Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mei Et Al. (2018)
Mei Et Al. (2018)
1
Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of Ministry of Education,
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
meiguox@163.com
2
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
1 Introduction
During pile driving, excess pore water pressures are generated in the vicinity of the pile,
and the dissipation of these excess water pressures will take weeks or months especially
in sensitive clays. In practice, drainage paths are often introduced near the pile to speed
up the soil consolidation process, such as the techniques of prefabricated vertical drains,
sand drains, and stone columns. It should be emphasized that the maximum excess
pressure occurs at the soil-pile interface. All these measures cannot be installed at loca‐
tions that are too close to the driven pile.
Some alternative solutions of introducing vertical drainage paths in the soil emerged
recently, including pervious concrete ground-improvement piles [1] and permeable pipe
piles [2, 3]. Pervious concrete piles have limitations in strength to resist loads in the
axial and lateral directions compared to normal concrete piles [1, 4]. Contrarily, perme‐
able pile is made of normal reinforced concrete, with drainage holes drilled around the
circumference the pile as illustrated in Fig. 1. The arrangement of these drainage holes
will be opened to enable the dissipation of excess pore pressures, once the driving
process is completed. This investigation will demonstrate the effectiveness of permeable
piles in accelerating soil consolidation using numerical simulations. Both compression
and flexural tests are conducted to check whether opening drainage holes will result in
a reduction of strength for permeable piles.
Two series of uniaxial compression tests (different concrete strength of C50 and C80)
have been performed on permeable pile specimens. Details of the testing program can
be found in Ni et al. [5]. Figure 3 depicts the correlation between the strength reduction
and the opening ratio of drainage holes. The ultimate compressive strength decreases
monotonically with openings, until a plateau of strength reduction of 80% is reached.
Calculations are carried out to determine the minimum required compressive strength
for normal piles, which is found to be much less than the measured values for permeable
piles. Drainage holes only reduce the ultimate compressive strength by a maximum of
20%, and permeable piles still fulfill the design needs.
Fig. 3. Reduction in ultimate compressive strength due to the opening of drainage holes.
Four point flexural tests are performed on six prototype-scale permeable piles. Interested
readers can find more details regarding the testing program in Ni et al. [5]. The patterns
of cracks in the concrete at the end of the tests are plotted in Fig. 4 for six piles. Cracks
in the normal pile are more concentrated, whereas cracks in the permeable pile spread
more over a wider area. The widths of all cracks are mapped, and it is found that the
widest crack always occurs in the normal pile. All cracks first initiate from the weak
zone in the pile. For permeable piles, the spread of cracks through multiple weak zones
can help to redistribute the flexural moment.
The variations of bending moment with the applied load are drawn in Fig. 5. As
expected, the measured bending moments from both normal and permeable piles are
comparable at lower loads, which follow a linear pattern of theoretical solution. With
the increase of the applied load, the measured values deviate from the analytical solution.
At the same load in a later stage, the bending moment of permeable pile is lower than
that of normal pile, which explains that less significant cracks are observed for permeable
pile. This also demonstrates that drilling drainage holes can help permeable piles to
withstand a higher level of flexure.
1004 G. Mei et al.
Fig. 4. Distribution of cracks in normal pile: (a), (b) and (c), and permeable pile: (d), (e) and (f).
Fig. 5. Measured bending moment for normal (1#) and permeable (4#) piles.
References
1. Suleiman, M.T., Ni, L., Raich, A.: Development of pervious concrete pile ground-improvement
alternative and behavior under vertical loading. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140(7),
04014035 (2014)
2. Ni, P., Mangalathu, S., Mei, G., Zhao, Y.: Permeable piles: an alternative to improve the
performance of driven piles. Comput. Geotech. 84, 78–87 (2017)
3. Ni, P., Mangalathu, S., Mei, G., Zhao, Y.: Laboratory investigation of pore pressure dissipation in
clay around permeable piles. Can. Geotech. J. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0180
4. Suleiman, M.T., Ni, L., Raich, A., Helm, J., Ghazanfari, E.: Measured soil-structure interaction
for concrete piles subjected to lateral loading. Can. Geotech. J. 52(8), 1168–1179 (2015)
5. Ni, P., Mangalathu, S., Mei, G., Zhao, Y.: Compressive and flexural behaviour of reinforced
concrete permeable piles. Eng. Struct. 147, 316–327 (2017)