Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 84 views

    In The Hon'Ble High Court of Delhi at Delhi

    Uploaded by

    madhav1100
    This document is a rejoinder filed by the petitioner in response to the reply filed by the respondent in an execution petition in the Honorable High Court of Delhi. It denies most of the contents of the respondent's reply and preliminary objections. It reiterates the contents and prayers made in the original petition and denies the calculations submitted by the respondent. It requests that the relief sought in the original petition be granted.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    In The Hon'Ble High Court of Delhi at Delhi

    Uploaded by

    madhav1100
    84 views5 pages
    This document is a rejoinder filed by the petitioner in response to the reply filed by the respondent in an execution petition in the Honorable High Court of Delhi. It denies most of the contents of the respondent's reply and preliminary objections. It reiterates the contents and prayers made in the original petition and denies the calculations submitted by the respondent. It requests that the relief sought in the original petition be granted.

    Original Title

    Ltd rejoinder

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a rejoinder filed by the petitioner in response to the reply filed by the respondent in an execution petition in the Honorable High Court of Delhi. It denies most of the contents of the respondent's reply and preliminary objections. It reiterates the contents and prayers made in the original petition and denies the calculations submitted by the respondent. It requests that the relief sought in the original petition be granted.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    84 views5 pages

    In The Hon'Ble High Court of Delhi at Delhi

    Uploaded by

    madhav1100
    This document is a rejoinder filed by the petitioner in response to the reply filed by the respondent in an execution petition in the Honorable High Court of Delhi. It denies most of the contents of the respondent's reply and preliminary objections. It reiterates the contents and prayers made in the original petition and denies the calculations submitted by the respondent. It requests that the relief sought in the original petition be granted.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 5

    IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT DELHI

    C.M.(M) NO…………………… OF 2018


    IN
    EXECUTION PETITION NO 164/2017

    IN THE MATTER OF:


    M/s S&S Technocrate (P) Ltd ……….Petitioner

    Versus
    Shri Rathi Steel Ltd …………Respondent

    REJOINDER ON BEHALF OF PETITINER TO THE REPLY


    FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1.

    MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:-

    Preliminary submissions:
    1. It is at the outset humbly submitted that Decree Holder has

    filed a 7 page reply which does not contain any specific

    reasoning for the payment. The DDA has to be impleaded, in

    order to, avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

    REPLY TO PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS:-


    2. That the contents of Para No.1 to 3 of preliminary objection

    of the Reply are absolutely wrong and hence the same are

    vehemently denied. It is specifically denied that no cause or

    occasion for the Applicant to file the present application, the

    present application is gross abuse misuse of the process of

    law. hence the application of the applicant is liable to be

    dismissed.

    REJOINDER TO THE PARAWISE REPLY:


    1. That the contents of para 1 to 7 of the para wise reply so

    far as it does not admit of the contents of corresponding

    para of the application are wrong and denied and the

    contents of corresponding para of the application are re-

    asserted and reiterated.

    2. That the contents of Para No. 8 of the para wise reply is

    absolutely wrong and hence the same are vehemently

    denied. It is submitted that the calculation sheet

    submitted by the respondent is wrong and hence merit no

    response.

    3. That the contents of para 9 of the para wise reply so far

    as it does not admit of the contents of corresponding para


    of the application are wrong and denied and the contents

    of corresponding para of the application are re-asserted

    and reiterated.

    REJOINDER TO REPLY TO THE GROUNDS:


    1. That the contents of para A of the grounds so far as it

    does not admit of the contents of corresponding para of

    the application are wrong and denied and the contents

    of corresponding para of the application are re-asserted

    and reiterated.

    2. That the contents of para B of the grounds so far as it

    does not admit of the contents of corresponding para of

    the application are wrong and denied and the contents

    of corresponding para of the application are re-asserted

    and reiterated.

    3. That the contents of para C of the grounds so far as it

    does not admit of the contents of corresponding para of

    the application are wrong and denied and the contents

    of corresponding para of the application are re-asserted

    and reiterated.

    4. That the contents of para D of the grounds so far as it

    does not admit of the contents of corresponding para of


    the application are wrong and denied and the contents

    of corresponding para of the application are re-asserted

    and reiterated.

    5. That the contents of para E to F of the grounds so far as

    it does not admit of the contents of corresponding para

    of the application are wrong and denied and the

    contents of corresponding para of the application are

    re-asserted and reiterated

    6. That the contents of para G to I of the grounds so far as

    it does not admit of the contents of corresponding para

    of the application are wrong and denied and the

    contents of corresponding para of the application are

    re-asserted and reiterated.

    7. That the contents of para J of the grounds so far as it

    does not admit of the contents of corresponding para of

    the application are wrong and denied and the contents

    of corresponding para of the application are re-asserted

    and reiterated.

    8. That the contents of para 10 to 12 of the grounds so far

    as it does not admit of the contents of corresponding

    para of the application are wrong and denied and the


    contents of corresponding para of the application are

    re-asserted and reiterated.

    9. That the contents of reply to Prayer clause are

    absolutely wrong and hence the same are vehemently

    denied. On the contrary it is respectfully submitted that

    the prayer made in the corresponding prayer clause of

    the complaint are reiterated as correct.

    PRAYER

    Last Para of the reply is a prayer to this Hon’ble

    Court which merits no consideration. On the

    contrary the complainant prays before this Hon’ble

    Court that the relief prayed in the complaint may

    kindly be granted in favour of the complainant and

    against the opposite party.

    New Delhi Petitiner through

    Counsels

    Filed on:

    You might also like