Skip to Main Content

HSNS364 Written Assignment 1

Response 2.docx
by Suhanya Sundaran

FILE 145867_SUHANYA_SUNDARAN_HSNS364_WRITTEN_ASSIGNMENT_1_R
ESPONSE_2_1871781_1494611680.DOCX (22.64K)
TIME SUBMITTED 27-AUG-2020 11:02AM (UTC+1000) WORD COUNT 1213
SUBMISSION ID 1374633670 CHARACTER COUNT 7104
 criteria is
about
nausea
assessm
ent and
not
about
physiolo
gy of
nausea

Intext citations mentioned in the first 2 sentences does not

contain any information to support the statement.
 Good
details
about
assessme
nt tool.
Please
make sure
to use
appropriat
e intext
citation to
back your
statement
s.

Good

Good
HSNS364 Written Assignment 1 Response 2.docx
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

22
Instructor

Suhanya

/30 You have provided some useful information in the

assignment. But some of the discussions were not
directly addressing the criteria (see intext comments).
Please make sure to include appropriate intext citation
which are relevant in supporting the statements. Good
attempt.

Renjith

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

Comment 1
Avoid using unnecessary heading as the word count for this assignment is very low (750). Rather
than wasting words on heading please use them in the discussion.

Text Comment. criteria is about nausea assessment and not about physiology of nausea

Comment 2
Irrelevant information in the above paragraph as the assignment criteria is about nausea assessment
and not nausea physiology

Comment 3
Citation inappropriate. I had a good look at his reference you mentioned here. It does not mention
about visual analogue score

Comment 4
This information is not present in the reference you mentioned here.

Text Comment. Intext citations mentioned in the first 2 sentences does not contain any
information to support the statement.
PAGE 3

Text Comment. Good details about assessment tool. Please make sure to use appropriate
intext citation to back your statements.

Text Comment. Good

Text Comment. Good

PAGE 4

Comment 5
skin cancer

Comment 6
You should have included few more types of cancer in this discussion

QM Include intext citation

You need to provide intext citation at the end of the sentence if the information is sourced from
journal articles/ publications/ websites etc.

Comment 7
Details you provided in the last part of the paragraph should have been linked back to some existing
programs and campaigns. Please remember criteria 3 is about health promotion and prevention
which are 'in place'.

PAGE 5

PAGE 6
RUBRIC: HSNS364 A1 PARTB T2 2019 74.40 / 100

CRITERIA 1 (26%) 65 / 100

Critical discussion of the assessments and assessment tools used in assessing Betty’s nausea and vomiting

HD Outstanding critical discussion and analysis of assessments and assessment tools.

(100) Excellent use of evidence to support discussion using a wide range of high quality
resources.

HD Outstanding critical discussion and analysis of assessments and assessment tools.

(95) Excellent use of evidence to support discussion using a wide range of high quality
resources.

HD Outstanding critical discussion and analysis of assessments and assessment tools.

(85) Excellent use of evidence to support discussion using a wide range of high quality
resources.

D Thorough critical discussion and analysis of assessments and assessment tools. Effective
(80) use of a wide range of evidence to support discussion.

D Thorough critical discussion and analysis of assessments and assessment tools. Effective
(75) use of a wide range of evidence to support discussion.

C An effective discussion of assessments and assessment tools. Discussion is supported by

(70) a range of evidence based resources, developing critical analysis.

C An effective discussion of assessments and assessment tools. Discussion is supported by

(65) a range of evidence based resources, developing critical analysis.

P Some discussion on assessments and assessment tools. Discussion is supported by

(60) some evidence based sources, some evidence of attempt at analysis of literature.

P Some discussion on assessments and assessment tools. Discussion is supported by

(55) some evidence based sources, some evidence of attempt at analysis of literature.

P Some discussion on assessments and assessment tools. Discussion is supported by

(50) some evidence based sources, some evidence of attempt at analysis of literature.

N Discussion is unclear or Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided on

(45) assessments and assessment tools. Not supported by evidence or supported by non-
evidence based sources; little or no attempt at analysis of sources.

N Discussion is unclear or Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided on

(40) assessments and assessment tools. Not supported by evidence or supported by non-
evidence based sources; little or no attempt at analysis of sources.

N Discussion is unclear or Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided on

(35) assessments and assessment tools. Not supported by evidence or supported by non-
evidence based sources; little or no attempt at analysis of sources.

CRITERIA 2 (28%) 85 / 100

Critical discussion on Two health care professionals involved in the care of Betty

HD Outstanding critical discussion of the roles of two health professionals involved in the care
(100) of Betty. Excellent use of evidence based resources used to support discussion using a
wide range of high quality resources.

HD Outstanding critical discussion of the roles of two health professionals involved in the care
(95) of Betty. Excellent use of evidence based resources used to support discussion using a
wide range of high quality resources.

HD Outstanding critical discussion of the roles of two health professionals involved in the care
(85) of Betty. Excellent use of evidence based resources used to support discussion using a
wide range of high quality resources.

D Thorough critical discussion of the roles of two health professionals involved in the care of
(80) Betty. Effective use of a wide range of evidence to support discussion.

D Thorough critical discussion of the roles of two health professionals involved in the care of
(75) Betty. Effective use of a wide range of evidence to support discussion.

C An effective discussion of the roles of two health professionals involved in the care of
(70) Betty. Discussion is supported by some evidenced based resources; developing critical
analysis.

C An effective discussion of the roles of two health professionals involved in the care of
(65) Betty. Discussion is supported by some evidenced based resources; developing critical
analysis.

P Some discussion of the roles of two health professionals involved in the care of Betty.
(60) Discussion is supported by some evidence based sources, some evidence of attempt at
analysis of literature.

P Some discussion of the roles of two health professionals involved in the care of Betty.
(55) Discussion is supported by some evidence based sources, some evidence of attempt at
analysis of literature.

P Some discussion of the roles of two health professionals involved in the care of Betty.
(50) Discussion is supported by some evidence based sources, some evidence of attempt at
analysis of literature.

N Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided on the roles of two health professionals

(45) involved in the care of Betty. Not supported by evidence or supported by non-evidence
based sources; little or no attempt at analysis of sources.

N Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided on the roles of two health professionals

(40) involved in the care of Betty. Not supported by evidence or supported by non-evidence
based sources; little or no attempt at analysis of sources.

N Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided on the roles of two health professionals

(35) involved in the care of Betty. Not supported by evidence or supported by non-evidence
based sources; little or no attempt at analysis of sources.
CRITERIA 3 (26%) 70 / 100
Critical discussion of the most prevalent health promotion and cancer prevention strategies

HD Outstanding critical discussion of the most prevalent health promotion and cancer
(100) prevention strategies. Excellent use of evidence based resources used to support
discussion using a wide range of high quality resources.

HD Outstanding critical discussion of the most prevalent health promotion and cancer
(95) prevention strategies. Excellent use of evidence based resources used to support
discussion using a wide range of high quality resources.

HD Outstanding critical discussion of the most prevalent health promotion and cancer
(85) prevention strategies. Excellent use of evidence based resources used to support
discussion using a wide range of high quality resources.

D Thorough critical discussion of the most prevalent health promotion and cancer prevention
(80) strategies. Effective use of a wide range of evidence to support discussion.

D Thorough critical discussion of the most prevalent health promotion and cancer prevention
(75) strategies. Effective use of a wide range of evidence to support discussion.

C An effective An effective discussion the most prevalent health promotion and cancer
(70) prevention strategies. Discussion is supported by some evidenced based resources;
developing critical analysis.

C An effective An effective discussion the most prevalent health promotion and cancer
(65) prevention strategies. Discussion is supported by some evidenced based resources;
developing critical analysis.

P Some discussion of the most prevalent health promotion and cancer prevention strategies.
(60) Discussion is supported by some evidence based sources, some evidence of attempt at
analysis of literature.

P Some discussion of the most prevalent health promotion and cancer prevention strategies.
(55) Discussion is supported by some evidence based sources, some evidence of attempt at
analysis of literature.

P Some discussion of the most prevalent health promotion and cancer prevention strategies.
(50) Discussion is supported by some evidence based sources, some evidence of attempt at
analysis of literature.

N Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided of the most prevalent health promotion

(45) and cancer prevention strategies. Not supported by evidence or supported by non-
evidence based sources; little or no attempt at analysis of sources.

N Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided of the most prevalent health promotion

(40) and cancer prevention strategies. Not supported by evidence or supported by non-
evidence based sources; little or no attempt at analysis of sources.

N Discussion is unclear or no discussion is provided of the most prevalent health promotion

(35) and cancer prevention strategies. Not supported by evidence or supported by non-
evidence based sources; little or no attempt at analysis of sources.
CRITERIA 4 (10%) 70 / 100
Writing: Follows requirements for structure, presentation grammar and spelling.

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to essay format writing conventions, grammatical

(100) conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structured assignment

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to essay format writing conventions, grammatical

(95) conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structured assignment

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to essay format writing conventions, grammatical

(85) conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structured assignment

D Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay format writing conventions, adheres to
(80) grammatical conventions with few errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment

D Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay format writing conventions, adheres to
(75) grammatical conventions with few errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment

C Partial but close adherence to essay format writing conventions, adheres to grammatical
(70) conventions, but with frequent errors, mainly a well- structured assignment, lacking
cohesion in places

C Partial but close adherence to essay format writing conventions, adheres to grammatical
(65) conventions, but with frequent errors, mainly a well- structured assignment, lacking
cohesion in places

P Minimal adherence to essay format writing conventions, minimal adherence to

(60) grammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment, frequently
lacking cohesion

P Minimal adherence to essay format writing conventions, minimal adherence to

(55) grammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment, frequently
lacking cohesion

P Minimal adherence to essay format writing conventions, minimal adherence to

(50) grammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment, frequently
lacking cohesion

N Little attempt to adhere to essay format writing conventions, multiple grammatical errors
(45) with minimal attention to writing / spelling conventions that significantly distract the reader
from the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion

N Little attempt to adhere to essay format writing conventions, multiple grammatical errors
(40) with minimal attention to writing / spelling conventions that significantly distract the reader
from the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion

N Little attempt to adhere to essay format writing conventions, multiple grammatical errors
(35) with minimal attention to writing / spelling conventions that significantly distract the reader
from the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion

CRITERIA 5 (10%) 85 / 100

Referencing: Follows requirements for referencing (APA 6th Edition) and the application of evidence

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to APA referencing conventions for the in-text and
(100) reference list Explicitly acknowledges all sources used throughout the assignment

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to APA referencing conventions for the in-text and
(95) reference list Explicitly acknowledges all sources used throughout the assignment

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to APA referencing conventions for the in-text and
(85) reference list Explicitly acknowledges all sources used throughout the assignment

D Mostly offers accurate and consistent APA referencing conventions for the in-text and
(80) reference list Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment

D Mostly offers accurate and consistent APA referencing conventions for the in-text and
(75) reference list Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment

C A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA references in the in-text and reference list
(70) Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment

C A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA references in the in-text and reference list
(65) Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment

P Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA references in the in-text and reference list
(60) Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment

P Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA references in the in-text and reference list
(55) Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment

P Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA references in the in-text and reference list
(50) Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment

N Did not adhere to the APA referencing conventions and/or made catastrophic, multiple
(45) and consistent APA errors throughout Little or no acknowledgment of sources used
throughout the assignment

N Did not adhere to the APA referencing conventions and/or made catastrophic, multiple
(40) and consistent APA errors throughout Little or no acknowledgment of sources used
throughout the assignment

N Did not adhere to the APA referencing conventions and/or made catastrophic, multiple
(35) and consistent APA errors throughout Little or no acknowledgment of sources used
throughout the assignment