Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effect of Fineness in Clinker-Calcined Clays-Limestone Cements
Effect of Fineness in Clinker-Calcined Clays-Limestone Cements
net/publication/277648554
CITATIONS READS
11 1,323
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Leng Vizcaino on 04 November 2017.
Vizcaı́no Andrés, Antoni, Alujas Diaz, Martirena ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
Hernández and Scrivener
Effect of fineness in
clinker-calcined clays-limestone
cements
Leng M. Vizcaı́no Andrés José Fernando Martirena Hernández
PhD Student, Center for the Research and Development of Structures and Professor, Center for the Research and Development of Structures and
Materials (CIDem), Universidad Central de Las Villas, Santa Clara, Cuba Materials (CIDem), Universidad Central de Las Villas, Santa Clara, Cuba
Mathieu Georges Antoni Karen Louise Scrivener
PhD Student, Laboratoire de Materiaux de Construction (LMC), École Professor, Laboratoire de Materiaux de Construction (LMC), École
Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Polytechnique Fédéral de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Adrian Alujas Diaz
Postdoctoral Researcher, Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Universidad
Central de Las Villas, Santa Clara, Cuba
This paper looks at the effect of fineness of the different components in a blend containing 55% Portland cement,
30% calcined clay and 15% limestone. The calcined clay originates from a natural deposit in Cuba and contains less
than 50% kaolinite. The particle size distribution (PSD) of each of the three components was varied by using different
grinding times, and the consequences on heat release, strength development, pore structure and phase assemblage
development were investigated up to 28 d. Higher fineness of both clinker and calcined clay can considerably
improve compressive strength at all ages, while limestone fineness only plays a role at early age. The formation of
carboaluminate hydrates owing to the combined addition of calcined clays and limestone is confirmed for this case
of a mixed clay with moderate kaolinite content.
Introduction It has also been shown that blended cements with good strengths
The demand for more sustainable cements has prompted the use at early ages may be obtained by substituting clinker with a
of blended cements, where part of the Portland cement clinker is combination of kaolinitic calcined clay and limestone (Antoni et
replaced by one or more supplementary cementitious materials al., 2012; Damidot et al., 2011). For up to 45% cement substitu-
(SCM), such as fine limestone, fly ash or slag. However, there are tion by a 2:1 blend of pure metakaolin and limestone, mechanical
two major barriers to increasing the levels of substitution of 20– properties at 7 and 28 d are better than the 100% cement
30% typically seen worldwide: technical performance, especially reference. These mechanical properties could be related to the
early strength, and supply of suitable SCMs (Schneider et al., refinement of the pore structure observed by mercury intrusion
2011). porosimetry (MIP) and the formation of an important amount of
carboaluminate hydrates.
Calcined clays are being increasingly investigated, owing to
their widespread availability in the world and interesting early It was therefore decided to investigate such blends further by
reactivity as pozzolans. Metakaolin (MK), a high-purity cal- using calcined clay originating from a clay deposit with moderate
cined clay, has proven to be a highly reactive pozzolan, either kaolinitic content, identified as a potential source for an industrial
as a mineral admixture for the production of high-performance trial. The results of this industrial trial are reported elsewhere
concrete, or as a normal pozzolan in pozzolanic blends (Sabir (Vizcaı́no et al., 2015). This novel cementitious system has been
et al., 2001; Siddique and Klaus, 2009). The reactivity of MK called the limestone calcined clays cement (LC3) and is currently
is associated with the content of mineral kaolinite in the being developed in a project funded by the Swiss Development
original clays, which is known to be the most reactive clay, Agency (SDC, 2015), with the goal to introduce this blend in
after appropriate thermal treatment, in comparison with other several countries where cement demand is growing very rapidly,
clay minerals such as montmorillonite or illite (Ambroise et such as India, Thailand or Brazil.
al., 1985; Fernández et al., 2011; He et al., 2000). Recent
studies have shown that, after optimisation of calcination, This paper aims at studying the relative influence of particle size
cement substituted by 30% low-grade clay with kaolinite distribution (PSD) of each component of a ternary blend where
content below 50% can yield the same mechanical performance approximately 45% of clinker has been replaced by a 2:1 blend
as Portland cement at 28 d (Antoni, 2013; Fernández López, of calcined clay–limestone on the mechanical and microstructural
2009). properties of the resulting blended cement.
546
Advances in Cement Research Effect of fineness in clinker-calcined clays-
Volume 27 Issue 9 limestone cements
Vizcaı́no Andrés, Antoni, Alujas Diaz,
Martirena Hernández and Scrivener
Raw kaolinite predispersion was applied for 15 min and samples were given the
⫺1·00 ⫻ 10⫺4 time to cool down to laboratory temperature prior to measure-
ment. Ground clinker and blended cements were dispersed in
⫺1·50 ⫻ 10⫺4 isopropanol, to prevent cement reaction, whereas clay minerals
were dispersed in a solution of 0 .01% poly acrylic acid (PAA)
⫺2·00 ⫻ 10⫺4 and limestone in water. A Micromeritics Accupyc 1330 V2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 9001000
Temperature: °C
instrument was used for bulk density measurements, and a
Micromeritics Gemini 2375 V4 instrument allowed the determi-
Figure 1. Temperature derivative of the thermogravimetric nation of a specific surface (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET)).
analysis of Pontezuela clay before and after calcination Samples were vacuum dried with the same apparatus at 2008C
until they reached a constant weight prior to measurement.
547
Advances in Cement Research Effect of fineness in clinker-calcined clays-
Volume 27 Issue 9 limestone cements
Vizcaı́no Andrés, Antoni, Alujas Diaz,
Martirena Hernández and Scrivener
Oxides Calcined clay Gypsum Clinker Limestone Quartz Cement Rietveld composition
Ternary blends were produced by blending the separately ground Table 2 gives the different combinations of materials used in the
clinker, calcined clay, limestone and gypsum in different combi- blends. The three-letter code for each blend denotes the nature of
nations of coarse and fine components, as detailed in Table 2. the clinker, calcined clay and limestone components as coarse (C)
The blends were homogenised in a Turbula1 shaker-mixer-T2F or fine (F) – for example, CFF means a blend of coarse clinker,
(Willy A Bachofen AG) for 2 h. The blend was composed of fine calcined clay and fine limestone. When a blend contains
48 .6% of clinker, 29 .0% of calcined clay, 14 .5% of limestone quartz in place of calcined clay or limestone, Q is used in place
and 7 .8% of gypsum (3 .0% sulfur trioxide). The amount of of the materials replaced.
gypsum added was chosen in order to control the reaction of the
alumina phase following the methodology of Antoni et al. (2012). The hydration of all the blends was followed by isothermal
calorimetry at 208C as cement pastes with a water-to-cement ratio
of 0 .45. No superplasticiser was used. The hydration of the pastes
Denominationa Grain fraction was stopped at 3, 7 and 28 d by solvent exchange, with
immersion in isopropanol for 7 d and drying in low vacuum
Clinker Calcined clay Limestone conditions in a desiccator for 7 d longer. The samples were
further ground to powder in a zirconia mortar with a pestle and
FFF Fine Fine Fine analysed by XRD and TGA.
FFC Fine Fine Coarse
FCF Fine Coarse Fine Mortar prisms 40 3 40 3 160 mm were made with water-to-
CFF Coarse Fine Fine cement ratio of 0 .5 according to BS EN 196-1 (BSI, 2005)
FFQ Fine Fine Quartz fine (cement here includes all the cementitious materials: clinker,
FQF Fine Quartz fine Fine calcined clays, limestone and gypsum), demoulded after 24 h and
FQQ Fine Quartz fine Quartz fine cured by immersion in tap water in a storage tank at 20 28C.
a The workability of the blends was adjusted depending on the
The first letter accounts for the clinker, the second for the calcined
clay and the third for the limestone fineness, respectively. water demand of the binder with Dynamon SX-32, a non-
sulfonated acrylic polymer superplasticiser (SP). All the inter-
Table 2. Combinations of components studied mixed mixtures needed 0 .8 wt% SP (normalised by weight of
total cement) except mix FQQ with quartz, which did not require
548
Advances in Cement Research Effect of fineness in clinker-calcined clays-
Volume 27 Issue 9 limestone cements
Vizcaı́no Andrés, Antoni, Alujas Diaz,
Martirena Hernández and Scrivener
any superplasticiser. The compressive strengths were measured at it is a multi-component clay, containing around 90 wt% total
3, 7 and 28 d. between kaolinite, a 2:1 mixed clay and goethite; these are all
components that naturally have high surface area and only 10%
The pore structure of these samples at 28 d were characterised by quartz. It can be reasonably assumed that the quartz particles were
MIP with Porotec GmbH Pascal 140 and Pascal 440 instruments further ground during the extra grinding time, whereas the clays
up to a maximum pressure of 400 MPa. The samples were and goethite particles, already very fine, remain mostly the same
‘stopped’ and dried, by the same isopropanol exchange procedure according to the fact that the energy required to break a particle is
described above. Each measurement was repeated twice. The inversely proportional to its size.
measurements were carried out on 1 .5 g samples of paste
composed of several pieces of about 3 3 3 3 3 mm, broken using It is also noted that calcination does not bring a significant
pliers. change in the specific surface, since the BET surface of the raw
clay was 36 m2/g. This is again in accordance with previous
results, for example from Fernández et al. (2011), who have
Results
shown that full dehydroxylation of kaolinite is usually obtained
Study of particle size distribution and surfaces without significant decrease of the specific surface and no major
depending on grinding time change of PSD.
The key parameters of the PSDs measured by laser granulometry
(Dv10, Dv50 and Dv90) and specific surfaces measured by BET are Grinding the limestone brings the grain size Dv50% from 3 .42
given in Table 3. The extra grinding time decreases the Dv50 size down to 1 .05 ìm. Both coarse and fine limestone particles are
of all three components. Nominally the reduction factor for the smaller than the fine clinker grains. The grain size of the
clay is the largest (,53), then limestone (,33) and last clinker reference quartz is fine, with Dv50% of 3 .3 ìm.
(,1 .53); however, only the clinker component shows a signifi-
cant increase in the BET surface area. There are two likely The characteristics of the mixed blends were also investigated.
reasons for this. First the limestone, and certainly the clay, have a Table 4 gives the results for the FFF and the CFF blended
high tendency to form agglomerates with high internal surface combinations. There is little difference between the two; unex-
area, which may be broken up by grinding without a large change pectedly a slightly coarser distribution is observed for FFF. For
in measured particle size. Second the Dv10 of the clinker is still comparison, Table 5 presents the physical properties of the blends
rather large after 30 min grinding time at 2 .3 ìm, which is resulting from mixing, calculated by combining the PSD of each
reduced to 0 .4 after further grinding, whereas the Dv10 values for
the other two components do not change much.
In terms of the specific surface area in the blend, the calcined Combination BET: Dv10: Dv50: Dv90:
clays play a crucial role since this parameter is considerably denomination m2g1 ìm ìm ìm
higher for clay minerals related to the rest of the components, for
FFF 10 .4 0 .8 14 .6 65 .4
both grinding times. The specific surface area indeed only mar-
CFF 11 .8 0 .6 10 .3 46 .4
ginally increases with longer grinding; from 33 .3 to 35 .1 m2/g.
However, it decreases significantly the average diameter Dv50% Table 4. Measured specific surface and PSD for blends FFF and
from 10 .33 to 1 .85 ìm. Such a behaviour must be analysed in the CFF
light of the nature of this clay. As stated in the preceding section,
Fine Coarse
Clinker 1 .4 0 .3 0 .4 7 .2 38 .8 2 .3 17 .6 61 .7
Calcined clay 35 .1 33 .3 0 .2 1 .9 10 .7 0 .7 10 .3 53 .7
Limestone 8 .5 6 .0 0 .2 1 .1 7 .1 0 .3 3 .4 25 .2
Quartz 3 .4 — 0 .6 3 .3 11 .0 — — —
549
Advances in Cement Research Effect of fineness in clinker-calcined clays-
Volume 27 Issue 9 limestone cements
Vizcaı́no Andrés, Antoni, Alujas Diaz,
Martirena Hernández and Scrivener
Combination BET: Dv10: Dv50: Dv90: to completely disperse the blended cement and that the blended
denomination m2g1 ìm ìm ìm cement was significantly agglomerated. Furthermore, it seems
that the combination with the finest fraction tends to enhance the
FFF 12 .5 0 .3 3 .2 27 .4 agglomeration degree. The image of scanning electron micro-
CFF 11 .9 0 .4 6 .1 45 .2 scopy-secondary electrons mode (SEM-SE) in Figure 4 supports
this statement. To take the image, the anhydrate cement grains
Table 5. Calculated specific surface area and PSD for blends FFF were glued in a resin and observed under the SEM. The SEM
and CFF was set in ‘secondary electrons’ mode to study the morphology
of non-hydrated cement.
4
CFF
Frequency: %
FFF
3
0
0·01 0·1 1 10 100 1000
Size: μm Figure 4. SEM-SE picture from blended cement with all
(a) components fine (FFF)
6
5
FFF
CFF
60
Frequency: %
4 55·7
Compressive strength: MPa
CFF 48·1
3 50
FFF
2 39·3
40
34·6
1
30 26·5
0 20·5
0·01 0·1 1 10 100 1000 20
Size: μm
(b)
10
3 7 28
Figure 3. Comparison of the PSD obtained experimentally by laser Curing age: d
granulometry (on the top) and by calculation combining the
different PSD of each fraction (bottom). Each letter corresponds to Figure 5. Mechanical strength of mortar prisms to assess
coarse (C) and fine (F) fraction for clinker, calcined clay and influence of clinker size at 3, 7 and 28 d. CFF: coarse clinker;
limestone, in that order FFF: fine clinker
550
Advances in Cement Research Effect of fineness in clinker-calcined clays-
Volume 27 Issue 9 limestone cements
Vizcaı́no Andrés, Antoni, Alujas Diaz,
Martirena Hernández and Scrivener
Isothermal calorimetry 0 .4 ìm; in comparison with 2 .3 ìm for the coarser clinker. This
The isothermal calorimetry output for the pastes comparing fine early difference is responsible for most of the difference in
and coarse clinker is shown in Figure 6. The heat evolution cumulated heat, since the cumulated curves seem to be parallel
curves show that the hydration of the paste with the finer clinker after 24 h and the occurrence of the aluminate peak.
component is significantly accelerated compared to the coarse
fraction. The cumulative curves confirm the higher degree of Mercury intrusion porosimetry
hydration at 3 d. The difference in the heat of hydration is, The influence of clinker PSD on porosity at 28 d can be observed in
however, smaller than the difference in strength for the blends Figure 7, where cumulated porosity obtained by MIP is plotted as a
tested at the same age. This is most probably related to the fact function of the porosity size. With finer clinker PSD, the threshold
that percolation threshold and formation of long-range connectiv- porosity (first inflection point in the curve that is also acknow-
ity can be significantly affected by varying not only the total solid ledged as the point where the pores begin to percolate (Winslow et
volume present but also the initial size distribution and packing al., 1994)) and the total cumulated porosity are significantly
of particles, which is typically the case when using different reduced, corresponding to the higher degree of hydration.
PSDs.
Effect of fineness of calcined clays
When looking at the normalised heat evolution, it can be Compressive strength results
observed that with finer clinker the main hydration peak occurs The effect of calcined clay fineness on compressive strength is
earlier and stronger; there is an enhanced nucleation effect, given in Figure 8. At 3, 7 and 28 d, the strength is considerably
noticeable by the steeper slope of this peak. The nucleation of improved with finer calcined clay PSD in comparison with the
calcium–silicate–hydrate (C–S–H) is closely related to the surface coarser PSD. The improvement reaches 33% at 3 d and decreases
area (Costoya Fernández, 2008) and so is associated with the with curing time; nonetheless there is about 20% relative
presence of submicronic particles; the Dv10 values confirm this difference at 28 d.
point, since for the finer clinker the value is about 0 .4 ìm,
meaning that 10% of the particles have a diameter lower than In addition, the compressive strengths values of a system with
45% quartz, slightly coarser than calcined clay, are given for
140 comparison. This contributes to underline the high pozzolanicity
of the combined addition of this calcined clay from natural origin
Cumulative heat: J/g clinker
30
Cumulated porosity: %
5
25
4 FFF
20 CFF
3
15
2 FFF
CFF 10
1
5
0
0 24 48 0
Time: h 0·001 0·01 0·1 1 10 100
(b) Porosity: μm
Figure 6. Isothermal calorimetry of pastes to evaluate the Figure 7. Mercury intrusion porosimetry results at 28 d on mortars
influence of clinker: (a) cumulated heat; (b) heat evolution. for different clinker grinding times. CFF: coarse clinker; FFF: fine
CFF: coarse clinker; FFF: fine clinker; all other being equal clinker; all other being equal
551
Advances in Cement Research Effect of fineness in clinker-calcined clays-
Volume 27 Issue 9 limestone cements
Vizcaı́no Andrés, Antoni, Alujas Diaz,
Martirena Hernández and Scrivener
50 FCF 46·5 system with fine calcined clay than with coarser calcined clay;
FFF however, at 24 h the difference in the total heat release between
40 39·3
the two systems is small. From 24 h until 72 h, however, the
32·3 cumulated heat released by the blend with finer calcined clays is
30 29·0 higher than with coarser clay, and considerably higher than the
26·5
21·4
system with only quartz. This difference may be related to the
19·8
20 17·4 reaction of the calcined clay component and is consistent with
the increase of strength observed in mortars made with fine
10 calcined clay at 3 d in comparison with those made with coarse
3 7 28 calcined clay and the reference filler. XRD analyses have
Curing time: d
confirmed the formation of carboaluminates (see later).
Figure 8. Mechanical strength of mortar prisms to assess
influence of calcined clay. Each letter corresponds to coarse (C) Mercury intrusion porosimetry
and fine (F) fraction for clinker, calcined clay and limestone, in Figure 10 shows a comparison of the porosity and PSD between
that order; letter Q corresponds to quartz pastes made with blends of coarse and fine calcined clay. The
blend made with the fine calcined clay exhibits a considerably
higher pore refinement and a lower total porosity in comparison
with the blend made with coarse calcined clay. The pore
refinement could be caused by a combination of the effect of
improved particle packing produced by a much smaller PSD that
120
could fill up the gaps between clinker grains (Poon et al., 2001)
and the higher pozzolanic reaction of the clay seen by calorime-
Cumulative heat: J/g clinker
100 try. Finally, the threshold porosity is about ten times coarser for
the system containing 45% quartz filler and the total porosity is
80 also significantly increased, showing the link between the space
filling by the products of the pozzolanic reaction and the
60
consequent increase of the tortuosity and the improvement of the
40 compressive strength.
FQQ
20 FCF Effect of limestone fineness
FFF Compressive strength results
0 Compressive strength results at 3, 7 and 28 d for different
0 24 48 72 96
Time: hours limestone PSDs and the quartz filler for comparison are given in
(a) Figure 11. The finest limestone brings a significant increase at
6
40
Heat evolution: mW/g clinker
5
35
Cumulated porosity: %
4 30
FFF
25 FCF
3 FQQ
FQQ 20
2 FCF
FFF 15
1
10
0
0 24 48 5
Time: h 0
(b) 0·001 0·01 0·1 1 10 100
Porosity: μm
Figure 9. Isothermal calorimetry of pastes to evaluate the
influence of calcined clay: (a) cumulated heat; (b) heat evolution. Figure 10. Mercury intrusion porosimetry results at 28 d on
Each letter corresponds to coarse (C) and fine (F) fraction for mortars for different calcined clays’ grinding times. Each letter
clinker, calcined clay and limestone, in that order; letter Q corresponds to coarse (C) and fine (F) fraction for clinker, calcined
corresponds to quartz clay and limestone, in that order; letter Q corresponds to quartz
552
Advances in Cement Research Effect of fineness in clinker-calcined clays-
Volume 27 Issue 9 limestone cements
Vizcaı́no Andrés, Antoni, Alujas Diaz,
Martirena Hernández and Scrivener
60
55·055·7 in the slope of the heat of hydration curve at very early ages in
Compressive strength: MPa
FFQ 51·2 accordance with the literature, where it has been observed that
50 FFC fine limestone can enhance cement hydration by providing extra
FFF
40 38·3 39·3 nucleation sites for calcium–silicate–hydrates (Montanaro, 1988;
34·0 Sato and Diallo, 2010).
30 26·5
23·023·9 In limestone (for the range of particle size chosen in this study),
20 the predominant effect is nucleation until 24 h; later on, carbo-
nates react with the alumina in the system to form carboalumi-
10 nates (Matschei et al., 2007).
3 7 28
Curing time: d
Mercury intrusion porosimetry
Figure 11. Mechanical strength of mortar prisms to assess Figure 13 shows the cumulated porosity obtained by MIP as a
influence of limestone. Each letter corresponds to coarse (C) and function of the pore size for 28-d paste samples. A quartz filler
fine (F) fraction for clinker, calcined clay and limestone, in that (15%) was included as reference (FFQ) in the experiment in
order; letter Q corresponds to quartz order to assess the impact of the interaction between limestone
and calcined clay.
3 d in comparison with the coarser limestone, but the differences Limestone fineness has a relatively minor effect at 28 d, the
tend to level off with curing time and are not significant any coarser limestone giving slightly higher total cumulated porosity,
longer from 7 d onwards. The difference with the quartz filler, in accordance with the comparable compressive strengths ob-
however, is significant at all ages; the synergy obtained with tained for the corresponding systems at the same age. The total
combined addition of calcined clays with limestone brings a porosity is also reduced when using limestone.
strength enhancement of about 10–15% at all ages.
Discussion
Isothermal calorimetry results Despite the differences observed in terms of strength and
Figure 12 shows the isothermal calorimetry curves of the pastes porosity, the phase assemblages observed by differential thermo-
made with blends of coarse and fine limestone, and a reference gravimetric analysis and XRD are globally the same and, since
with inert quartz. The samples made with limestone both release the clay is too complex, it was not possible to carry out Rietveld
slightly higher heat than the sample made with quartz, which refinement to quantify precisely the variation of the phases. For
indicate some reaction, but this is small and hardly significant the sake of simplicity, the example of FFF at 3, 7 and 28 d is
because the amount of limestone reaction is low and also because given in Figure 14 and Figure 15 for differential thermogravi-
there are minor amounts of limestone in the clinker (Antoni et metric analysis and XRD, respectively). The phase assemblage
al., 2012). observed with natural clays is similar to the one observed with
pure metakaolin (Antoni et al., 2012). It is composed of
The blend made with finer limestone shows a moderate increase
35
6 30
Cumulated porosity: %
Heat evolution: mW/g clinker
25
5 FFF
20 FFC
4 FFQ
15
3
FFQ 10
2 FFC
5
FFF
1
0
0·001 0·01 0·1 1 10 100
0 Porosity: μm
0 24 48
Time: h
Figure 13. Mercury intrusion porosimetry results at 28 d on
Figure 12. Isothermal calorimetry of pastes to evaluate the mortars to assess effect of limestone particle size and differentiate
influence of calcium carbonate (top: cumulated heat; bottom: the filler effect from the effect of the chemical reactions. Each
heat evolution). Each letter corresponds to coarse (C) and fine (F) letter corresponds to coarse (C) and fine (F) fraction for clinker,
fraction for clinker, calcined clay and limestone, in that order; calcined clay and limestone, in that order; letter Q corresponds to
letter Q corresponds to quartz quartz
553
Advances in Cement Research Effect of fineness in clinker-calcined clays-
Volume 27 Issue 9 limestone cements
Vizcaı́no Andrés, Antoni, Alujas Diaz,
Martirena Hernández and Scrivener
⫺1·0 ⫻ 10⫺4
Derivative: 1/s
⫺1·5 ⫻ 10⫺4
⫺2·0 ⫻ 10⫺4
⫺2·5 ⫻ 10⫺4
⫺3·0 ⫻ 10⫺4
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Figure 14. Derivative of the TGA of blend with all of the fine
components (FFF) at 3, 7 and 28 d
Hemi-
carboaluminate Calcium
Mono- hydrate Calcium
Ettringite carboaluminate Ettringite Ettringite Quartz Ettringite Quartz carbonate
28d
7d
3d
5 10 15 20 25 30
2θ angle: degrees
554
Advances in Cement Research Effect of fineness in clinker-calcined clays-
Volume 27 Issue 9 limestone cements
Vizcaı́no Andrés, Antoni, Alujas Diaz,
Martirena Hernández and Scrivener
555
Advances in Cement Research Effect of fineness in clinker-calcined clays-
Volume 27 Issue 9 limestone cements
Vizcaı́no Andrés, Antoni, Alujas Diaz,
Martirena Hernández and Scrivener
Matschei T, Lothenbach B and Glasser FP (2007) The role of Research Record 2141: 61–67, http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/
calcium carbonate in cement hydration. Cement and Concrete 2141–11.
Research 37(4): 551–558, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ Schneider M, Romer M, Tschudin M and Bolio H (2011)
j.cemconres.2006.10.013. Sustainable cement production—present and future. Cement
Montanaro L (1988) Action de CaCO3 et CaSO4* 2H2O sur and Concrete Research 41(7): 642–650, http://dx.doi.org/
l’hydratation de C3S. Cement and Concrete Research 18(3): 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.019.
431–437. SDC (Swiss Development Agency) (2015) Limestone Calcined
Murat M and Comel C (1983) Hydration reaction and hardening Clay Cement LC3. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology,
of calcined clays and related minerals III. Influence of Lausanne, Switzerland. See https://www.lc3.ch (accessed
calcination process of kaolinite on mechanical strengths of 08/02/2015).
hardened metakaolinite. Cement and Concrete Research Siddique R and Klaus J (2009) Influence of metakaolin on the
13(5): 631–637. properties of mortar and concrete: A review. Applied Clay
Poon CS, Lam L, Kou SC, Wong YL and Wong R (2001) Rate of Science 43(3–4): 392–400.
pozzolanic reaction of metakaolin in high-performance Vizcaı́no L, Sánchez S, Pérez A et al. (2015) Industrial trial to
cement pastes. Cement and Concrete Research 31(9): 1301– produce low clinker, low carbon cement. Journal Materiales
1306. de Construcción, IETC, Spain 65(317): in press, http://
Sabir BB, Wild S and Bai J (2001) Metakaolin and calcined clays dx.doi.org/10.3989/mc.2015.00614.
as pozzolans for concrete: A review. Cement and Concrete Winslow DN, Cohen MD, Bentz DP, Snyder KA and Garboczi EJ
Composites 23(6): 441–454. (1994) Percolation and pore structure in mortars and
Sato T and Diallo F (2010) Seeding effect of nano nano- concrete. Cement and Concrete Research 24(1): 25–37, http://
CaCO3 on the hydration of tricalcium silicate. Transport dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/0008–8846(94)90079–5.
556
View publication stats