ENI Well
ENI Well
ENI Well
REFER TO
DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY' DEPT. TYPE SECTION N.
PAGE. 1
ENI S. p . A .
A g ip Div isio n OF 108
STAP P 1 M 7130
TITLE
WELL TEST PROCEDURES MANUAL
DISTRIBUTION LIST
NOTE: The present document is available in Eni Agip Intranet (http://wwwarpo.in.agip.it) and a CD-
Rom version can also be distributed (requests will be addressed to STAP Dept. in Eni -
Agip Division Headquarter)
The present document is CONFIDENTIAL and it is property of AGIP It shall not be shown to third parties nor shall it be used for
reasons different from those owing to which it was given
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 2 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
INDEX
1. INTRODUCTION 7
1.1. Purpose of the manual 7
1.2. Objectives 7
1.3. Drilling Installations 8
1.4. UPDATING, AMENDMENT, CONTROL & DEROGATION 9
5. SAFETY BARRIERS 18
5.1. Well Test Fluid 18
5.2. Mechanical Barriers - Annulus Side 19
5.2.1. SSTT Arrangement 19
5.2.2. Safety Valve Arrangement 21
5.3. Mechanical Barriers - Production Side 22
5.3.1. Tester Valve 22
5.3.2. Tubing Retrievable Safety Valve (TRSV) or (SSSV) 23
5.4. Casing Overpressure Valve 23
7. SURFACE EQUIPMENT 33
7.1. Test Package 33
7.1.1. Flowhead Or Surface Test Tree 33
7.1.2. Coflexip Hoses And Pipework 33
7.1.3. Data/Injection Header 34
7.1.4. Choke Manifold 34
7.1.5. Steam Heater And Generator 35
7.1.6. Separator 35
7.1.7. Data Acquisition System 36
7.1.8. Gauge/Surge Tanks And Transfer Pumps 36
7.1.9. Diverter Manifolds, Burners and Booms 37
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 4 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
9. PERFORATING SYSTEMS 46
9.1. Tubing Conveyed Perforating 46
9.2. Wireline Conveyed Perforating 46
9.3. Procedures For Perforating 46
10.4.3. Material 55
10.4.4. Weight per Foot 55
10.4.5. Drift 55
10.4.6. Capacity 55
10.4.7. Displacement 55
10.4.8. Torque 56
10.4.9. AGIP (UK) Test String Specification 56
10.4.10. Inspection 57
10.4.11. After Testing/Prior To Re-Use 58
10.4.12. Tubing Movement 58
10.5. Landing String Space-Out 58
10.5.1. Landing String space-Out Procedure 60
10.6. GENERAL WELL TEST PREPARATION 61
10.6.1. Crew Arrival on Location 61
10.6.2. Inventory of Equipment Onsite 62
10.6.3. Preliminary Inspections 62
10.7. Pre Test Equipment Checks 63
10.8. Pressure Testing Equipment 65
10.8.1. Surface Test Tree 66
14. SAMPLING 80
14.1. Conditioning The Well 80
14.2. Downhole Sampling 80
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 6 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
1. INTRODUCTION
The main objective when drilling a well is to test and evaluate the target formation. The normal
method of investigating the reservoir is to conduct a well test. There are two types of well test
methods available:
• Drill Stem Test (DST). The scope is to define the quality of the formation fluid.
Where drillpipe/tubing in combination with downhole tools is used as a short term
test to evaluate the reservoir. The formation fluid may not reach or only just reach
the surface during the flowing time.
• Production Test. The scope is to define the quality and quantity of the formation
fluid. Many options of string design are available depending on the requirements of
the test and the nature of the well.
Many designs of well testing strings are possible depending on the requirements of the test
and the nature of the well and the type of flow test to be conducted but basically it consists of
installing a packer tailpipe, packer, safety system and downhole test tools and a tubing or drill
pipe string then introducing a low density fluid into the string in order to enable the well to flow
through surface testing equipment which controls the flow rate, separates the fluids and
measures the flow rates and pressures.
A short description of the types of tests which can be conducted and generic test string
configurations for the various drilling installations, as well as the various downhole tools
available, surface equipment, pre-test procedures and test procedures are included in this
section.
Well test specific wireline and coiled tubing operations are also included.
1.2. OBJECTIVES
The test objectives must be agreed by those who will use the results and those who will
conduct the test before the test programme is prepared. The Petroleum Engineer should
discuss with the geologists and reservoir engineers about the information required and make
them aware of the costs and risks involved with each method. They should select the easiest
means of obtaining data, such as coring, if possible. Such inter-disciplinary discussions
should be formalised by holding a meeting (or meetings) at which these objectives are
agreed and fixed.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 8 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
At the top of the SSTT is the hydraulic latch section which contains
the operating mandrels to open the valves and the latching
mechanism to release this part of the tree from the valve section in
the event that disconnection is necessary.
2.1. DRAWDOWN
A drawdown test entails flowing the well and analysing the pressure response as the reservoir
pressure is reduced below its original pressure. This is termed drawdown. It is not usual to
conduct solely a drawdown test on an exploration well as it is impossible to maintain a
constant production rate throughout the test period as the well must first clean-up. During a
test where reservoir fluids do not flow to surface, analysis is still possible. This was the
original definition of a drill stem test or DST. However, it is not normal nowadays to plan a test
on this basis.
2.3. BUILD-UP
A build-up test requires the reservoir to be flowed to cause a drawdown then the well is
closed in to allow the pressure to increase back to, or near to, the original pressure which is
termed the pressure build-up or PBU. This is the normal type of test conducted on an oil well
and can be analysed using the classic Horner Plot or superposition.
From these the permeability-height product, kh, and the near wellbore skin can be analysed.
On low production rate gas wells, where there is a flow rate dependant skin, a simple form of
test to evaluate the rate dependant skin coefficient, D, is to conduct a second flow and PBU at
a different rate to the first flow and PBU. This is the simplest form of deliverability test
described below.
2.4. DELIVERABILITY
A deliverability test is conducted to determine the well’s Inflow Performance Relation, IPR,
and in the case of gas wells the Absolute Open Flow Potential, AOFP, and the rate dependant
skin coefficient, D.
The AOFP is the theoretical fluid rate at which the well would produce if the reservoir sand
face was reduced to atmospheric pressure.
This calculated rate is only of importance in certain countries where government bodies set
the maximum rate at which the well may be produced as a proportion of this flow rate.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 11 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
2.5. FLOW-ON-FLOW
Conducting a flow-on-flow test entails flowing the well until the flowing pressure stabilises and
then repeating this at several different rates. Usually the rate is increased at each step
ensuring that stabilised flow is achievable. The durations of each flow period are equal. This
type of test is applicable to high rate gas well testing and is followed by a single pressure build
up period.
2.6. ISOCHRONAL
An Isochronal test consist of a similar series of flow rates as the flow-on-flow test, each rate
of equal duration and separated by a pressure build-up long enough to reach the stabilised
reservoir pressure. The final flow period is extended to achieve a stabilised flowing pressure
for defining the IPR.
2.9. INTERFERENCE
An interference test is conducted to investigate the average reservoir properties and
connectivity between two or more wells. It may also be conducted on a single well to
determine the vertical permeability between separate reservoir zones.
A well-to-well interference test is not carried out offshore at the exploration or appraisal stage
as it is more applicable to developed fields. Pulse testing, where the flowrate at one of the
wells is varied in a series of steps, is sometimes used to overcome the background reservoir
pressure behaviour when it is a problem.
2.10. INJECTIVITY
In these tests a fluid, usually seawater offshore is injected to establish the formation’s
injection potential and also its fracture pressure, which can be determined by conducting a
step rate test. Very high surface injection pressures may be required in order to fracture the
formation.
The water can be filtered and treated with scale inhibitor, biocide and oxygen scavenger, if
required. Once a well is fractured, which may also be caused by the thermal shock of the
cold injection water reaching the sandface, a short term injection test will generally not provide
a good measure of the long term injectivity performance.
After the injectivity test, the pressure fall off is measured. The analysis of this test is similar to
a pressure build-up, but is complicated by the cold water bank.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 13 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Well testing is potentially hazardous and requires good planning and co-operation/co-
ordination between all the parties involved.
The most important aspect when planning a well test, is the safety risk assessment process.
To this end, strict areas of responsibilities and duties shall be defined and enforced, detailed
below.
Depending on the type of test, the following personnel may also be required on the rig during
the Well test:
• Company Stimulation Engineer.
• Company Reservoir Engineer.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 14 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Supervisor during the formation testing operation. His main responsibility is to ensure that the
required well test data is collected in accordance to the programme and for the quality of the
data for analysis. He will provide a quick look field analysis of each test period and on this
basis he will advise on any necessary modifications to the testing programme.
When the rig reaches Total Depth (TD) and all the available data is analysed, the company
Reservoir/Exploration Departments shall provide the Company Drilling/Production and
Engineering departments with the information required for planning the well test (type,
pressure, temperature of formation fluids, intervals to be tested, flowing or sampling test,
duration of test, type of completion fluid, type and density of fluid against which the well will be
opened, type of perforating gun and number of shots per foot, use of coiled tubing stimulation,
etc.).
The Drilling, Production and Engineering departments shall then prepare a detailed testing
programme verifying that the testing equipment conforms to these procedures. The duty of
the Engineering Department is also to make sure that the testing equipment is available at the
rig in due time.
Company and contractor personnel on the rig shall confirm equipment availability and
programme feasibility, verifying that the test programme is compatible with general and
specific rules related to the drilling unit.
Governmental bodies of several countries lay down rules and regulations covering the entire
drilling activity. In such cases , prior to the start of testing operations a summary programme
shall be submitted for approval to national agencies, indicating well number, location,
objectives, duration of test and test procedures.
Since it is not practical to include all issued laws within the company general statement the
company (Drilling, Production, Engineering departments and rig personnel) shall verify the
consistency of the present procedures to suit local laws, making any modifications that would
be required. However, at all times, the most restrictive interpretation shall apply.
4.1. CONTENTS
The programme shall be drawn up in order to acquire all necessary information taking into
account two essential factors:
• The risk to which the rig and personnel are exposed during testing.
• The cost of the operation.
5. SAFETY BARRIERS
Barriers are the safety system incorporated into the structure of the well and the test string
design to prevent uncontrolled flow of formation fluids and keep well pressures off the casing.
It is common oilfield practice to ensure there are at least two tested barriers in place or
available to be closed at all times. A failure in any barrier system which means the well
situation does meet with this criteria, then the test will be terminated and the barrier replaced,
even if it entails killing of the well to pull the test string.
To ensure overall well safety, there must be sufficient barriers on both the annulus side and
the production or tubing side. Some barriers may actually contain more than one closure
mechanism but are still classified as a single barrier such as the two closure mechanism in a
SSTT, etc.
Barriers are often classified as primary, secondary and tertiary.
This section describes the barrier systems which must be provided on well testing
operations.
During the testing operation when the packer is set and the well is flowing, the test fluid is only
one of the barriers on the annulus side.
The test fluid density will be determined form log information and calculated to provide a
hydrostatic pressure, generally between 100-200psi, greater than the formation pressure.
completion. As the test fluid is usually a clear brine for damage prevention reasons, high
overbalance pressures may cause severe losses and alternatively, if the overbalance
pressure is too low, any fluid loss out of the wellbore may quickly eliminated the margin of
overbalance. When using low overbalance clear fluids, it is important to calculate the
temperature increase in the well during flow periods as this decreases the density.
An overbalance fluid is often described as the primary barrier during well operations.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 19 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
A modern test method used on wells which have high pressures demanding high density test
fluids which are unstable an extremely costly, is to design the well test with an underbalanced
fluid which is much more stable and cheaper. In this case there will be one barrier less than
overbalance testing. This is not a problem providing the casing is designed for the static
surface pressures of the formation fluids and that all other mechanical barriers are available
and have been tested.
Therefore, under normal circumstances there are three barriers on the annulus side with the
overbalance test fluid. If one of these barriers (or element of the barrier) failed then there
would still be two barriers remaining.
An alternate is when the BOPs are removed and a tubing hanger spool is used with a Xmas
tree. In this instance the barrier envelope on the casing side would be casing/hanger
spool/side outlet valves.
The arrangement of the BOP pipe ram closure varies with whether there is a surface or
subsea BOP stack. When testing from a floater, a SSTT is utilised to allow the rig to suspend
operations and leave the well location for any reason. On a jack-up, a safety valve is installed
below the mud line as additional safety in the event there is any damage caused to the
installation (usually approx. 100m below the rig floor). Both systems use a slick joint spaced
across the lower pipe rams to allow the rams to be closed on a smooth OD.
Note: The shear rams are not capable of cutting the SSTT assembly unless a
safety shear joint is installed in the SSTT across the shear ram position.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 20 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
1 3 3 / 8 ” o r 1 1 ” 5 0 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 0 - 1 5 0 0 0 p s i W . P . B O P S T A C K S
TUBING
PIPE RAMS
SHEAR RAMS
5” SLICK JOINT
5” PIPE RAMS
SPACER SPOOL
0.6 to 1.0 metre long
5” SLICK JOINT 5” SLICK JOINT 5” SLICK JOINT
5” SLICK JOINT
SPACER SPOOL
TUBING SPOOL 0.6 to 1.0 metre long TUBING SPOOL
8” O.D. 8” O.D.
SAFETY VALVE SAFETY VALVE
8” O.D.
SAFETY VALVE
8 ” O . D .
5.25” O.D.
S A F E T Y V A L V E
ALL WELLS
ALL WELLS JACK UP, FIXED PLATFORMS and ON-SHORE RIGS WITH 7” PRODUCTION CASING WITH 7”
WITH 9 5/8”
PROD. CASING PROD. CASING
Jack-Up
• Tester valve
• Safety valve
• Surface test tree.
Land well
• Tester valve
• Safety valve
• Surface test tree.
6.1. GENERAL
The well testing objectives, test location and relevant planning will dictate which is the most
suitable test string configuration to be used. Some generic test strings used for testing from
various installations are shown over leaf:
In general, well tests are performed inside a 7ins production liner, using full opening test tools
with a 2.25ins ID. In larger production casing sizes the same tools will be used with a larger
packer. In 5-51/2ins some problems can be envisaged: availability, reliability and reduced ID
limitations to run W/L. tools, etc. smaller test tools will be required, but similarly, the tools
should be full opening to allow production logging across perforated intervals. For a barefoot
test, conventional test tools will usually be used with a packer set inside the 95/8ins casing.
If conditions allow, the bottom of the test string should be 100ft above the top perforation to
allow production logging, reperforating and/or acid treatment of the interval.
In the following description, tools which are required both in production tests and conventional
tests are included. The list of tools is not exhaustive, and other tools may be included.
However, the test string should be kept as simple as possible to reduce the risk of
mechanical failure. The tools should be dressed with elastomers suitable for the operating
environment, considering packer fluids, prognosed production fluids, temperature and the
stimulation programme, if applicable.
The tools must be rated for the requested working pressure (in order to withstand the
maximum forecast bottom-hole/well head pressure with a suitable safety factor).
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 25 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Figure 6.A - Typical Jack Up/Land Test String - Packer With TCP Guns On Packer
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 26 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Figure 6.B - Typical Test String - Production Packer With TCP Guns Stabbed Through
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 27 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
6.2.15. Crossovers
Crossovers warrant special attention They are of the utmost importance as they connect
every piece of equipment in the test string which have differing threads. If crossovers have to
be manufactured, they need to be tested and fully certified. In addition, they must be checked
with each mating item of equipment before use.
The control umbilical is connected to the top of the latch which can, under most
circumstances be reconnected, regaining control without killing the well. The valves hold
pressure from below, but open when a differential pressure is applied from above, allowing
safe killing of the well without hydraulic control if unlatched.
7. SURFACE EQUIPMENT
This sub-section contains the list of surface equipment and the criteria for use.
With the rig at its operating draft, the flowhead should be positioned so that it is at a distance
above the drill floor which is greater than the maximum amount of heave anticipated, plus an
allowance for tidal movement, i.e. 5ft and a further 5ft safety margin.
Coflexip hoses are used to connect from the flowhead kill wing and flow wing to the rig
manifold and the test choke manifold. A permanently installed test line is sometimes available
which leads from the drill floor to the choke manifold location.
Additional protection can be given by installing relief valves in the lines. Is now common
practice to have a relief valve on the line between the heater and the separator to cater for any
blockage downstream which may cause over-pressure in the line. If there is further risk from
plugging of the burner nozzles by sand carry-over, then consideration should be given to
installing further relief valves downstream of the separator to protect this lower pressure rated
pipework.
Note: Ensure that the Coflexip hoses are suitable for use with corrosive brines.
Most of the pressure and temperatures take off points will be duplicated for the Data
Acquisition System sensors.
For use on high flow rate wells, a 4ins bore steam heater should be used to reduce high back
pressures.
The heat required to raise a gas by 1oF can be estimated from the formula:
2,550 x Gas Flow (mmscf/day) x Gas Specific Gravity (air = 1.000), BTU/hr/oF
The heat needed to raise an oil by 1oF can be estimated from:
8.7 x Oil Flow (bbls/day) x Oil Density (gms/cm3), BTU/hr/oF
Always use the largest steam heater and associated generator that space or deck loading will
allow as the extra output is contingency for any serious problem which may arise. The rig
steam generator will not usually have the required output and therefore diesel-fired steam
generator in conjunction with the steam heat exchanger should be supplied by the surface
test contractor.
7.1.6. Separator
The test separator is required to:
• Separate the well flow into three phases; oil, gas and water
• Meter the flow rate of each phase, at known conditions
• Measure the shrinkage factor to correct to standard conditions
• Sample each phase at known temperature and pressure.
The standard offshore separator is a horizontal three phase, 1,440psi working pressure unit.
This can handle up to 60mmscf/day of dry gas or up to 10,000bopd and associated gas at its
working pressure Other types of separator, such as the vertical or spherical models and two-
phase units may be used.
Gas is metered using a Daniel’s or similar type orifice plate gas meter. The static pressure,
pressure drop across the orifice plate and the temperature are all recorded. From this data
the flow rate is calculated.
The liquid flowrates are measured by positive displacement or vortex meters.
The oil shrinkage factor is physically measured by allowing a known volume of oil, under
controlled conditions, to de-pressurise and cool to ambient conditions. The shrinkage factor is
the ambient volume, divided by the original volume. The small volume, however, of the
shrinkage meter means that this is not an accurate measurement.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 36 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
The oil flow rate is corrected for any volume taken up by gas, water, sand or sediment. This
volume is calculated by multiplying the combined volume by the BS&W measurement and the
tank/meter factor. Oil meters are calibrated onshore but it is also necessary to divert the oil
flow to a gauge tank for a short period to obtain a combined shrinkage/meter factor as the
meter calibration is subject to discrepancy with varying oil gravity and viscosity.
The separator relief system is calibrated onshore and should never be function tested
offshore, hence the separator should only be tested to 90% of the relief valve setting.
It is important that the separator bypass valves, diverter valves for the vent lines leading from
the separator relief valve, rupture disc or back-up relief valve, are checked for ease of
operation.
The main advantage of DAS is that real time plots can be displayed at the well site for
troubleshooting. Another advantage is that all of the surface (and possibly downhole) data is
collected into one system and can be supplied on a floppy disk for the operator to analyse and
subsequently prepare well reports.
The Emergency Shut Down (ESD) system is the primary safety system in the event of an
uncontrolled escape of hydrocarbons at surface. The system consists of a hydraulically or
pneumatically operated flowhead flow wing valve, control panel and a number of remotely air
operated pilot valves. When a pilot or the main valve in the panel is actuated, it causes a loss
of air pressure in turn dropping out the main hydraulic valve which releases the pressure from
the flowhead ESD valve actuator.
The push button operated pilot valves are strategically placed at designated accessible areas
where the test crew and/or rig crew can actuate them by pushing the button when they
observe an emergency situation. Other pilots may be high or low pressure actuated pilots
installed at critical points in the system to protect equipment from over-pressure or under-
pressure which would indicate an upstream valve closure, blockage or leak etc. The system
is also actuated if a hose is cut or melted by heat from a fire, also releasing the air pressure.
7.3.3. Crossovers
Crossovers warrant special attention They are of the utmost importance as they connect
every piece of equipment in the test string which have differing threads. If crossovers have to
be manufactured, they need to be tested and fully certified. In addition, they must be checked
with each mating item of equipment before use.
7.5.2. Separator
• Oil flow meters on both separator oil lines.
• Gas flow meter.
• Thermometers.
• Pressure gauges.
The two of the most important parameters measured during well testing are downhole
pressures and temperatures. This data is obtained from BHP gauges installed as close to the
perforations as is practicable. BHP gauges are either mechanical or electronic type gauges.
The mechanical BHP gauge is rarely used today as it accuracy does not generally meet the
demands of engineers for modern analysis. It does still have uses on high temperature wells
where the temperature is above the limit of electronic gauges or when simple low cost
surveys are required; for instance, to obtain bottom hole pressure before a workover. They
are cheaper due to the lower gauge purchase cost and because it is not necessary to have a
gauge specialist to run them.
The electronic gauge is used in most circumstances and there are a number of different
models on the market with a wide range of accuracy and temperature specifications to meet
various test demands. It is critical to ensure that the gauge selected is fit for purpose as some
of the higher accuracy gauges are more susceptible to damage like the crystal gauge and
also more expensive. The criteria used should be to select the most robust and cost
competitive gauge which meets the test requirements. Currently there are three basic types
of pressure sensors used in electronic gauges available: Quartz Crystal, Capacitance, and
Strain.
The electronic gauge can operate through an electric cable for surface read out in real time
but more generally is run with an memory section which stores the data electronically on
chips. The early gauges had a very limited storage capacity of around 2.5K data points but
this has dramatically increased where gauges now have up to 500K. They can also be
programmed to change the sampling speed at various times and/or on pressure change
(∆p). This provides the reservoir engineer with accurate data at the desired and most critical
points in the test.
Both mechanical and electronic types of gauges are listed below in order of decreasing
accuracy.
of the diaphragm causes the deflection which is measured and translated into pressure. The
accuracy of the gauge is lower than the quartz or the capacitance. This type of gauge is
extremely robust and is not affected by temperature changes.
9. PERFORATING SYSTEMS
Two methods are currently used to perforate wells: wireline conveyed guns or tubing
conveyed guns. Tubing conveyed perforating is the Eni-Agip preferred method for well test
operations, as the zones to be tested can be perforated underbalanced in one run, with large
charges. However, under some circumstances wireline conveyed guns may still be preferred.
Both methods are described in the following sections.
The type of explosive to be used is dependant mainly on the bottomhole temperature and the
length of time the guns are likely to be on bottom before firing (Refer to the ‘Completion
Manual-Perforating Section’)
This section describes the operations necessary to prepare the well for well testing.
10.2.3. Recommendations
An independent surveyor should be engaged to perform the following duties:
The mud pits should be cleaned as follows using seawater, prior to transferring
completion brine from storage tanks to the pits.
• When all the mud has been emptied from the pit tanks to be used, clean the mud
tanks as thoroughly as possible to avoid any brine contamination. Clean initially
using buckets and shovels.
• Wash the first mud pit with 50bbls seawater pill containing descaler and oil mud
removers.
• Pump pill into second pit and make up second 50bbls pill containing lower
concentration descaler/oil mud remover.
• Pump second pill into first pit and first pill into third pit. Continue the system until
all pits are clean, including slug and premix pits, and all the surface lines.
• Prepare a third 50bbls pill and pump again through all pits if required.
2) Dump Valves
Prior to receiving the brine, ensure all ‘O’ rings and seats are functioning correctly.
Leaking valves can cause significant brine losses.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 51 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
4) Water Lines
All water lines should be taped or chained off.
5) Pump Packing
Replace all work mixing pump packing.
6) Tripping
Significant losses of brine can be avoided during tripping by:
• Using wiper plugs
• Using collection box and drip pan
• Slugging of pipe with heavier weight brine.
7) Rig Shakers
Should it be necessary to pass brine over rig shakers when circulating, ensure
equipment is operating properly. Avoid diluting brine by washing down or cleaning
screens with water.
8) Settling Pit
Tank or tanks should be dedicated to be used as settling/separation tanks for brine that
became abnormally contaminated during the course of the testing operation. Brines
contaminated with solids, oil, cement, or other should be placed in tanks and chemically
treated as required. For oil and solids and/or polymer-contamination, pilot testing should
be performed to determine treatments of flocculants and/or oil separation chemicals,
viscosity breakers, etc. Following chemical treatment, the brine should be filtered and
returned to the active system, and re-weighted if necessary.
9) Sand Traps
If used to contain brine during the operation, these traps should be thoroughly cleaned
prior to the introduction of the brine system. It should also be pre-determined that fluid
can be completely removed when required.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 52 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
• Indirect Displacement (of which a key ingredient is flushing the wellbore with large
volumes of water).
• Direct Displacement (where minimal seawater flushing is utilised).
7) Pick up bit for casing and drill out cement to the top of the liner. If it is planned to
perform a pressure or inflow test on the liner lap, a casing scraper should be run with
the bit unless excessive drilling is expected.
8) Run in the hole with bit for liner and drill out the liner to landing collar which is then the
PBTD (Refer to section 10.1).
9) Run and record CBL/VDL or CET from the landing collar to the top of the liner.
10) If there are reasons to believe that the integrity of the seal on the liner lap is not effective,
a pressure and/or inflow test should be performed (Refer to section 10.1).
11) If the liner lap is found to be leaking then a remedial cementing job is advised.
3) Conduct a body pressure test to a minimum of 1,000psi above the maximum expected
differential pressure, or 1,000psi above the maximum wellhead pressure, whichever is
the greatest.
4) Pressure test, from direction of flow, all test string valves to a minimum of 1,000psi
above either the maximum expected differential pressure, or wellhead pressure,
whichever is the greatest.
5) Pressure test, from above, all test string valves, if appropriate, to a minimum of
1,000psi above either the maximum differential pressure, or wellhead pressure,
whichever is the greatest.
6) Where appropriate, the downhole test equipment should be function tested.
7) The test string components must be drifted to the 2.25ins maximum drift size to cater
for all contingencies.
8) These tests should be carried out on the pipedeck and the tools dressed with the
correct value shear pins or rupture discs, as per programme.
9) Check that the appropriate crossovers are available and make up to the downhole test
equipment.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 54 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
The primary seal is metal-to-metal but some connections also have a secondary metal-to-
metal seals or a Teflon packing ring.
Some premium connections are superior to others regarding being gas tight or good for high
pressure and temperatures etc., therefore an operator must make a thorough investigation to
find the connection which is best fit for purpose. It is normally agreed that premium threads
with a torque shoulder such as Hydril is ideal for testing as it has low refurbishment costs and
is quick to make up and reasonably robust against handling damage, however it is limited to
the number of thread re-cuts that can be machined before requiring to be sent back to the mill
for upsetting again.
Typically, as an example of a good well test tubing, is Eni-Agip’s (UK) Affiliate who use a 41/2”
15.5lbs/ft grade with the D95 SPJD-6 (Hydril compatible) thread connection for well testing.
The specification for this tubing is given in the following sub-sections.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 55 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
10.4.3. Material
The choice of tubing material should take into account the expected produced fluids. If sour
fluids are expected the material should be no harder than 22 HRC. This limits the choice to
C75 or N 80 as the toughest grades. However, special grades up to C 95 may be used if they
are specified for sour service and have passed the NACE sulphide stress cracking tests (API
SPEC 5AC).
Safety factors in axial tension should ideally not be less than 1.7, but a lower limit of 1.4 can
be accepted if a triaxial stress envelope is used. Agip (UK)’s test string is grade D 95 SG
(Dalmine designation, equivalent to C 95) and is suitable for tests where H2S is present.
10.4.5. Drift
Is slightly less than ID and represents maximum effective available bore diameter for the
passage of tools. API Spec 5A specifies the dimensions of mandrels to be used in drift
testing. All tubulars to be run in a well, i.e. casing, tubing, nipples, packers etc. must be drifted
prior to running.
10.4.6. Capacity
This is the amount of fluid required to fill a measured distance inside the tubing, e.g. the Agip
(UK) tubing has a capacity of 0.01422bbl/ft, sometimes expressed as 14.22 barrels per
thousand feet.
10.4.7. Displacement
This is the volume occupied by the tubing material, or the volume of fluid which the tubing will
displace.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 56 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
10.4.8. Torque
Is the amount of rotational force applied to connect the pin and the box connections to
optimise the mechanical and sealing performance of the connections, e.g. the values for the
Agip (UK) string are as follows:
• Minimum - 6,800ft/lbs
• Optimum - 7,650ft/lbs
• Maximum - 8,500ft/lbs.
Pipe Connection
ID 3.826ins 3.765ins
Drift 3.701ins
Min 6,800ft/lbs
Torque Values Opt 7,650ft/lbs
Max 8,500ft/lbs
0.01422bbls/ft
Capacity or
14.22bbls/1,000 ft
0.00564bbls/ft
Displacement or
5.64bbls/1,000 ft
Burst 12,450psi
Collapse 12,760psi
Yield 419,000lbs
Table 10.A - AGIP (UK) Tubing Data
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 57 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
10.4.10. Inspection
Prior To Running (On Board Visual Inspection And Field Repair)
Ensure all connections are dried after cleaning and before inspection.
Check the starting threads to ensure they have no small slivers or edges of steel which could
indicate galling or over-torque.
Visual inspection should concentrate on the primary metal to metal seal surface of the pin and
box. These seals should be free from corrosion and defects.
The sealing mechanism is based on having sufficient pin-to-box metal-to-metal contact
stress around the full circumference of the connection. The pin and box seal surfaces should
be examined for any seal irregularity.
Check seal surface for:
• Longitudinal cuts and scratches
• Out-of-roundness
• Corrosion pits, rust and scale
• Galling.
Some type tubing connections have an external shoulder which is the primary shoulder on
these connections, controlling the position of the pin relative to the box. The proper location on
a fully made-up connection of all other seals and shoulders is determined by the position of
this shoulder.
The surface is also intended to be a secondary pressure seal. This requires that visual
inspection criteria similar to those used for the internal seal be used for the shoulder.
Check shoulder for:
• Radial cuts and scratches
• Out-of -roundness
• Corrosion pits, rust and scale
• Galling.
If the visual inspection detects some light corrosion/rust on the seal surface then this must be
removed before running. To alleviate this problem the rust or discoloration can be easily
removed by a light rubbing action using No 400 emery cloth or steel wool.
Minor thread damage (not seal) may be repaired with a fine needle file or No 400 emery cloth.
If any joints or connection show ovality then they should not be run.
If possible, note whether the pipe is straight, this may not be possible until the joint is being
run.
Drift pipe with correct size (OD and length) drift.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 58 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Note: Ensure that either choke or kill line is connected below pipe ram that is to
be used on slick joint. This is necessary for annulus control and
monitoring during DST operations.
2) Consult with the Mud Engineer about the performance of the mud/brine system under
conditions of static temperature and pressure for the anticipated duration of the test and
the compatibility of the mud/brine system to the cushion.
3) Confer with the Tool Pusher concerning testing requirements during the test, such as:
• Procedures for pressure testing and functioning equipment and the necessity of
doing this in a restricted area within easy access to air and water points.
• Pressure control and monitoring of the annulus. In particular, the presence of non
return valves in the rig manifolding needs to be discussed and how they can be
removed or bypassed. Potential tie-in points on the rig manifold for a pressure
monitor etc.
• Availability of handling equipment (e.g. lift subs, elevators).
• Procedures for picking up test tools.
The following additional inspections shall be performed prior to start testing operations, under
the direct responsibility of Company Drilling and Completion Supervisor, who can avail
himself of production test equipment operators:
1) It shall be ascertained that the separator is equipped with safety valves (pop valves
and/or rupture plate outlets) in top operating conditions. The outlets of separator and the
vent lines of production tank(s) shall be free from obstructions and secured to fixed
structure of the rig. These lines shall usually be connected to the flares.
2) Inspections shall be carried out on the flares (blow-off lines), on the burners/flares
booms and on the burners igniting system.
For the ignition of burners/flares, a back-up system shall be available in addition to the
main fixed system.
A test on burners shall be performed using diesel oil as fuel.
An adequate supply of propane or butane should be available, if such fuel is used for the
igniting system.
Due to their dangerous nature, propane or butane bottles shall be stored in protected
area.
3) Each burner shall be capable of burning the whole amount of hydrocarbon produced,
that is to say their capacity shall be compatible with the maximum possible production.
Inspections shall be made on the water sprinkler system for the protection of the rig
from heat radiation in the area where burners are installed. In addition to this fixed
installation, special fire-fighting hoses with adjustable nozzles shall always be available
to cool any part of the rig that would happen to remain outside the protection of the
water sprinkler system.
procedures. Tools must be positioned in a manner so that they are secure and cause
minimal obstruction.
2) Visually inspect all tools to ensure no damage was sustained in transit particularly to
threads and sealing surfaces.
3) Function and pressure test tools according to procedures laid out in the service
companies operations manual which will be made available on the rig.
4) Ensure that all tool dimensions are accurately measured and lengths of extending
mandrels recorded etc.
5) Ensure all required crossovers have been sent and physically checked for correct
threads. Measure crossovers and note length, ODs and IDs. Particular attention should
be paid to the IDs of rented crossovers.
6) Ensure all tubulars are drifted, cleaned internally and the connections have been
inspected prior to running.
7) Lengths, ODs, IDs and thread connections of all downhole tools should be checked for
correct size and a list produced. All tools should be clean, free of any dirt or debris and
the connections cleaned properly on the rack. All crossovers should be properly
bevelled inside and out.
8) All downhole tools should be drifted to 2.125ins to allow running of surface read out or
any other wireline or coil tubing tool.
9) The pipe tester valve (PTV) should be made up to the packer on the deck and tested
from below to it’s working pressure prior to running in the hole.
10) A visual inspection should be made of the packer elements prior to running. The packer
should be set appropriately above the perforated interval to allow safe wireline
operations such as production logging, if required (i.e. ensure the bottom of the tailpipe
is positioned approximately 100ft above the top perforation).
11) The packer should never be set across a casing collar.
12) All downhole test tools should be pressure tested at surface to a minimum of 1,000psi
above maximum anticipated pressure.
13) A list of all pressure gauges and serial numbers should be compiled and submitted to
the Company Production Test Supervisor.
14) Only API 5A Modified thread lubricant should be used on tools, tubing and drill collar
connections.
15) The lubricant should be applied to the pin end only with a paint brush. Apply sparingly.
16) Check the brine weight as accurately as possible and ensure that it is correct, based on
the RFT results.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 65 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
The flowhead shall be pressure tested before installed it on the well with a tubing pup joint
assembled on bottom in the followed way:
1) Plug the kill side, the flow side and close the swab valve; pressure test the internal of
flowhead pumping through the pup joint.
2) Bleed off pressure and remove plugs from kill and flow side, close kill valve ,flow side
fail-safe valve and pressure test the gates from inside.
3) Close master valve and bleed off the down stream pressure to pressure test the gate
from below.
Detailed individual well programmes will be issued for all wells to be tested, which includes
development, appraisal and exploration wells.
Each programme will include contents, the exact details of which will be well specific
dependent upon the well status and expected well parameters. The following is the contents
of a typical test programme.
a) Test Objectives.
b) General well data and perforating details.
c) Summary of test programme.
d) Guidelines for liner lap test and space-out calculations.
e) Sequence of operations for running downhole tools and surface equipment rig up.
f) Flowing procedures for each test conducted.
Detailed string diagrams and equipment layout diagrams will be included, as well as all
relevant pressure testing procedures and equipment ratings.
11.1. GENERAL
a) The testing string shall normally be made up of tubing. The use of drill pipe is only
allowed in limited fluid entry test (DST).
b) All equipment and material used in production tests shall be H2S service.
c) Governmental bodies charged with the control of drilling activity and/or other state
agencies shall be notified, if required, on test execution with advanced notice.
d) Before starting and upon completion of flaring operations, company shall give notice to
competent authorities.
e) Prior to the start of casing perforating, visitors and non essential personnel shall leave
the rig and rig personnel shall be limited to the minimum.
f) Prior to start well testing operations a meeting shall be held by wellsite Company Drilling
and Completion Supervisor and Drilling Contractor Toolpusher to make all personnel
involved are acquainted with detailed operating program (procedures and rules).
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 69 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
h) The pins and boxes should be visually inspected for any damage by a qualified
Tubing Inspector.
i) Reject and damaged joints should be painted red and documented and then
returned to the onshore base for remedial work if necessary.
j) The tubing should then be drifted/measured, and each joint numbered in the
middle of the joint with white paint and strapped and tally recorded (drift the pipe
box to pin at all times).
k) After the threads have been cleaned and inspected it is important they be
protected from corrosion. Never leave the threads for longer than two hours
without corrosion protection.
l) If the connections are cleaned more than two hours but less than 12hrs prior to
the joint being run, then a light oil should be used to prevent corrosion. If it is to be
longer than 12hrs then a light film of dope and protectors should be reapplied.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 70 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
21) Install the surface test tree and 50ft bails or CTU lifting frame.
22) Run a GR/CCL log to verify the packer setting depth. (Refer to appropriate section
according to gun type).
23) Set the packer and set down weight until the fluted hanger lands out in the wellhead.
24) Set the packer and set down weight until the fluted hanger lands out in the wellhead.
25) Run a GR/CCL log to verify the packer setting depth. (Refer to appropriate section
according to gun type).
26) Carry out the hook-up and final pressure testing.
27) The well is now ready to be perforated and tested.
23) Pull slowly out of the packer and pull back the pipe to install the SSTT.
24) Space out and pick up the SSTT assembly, install onto the tubing and function test.
25) Continue running the landing string, strapping the SSTT hoses to the tubing.
26) Install the lubricator valve.
27) Continue running the landing string, strapping all hoses to the pipe.
28) With the seal assembly still out of the packer, install the surface test tree attached to
the final joint. Rig up the 50ft bails or CTU lifting frame.
29) Carry out the hook-up pressure test.
30) Slowly lower the seal assembly into the packer and land the SSTT hanger.
31) Conduct the final string pressure tests.
32) The well is now ready to be perforated and tested.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 74 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Note: Annulus pressure should always be controlled by the rig choke manifold.
and any hydrocarbons vented to the poor-boy de-gasser.
a) Initial opening and/or initial flow through separator shall be carried out in daylight only. All
subsequent flow/build-up operations can be performed at night under favourable
weather conditions.
b) Wind speed and direction shall constantly be monitored before formation clean out and
during the flow to avoid smoke vapour, gas and heat invading the rig.
To this purpose, Company and Contractor personnel shall continuously and directly
monitor the flame behaviour at the flares to be able to intervene in case of sudden
changes in wind direction.
g) Initial opening shall be avoided in windless condition. The decision to suspend a test
due to windless conditions shall be taken by Contractor's Toolpusher after consultation
with Company's Drilling and Completion Supervisors.
h) The test shall be suspended whenever the normal course of operations is hampered or
drilling unit's safety is jeopardised (heating of the structures, presence of smokes, gas
on the rig).
i) Wireline operations inside a test string shall be limited as much as possible.
j) Downhole pressure build-up (shut-in) shall be obtained by closing the tester valve.
k) Well shut-in at the surface shall only be limited to extreme case.
l) Upon flow beginning, the presence of H2S into the formation fluid shall be detected as
soon as possible.
If H2S is present, procedures to operate in sour gas contaminated environments shall
be strictly observed (Refer to the Drilling Procedures Manual).
Frequent test on H2S presence shall be carried out on the rig floor, production
equipment and flares area, near pumps and engines.
Any indication of H2S presence shall immediately be notified to Contractor's Toolpusher
and Company's Drilling and Completion Supervisor.
m) It is forbidden to release to the atmosphere non-combusted hydrocarbons.
Only the use of production stock tanks shall be allowed.
n) All stimulation jobs and subsequent formation clean out operations, shall be performed
in daylight.
o) During acid jobs, at least two water hoses shall be available to dilute any possible acid
spills.
p) During acidizing, surface pressure’s shall not exceed the surface equipment testing
pressure or the working pressure of the weakest joint of the test string, whichever is
lowest.
q) During acid job must be definite and marked all the pressure areas.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 76 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
13.1. GENERAL
The following is the procedure for gathering well test data:
1) Monitor all data points with the electronic surface data acquisition system as shown in
table 13.a.
2) Take manual separator and manifold readings every 30min during the well test and as
directed during clean-up.
3) Flow to the gauge tank for liquid flow rates and meter calibration.
4) Take manual H2S and CO2 Draeger readings every hour during the clean-up.
5) Maintain detailed records on all well flow characteristics and operational changes with
description, e.g. ‘fluid to surface’, ‘direct flow to test equipment’ etc.
6) Take BS&W samples every 30min and the mud logger is to perform laboratory analysis
of water for chlorides and any other ions such as Ca, Mg, sulphates, TDS, pH and
density.
7) Record the specific gravity of the gas, oil and condensate every 30min.
8) Take pressurised combination gas, oil or condensate samples from the separator for
every main flow period for PVT analysis or as required by the Reservoir Engineer. Make
detailed records and complete the sample forms to give type of sample, well
parameters, at sampling time, time sample take, bottle numbers etc. Dispatch all PVT
samples immediately for analysis.
9) Collect other fluids samples as detailed in the Well Testing Programme. Dispatch these
to the district warehouse for storage until their disposition is decided.
10) During a water test, collect water samples every hour during clean-up and stable flow
periods and perform onsite analysis, initially to monitor clean-up from contaminated to
true formation water and then to confirm the continued production of clean formation
water. Onsite analysis is to be conducted to check for chloride and equivalent sodium
chloride levels, sediment, resistivity, pH, total dissolved solids and specific gravity.
11) Collect samples of true produced formation water in plastic or pressurised containers,
as instructed by the Reservoir Department for laboratory analysis. Dispatch as per step
6) above.
12) Foreign or unidentified materials produced from the well should be kept in a marked up
plastic sample packet for onshore analysis.
13) All samples must be clearly identified and logged.
14) In addition to Draeger readings and, if required, monitor constantly for CO2 and H2S
presence throughout the test using Orsat (UOP 172/59) and cadmium sulphate titration
(ASTM D2385).
15) Monitor sand production by sand detection system and take samples as necessary.
16) Take manual pressure and temperature readings upstream and downstream of the
choke, initially every five minutes, during the clean-up.
17) Monitor bottomhole flowing and shut-in pressures and temperatures with surface
readout system as appropriate.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 77 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Note: These intervals may be altered at the discretion of the well site Company
Production Test Supervisor.
Readings Timing
1 Well Pressure 1st Flow Every 1 min for 10 mins
Every 2 mins for 20 mins
Every 5 mins until end
Further Flow Periods Every 5 mins for 1 hour
Every 15 mins until end
Monitor THP during build up in case tester valve is leaking
2 Wellhead Temperature 1st Flow as above
Further Flow Periods as above
3 SRO Pressure and Further Flow Periods Every 15 secs for 10 mins
Temperature
(Print-outs)
Every 1 min for 20 mins
Every 5 mins until end
Each build up Every 15 secs for 15 mins
Every 1 min for 45 mins
Every 5 mins until end of build up
4 Separator Flow Rates Every 30 mins
5 Shrinkage Every 2 hours
6 Oil and Gas Gravities Every 1 hour
7 BS&W As frequent as possible to determine if sand is
being produced
8 H2S Determination 1st Flow As frequent as possible with detector tubes at
choke manifold bubble hose
Further Flow Periods Every 2 hours by chemical analysis of separator
gas
9 CO2 Determination As for H 2S
10 Downhole Memory Gauges Minimum 4 gauges, preferably 6-8 gauges, to be
run. Minimum 2 different types of gauge to be run.
Seek advice from Reservoir Engineers during test
planning for special requirements.
13.6. COMMUNICATIONS
(Also refer to the Company ‘Drilling Procedures Manual’.)
During the course of the test, it is important that information flows freely from the rig to the
onshore base. The following telexes should be sent to the base to reduce the risk of
misunderstanding and ensure a smooth operation.
• A daily telex should be prepared on the rig for transmission in the morning
covering the last 24hr period ending at 24.00hrs. This should be on the desk of
base personnel when they arrive in the morning and will be used to keep partners
informed. An afternoon telex should also be prepared covering the period to
15.00hrs. These telexes should include operations on an hour-by-hour basis with
details of tools run in hole, flowrates, pressures etc.
• A telex should be sent at the end of each test briefly summarising the daily
operations and main results of the test. This is a ready source of data on the test
which may be used for parent Company reports and reports to partners.
• Samples taken during the test should be sent to shore as soon as the test has
been completed. A telex should be sent listing all the samples, the boat used for
transportation when the boat leaves the rig and the ETA. If offshore, do not
send all the samples taken during a single test on the same boat; split
samples into complete sets and dispatch on different vessels.
If any changes are to be made to the programme during testing operations, a telex or fax will
be sent from the rig to the base summarising the procedure that is proposed to be followed
for the next sequence of operations. This should be accordingly approved by shore base
Production Superintendent who will ensure that all relevant personnel are informed of the
change in the programme.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 80 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
14. SAMPLING
If the above measurements are stable then the well may be considered ready for separator
sampling.
Care should also be taken to ensure the well flow rate is in excess of the minimum at which
liquid fallback in gas wells occurs, otherwise surface samples will not be representative. This
rate is dependent mainly upon the GLR and the tubing size.
If the well has been perforated close to the gas/oil contact, samples may be invalid and
should probably not be taken.
Surface sampling can be undertaken if the well is producing water but downhole sampling is
not recommended.
Depending on conditions, sampling should continue until consistent quality checks are
obtained on two separate samples.
Note: All sampling should utilise mercury-free systems and piston type sample
bottles for safety of personnel.
For long term storage of Agip samples, all well effluent samples should be transferred to
Teflon lined bottles and the mercury-free bottles returned off rental.
7) All samples must be labelled immediately after being taken using Agip sample labels, if
available. The following information must be recorded:
• Well number.
• DST number.
• Choke size.
• Perforation interval.
• Time of sampling and duration.
• Oil/condensate and gas rate at time of sampling.
• Stock tank oil/condensate, temperature, gravity and shrinkage, pressure.
• Gas temp, gravity, static and differential pressures, orifice size and meter run
size.
• BS&W.
8) All samples should be loaded into an empty container and shipped to base as soon
after the test as possible. Record on the morning report, the container in which the
samples are being shipped to shore. Do not ship all samples in one container, split
samples into two representative batches and ship in separate containers.
9) It is vital when taking samples that any problems are recorded, highlighted and fully
documented.
Note: The sampling point should not be on the lower half of the flowline cross
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 83 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Note: The sampling point should not be on the upper half of the flowline cross
section, due to any possibility of there being free gas. If the sampling
point is on the wall of the flowline then it is preferable that it is on the
side, rather than on the top or the bottom, due to possibility of free gas or
water being in the flowline.
Note: No manifold or gauge should be attached to the second valve (V2) under
any circumstances. This is to prevent the loss of any of the heavier
components of the gas which might have condensed in the bottle when
exposed to a vacuum.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 84 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
5) The bottle valve (V1) may now be slowly cracked open. Even with the noise around a
separator, it is still quite easy to hear the gas ‘hissing’ into the bottle and this can also
be heard even when wearing a BA set. Sometimes the gauge needle can be seen to
slightly dip on the initial opening.
If there is just one gas bottle being filled to one oil bottle, then the sampling time should
be about 30 minutes. This length of time means there is less chance of an invalid
sample being taken.
If the ratio of gas samples to oil samples is greater that 1:1, then the fill time should be
worked out to still allow the oil samples to take about 30 minutes.
6) When the sample bottles are full and the sampling time has elapsed, shut the bottle
valve (V1) and the valve on the separator sampling point (V3).
7) Record the pressure on the gauge, and bleed off about 30psi (using V4) then open the
bottle valve (V1). The gauge should now read the original sampling pressure. If it doesn’t
then check the manifold and the bottle valve for blockages or icing-up. If possible clear
the obstruction, take up a fresh bottle, and re-sample both the oil and gas samples. If
the pressure returns to near the original, then the sample is good and the separator
sampling point valve (V3) may be reopened for a few moments to allow the pressure in
the bottle to return to the sampling pressure.
8) Record the final sampling pressure and temperature, as they will be needed for the
sampling sheets. The bottle and manifold valves (V1, V3) may now be closed, and the
connecting line broken.
9) Plug the valves, and both valves checked in a bucket of water for any leaks. Now place
the bottle safely aside.
10) Prepare for the next bottle for sampling.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 85 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
7) Remember that this sample must be taken in conjunction with the gas sample.
8) When the sample bottle contains 600cc of separator fluid, close the flow regulating
valve (V5). Shut the top bottle (V1) and manifold valves (V3). Bleed off and disconnect
the top manifold from the bottle and plug the top bottle valve (V1).
9) The sample is now consolidated.
10) A gas cap should now be formed to permit the safe shipping and storage of the bottle.
This is done by removing a portion of the buffer fluid equal to 10% of the sample
volume. This is called the Ullage.
11) The final pressure and temperature should now be recorded. This is vital for the
laboratory as it informs them what conditions to expect when they analyse the sample
and how much buffer fluid to inject to enable them to match the sampling conditions.
12) The bottom bottle valve (V2) should now be closed and the pressure in the bottom
manifold valve bled off before removal.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 86 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
1) Fit a plug to the bottom valve (V2). Check the integrity of the valves and plugs by
immersing the bottle in a bucket of water and checking for bubbles. Remove from the
water, dry the bottle and fit the protective end caps.
2) Now place the bottle in its box and set aside.
3) Prepare the next bottle for sampling.
14.6. SAFETY
All equipment must be pressure tested and appropriately certified prior to dispatch.
Obtain and comply with any permit to work system before commencing any work.
Both types of wireline require the use of long bails, or a C/T (coiled tubing) lifting frame, to
cater for the rigging up of the wireline BOPs and the lubricator on top of the flowhead.
Pressure testing is to be carried out against the lubricator valve. The main difference between
a slickline and electric line rig up is that double BOPs and a grease flowtube must be used to
achieve a seal on a braided cable.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 90 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
To prevent hydrate formations during shut-in periods, glycol should be injected continuously
into the vertical run of the flowhead as well as at the Sub Sea Test Tree.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 91 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
The main use of nitrogen on an exploration well test is to introduce a partial nitrogen cushion
into the test string by displacing the tubing contents through a tubing-annulus differential
pressure-operated circulation valve into the annulus. Fluid returns must be monitored to
ensure no nitrogen is allowed into the annulus.
The nitrogen cushion pressure can be rapidly reduced to give a very large drawdown when
perforating underbalance or bringing on a well which had already been perforated
overbalance. This would be useful on tight or depleted reservoirs. It could also be used for
detonating TCP guns using a hydro-mechanical firing device operating at a given tubing-
annulus differential by holding the annulus pressure and bleeding away the nitrogen cushion
pressure.
Alternatively, with the well open, the nitrogen could be bled off very slowly to minimise the
drawdown, for instance, on a poorly consolidated sand. The disadvantage with this is that it is
uncertain what is occurring downhole as the nitrogen is bled off. However the advantage is if
the well does not flow to surface, the tubing contents can be reverse circulated out of the well
to determine the what the influx was and, if needed, a second nitrogen cushion could be
circulated into placed in another attempt to bring the well in. If this failed, the well would have
to be gas lifted using a coiled tubing unit.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 92 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Equipment for a coil tubing operation offshore for use on a well test is the same as on a
platform except that a lifting frame is installed to simplify the rig up. This must be rigged up on
the flowhead from the beginning as part of the landing string as this cannot be accomplished
afterwards.
The built-in lifting hoist must be a chain pulley type, which stops immediately the drive control
is released. It can also be used for the wireline rig-up making it easier and safer.
Coiled tubing on a well test is normally used for:
• Gas lifting using nitrogen
• Spotting fluids i.e. accurately placing fluids for squeezing, perforating etc.
• Logging (Stiff Wireline) in high deviations with cable inside the tubing.
The main limitation of coiled tubing is that it has a low burst and collapse pressure rating,
therefore a pre-job computer analysis should be run using all the expected well parameters
such as the expected well pressures and temperatures, internal pressures on the tubing, hole
angles, depths and tubing data etc.
When coiled tubing is to be run on a well test, it is essential that the sub-sea test tree is
dressed to be capable of cutting, whatever the size of the tubing.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 93 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
There are a number of methods for conducting a well kill operation in a well test situation,
dependent upon the well hardware and configuration, taking into account of any well problems
which have arisen. However, the two main methods under normal circumstances are;
‘Reverse Circulation’ and ‘Bullheading’.
Note: Bullheading from surface should never be carried out as a routine kill
method without prior permission from Eni-Agip management. Procedures
for any such method of well kill would be issued in the test programme.
Killing by reverse circulation is the preferred method of killing a well as it reduces the quantity
of foreign materials coming into contact with and prevents over pressuring the formation.
Bullheading is sometimes preferred in cases where the circulation method may not be
efficient due to gas entrainment etc.
Other methods of well kill are used in circumstances where there has been a circulating valve
failure or a blockage in the tubing. These are; ‘Bleed off and Bullhead’, ‘Reverse Circulate and
Bullhead’ and ‘Lubricate’. These are so specialised in nature that it is not practical for them to
be used without first thoroughly examining the well situation and then producing a detailed well
specific programme and are, therefore, not addressed in this manual.
On tests with Semi-Submersibles there is a well kill procedure for making the well safe for a
disconnection due to bad weather etc.
5) Calculate the maximum the bottomhole pressure to be applied, which must be kept
below the formation frac pressure.
6) If the formation takes the pumped fluid, continue bullheading down the test string and
liner below the packer to the bottom perforations. Check the volume of pumped brine.
7) A variation in the pumping pressure should be detected when brine reaches the
formation. Record the leak-off rate.
8) Carry out a 30min flow check. If static, proceed to step 14.
9) If the well takes brine at more than 5bbl/hr, the displacement of a temporary plugging pill
to bottom may have to be considered.
10) If the formation doesn’t take the pumped fluid or the injection rate is less than 0.1bpm
over a 3hrs period, close the kill side wing valve and tester valve.
11) With the multi-function circulating valve in the test position, open the single shot
reversing valve and reverse circulate until the tubing and annulus are in balance.
12) For tests using permanent packers, pull out seal assembly and reverse circulate at
least twice bottoms up, or until minimum gas returns.
For conventional DST, unseat the packer and bullhead the hole contents below the
packer into the formation. Reverse circulate again, if necessary, until tubing and
annulus are in balance.
13) Flow check the well.
14) Once the well is stable, pull string out of hole while carefully monitoring the hole volume,
especially while DST tools are in 7ins liner as the swabbing effect is to be avoided.
15) If the brine lost into formation is more than 5bbl/hr, the displacement of a temporary
plugging pill to bottom must be considered.
This may be composed of CaCO3, HEC or MICA etc. and the material must be
available on the rig to make up the appropriate weighted pill.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 95 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
The drawback of bullheading is when the formation may be fractured, as with low permeability
reservoirs. This can lead to a protracted well kill with hydrocarbons leaking back from the
fracture into the well bore and migrating upwards in the well.
As a very rough way of estimating if bullheading will fracture the formation is as follows:
a) Estimate the productivity index (PI) of the well form surface pressure and flow rate data.
b) Use the estimated of PI to calculate the injection pressure at a rate of 1bbl/min
(1,440bbl/d).
c) Compare the estimated injection pressure with the prognosed formation fracture
pressure.
If in an emergency situation, when there is insufficient time to kill the well, disconnection will
be implemented without the well kill. In this eventuality, there will still be the requisite number
of barriers on the well for safety, although reconnection to a live well has it’s own particular
risks. This operation would be detailed in a separate programme.
Note: Use of two bridge plugs instead of bridge plug and cement is to avoid
contamination of the completion brine.
Separate detailed procedures will be issued as part of the well specific drilling programme.
Pre-drilled development wells will also be covered by well specific drilling programmes.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 98 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Both CaBr2/CaCl2, as brine and powder can cause skin irritation and even blistering if allowed
to remain in contact with the skin. It is therefore important that personnel involved in work
where they may be exposed to the brine or powder should be protected as follow:
a) Rubber gloves (gauntlet type to cover wrists)
b) Waterproof slicker suits with hoods
c) Rubber boots (leather boots are shrivelled by the brine)
d) Full face masks for use when mixing powdered CaBr2/CaCl2.
e) Barrier cream (e.g. ‘Vaseline’) for use on exposed skin, particularly face, neck and
wrists, to prevent direct skin contact with the brine.
Additionally, whenever powder/brine is inadvertently splashed onto clothing, then the affected
clothes should be changed and washed forthwith. Never allow brine to dry on the skin or
clothes.
If brine is splashed into the eyes, wash the eyes at once with copious amounts of fresh water.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 99 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
FIELD NAME
Drilling
District/Affiliate Company
DATE: ARPO 02 Cost center
Well Last casing Next Casing BOP Type Ø w.p. [psi] M.D. (24:00) [m]
Ø nom.[in] Stack T.V.D. (24:00) [m]
Top [m] Diverter Total Drilled [m]
Bottom [m] Annular Rotating Hrs [hh:mm]
Top of Cmt [m] Annular R.O.P. [m / h]
Last Survey [°] at m Upper Rams Progressive Rot. hrs [hh:mm]
Shows
Operation at 07:00
Mud type Bit N° Run N° N° Run N° Bottom Hole Assembly N° __________ Rot. hours
Density [kg/l] Data Description Ø Part. L Progr.L Partial Progr.
Viscosity [s/l] Manuf.
P.V. [cP] Type
Y.P. [g/100cm2 ] Serial No.
Gel 10"/10' / IADC
Water Loss [cc/30"] Diam.
HP/HT [cc/30"] Nozzle/TFA
Press. [kg/cm 2] From [m]
Temp. [°C] To [m]
Cl- [g/l] Drilled [m]
Salt [g/l] Rot. Hrs.
pH/ES R.P.M.
MBT [kg/m3 ] W.O.B.[t]
Solid [%] Flow Rate Stock Quantity UM Supply vessel
Oil/water Ratio. Pressure
Sand [%] Ann. vel.
pm/pom Jet vel.
pf HHP Bit
mf HSI Total Cost Supervisor:
Daily Losses [m3 ] I O D L I O D L Daily
Progr. Losses [m3 ] B G O R B G O R Progr.
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 100 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Report[m]
From N° Depth
Interval(m)
Drilled (m) Mud Type
Density (kg/l)
3
To [m] Drilled Volume [m ] Cl- concentration (g/l )
3
Phase size [in] Cumulative volume [m ]
3 3
Water consumption Phase /Period [m ] Cumulative [m ]
3 3
Readings / Truck Fresh water [m ] Recycled [m ]
3
Mud Volume [m ] Phase Cumulative Service Company Contract N°
Mixed Mud Company
Remarks
Supervisor
Superintendent
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 101 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Situation Top [m] Bottom [m] Top [m] Bottom [m] Max inclination [°] Type
Open hole @m Dens.[kg/l]:
Last casing DROP OFF [m]
Superintendent
Contractor Representative:
DISTRICT OR SUBSIDIARY NOTES:
Technical Normal
Safety/Quality Innovative
Analysis Code:
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 103 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
CONTRACTOR EVALUATION
(FEED BACK REPORT 02)
District/Subsidiary
Report Date:
Well Name: Well Code:
General Information
Contract No.: Contract Type: Contractor:
Service/Supply: Distributed By:
R1 Technical Requirements
FB_01 REPORT REFERENCES
FB Report No.: Time Lost (Hr.Min): Economic Cost (£M):
Category Evaluation Score (0-9)
Suitability of Equipment and Materials
Compliance of Equipment and Materials to the
Adequacy of Personnel
Meeting with Operational Programme Requirements
Meeting with Contract Operation Timings
Equipment Condition/Maintenance
R2 Management and Organisational Requirements
FB_01 REPORT REFERENCES
FB Report No.: Time Lost (Hr.Min): Economic Cost (£M):
Category Evaluation Score (0-9)
Availability of Equipment and Materials
Technical and Operational Support to Operations
Capability and Promptness to Operational Requests
R3 Safety and Quality Assurance Requirements
FB_01 REPORT REFERENCES
FB Report No.: Time Lost (Hr.Min): Economic Cost (£M):
Category Evaluation Score (0-9)
Meeting with the Contract Agreement DSS
Availability and Validity of Requested Certificates
Meeting with Contract Quality Assurance Terms
Event Support Documentation
Type of Subject: Issued By: Date:
Document:
Notes:
Appendix B - ABBREVIATIONS
AC/DC Alternate Current, Direct Current
API American Petroleum Institute
BG Background gas
BHA Bottom Hole Assembly
BHP Bottom Hole Pressure
BHT Bottom Hole temperature
BMT Blue Methylene Test
BOP Blow Out Preventer
BPD Barrel Per Day
BPM Barrels Per Minute
BPV Back Pressure Valve
BSW Base Sediment and Water
BUR Build Up Rate
C/L Control Line
CBL Cement Bond Log
CCL Casing Collar Locator
CDP Common Depth Point
CET Cement Evaluation Tool
CGR Condensate Gas Ratio
CR Cement Retainer
CRA Corrosion Resistant Alloy
C/T Coiled Tubing
DC Drill Collar
DE Diatomaceous Earth
DHM Down Hole Motor
DHSV Down Hole Safety Valve
D&CM Drilling & Completion Manager
DP Drill Pipe
DPHOT Drill Pipe Hang off Tool
DST Drill Stem Test
E/L Electric Line
ECD Equivalent Circulation Density
ECP External Casing Packer
EMS Electronic Multi Shot
EMW Equivalent Mud Weight
EP External Pressure
ESD Electric Shut-Down System
ESP Electrical Submersible Pump
ETA Expected Arrival Time
FBHP Flowing Bottom Hole Pressure
FBHT Flowing Bottom Hole Temperature
FPI/BO Free Point Indicator / Back Off
FTHP Flowing Tubing Head Pressure
FTHT Flowing Tubing Head Temperature
GLR Gas Liquid Ratio
A RPO IDENTIFICATION CODE PAGE 105 OF 108
EN I S.p.A.
REVISION
A g ip Div isio n
STAP-P-1-M-7130 0
Appendix C - BIBLIOGRAPHY
Document: STAP Number
Other
API Specification No 811-05CT5