‫‪No.

F-14-AAA-0000‬‬

‫ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻬﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ‬

‫ﻫﺪﻑ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ‬

‫ﻣﻬﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﺑﻼﺩﻱ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﻼ ﺍﺻﻼﻥﭘﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺭﻩ ﺷﺎﻳﮕﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﻣﻴﺜﻢ ﻧﺠﻔﻲ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺳﺒﻮﺣﻲ‪ ،‬ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ﺯﻳﻨﺎﻟﻲ‬
‫ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻬﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﻓﻨﻲ‬ ‫ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ‬
‫ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻬﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﻣﻮﻧﻨﻜﻮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫ﭼﻜﻴﺪﻩ — ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ‬

‫‪ .1‬ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ‬ ‫ﺩﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﻓﻨﻲ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺑﻬﺮﻫﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ‬
‫ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ‪ ،‬ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ‪ ،‬ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻭ ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺖ‬ ‫ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ‪ ،‬ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ‬
‫ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻋﻤﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ‬ ‫ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻓﻨﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ‬
‫ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻨﺎﻣﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻫﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺑﻬﻢ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﮕﻲ‬ ‫ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ژﻧﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻭ … ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ‬ ‫ﺯﻳﺎﻥﺑﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ‪ .‬ﻣﺴﺄﻟﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ‬
‫ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻫﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ‬ ‫ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺑﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﻳﻞ‬
‫ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ‪ ،‬ﻳﺎ ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﻲ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮﻱ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺰﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎً ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮﻱ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻭ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ‬
‫ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻱ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺮﻫﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ‬
‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻬﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭ‬
‫ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻳﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺳﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ‬
‫ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ‪ N-1‬ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ‬
‫ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪ ، PV‬ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪ QV‬ﻭ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ‬
‫ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ‪ ،‬ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‪ ،‬ﻣﺤﻞ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺐ‪،‬‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻤﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ‬
‫‪،DIgSILENT‬‬ ‫ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻓﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ‬
‫ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺮﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ‬
‫‪ DSATOOLS‬ﻭ ‪ MATLAB‬ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺒﻴﻪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ‬
‫ﺍﺯﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ )ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ‪ (2‬ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻟﻲ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻً ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ‬
‫ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺯ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ‬ ‫ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ — ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ؛ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ؛ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪PV‬؛‬
‫ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺘﻲ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ‬ ‫ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪QV‬؛ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻫﺪﻑ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺷﻮﺩ‪.‬‬
 ‫ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻕ – ‪ 1393‬ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫ﻣﺴﺄﻟﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺑﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ‬
‫ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﻳﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ‬
‫ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﻳﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ‬
‫ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺗﺎ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ‬
‫ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺣﺎﺋﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ]‪ [1‬ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪ PV‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ :1‬ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ‪ PV‬ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ‬
‫ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺯﺍﻧﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ‬
‫ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﺭ )ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ( ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ‬ ‫ﺭﻭﺷﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ‬

‫ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ‪ P-V‬ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ‬ ‫ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪ PV‬ﻭ ‪ ،[1] QV‬ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ]‪ ،[2‬ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ]‪ [3‬ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ‬

‫ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺳﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ ،‬ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ‬ ‫]‪ [5‬ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺵ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻣﻲ‬ ‫ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ]‪ [4‬ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ‬

‫ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ‬

‫ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ‪ .‬ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷﺪﻫﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ]‪ [6‬ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬

‫ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ 1‬ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬

‫‪ .2‬ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪PV‬‬
‫ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ :1‬ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ]‪[7‬‬
‫ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ‪ ،‬ﺭﻭﺵ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ‪-‬‬
‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ‪N-2‬‬ ‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ‪N-1‬‬ ‫ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ‬
‫ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ) ‪ (PV‬ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯ‬
‫‪% 2/5‬‬ ‫‪%5‬‬ ‫‪%5‬‬ ‫ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ‬
‫ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ‪ P‬ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ‪ PV‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻭ‬
‫ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﻭ ‪ V‬ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺷﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ‬
‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ‬ ‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻟﻲ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠﻲ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ‬
‫‪ .3‬ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪QV‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ژﻧﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺷﻬﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻭﺳﻴﻊ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻬﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻴﻴﺎﺑﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ‬
‫ﮔﻴﺮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺷﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ) ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪(QV‬‬ ‫ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ‬
‫ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺭﻭﺵ ‪ PV‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺷﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ 2‬ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲﻫﺎﻱ ‪ QV‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ‬
‫ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ‪ .‬ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻖ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ‬
‫ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ‬
‫ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻴﻴﺎﺑﺪ‪ ،‬ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﺷﺪ‪.‬‬
‫‪ N-2‬ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﻬﺮﻫﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬ ‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ‪ N-1‬ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺘﻤﻞ‬
‫ﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ‬ ‫ﺷﻴﺐ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ‬
‫ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺻﻔﺮ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﻫﺮ‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ 1‬ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ‪ PV‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ﺭﺳﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ‬
‫ﭼﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ )ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻲ(‪ ،‬ﻧﻘﻄﻪ‬
‫ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ‪ .‬ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲﻫﺎﻱ ‪ QV‬ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺭﺍ‬

‫‪2‬‬
 ‫ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻕ – ‪ 1393‬ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫ﺟﻬﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ‪ .‬ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ‬
‫ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ‬
‫ﺁﻥ ﺷﻴﻦ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻞ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ‪.‬‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ :3‬ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻴﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ :2‬ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ‪ QV‬ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ‬
‫‪ .4‬ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ‬ ‫ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ‪ QV‬ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﻓﻘﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ‬

‫ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺷﺒﻜﻬﻬﺎﻱ‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻘﻄﻬﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ‬

‫ﻗﺪﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺲ ژﺍﻛﻮﺑﻴﻦ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻴﺒﺮﺩ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺯﻳﻨﻲ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﻓﻘﻲ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﻴﻦ‬

‫ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﻴﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺷﺒﻜﻬﻬﺎﻱ‬ ‫ﻣﻴﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ‬

‫ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻡ‬ ‫ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ‪ ، PV‬ﻣﻴﺒﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺑﺪﻳﻦ‬
‫ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ‬
‫ﮔﺮﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ‬
‫ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫‪ 5‬ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻱ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻣﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ‪.‬‬

‫ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ 3‬ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ‪ QV‬ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪،‬‬
‫‪ .4.1‬ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ‬ ‫ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ‪ QV‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻴﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ‪ N-1‬ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ‪a‬‬

‫ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ‬ ‫ﻣﮕﺎﻭﺍﺭﻱ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ‪ ،‬ﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺳﭙﺲ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ‪ %5‬ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ‪ QV‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ‪-‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ‪ ،‬ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﻓﺮﺽ‬ ‫ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ‪ N-1‬ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ‬
‫ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺧﻄﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ‪:‬‬ ‫ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ‪ b‬ﻣﮕﺎﻭﺍﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻲ ‪-‬‬
‫‪ c‬ﻣﮕﺎﻭﺍﺭ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ‬
‫‪ ∆P   J Pθ‬‬ ‫‪J PV   ∆θ ‬‬ ‫ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ‬
‫)‪(1‬‬
‫‪∆Q  =  J‬‬ ‫‪J QV  ∆V ‬‬ ‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺷﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ‬
‫‪‬‬ ‫‪  Qθ‬‬
‫ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ‪ V-Q‬ﺑﺎ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ‪ P‬ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ‬
‫ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻴﮕﺮﺩﺩ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺽ‬
‫‪ ∆P = 0‬ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ‪:‬‬

‫(‬ ‫)‬
‫‪∆Q = J QV − J Qθ J P−1θ J PV ∆V = J R ∆V‬‬ ‫)‪(2‬‬

‫‪3‬‬
 ‫ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻕ – ‪ 1393‬ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫ﺷﻮﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ )ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ‬ ‫ﻳﻚ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺪ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﻣﻲ‬ ‫‪∆V = J R−1∆Q‬‬ ‫)‪(3‬‬

‫ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ( ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ‬
‫ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫‪ J R‬ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺲ ژﺍﻛﻮﺑﻴﻦ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﻄﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ‬ ‫‪R‬‬ ‫‪R‬‬

‫ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﻲ ‪-‬‬ ‫ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺧﻄﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‬
‫ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻛﻪ‬ ‫ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺲ ‪ J R‬ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ‬
‫‪R‬‬ ‫‪R‬‬

‫ﺣﺎﻭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻡ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺯﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ‪:‬‬
‫ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻣﻴﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺳﺮﻱ‬
‫‪J R = ΦΛΓ‬‬ ‫)‪(4‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ‪:‬‬
‫‪ = Φ‬ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺲ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ‬
‫‪ .4.2‬ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎ‬ ‫‪ = Γ‬ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺲ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﭼﭗ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺷﻴﻦ ‪ ‌k‬ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺩ ‪ i‬ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪:‬‬ ‫‪ = Λ‬ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺲ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ‬
‫ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ‪:‬‬
‫‪Pki = Φ ik γ ki‬‬ ‫)‪(9‬‬
‫‪∆V = ΦΛ−1Γ∆Q‬‬ ‫)‪(5‬‬
‫‪ Φ ik , γ ki‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻋﻀﻮ ‪k‬ﺍﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭ‬
‫ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﭼﭗ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ‪ i‬ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ‬ ‫‪Γ∆V = Λ−1Γ∆Q‬‬ ‫)‪(6‬‬
‫ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ‬
‫ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻮﺩ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ‬
‫‪∆v = Λ−1∆q‬‬ ‫)‪(7‬‬
‫‪ DSATools‬ﻗﺎﺑﻞ‬ ‫ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻓﺰﺍﺭ‬
‫ﺍﺱﺗﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪.‬‬
‫‪1‬‬
‫= ‪∆vi‬‬ ‫‪∆q‬‬ ‫)‪(8‬‬
‫ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ‬ ‫‪λi i‬‬
‫ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ‬
‫ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺘﻲ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎ‪،‬‬ ‫‪ ∆v, ∆q‬ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ‬ ‫ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻨﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ‪ i‬ﺍﻡ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ‪ 8‬ﻣﺸﺨﺺ‬
‫ﺑﺎ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ‬ ‫ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻮﺩ ‪i‬ﺍﻡ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻮﺩ ‪i‬ﺍﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ‬
‫ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺷﻴﻦ ﻫﺎ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﭘﻴﺸﮓﻳﺮﺍﻧﻪ‬ ‫ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪.‬‬
‫)ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺭﻳﺰﺵ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺑﺰﺭگ( ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ‬ ‫ﺍﮔﺮ ‪ λi > 0‬ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ ،‬ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻮﺩ ‪i‬ﺍﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻭ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻫﻤﺴﻮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ‬
‫ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ‪ λi‬ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻮﺩ ‪i‬ﺍﻡ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺭﺍ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ‪ λi .‬ﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻛﻢ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ‬
‫‪ .4.3‬ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ‬ ‫ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ‪ λi‬ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻣﻮﺩ ‪i‬ﺍﻡ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯ‬
‫ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﻮﺩ ‪i‬ﺍﻡ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻫﺮﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ‪ λi‬ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺻﻔﺮ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ‪ ،‬ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ‬
‫ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﻮﺩ ‪i‬ﺍﻡ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ‬ ‫ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺑﻪ‬
‫ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ‪:‬‬ ‫ﻣﺮﺯ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲ ﺭﺳﺪ‪ .‬ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ‬
‫ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺮ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ‬

‫‪4‬‬
 ‫ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻕ – ‪ 1393‬ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫ﺁﻧﺠﺎﺋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ‬ ‫‪∆Q (i ) = Φ i‬‬ ‫)‪(10‬‬
‫ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ‪ ،‬ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺷﺎﺧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺴﺰﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻟﻴﺰﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ‬
‫ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻦ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺷﺎﺧﻬﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﭘﺨﺶ‬ ‫ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ‪ 11‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ‪ ،‬ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﺒﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺷﺎﺧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻱ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ‪ ،‬ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ‬ ‫‪∑Φ‬‬ ‫‪j‬‬
‫‪2‬‬
‫‪ji‬‬ ‫‪=1‬‬ ‫)‪(11‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻣﻮﺩ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ‬
‫ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻭ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ‬ ‫ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﻲ‬
‫ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻴﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﻱ‬
‫ﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ‪:‬‬
‫ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻣﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪.‬‬

‫‪1‬‬
‫‪ .4.4‬ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ‬ ‫= ) ‪∆V (i‬‬ ‫) ‪∆Q (i‬‬ ‫)‪(12‬‬
‫‪λi‬‬
‫ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ‬
‫ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻭ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﻣﺘﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ‬
‫) ‪∆θ (i ) = − J p−θ1 J PV ∆V (i‬‬ ‫)‪(13‬‬
‫ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ‬
‫ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪ ژﻧﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻘﻲ ﺑﺎﺱ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺲ ژﺍﻛﻮﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻓﺰﺍﺭ‬
‫‪ 17‬ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪﻩ‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ‬ ‫ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻦ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻭ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ‬ ‫)‪ DSATools (VSAT‬ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﺎ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‪ ،‬ﻫﺮ ژﻧﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﺴﻔﻮﺭﻣﺎﺗﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﻦ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻃﺮﻑ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﺮ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ‪ ،‬ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺗﻠﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ‬
‫‪ HV‬ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ ،‬ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻴﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻘﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪ‬ ‫‪ 14‬ﺣﺎﺻﻞ‬ ‫ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ‪ .‬ﺗﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ‬
‫ژﻧﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ‪ 18‬ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ‪ 19‬ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺿﺮﻳﺐ‬ ‫ﻣﻴﮕﺮﺩﺩ‪ .‬ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻫﺮ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ‬
‫ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ژﻧﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ ‪m‬ﺍﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪ ‪i‬ﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ‪ 20‬ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪:‬‬ ‫)‪ (15-1‬ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻭ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﺑﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ‬
‫ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ‪ δ i ، V j ، Vi‬ﻭ ‪ δ j‬ﺍﺯ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ‬
‫‪n‬‬
‫) ‪Qm = ∑VmV j Υmj sin(δ m − δ j − θ mj‬‬ ‫)‪(17‬‬ ‫ﻣﻴﺂﻳﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ‪ j‬ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺩ ‪ i‬ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ‪ Pij‬ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
‫‪j =1‬‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪ ،‬ﺍﺯ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ‪ j‬ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻛﺰﻳﻤﻢ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻠﻔﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﺷﺎﺧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ‪.‬‬
‫) ‪Qm = VmV j Υmj sin(δ m − δ j − θ mj‬‬ ‫)‪(18‬‬

‫[‬ ‫]‬
‫)‪Qloss.in.ij = Vi 2 + V j2 − 2ViV j cos(δ j − δ i ) ⋅ (−image(Υij )) (14‬‬
‫‪∆Q m = V j Υmj sin(δ m − δ j − θ mj ) ⋅ ∆V m‬‬
‫‪+ V m Υmj sin(δ m − δ j − θ mj ) ⋅ ∆V j‬‬ ‫)‪(19‬‬ ‫= ‪∆Qloss.in.ij‬‬
‫)‪(15‬‬
‫‪+ V mV j Υmj cos(δ m − δ j − θ mj ) ⋅ ∆δ m‬‬ ‫[‬ ‫]‬ ‫[‬ ‫]‬
‫‪ 2Vi − 2V j cos(δ j − δ i ) ⋅ ∆Vi + 2V j − 2Vi cos(δ j − δ i ) ⋅ ∆V j ‬‬
‫) ) ‪ ⋅ (− image(Υij‬‬
‫‪− V mV j Υmj cos(δ m − δ j − θ mj ) ⋅ ∆δ j‬‬
‫‪‬‬
‫[‬ ‫]‬ ‫[‬ ‫]‬
‫‪− 2ViV j sin(δ j − δ i ) ⋅ ∆δ i + 2ViV j sin(δ j − δ i ) ⋅ ∆δ j‬‬ ‫‪‬‬

‫‪∆Qm‬‬ ‫‪∆Qloss.in. j‬‬

‫= ‪Pim‬‬ ‫)‪(20‬‬ ‫= ‪Pij‬‬ ‫)‪(16‬‬
‫‪max(∆Q‬‬ ‫)‬ ‫) ‪max(∆Qloss‬‬

‫ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ژﻧﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻴﻦ‬ ‫ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺿﺮﺍﻳﺐ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ‬
‫ژﻧﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﻤﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ‬ ‫ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻲ‪ ،‬ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ‬
‫ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ‪ .‬ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ژﻧﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ‬

‫‪5‬‬
 ‫ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻕ – ‪ 1393‬ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ‬
‫‪ .6‬ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ‬
‫ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ 5‬ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ‬ ‫ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻣﻴﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺳﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ‬
‫ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺳﻬﺎ‪،‬‬
‫‪ PV‬ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ‬ ‫ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ‬
‫ﺷﺎﺧﻬﻬﺎ ﻭ ژﻧﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﻧﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ )ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ (1‬ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻴﮕﺮﺩﺩ‪.‬‬

‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻫﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ‬
‫‪ .5‬ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ‬
‫ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺷﻴﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ‬
‫ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻬﺎﻧﺪ‪ ،‬ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ‪ ،‬ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ‬

‫ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﻧﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻣﺪﻟﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ‬
‫‪1392‬‬ ‫ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺻﺤﺘﺴﻨﺠﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻬﺮﻫﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﭘﻴﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ‬
‫ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻭ ﺷﻴﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ‬
‫ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻮﺑﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ )ﺳﻄﻮﺡ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ‪ kV 230‬ﻭ ‪ (400‬ﻭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﻱ‬
‫ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ‪ ،‬ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﻴﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺐ‬
‫ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ )ﺗﺎ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ‪ kV 33‬ﻭ ‪ (11‬ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ‪ ،‬ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪ QV‬ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ‬
‫ﺑﺮﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻓﻴﻤﺎﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ‪ 5‬ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻱ‬
‫ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻴﮕﺮﺩﺩ‪ .‬ﺳﭙﺲ ﻣﺠﺪﺩﺍ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ‬
‫ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺎ‬ ‫ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ‪ ،‬ﺻﺤﺖ ﺳﻨﺠﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﺪﻟﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﻚ‬

‫ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻴﻴﺎﺑﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺳﺎﻝ ‪ 92‬ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ‪ ،‬ﺳﭙﺲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‪ ،‬ﻃﺒﻖ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻬﺎﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻳﻘﻴﻦ‬
‫ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ ‪ 94‬ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺷﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻓﻖ ﺳﺎﻝ ‪ 94‬ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺣﻬﺎ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻃﺮﺣﻬﺎﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻫﻲ‪ ،‬ﭘﺴﺖ ‌ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺳﻄﻮﺡ‬
‫‪ .7‬ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻮﻕ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ 4‬ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ‬
‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺂﺑﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ‬ ‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻓﺰﺍﺭ ‪ DIgSILENT‬ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ‬
‫ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭ ‪ PV‬ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 6‬ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ‬
‫ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪ PV‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ 2‬ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ‬
‫ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‪،‬‬
‫‪ % 9/8‬ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻴﺮﺳﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻨﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ‬
‫ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻣﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺳﻪ‬
‫‪132 kV‬‬ ‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ‪ 2 ،1‬ﻭ ‪ 5‬ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻳﻨﮓ‬
‫ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺷﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺠﺪﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬

‫ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ :4‬ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ‬

‫‪6‬‬
 ‫ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻕ – ‪ 1393‬ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ :2‬ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ‪N-1‬‬

‫ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ )‪(%‬‬ ‫ﺳﻄﺢ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ‬ ‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ‪N-1‬‬
‫‪0/66‬‬ ‫‪132‬‬ ‫ﺍﻳﺬﻩ – ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ‬ ‫‪1‬‬
‫‪2/94‬‬ ‫‪132‬‬ ‫ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ‪ -‬ﺳﻮﺳﻦ‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫‪3/6‬‬ ‫‪132‬‬ ‫ﻣﺎﻫﺸﻬﺮ – ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ‬ ‫‪3‬‬
‫‪3/77‬‬ ‫‪132‬‬ ‫ﺷﻮﺷﺘﺮ ‪ -‬ﺩژﭘﻞ‬ ‫‪4‬‬
‫‪4/73‬‬ ‫‪132‬‬ ‫ﺍﻳﺬﻩ ‪ -‬ﺑﺎﻏﻤﻠﻚ‬ ‫‪5‬‬
‫‪5/83‬‬ ‫‪230‬‬ ‫ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻳﻪ‪ - 1‬ﻣﺎﺭﻭﻥ‬ ‫‪6‬‬
‫‪6/1‬‬ ‫‪400‬‬ ‫ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ – ﻛﺎﺭﻭﻥ‪3‬‬ ‫‪7‬‬

‫ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ :3‬ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ‪N-2‬‬

‫ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ )‪(%‬‬ ‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ‪N-2‬‬
‫‪3/4‬‬ ‫ﺩﻭ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ‬ ‫‪1‬‬
‫‪4/3‬‬ ‫ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﺴﻔﻮﺭﻣﺎﺗﻮﺭ ‪ 400/230‬ﭘﺴﺖ‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ ‪ 2‬ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺧﺎﺯﻧﻲ‬
‫‪9/3‬‬ ‫ﺩﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﺴﻔﻮﺭﻣﺎﺗﻮﺭ ‪ 400/230‬ﭘﺴﺖ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻳﻪ ‪1‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬

‫ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ‪ ،‬ﻣﻴﺒﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺷﻴﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ ﺷﻴﻦ ‪-‬‬
‫ﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ 4‬ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ‪ ،‬ﺷﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻏﻤﻠﻚ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ‬ ‫ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ :5‬ﻓﻠﻮﭼﺎﺭﺕ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ‬
‫ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ﻣﻴﺒﺎﺷﺪ‪.‬‬

‫ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ :4‬ﺷﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻭ ژﻧﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ‬

‫)ﺍﻳﺬﻩ – ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ(‬
‫ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ‬ ‫ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﻡ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ‬ ‫ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺱ‬
‫‪1‬‬ ‫ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫ﻣﺎﺭﻭﻥ ‪ -‬ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ ‪2‬‬ ‫‪0.49‬‬ ‫ﺑﺎﻍ ﻣﻠﻚ‬
‫‪0.78‬‬ ‫ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ‬ ‫‪0.91‬‬ ‫ﻣﺎﺭﻭﻥ ‪ -‬ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻳﻪ ‪1‬‬ ‫‪0.42‬‬ ‫ﺍﻳﺬﻩ‬
‫‪0.51‬‬ ‫ﺯﺭﮔﺎﻥ‬ ‫‪0.24‬‬ ‫ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ ‪ -‬ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ ‪2‬‬ ‫‪0.39‬‬ ‫ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻭﻭﺩ‬
‫‪0.38‬‬ ‫ﻛﺮﺧﻪ‬ ‫‪0.22‬‬ ‫ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺱ – ﻛﺎﺭﻭﻥ ‪3‬‬ ‫‪0.34‬‬ ‫ﺳﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﻥ‬
‫‪0.31‬‬ ‫ﻣﺎﺭﻭﻥ‬ ‫‪0.16‬‬ ‫ﺷﻮﺷﺘﺮ – ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺱ‬ ‫ﺳﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ‪0.26‬‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ :6‬ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭ ‪ PV‬ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ‬

‫ﺑﺎ ﺭﺳﻢ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻴﻬﺎﻱ ‪ QV‬ﺩﺭ ﺷﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻏﻤﻠﻚ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ﻭ‬ ‫ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ‪ N-2‬ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ‬
‫ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ‪ % 5‬ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ‬ ‫‪ % 2/5‬ﺑﺮﺍﻱ‬ ‫ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ 3‬ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ‬
‫ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ‪ ، N-2‬ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ‪.‬‬

‫‪7‬‬
 ‫ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻛﺘﻴﻮ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻕ – ‪ 1393‬ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‬

‫‪ .8‬ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻬﮕﻴﺮﻱ‬ ‫‪250‬‬

‫‪200‬‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺷﻲ‬ ‫ب شيازفا ‪ + 5%‬دماشيپ‬
‫را‬
‫ﻣﺮﻛﺐ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪ ،PV‬ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ‪ QV‬ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ‬

‫)‪Reactive Power (Mvar‬‬

‫‪150‬‬

‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺷﻴﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ‬

‫‪100‬‬
‫ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ‪ ،‬ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺳﭙﺲ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ‬ ‫‪50‬‬
‫يزاسناربج‬ ‫دماشيپ‬
‫ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻤﺎﺕ‬ ‫زاين دروم‬
‫‪0‬‬
‫ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻣﻴﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ‪.‬‬
‫‪-50‬‬ ‫لامرن‬
‫ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ‬
‫‪-100‬‬
‫‪0.7‬‬ ‫‪0.8‬‬ ‫‪0.9‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪1.1‬‬
‫]‪[1‬‬ ‫‪B. Gao: “Voltage stability evaluation using modal analysis”, in‬‬ ‫)‪Voltage (p.u‬‬
‫‪Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 1529-1542,‬‬
‫‪November 1992.‬‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ ‪ :7‬ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ‪ QV‬ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻏﻤﻠﻚ‬
‫]‪[2‬‬ ‫‪P. Kundur, “Power System Stability and Control”, ISBN 0-07-035958-‬‬
‫‪X, McGraw-Hill, 1994.‬‬ ‫‪ 92 MVAR‬ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ‬ ‫ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ‬
‫]‪[3‬‬ ‫‪N. Flatabo: “Voltage stability condition in a power transmission system‬‬
‫‪calculated by sensitivity methods”, in IEEE Transaction on Power‬‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺐ‬
‫‪Systems, Vol. 5, No. 4, p.1286-1295, November 1990.‬‬
‫ﺩﺭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ 5‬ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻴﻦ‬
‫]‪[4‬‬ ‫‪P.A. Lof: “Voltage stability indices for stressed power systems”, in‬‬
‫‪IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, Vol. 8, No. 1, p. 326-335,‬‬ ‫ﺑﺎﻏﻤﻠﻚ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻭ‬
‫‪February 1993.‬‬
‫]‪[5‬‬ ‫‪C.A. Canizares: “Basic theoretical concept, Chapter 5 Voltage stability‬‬ ‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ‪ ،‬ﺑﻴﺘﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬
‫‪indices”, in IEEE Power Engineering Society, August 2004.‬‬
‫]‪[6‬‬ ‫‪V. Balamourougan: “Technique for online prediction of voltage‬‬ ‫ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ :5‬ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻏﻤﻠﻚ‬
‫‪collapse”, in IEE Procedure on Generation, Transmission and‬‬
‫‪Distribution, Vol.151, No. 4, p. 453-460, July 2004.‬‬ ‫ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ )‪(%‬‬ ‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ‬
‫]‪[7‬‬ ‫‪Voltage Stability Criteria, Undervoltage Load Shedding Strategy, and‬‬
‫‪3/87‬‬ ‫ﻣﺎﻫﺸﻬﺮ – ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ‬ ‫‪1‬‬
‫‪Reactive Power Reserve Monitoring Methodology Final Report,‬‬
‫‪Reactive Power Reserve Work Group (RRWG) - Technical Studies‬‬ ‫‪4/26‬‬ ‫ﺷﻮﺷﺘﺮ ‪ -‬ﺩژﭘﻞ‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫‪Subcommittee Western Electricity Coordinating Council, May 1998‬‬
‫‪6/17‬‬ ‫ﺍﻳﺬﻩ – ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ‬ ‫‪3‬‬
‫‪7/58‬‬ ‫ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ‪ -‬ﺳﻮﺳﻦ‬ ‫‪4‬‬
‫‪10/42‬‬ ‫ﺍﻳﺬﻩ ‪ -‬ﺑﺎﻏﻤﻠﻚ‬ ‫‪5‬‬

‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ‪ QV‬ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ﻣﺎﻫﺸﻬﺮ‪ -‬ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ‬
‫ﺷﻮﺷﺘﺮ‪ -‬ﺩژﭘﻞ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ‪ 6‬ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ‬
‫ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻫﻤﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ‬
‫ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻟﺘﺎژ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ‪.‬‬

‫ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ‬ ‫ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ‬ ‫ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ‬ ‫ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪ ‪N-1‬‬

‫)ﺩژﭘﻞ(‬ ‫)ﻣﺪﻧﻲ(‬ ‫)ﺑﺎﻏﻤﻠﻚ(‬ ‫ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ‬
‫‪20‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬ ‫‪92‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ )‪(MVAR‬‬
‫‪6/35‬‬ ‫‪6/25‬‬ ‫‪6/17‬‬ ‫‪0/66‬‬ ‫ﺍﻳﺬﻩ – ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ‬ ‫‪1‬‬
‫‪7/78‬‬ ‫‪7/61‬‬ ‫‪7/58‬‬ ‫‪2/94‬‬ ‫ﻣﺴﺠﺪ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ‪ -‬ﺳﻮﺳﻦ‬ ‫‪2‬‬
‫‪6/24‬‬ ‫‪6/20‬‬ ‫‪3/87‬‬ ‫‪3/6‬‬ ‫ﻣﺎﻫﺸﻬﺮ – ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ‬ ‫‪3‬‬
‫‪6/41‬‬ ‫‪4/30‬‬ ‫‪4/26‬‬ ‫‪3/77‬‬ ‫ﺷﻮﺷﺘﺮ ‪ -‬ﺩژﭘﻞ‬ ‫‪4‬‬
‫‪10/67‬‬ ‫‪10/47‬‬ ‫‪10/42‬‬ ‫‪4/73‬‬ ‫ﺍﻳﺬﻩ ‪ -‬ﺑﺎﻏﻤﻠﻚ‬ ‫‪5‬‬

‫‪8‬‬