two of the options are correct, the answer must be “all of
the above”. If they know one is incorrect, the answer must not be “all of the above”. A student may also read
the first option, determine that it is correct, and be misled into choosing it without reading all of the options.
Avoid using “none of the above”.
The option “none of the above” does not test whether the student knows the correct answer, but only that
he/she knows the distractors aren’t correct.
Refrain from using words such as always, never, all, or none.
Most students know that few things are universally true or false, so distractors with these words in them can
often be easily dismissed.
Avoid overlapping choices.
Make the alternatives mutually exclusive. It should never be the case that if one of the distractors is true,
another distractor must be true as well.
Avoid questions of the form “Which of the following statements is correct?”
There is no clear question being asked, and the choices are often heterogeneous. Such questions are better
presented in the form of True/False questions.
ADVANTAGES
Versatility: multiple-choice test items are appropriate for use in many different subjects-matters areas,
and can be used to measure a great variety of educational
objectives.
Validity: in general, it takes much longer to respond to an essay test question than it does to respond to a
multiple choice-question test item, since the composing and recording of an essay answer is such slow
process. A student is therefore able to answer many multiple-choice items in the time it would take to
answer a single essay question. Consequently, the test scores will likely to be more representative of the
student’s overall achievement in the course.
Reliability: well written multiple-choice test items compare favourably with other test items on the issue
of reliability. They are less susceptible to guessing than are true-false test items, and therefore are capable of
producing more reliable scores. Their scoring is more clear cut than short-answer test item as there are no
misspelled or partial answer to deal with.
Efficiency: multiple choice items are amendable to rapid scoring which is often done by scoring
machines. This expedites the reporting of the test results to the student so that any follow-up clarification of
instruments may be done before the course has preceded much enough.
DISADVANTAGES
They are difficult to construct. The teacher cannot think of possible distractors.
More time required to construct such items.
It is difficult to find out four choices for each item
They do not permit the examinee to express their own views.
They cannot measure attitude and motor skills.
An element of guess work is not entirely eliminated.