Which Size Tire Fits Which Size Rim?
Which Size Tire Fits Which Size Rim?
Which Size Tire Fits Which Size Rim?
Bicycle tires come in a bewildering variety of sizes. To make matters worse, in the early days of
cycling, every country that manufactured bicycles developed its own system of marking the
sizes. These different national sizing schemes created a situation in which the same size tire
would be known by different numbers in different countries. Even worse, different-sized tires
that were not interchangeable with one another were often marked with the same numbers!
This page covers sizes in common use as of its writing, and a number of older sizes. Sutherland's
Handbook for Bicycle Mechanics, 3rd through 6th edition, covers dozens of additional, antique
sizes. The 6th edition is available on CD ROM from Sutherland's. Better bike shops will have a
copy.
Unfortunately, evolution of tires and rims has made these measurements lose contact with
reality. Here's how it works: Let's start with the 26 x 2.125 size that became popular on
heavyweight "balloon tire" bikes in the late '30's and still remains common on "beach cruiser"
bikes. This size tire is very close to 26 inches in actual diameter. Some riders, however were
dissatisfied with these tires, and wanted something a bit lighter and faster. The industry
responded by making "middleweight" tires, marked 26 x 1.75 to fit the same rims. Although they
are still called "26 inch", these tires are actually 25 5/8", not 26". This same rim size was adopted
by the early pioneers of west-coast "klunkers", and became the standard for mountain bikes. Due
to the appetite of the market, you can get tires as narrow as 25 mm to fit these rims, so you wind
up with a "26 inch" tire that is more like 24 7/8" in actual diameter!
A second number or letter code would indicate the width of the tire. (26 x 1.75, 27 x 1
1/4...650B, 700C...)
If two tires are marked with sizes that are mathematically equal,
but one is expressed as a decimal and the other as a fraction,
these two tires will not be interchangeable.
Dishonesty in Sizing
Competitive pressures have often led to inaccuracy in width measurement. Here's how it works:
Suppose you are in the market for a high performance 700 x 25 tire; you might reasonably
investigate catalogues and advertisements to try to find the lightest 700-25 available. If the Pepsi
Tire Company and the Coke Tire Company had tires of equal quality and technology, but the
Pepsi 700-25 was actually a 700-24 marked as a 25, the Pepsi tire would be lighter than the
accurately-marked Coke 700-25. This would put them at a competitive advantage. In self
defense, Coke would retaliate by marketing an even lighter 700-23 labeled as a 700-25.
This scenario prevailed throughout the '70's and '80's. The situation got so out-of-hand that
cooler heads have prevailed, and there is a strong (but not universal) trend toward accurate width
measurements.
B.S.D.
ISO, the International Organization for Standardization has developed a universal tire sizing
system that eliminates this confusion. (This system was formerly known as the "E.T.R.T.O."
system, developed by the European Tyre and Rim Technical Organisation.)
The ISO system uses two numbers; the first is the width of the tire or rim in millimeters (The
actual tire width will vary a bit depending on the width of the rim. The rim width is the inner
width measured between the flanges as shown in the diagram.)
The second ISO number is the critical one, it is the diameter of the bead seat of the rim, in mm
("B.S.D."). Generally, if this number matches, the tire involved will fit onto the rim; if it doesn't
match, the tire won't fit.
For example, a 700 x 20 C road tire would be a 20-622; a 700 x 38 hybrid tire would be a 38-
622. The width difference between these sizes would make them less-than ideal replacements for
one another, but any rim that could fit one of them would work after a fashion with the other.
A general guideline is that the tire width should be between 1.45/2.0 x the inner rim width.
If you flatten out a tire and measure the total width from bead to bead, it should be
approximately 2.5 x the ISO width.
If your tire is too narrow for the rim there's an increased risk of tire/rim damage from road
hazards.
If its too wide for the rim, there's an increase risk of sidewall wear from brake shoes, and a
greater risk of loss of control in the event of a sudden flat.
The following is a partial listing of traditional tire sizes, with their ISO bead seat equivalents.
The ISO comparison list at the bottom of this page covers all sizes which we know to be in
production as of 2016. The fractional, decimal and French lists cover common sizes.
Fractional sizes:
Fractional ISO Applications
French sizes:
In the French system, the first number is the nominal diameter in mm, followed by a letter code
for the width: "A" is narrow, "D" is wide. The letter codes no longer correspond to the tire width,
since narrow tires are often made for rim sizes that originally took wide tires; for example, 700 C
was originally a wide size, but now is available in very narrow widths, with actual diameters as
small as 660 mm.
Most of this information was compiled by John Allen for Sutherland's Handbook For
Bicycle Mechanics, the bible of bicycle technology. Sutherland's, 6th edition has a more
detailed, more thorough version of this chart.
Width Considerations
Although you can use practically any tire/rim combination that shares the same bead seat
diameter, it is unwise to use widely disparate sizes.
If you use a very narrow tire on a wide rim, you risk pinch flats and rim damage from road
hazards.
If you use a very wide tire on a narrow rim, you risk sidewall or rim failure. This combination
causes very sloppy handling at low speeds. Unfortunately, current mountain-bike fashion pushes
the edge of this. In the interest of weight saving, most current mountain bikes have excessively
narrow rims. Such narrow rims work very poorly with wide tires, unless the tires are
overinflated...but that defeats the purpose of wide tires, and puts undue stress on the rim
sidewalls.
Georg Boeger has kindly provided a chart showing recommended width combinations:
The GMS uses a two-number system: the first number is the width of the casing, and the second
number is the width of the tread, both in millimeters. These measurements are taken on a rim
which is 20 mm wide at the bead-capturing point, with a tire inflated to 60psi and maintained for
24 hours.
In addition to being able to accurately size a tire, knowing the actual casing size and tread width
provides an indication of air volume, tread characteristics and tread contact area; all of which
provide you with a more concise idea of what ride characteristics to expect from each of WTB's
tires.
Unless special cement which does not allow on-road replacement of a tire is used, tubulars
"squirm" against the rims and are slower than the best wired-on tires, even though lighter -- see
details from Jobst Brandt.
Tubulars existed in several different sizes, but only 700c and 26-inch tubulars are readily
available these days. Beware: sizes of 26" and 24" tubulars are not well-standardized. Take
the rim with you when buying a tire, and vice versa. Size variations of tubulars are covered in
Sutherland's Handbook for Bicycle Mechanics, 7th Edition, available from Sutherland's, and on
the mechanic's bookshelf at better bike shops.
Full-sized tubulars fit rims of the same diameter as 622 mm (700c) clinchers. This size is
sometimes referred to as "28 inch" or "700". It is also, confusingly, sometimes referred to
as "27 inch." The "27 inch" designation is inaccurate and obsolete, but you'll sometimes
run into it in older printed material.
In clincher tires, there is a real difference between "700c" and "27 inch" sizes, but for
tubulars this is a false distinction. Whenever you see mention of "27 inch tubulars" the
writer is actually referring to standard full-sized tubulars, as used on most racing bikes.
"26 inch" or "650" tubulars are smaller, mainly used on time-trial or motorpacing track
bikes. There are two common "26 inch" sizes, corresponding to the 584 mm and 571
mm ISO sizes. There are a couple of oddball sizes as well.
"24 inch" (two slightly different sizes), "22 inch" "20 inch" and "18 inch" tubulars are
sizes formerly used for children's racing bikes, but pretty much extinct these days. The
"18 inch" size corresponds to the "17 inch" (369 mm) size used on Moulton bicycles.
If you want to sound like an ignorant yahoo, call them "tubies" or "tubeless tires."
What's New
Sheldon Brown on Facebook
Site Feedback & Questions
Articles by Sheldon Brown and Others
What's New
Beginners
Bicycle Glossary
Brakes
Commuting
Cyclecomputers
Do-It-Yourself
Essays and Fiction
Family Cycling
Fixed-Gear
Frames
Gears and Drivetrains
Humor
Old Bikes
Repair Tips
Singlespeed
Tandems
Touring
Wheels
Translations
Sheldon - the man