Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Jan 19B Edtech Presentation - Juanzo

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

EDUCATION

TECHNOLOGY
OBJECTIVES
At the end of this chapter, we should be able to:

1. Explain models of technology adoption.


2. Propose a model for technology adoption.
3. Highlight the pivotal role of educational technology in the
teaching and learning process.
MODELS OF TECHNOLOGY
ADOPTION
HOW HAS THE
ROLE OF
TECHNOLOGY
CHANGED?
HOW MAY
TECHNOLOGY BE
ADOPTED IN THE
CLASSROOM?
HAS THE ROLE OF
TEACHERS CHANGED,
TOO, AS A RESULT OF
TECHNOLOGY
INNOVATION? HOW?
MODELS OF TECHNOLOGY
ADOPTION THAT MAY BE
EMPLOYED IN THE CLASSROOM
EVOLUTION
The contemporary perspective
of educational technology
focuses on a learner’s active
construction of knowledge
and can reach all the way to
REORIENTATION the Evolution phase

INTEGRATION

The traditional perspective


of educational technology
focuses on either the
UTILIZATION
technology itself or a
teacher’s instruction and is
limited to the first three
phases Figure 1. A model of adoption of both
FAMILIARIZATION “idea” and “product” technologies in
education (Hooper and Rieber, 1997)
The phase where the educational system as a whole and
EVOLUTION educational technology in particular involves or changes to
become relevant and effective

The phase where the teacher rethinks about and reflects on


their instruction practices and the purpose of the classroom
REORIENTATION and channel their attention from teacher-centered learning to
student-centered learning

The conscious and constant use of technology in the


INTEGRATION classroom and that absence of it would deter and impede
instruction

The stage where the teacher tries out the technology in the
UTILIZATION classroom

FAMILIARIZATION The teacher’s initial encounter with technology


WILL TECHNOLOGY
BE MISUSED IF ONE
OF THE FIVE STAGES
IN THE MODEL IS
SKIPPED? WHY OR
WHY NOT?
OTHER MODEL OF TECHNOLOGY
ADOPTION as summarized by Toledo (2005)
ROGERS (1995) GLADHART (2001) ADOPTION RUSSELL (1996)
STAGE INNOVATION-DECISION RUBRIC FOR COMPUTER LEARNING TO USE
PROCESS TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY
1 Knowledge Entry Awareness
2 Persuasion Adoption Learning the process
3 Decision Adaptation Understanding and
application of the
process
4 Implementation Appropriation Adaptation to new
contexts
5 Orientation Invention Familiarity and
Confidence
6 Creative application to
new contexts
• Evidence of the integration of standards proficiencies for students indicated
SYSTEM-WIDE • Computer technology being imbedded into each of the teacher education
courses
INTEGRATION • Faculty and students enthusiasm for integration increases
• Further movement in the department toward providing the needed education
technology hardware, software, and systematic training for faculty success in
computer technology integration
EXPANSION • Strengthening of the relationships between the support personnel and the
faculty
• Presence of these relationships produce positive impact on the faculty levels of
use and integration
• Schools, college, and Department of Education begin to complete tasks that
enable them to infuse computer technology throughout the curriculum
DEVELOPMENT - acquisition of technical resources such as computers for faculty,
computer laboratories
- hiring of education technology faculty and specialists
- planning and implementation of new faculty development programs
• Change in support of leadership at the university, school, and/or departmental
levels
TRANSITION • Increased interest and vision for the use and integration of computer
technology filters down to the teacher educators
• Requirements of technology standards produces shift

• Lack of university leadership


PRE- • Few faculty using computer technology
• Stand-alone classes offered to meet credentialing requirements
INTEGRATION • Lack of infrastructure to provide funding, support, and resources
END ☺
THANK YOU FOR
LISTENING AND FOR
YOUR ACTIVE
PARTICIPATION

You might also like