Indian Journal of Criminology 2018-19 PDF
Indian Journal of Criminology 2018-19 PDF
Indian Journal of Criminology 2018-19 PDF
OF
CRIMINOLOGY
Volume 46 & 47
2018-19
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY
The Indian Journal of Criminology is a joint publication of Indian Society of Criminology (ISC), K.L.
Arora Chair in Criminal Law and Centre for Criminology and Victimology at National Law University
Delhi. The Journal is published twice in a year (January and July). The scope of the Journal covers
all aspects of criminology, penology and victimology including all such issues bordering sociology,
psychology, law, social work and ICT applications. Empirical research based papers in the broader
domain of criminal justice administration are specially encouraged. Comparative studies from the
international contributors focusing on the substantive and applied aspects of criminology and criminal
justice are highly solicited. We also welcome papers from the University Departments/ institutions,
Correctional Services, Social Welfare Organisation, forensic Sciences Laboratories etc.
Instructions of Authors
1. All Manuscripts and other communications relating to the Journals should be submitted through
email in word format at indianjournalofcriminology@gmail.com
2. Each article should be accompanied by an abstract of about 100 words (15 to 20 typed lines).
3. A declaration to the effect that to the effect that the article has not been submitted for publication
elsewhere, signed by all authors should be submitted along with the article.
4. Articles submitted to the Indian Journal of Criminology should be type written and double spaced
on A4 size Bond paper. Matter should be typed on one side of the paper only, with a wide margin.
The length of the article should not exceed 15 typed pages. Symbols, formulae and equations
must be written clearly and with great care. Too many lengthy tables and graphs should be
avoided.
5. Reference are made according to the abridged Harvard method by giving the author’s name and
date to publication in the text e.g. (Panakal, 1973). Reference list at the end of the paper should
be in the alphabetical order of author’s names in the following form:
Panakal, J.J. (1973). An Agenda for Criminology
Indian Journal of Criminology, 1(1). 1-5.
6. Authors will be supplied softcopy of their article(s) on request to be sent at
indianjournalofcriminology@gmail.com
7. The Journal is available on subscription by paying annual subscription as under:
Individual Rs.300/-
Institutional Rs.500/-
Foreign $50/- (Including Air Mail Surcharge)
Managing Editor:
Dr. Syed Umarhathab
Assistant Professor, M.S. University, Tirunelveli, India
Executive Editors:
Dr. Ritu Sharma
Associate Professor, NLU Delhi
Dr. Akash Singh
Assistant Librarian, NLU Delhi
Dr. Garima Pal
Research Associate,NLU Delhi
Contents
Articles
ABSTRACT
‘Satyameva Jayate’- Truth alone Triumphs, enunciates the Indian ideology which confers the
zenithal importance to truth. Truth and Justice are somewhat synonymous for the common
man, and thus, when justice fails, truth stands defeated. The Malimath Committee in its
Report on Reforms in Criminal Justice System, 2003 deliberated on the need to attain the
ultimate end, not in terms of acquittal or conviction, but truth. Referring to the observations of
Dr. R. Venkataraman, Former President of India, the Committee reiterated that “the Judge is
not concerned with the truth; he is only concerned with the proof.” In fact, the law of evidence
clearly enumerates that either the evidence is proved, disproved, or, not proved. In other
words, facts of a case are to be established by means of evidence, which is submitted before
the Court, and, the latter has to decide whether the facts are thereby established. In case the
Court is convinced to the point of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’, conviction is maintained for
the accused, whereas in all other cases, it is acquittal. It is merely presumed that truth will
surface from the individual version of facts presented by the prosecution and the defense in
presence of the Judge, who appears to have little or no say in the drama that unfolds before
him in the court room. He simply plays the role of a mute spectator at the contest between two
parties and declares who has won and lost. The Malimath Committee criticized this system
to be profoundly loaded in favor of the accused and accordingly made recommendations to
incorporate appropriate changes in the law.
An illustration may be given from K. Venkateshwarlu v.State of Andhra Pradesh(2012) where
the Court found itself helpless to give justice to a polio-ridden child rape victim; although it
was proved that she was sexually assaulted by the accused, a police officer. Lamenting on the
acquittal, the Court said:
“The demeanor of Aruna, the tears in her eyes, her walking out of the Court after looking at
the appellant, pricks the judicial conscience….”
A decade and a half later since the Committee suggested necessary amendments to shift the
core focus of criminal justice to attainment of truth, little has been achieved. Except for sparing
aspects of victim participation, the remaining suggestions have gone unhindered. The present
system suffers from the same laxity as before. The paper analyses recent judicial trends to
indicate the continued ineptness of the adversarial system to achieve justice, and consequently
truth, and the dire need to bring about changes.
KEY WORDS
Malimath Committee, Adversarial System, Truth, Justice, Victims.
Rajesh Kumar*
Abstract
The objective of this study is to present a blueprint; how to test the safety status of a city. It
applies the proposed model to investigate the first list of Indian smart cities. It measures the
safety status of select cities by analyzing the crime standpoints and attempts to enquire; Are
smart cities safe cities? The method creates five crimes categories based on relative nature and
severity. Further, it assigns different value points for different crime categories to develop the
city’s safety point as a determinant which constructs a more balanced tool. The study prima
facie confirms that none city found safe as per the scale set forth. The applied model is one of
the modules which may supplement to a broader assessment framework. Through a review of
studies, it endorses the identical elements that will enrich the evaluation process and also be
the topics of future investigations.
KEY WORDS
Urban safety; Measurement model; Indian smart cities; Ranking of safe cities; Crime
statistics.
*FORE School of Management New Delhi, ORCID No. 0000-0002-8735-3540, Email: rkdce2004@gmail.com
Similarly, the above method applied to get If 72.98<CSP then the city is considered as
nRCC and CSP for both IPC and SLL. ‘Relatively Safe’
Refer table 2: the seven cities found CSP in If 0<CSP≤72.98 then the city is considered
+ and five cities in – under IPC; five cities as ‘Unsafe’
found CSP in + and seven cities – under If 0<CSP≤-72.98 then the city is considered
SLL and as overall equal cities six found in as ‘Relatively Unsafe’
+ and – both.
If -72.98<CSP then the city is considered as
Further, the cities divided into following ‘More Unsafe’
five safety statuses as per the gained CSP.
The CSP score assists the comparison among
Safe City Status cities and ranks them in order as depicted
It assumes the city’s safety level as per IPC in table 3. An ideal condition assumed for
as… a safe city; the city which obtained zero (0)
CSP score considered a safe city and zero rank of a smart city and a safe city. Hence,
(0) CSP score set as an index for the safe the rank of smart cities irrelevant to their
city. The obtained CSP score by the cities in status of safety. While comparing, two safer
plus and in minus appropriately assigned cities as per RCC of table 1 found a place
safety status in table 3. The city’s safety in the top three safer cities as per nRCC in
status presented as per the obtained CSP table 3. Identically all five top unsafe cities
score for IPC, SLL and overall separately. of table 1 found the place among top five
It depicts the safety level in decreasing unsafe cities in table 3 but in a changed
order from safe to unsafe. (From city SU to order. Hence, results of this study are along
JP) Prima facie, none city found safe as per the line which proved its worth by filling
the scale set forth. Inconsistency noticed the proportional gaps which observed in
in smart city rank and safety status of the table 1 and by applied to the proposed
cities while comparing CSP score as per the model; it presents refined results in table
IPC, SLL and overall. 3. By applying the model anyone can find
the safety status of a particular city and
Concluding Remarks
can rank them by comparing among other
The study observes no consistency in the
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY - Volume 46 & 47 2018-2019
22
uniform cities. The method used in this figures for better evaluation model.
study may be an example to other similar Through the literature review, it identifies
studies or will add value to more exhaustive the above components that may enhance
studies. The study will draw the attention the evaluation procedure and could be
of think tanks, government agencies, the topics for future research. Further,
and individuals who involve in research, standardization of crime data from local to
policy making, and execution of decisions. international level is highly requisite for a
Further, it will encourage them to develop more structured and elaborative evaluation
benchmarks for the evaluation processes. method.
It is acknowledged that the results are * Due to non-availability of AIR, lowest
significant even though there are many RCC of the city considered as AIR for that
limitations to the study. It recommends a particular crime.
holistic evaluation framework comprising
Note: 1. The calculated values are rounded
personal safety, digital security, health
up to one decimal and two decimals for RCC
security, infrastructure safety, a safety
and nRCC (in bracket) respectively; hence
measure for the natural disaster, and human
an approximate value is used for analysis.
errors, etc. Further, an integrated uniform
crime reporting platform (to lodge FIR) is 2. While conducting a study for other cities,
in the want of dealing with under-reported existing crime may be removed or added
cases. Standardization of crime statistics new crime(s), sub-crime(s) or category as
recording and reporting is substantially require
essential to compare identical and contrary
Table 4: IPC-Crimes, Sub-crimes with AIR, Value points of crime category, and city’s RCC with nRCC in (bracket)
Valu
e
Sr Crimes Sub-Crimes AIR AM BP CB CH ID JB JP KC LD PN SU VP
point
1.4 2.9 1.2 1.6 3.2 3.2 3.7 0.5 4.5 2.5 2.2 1.4
1 Murders 2.6 5
(2.69) (5.58) (2.31) (3.08) (6.15) (6.15) (7.12) (0.96) (8.65) (4.81) (4.23) (2.69)
Murder 9.7
Attempt to Commit 0.8 4.0 1.8 2.4 9.1 3.4 0.9 4.2 3.6 0.4 2.8
2 3.7 4 (10.49
Murder (0.86) (4.32) (1.95) (2.59) (9.84) (3.68) (0.97) (4.54) (3.89) (0.43) (3.03)
)
Culpable Homicide
0.1 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 0
3 not amounting to 0.3 4
(1.33) (4) (0) (1.33) (0) (4) (2.67) (1.33) (9.33) (2.67) (1.33) (0)
Homicide Murder
5 Rape Rape 5.7 5 0.9 7.1 0.1 0.3 3.5 6.5 9.1 2.4 6.3 5.3 0.9 5
(0.79) (6.23) (0.09) (0.26) (3.07) (5.7) (7.98) (2.11) (5.53) (4.65) (0.79) (4.39)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 for Murder 0.1 3
(0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
21.3
Other Kidnapping & 2.1 10.9 0.3 0.3 18.2 17.6 0.2 3.6 13 3.7 10.9
10 3.9 3 (16.38
Abduction (1.62) (8.38) (0.23) (0.23) (14) (13.54) (0.15) (2.77) (10) (2.85) (8.38)
)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Dacoity with Murder 0 5
(0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
Dacoity
0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.4 0
12 Dacoity 0.3 4
(1.33) (1.33) (2.67) (1.33) (2.67) (2.67) (0) (5.33) (1.33) (10.67) (5.33) (0)
17
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY - Volume 46 & 47 2018-2019
25
Preparation and 0 0.5 0.1 0 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.3 1.9 0.6 0.1 0
13 0.3 2
Assembly for Dacoity (0) (3.33) (0.67) (0) (4) (1.33) (1.33) (2) (12.67) (4) (0.67) (0)
8
2.0 7.9 5.6 0.8 11.9 10.2 1.6 1.1 14.5 0.7 1.7
14 Robbery 2.9 4 (11.03
(2.76) (10.9) (7.72) (1.1) (16.41) (14.07) (2.21) (1.52) (20) (0.97) (2.34)
)
29.7
Criminal Trespass / 6.7 0 5.0 2.5 52.6 33.6 3.4 0.3 16.9 4.5 16.0
15 Criminal 6.9 3 (12.91
Burglary (2.91) (0) (2.17) (1.09) (22.87) (14.61) (1.48) (0.13) (7.35) (1.96) (6.96)
Trespass / )
Burglary House Trespass & 2.3 47.2 1.3 0.6 0 6.5 7.1 1.2 13.8 6.7 0.7 2.9
16 2.2 3
House Breaking (3.14) (64.36) (1.77) (0.82) (0) (8.86) (9.68) (1.64) (18.82) (9.14) (0.95) (3.95)
26.8 126.9 9.6 2.3 183.1 42.8 177.4 5.2 10.7 53.3 19 20.8
17 Auto Theft 15.8 3
(5.09) (24.09) (1.82) (0.44) (34.77) (8.13) (33.68) (0.99) (2.03) (10.12) (3.61) (3.95)
Theft
12.4 40.4 12.8 9.8 68.7 26.1 63.1 10.1 24.8 46.5 6.4 37.7
18 Other Theft 21.3 2
(1.16) (3.79) (1.20) (0.92) (6.45) (2.45) (5.92) (0.95) (2.33) (4.37) (0.6) (3.54)
Criminal Breach of 2.6 1.7 0.6 0.8 2.0 0.6 6 0.8 2.3 2.1 0.5 3.9
21 1.5 3
Trust (5.20) (3.4) (1.2) (1.6) (4) (1.2) (12) (1.6) (4.6) (4.2) (1) (7.8)
2.8 9.0 7.2 3.1 6.0 6.9 176.5 26.6 27.9 15.5 7.8 29.9
22 Cheating 9.2 1
(0.30) (0.98) (0.78) (0.34) (0.65) (0.75) (19.78) (2.89) (3.03) (1.68) (0.85) (3.25)
0.4 0.1 0.1 1.7 1.2 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.6
23 Forgery 1.1 2
(0.73) (0.18) (0.18) (3.09) (2.18) (0.73) (0.18) (0.91) (0.18) (0.18) (1.45) (1.09)
Offences Reltd to
Bank Notes
0.2 1.4 0.6 0.2 2.6 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.4 1.1 0.1 0.9
25 Arson 0.8 4
(1) (7) (3) (1) (13) (2.5) (3.5) (1.5) (2) (5.5) (0.5) (4.5)
2.7 1.4 1.0 0.5 3.4 7.3 0.3 3.9 12.3 12.9 3.8 4.2
26 Grievous Hurt Grievous Hurt 7.4 3
(1.09) (0.57) (0.41) (0.2) (1.38) (2.96) (0.12) (1.58) (4.99) (5.23) (1.54) (1.7)
19
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.1
27 Acid Attack 0 4
(0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
Attempt to Acid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
28 0 3
Attack (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
1.2 17.1 0 0.1 4.2 5.3 1.6 6.6 3 5.8 0.9 3.8
30 Sexual Harassment 4.0 4
(1.20) (17.1) (0) (0.1) (4.2) (5.3) (1.6) (6.6) (3) (5.8) (0.9) (3.8)
Use of Criminal
Assault on 0.1 0 0 0 0.1 0.9 0.8 0 0.8 0.4 0 1.4
31 Force With Intent to 1.4 3
Women with (0.21) (0) (0) (0) (0.21) (1.93) (1.71) (0) (1.71) (0.86) (0) (3)
Disrobe
Intent to
Voyeurism 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.1 0 0.1 0.1 0 0.4
32 Outrage her 0.1 1
(0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (3) (1) (0) (1) (1) (0) (4)
Modesty
0.3 0 0 0 1 3.2 0.7 0 0.4 3 0.1 2.2
33 Stalking 1.0 2
(0.60) (0) (0) (0) (2) (6.4) (1.4) (0) (0.8) (6) (0.2) (4.4)
34 Others 7.0 1 0.7 0 0.6 0.6 4.5 5.6 7.4 0 3.8 4.5 0.1 7.1
(0.10) (0) (0.09) (0.09) (0.64) (0.8) (1.06) (0) (0.54) (0.64) (0.01) (1.01)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
35 At Office Premises 0 2 20
(0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
In Public Transport 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
37 Insult to 0.1 2
System (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
Modesty of
Places other Than 0 1.0 0 0 4.8 1.5 0 0.9 0.4 1 0 0.5
38 Women 1.2 2
above Places (0) (1.67) (0) (0) (8) (2.5) (0) (1.5) (0.67) (1.67) (0) (0.83)
Cruelty by Husband 9.4 16.7 1.9 2.3 9.9 11.1 36.2 5.8 7.9 7.5 5.7 22.1
39 18.7 3
or His Relatives (1.51) (2.68) (0.30) (0.37) (1.59) (1.78) (5.81) (0.93) (1.27) (1.2) (0.91) (3.55)
Importation of Girls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
40 0 3
from Foreign Country (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
Causing Deaths Due to Rash / 5.8 8.8 12.0 10.0 10.3 17.6 28.2 6.4 17.0 9.2 5.6 22.4
41 10.3 4
Deaths by Negligent Driving (2.25) (3.42) (4.66) (3.88) (4) (6.83) (10.95) (2.49) (6.6) (3.57) (2.17) (8.7)
42 Negligence Deaths Due to other 0.4 5 0.1 0.8 1.3 1.2 1 1.5 0.2 0.1 0 0.8 0 1
21
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY - Volume 46 & 47 2018-2019
27
Causes (12.5) (10) (16.25 (15) (12.5) (18.76 (2.5) (12.5) (0) (10) (0) (12.5)
) )
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
43 Sedition 0 4
Offences (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
Against State 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
44 Others 0 3
(0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
On Ground of
Offences 0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
45 Religion, Race, Birth 0.1* 3
Promo -ting (0) (3) (12) (3) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
Place, etc.
Enmity
Imputation,
Between
Assertions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
46 Different 0 4
Prejudicial to (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
Groups
National Integration
0.7 0.6 0.9 0.9 1 2.1 0.5 0.3 0.5 1.4 0.3 0.6
47 Extortion 0.8 4
(3.5) (3) (4.5) (4.5) (5) (10.5) (2.5) (1.5) (2.5) (7) (1.5) (3)
48 Disclosure of Identity 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
of Victims (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
50 Human Trafficking 0.1 4
(0) (0) (0) (0) (4) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0)
125.0 286.8 50.4 31.5 243.6 337.1 179.2 67.0 83.7 41.1 5.3 65.8
52 Other IPC Crimes 77.4 2
(3.23) (7.41) (1.3) (0.81) (6.29) (8.71) (4.63) (1.73) (2.16) (1.06) (0.14) (1.7)
(72.03 (254.1 (78.88 (226.6 (193.9 (224.15 (129.2 (146.0 (186.3 (53.5 (113.12
Total nRCC (89)
) 0) ) 8) 5) ) 6) 9) 5) 2) )
Valu
e
Sr Crimes AIR AM BP CB CH ID JB JP KC LD PN SU VP
point
0.1 0.8 4.8 1.4 0.9 4 0.7 30.9 30.2 1.1 0.1 1.7
2 NDPS Act 4 4
(0.1) (0.8) (4.8) (1.4) (0.9) (4) (0.7) (30.9) (30.2) (1.10) (0.1) (1.7)
72.7 103.9
20.8 14.2 2.6 42.9 44.2 2.3 22.7 8.2 17.9 1.4
3 Gambling Act 10.3 2 (14.12 (20.17
(4.04) (2.76) (0.5) (8.33) (8.58) (0.45) (4.41) (1.59) (3.48) (0.27)
) )
132.7 133.2
58.2 32.8 26.8 3.1
4 Excise Act 16.4 2 0 (16.18 0 0 (16.34 0 0 0
(7.1) (4) (3.27) (0.38)
) )
205.1 903.9
124.5 101.1 191.8 27.2
5 Prohibition Act 39.8 2 (10.46 0 24 0 0 0 0 (46.12 0
(6.35) (5.16) (9.79) (1.39)
) )
Explosives & Explosive 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 3.9 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.5
6 0.3 4 0 0
Substances Act (12) (1.33) (1.33) (1.33) (6.67) (52) (6.67) (1.33) (4) (6.67)
Immoral Traffic (Prevention) 0.1 0.2 1.7 2.3 0.4 0.7 2.8 1.3 1.2 2.0
7 0.2 4 0 0
Act (2) (4) (34) (46) (8) (14) (56) (26) (24) (40)
0.1
8 Indian Railways Act 0.1* 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(2)
0.1 0.1
9 Registration of Foreigners Act 0.1* 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(3) (3)
0.2
10 Protection of Civil Rights Act 0.2* 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(2)
12 Essential Commodities Act 0.4 2 0 0.6 0 0 0.3 0 0.1 0.8 1.1 0.7 0 0.3
0.9
14 Dowry Prohibition Act 1.6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(1.69)
Indecent Representation of
15 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Women (Prohibition) Act
0.6 0.7 6.2 4.8 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.5 2.5 1.0 0.3 0.8
16 Copy Right Act, 1957 0.4 2
(3) (3.5) (31) (24) (1) (2) (4.5) (2.5) (12.5) (5) (1.5) (4)
8.7 10.7
Protection of Children from 3.0 5.5 1.3 1.6 0.5 0.4 3.0 0.1
17 3.3 4 (10.55 (12.97 0 0
Sexual Offences Act (3.64) (6.67) (1.58) (1.94) (0.61) (0.48) (3.64) (0.12)
) )
0.4 0.1
19 Forest Act 0.3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(4) (1)
0.4 0.7 0.4 0.3 1.4 1.8 14.9 1.0 1.2 0.3 0.3 13.9
22 Information Technology Act 0.6 3
(2) (3.5) (2) (1.5) (7) (9) (74.5) (5) (6) (1.5) (1.6) (69.5)
27
1.2
30 National Security Act 1.2* 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(4)
1.5
Prevention of Damage To 1.3 0.4 1.0 0.8
34 0.4 3 0 0 0 0 (11.25 0 0 0
Public Property Act (9.75) (3) (7.5) (6)
)
Transplantation of Human
35 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Organs Act
(2) (2)
Prevention of Insults To 28
37 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
National Honor Act
Act, 2005
15.5 3.4
3.0
39 Lotteries (Regulation) Act 0.3 2 0 0 (103.3 0 0 0 0 (22.67 0 0 0
(20)
3) )
0.1 0.1
41 Foreigners Act 0.2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(1.5) (1.5)
29
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY - Volume 46 & 47 2018-2019
31
Representation of the People
44 0.1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act
0.8 0.5
45 Emigration Act 0.5* 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(4.8) (3)
47 (Regulation of Production, 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amendment Act
(Prohibition of Unlawful
Activities) Act
(Prohibition) Act
Pre-Natal Diagnostic
55 (Regulation of fishing by 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
258. 32.1 1.3 111.9 843.9 2.7 3.4 43.9 1125.4 19.5 35.4 392.4 1.6
56 Other SLL Crimes 2
9 (0.25) (0.01) (0.86) (6.52) (0.02) (0.03) (0.34) (8.69) (0.15) (0.27) (3.03) (0.01)
(90.54 (197.7 (129.5 (83.39 (140.3 (307.1 (164.6 (138.0 (55.5 (63.86 (136.4
Total nRCC (46.9)
) 6)
31 1) ) 4) 4) 7) 2) 1) ) )
* Due to non-availability of AIR, lowest RCC of the city considered as AIR for that particular crime.
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY - Volume 46 & 47 2018-2019
Note: 1. The calculated values are rounded up to one decimal and two decimals for RCC and nRCC (in bracket) respectively; hence
2. While conducting a study for other cities, existing crime may be removed or added new crime(s), sub-crime(s) or category as
32
3
Shreya Goswami, Bhagat Singh to Jawaharlal Nehru, here’s what our leaders experienced in British jails,13 August
2017, India Today. Available at: https://www.indiatoday.in/lifestyle/people/story/indian-leaders-british-prisons-
independence-struggle-bhagat-singh-mk-gandhi-jawaharlal-nehru-lifest-1029351-2017-08-13
4
National Crime Records Bureau. (2017) ‘Prison Statistics India’, New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs
5
Raghavan, R.K. ( 2018) ‘Ripe for prison reform’, The Hindu, 22 October.
6
CHRI. (2018) ‘Jail Mail: Prisons and Parliament’, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.
7
CHRI. (2019) ‘Jail Mail: Prisons and Parliament – Winter Session 2018’, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.
8
Research at MOJ (GOV.UK, Ministry of Justice) Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-
of-justice/about/research (Accessed 5 August 2018).
9
Bureau of Police Research and Development (2007) ‘National Policy on Prison Reforms and Correctional
Administration’, Available at: http://www.bprd.nic.in/writereaddata/userfiles/file/5261991522-part%20i.pdf
10
Bureau of Police Research & Development. (2007) National Policy on Prison Reforms and Correctional Administration.
New Delhi: BPR&D.
Re - Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 406 of 2013]
16
20. Sunil Batra vs. Delhi Administration [1980 AIR 1579, 1980 SCR (2) 557]
21. Lalli, U. (2003). Impact of Human Rights Training Programme on Prison Staff. UK: British Council.
State of Gujarat vs. Hon’ble High court of Gujarat, (1998) 7 SCC 392
34
UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners - Nelson Mandela Rules (2015) Available at: https://
35
Chowdhury, N. R. (2002). Indian Prison Laws and Correction of Prisoners. New Delhi : Deep & Deep Publications
36
PVT. LTD.
ABSTRACT
Recidivism is one of the major social and legal problems which is mostly underestimated
and not appropriately addressed because the rate of recidivism in India is low (which is
6.4% according to the National Crime Records Bureau). This study is aimed at studying
the factors contributing to recidivism, and the study is carried among prisoners in Tihar
Jail, New Delhi. Data were collected from the prisoners who are convicted more than once,
and in-depth interview method was used collection data. The prisoner’s interviews were
recorded, transcribed, member-checked and analyzed using Creswell’s data analysis process
in the form of themes. The findings of this study revealed that the factors contributing
for recidivism are: substance abuse, financial instability, unemployment and poor living
conditions, lack of parental care and supervisions, societal reaction and non-acceptance,
peer pressure and influence, migration from village to city, early school dropout, Broken
relationship/no relationship, lack of rehabilitation, reintegration and aftercare programme,
labeling and stigmatization.
KEY WORDS
Recidivism, Repeat Offenders, Contributing Factors for Recidivism, Tihar Jail
*Research Assistant, Centre for Criminology and Victimology, National Law University, New Delhi, India.
Mobile: +91-9971699043 Email: smanikbca@gmail.com
**Professor and Head, Department of Criminology, Raksha Shakti University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Mobile: +91-9099983193 Email: profjai@rsu.ac.in URL: http://www.jaishankar.org
51chart
Figure 2: Factors Contributing to Recidivism
Figure 2: Factors Contributing to Recidivism chart
FACTORS CONTRIBUTING
TO RECIDIVISM
Area of Dwelling
Broken/ No
Relationship
Early School
Dropout
Lack of Parental
Area of Dwelling/ Labeling and Stigmatization
Care and
Crime Prone Area
Supervisions
Unemployment No family
Early School Dropout and Financial support
Instability
Bad Peer and Peer Pressure
Police detention
Sub-Culture
Substance Abuse
Frustration
No means/ Poor
1st time offence
Financial Condition
Joining Gangs
Failure of Corrections
Recidivism
ABSTRACT
The study was conducted on a sample of 200 male adolescents drawn equally from Child
in Conflict With Law (CICL) and non-CICL group. The CICL (100) consisted of those who
had violated the law and were lodged in the observation homes. The non-CICL counterparts
(N=100) consisted of those who had not committed any crimes. The subjects selected
for the two samples were compared with each other in terms of their adjustment status.
The Adjustment Inventory developed by Sinha and Singh (1984) was used to assess the
adjustment status under study. The statistical comparison of different groups of CICL and
non-CICL with each other in terms of their levels of adjustment and its dimensions revealed
that all the groups of CICL were not found to differ significantly between themselves in terms
of their adjustment scores but they differed significantly with their non-CICL counterparts.
Moreover, it was found that different groups of CICL showed poor social, emotional and
educational adjustment as compared to their non-CICL counterparts with a significant
margin. Findings revealed that CICL and non-CICL differed significantly in terms of their
social, emotional and educational adjustment indicating that CICL had poor adjustment in
these areas than those of the non-CICL group.
KEY WORDS
Child in Conflict With Law, Non-CICL, Adjustment and Bihar
*Associate Professor, Univ. Dept. of Psychology; TM Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
was the level of adjustment in the respective Preliminary analysis of the result as
dimension. Reliabilities of the test by the mentioned in table 1 shows that different
split-half, test-retest and KR methods were group of CICL, as compared to non-CICL,
found to be 0.95, 0.93, and 0.94, respectively. were found to have significantly lower levels
Validity was also satisfactory. of adjustment. The results further revealed
that petty, serious and heinous group
Procedure: As some of the respondents
of criminals did not differ significantly
were simply literate, the scale was first
between themselves but they had marked
transformed into an interview schedule
the significant difference with non-CICL
so that the task of data collection could
counterparts. Moreover, it was found that
be easily accomplished. Mainly, to ensure
the non-CICL had relatively a higher level
the collection of their genuine and honest
of adjustment pattern followed by serious,
responses, an attempt was made to establish
petty and heinous criminals.
a rapport with them before starting the
interview procedure. The process of rapport Table 2 records the summary of the findings
building lasted at least for 15 minutes of the statistical comparison between
for each of the subjects. Consequently, different group of CICL and non-CICL in
the subjects extended their sincere terms of their level of emotional adjustment.
participation and full cooperation because There existed no significant differences
they were convinced of the intention of the between petty and serious criminals (t=.33/
investigation,. This was quite evident from p<.05), petty and heinous criminals (t=.99/
their willingness to participate in the study, p<.05), and between serious and heinous
as well as their often searching enquiries criminals (t=.71/p<.05), in terms of
about the findings thereof. emotional dimensions of adjustment score.
However, all the groups of CICL, such as
petty, serious and heinous criminals differed
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY - Volume 46 & 47 2018-2019
62
Table 2: Comparison of different CICL & non-CICL groups and their relative standing
in terms of their level of emotional adjustment score
t-ratio F Value
Groups N Mean SD
B C D B C D
A 40 9.37 2.52 .33(NS) .99(NS) 8.93** .62(NS) 3.1(NS) 2.83(NS)
B 44 9.57 2.84 x .71(NS) 9.20** x 1.14(NS) 7.45**
C 16 10.19 3.33 x x 7.34** x x 11.82**
D 100 5.69 2.07 x x x x x x
t-ratio F Value
Groups N Mean SD
B C D B C D
A 40 9.62 2.89 .054(NS) .73(NS) 8.23** .16(NS) .06(NS) 9.09**
B 44 9.59 2.86 x .78(NS) 8.39** x .002(NS) 15.18**
C 16 10.25 2.95 x x 7.22** x x 6.86**
D 100 6.16 1.94 x x x x x x
Note: A= Petty criminals, B= Serious criminals, C= Heinous criminals and D= Non-
delinquents; NS= Not significant, * significant at .05 level, **Significant at .01 level
Table 4: Comparison of different CICL & non-CICL groups and their relative standing
in terms of their level of educational adjustment score
t-ratio F Value
Groups N Mean SD
B C D B C D
A 40 9.97 2.70 .004(NS) .03(NS) 8.26** x .06(NS) 9.09**
.41(NS) .082(NS) 1.15(NS) 2.86 x .78(NS) 8.39** x .002(NS) 15.18**
B 44 9.98 3.16 x .02(NS) 7.98** x .52(NS) 3.7*
C 16 10.00 2.34 x x 6.09** x x .20 (NS)
D 100 6.27 2.26 x x x x x x
REFERENCES
• Ambastha, A.K.P. (1997). A Study of Antecedents and Correlates of Delinquent Behaviour.
A Ph.D. Thesis Submitted to Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.
• Agarwal, Anuradha. (2014). A Comparison Study of the Home, Emotional and
Adjustment of Delinquent and Non-Delinquent Adolescents. International Journal of
Education and Science Research Review. Vol. 1; Issue- 4. P. 95-99.
• Choudry, I.Y. (1993). A Comprehensive Study of Adolescents and Their Adjustment
Problems. A Ph.D Thesis of University of Punjab, Lahore.
• Crowe, R. R. (1974). An Adoption Study of Antisocial Personality. Archives of General
Psychiatry. Vol. 31, Pp 785-791.
• Eysenck, H.J. (1972). Crime and Personality. London, Granada Press.
• Ge, H. & Conger, R.D. (2015). Adjustment problems and Emerging Personality
Characteristics from Early to Late Adolescence. American Journal of Community
psychology. Vol. 27, Issue 3. Pp 429-459.
• Hussain, M.Q. (1984). A Study of Certain Areas of Adjustment of adolescent Criminals.
Indian Journal of Criminology. Vol. 12(1).
• J. J. Act. (2015). Silent Features of Juvenile and Justice (Care and Protection of Children)
Act.
• Kumari, Nitu. (2019). Profile of Juvenile Delinquents: Psychological Study. An
Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis. Submitted to TM Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.
• Krishna, K.P & Kumar, S. (1981). Adjustment Problems among Truants. Indian Journal
of Criminology. 9a (1).
• Krishna, U (1993). Effect of Sociological and Psychological Factors on Adolescents
Delinquent Behaviour. Asian Journal of Psychology and Education. Vol. 26, No. 1; Pp
28-31.
ABSTRACT
Rationality and opportunity are the two essential components of crime. Rationality denotes
the rationale of the offenders in choosing a target, whereas opportunity indicates the
opportunities offered by the environment to precipitate the crime. Rational Choice Theory
(RCT) states that the offender’s rationality depends on financial gains and the amount of
risk involved in the act of crime. Unlike Rational Choice Theory, Routine Activity Theory
(RAT) emphasizes that a suitable target and the absence of a competent guardian provides
opportunities for offenders. Thus, Rationality and Opportunity are the key factors for an
extensive understanding in order to frame an effective crime reduction strategy. This paper
attempts to analyse the concepts “rationality” and “opportunity” in the crimes reported in
print and electronic media in Chennai city during 2014 and 2015. Through, such analysis,
this paper attempts to study the proportion of rationality and opportunity in the commission
of crime.
KEY WORDS
Crime, Rationality, Opportunity and Crime Reduction
numbers reveal that burglary (91 cases, 60.7%) is the most common form of crime among
69
in chain snatching. Likewise, indulging in Table 1 : Area-wise Incidents of Crime
a robbery is purposeful/rational behaviour.
Area Frequency Percent
The victim is not selected randomly and
this selection involves some rationality. Central Chennai 33 22
Robbers try to achieve their needs by North Chennai 41 27.3
forceful and illegitimate ways. For this South Chennai 37 24.7
purpose, the robbers make a choice, which
Outskirts 39 26
involves calculating the risks and benefits.
In the process of selecting a target for Total 150 100
robbery, the offenders first select a suitable As shown in Table 1, North Chennai tops
area and subsequently, select a suitable the list with 27.3% and the outskirts of
target (Bernasco & Block, 2009). However, Chennai records 26% of crimes. South and
this can be applied to other property crimes Central Chennai recorded 24% and 22%
as well. In theft, offenders select a target respectively. Commission of a crime has
which can be easily taken. Thus, among a significant relationship with locations;
these crimes, robbery and chain snatching some places are more crime-prone than
are more rational since it involves pre- others (Sherman, Gartin, & Buerger, 1989;
preparation. There might be opportunity Spelman, 1995; & Block, 1995). Crimes are
involved in robbery and chain snatching strongly related to socially disorganized
but it is considered as rational only because and urban setting (Wisburd, Bernasco, &
it involves at least a minimum level of Bruinsma, 2009). The disorganized are more
preparation. Whereas in theft and burglary, vulnerable and such places will have more
the offenders are more opportunistic, the prevalence of crime. Vulnerability denotes
reason is that any unoccupied houses or weak physical infrastructure and social
buildings or unguarded valuables can attract environment, in other words, disorganized
an offender. It puts forward the question environment. North Chennai has recorded
how the crimes are considered as rational 27.3% of the crimes studied, and it is a
or opportunistic. Both opportunity and place in which physical infrastructure and
rationality may play a vital role in the above- social environment are weak compared to
mentioned crimes. They are considered as other areas mentioned in the Table 1. A
rational or opportunistic based on which of socially disorganized environment provides
their proportion outweighs the other. There many opportunities for the commission of
are other factors important to understanding a crime. Since the environment is already
the role of opportunity and rationality in the disorganized and risk for offenders is very
commission of a crime and are discussed in less, there is more chance that an offender
the upcoming sections. selects a target from such an environment.
Place and crime Even though there is not much difference
The place where a crime is committed has in the number of crimes reported in the
a vital role in rationality and opportunity. south (24.7%) and central (22%) Chennai,
The types of crime also differ according these are the places where the environment
to the place. Place here refers to any is comparatively more organized than
street, house, or building where the crime the north and outskirts of Chennai.
occurred. The physical infrastructure and Social disorganization theory states that
social environment makes one place more delinquency and crime are common in poor,
vulnerable than the other. highly populated and unorganized areas. In
line with the social disorganization theory,
this study claims that organized places
ABSTRACT
Our country has witnessed an increase in numbers of rape crimes and so are the victims. Strict
sentencing laws and enhanced registration have not deterred the offenders but have instilled
fear in the mind of rape victims. The efforts to sensitize criminal justice personnel working for
rape victims has not yielded satisfactory results as there is still some element of shame and
degradation experienced by the victims in the whole process. There is need to rehabilitate
victims to lessen their pain and suffering via fulfilling their needs that arise as a consequence of
their victimization. The article discusses in length different forms of rehabilitation to fulfill the
victim’s needs such as medical, physical, sexual, psychological, occupational, social (formal
and informal), and also the possibility of introducing Restorative Justice System, which is
relatively new to India, to further deal with the concerns of victims. The article puts forth a
reasonable argument that if such rehabilitative and restorative options are developed through
the initiative of Government and private machinery could make a huge difference in the life
of the victims.
KEY WORDS
Victim; Rehabilitation; Reintegration; Needs; Rape**
*Dr. Vibha Hetu, Consultant, Lok Nayak Jayprakash Narayan National Institute of Criminology and Forensic Science
(L.N.J.N.N.I.C.F.S.), Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), Government of India (GOI), Sector-3, Rohini, Delhi, India.
Email: vibhahetu@gmail.com
under the circumstances falling under any Seventhly — When she is unable to
of the following seven descriptions:— communicate consent.
26000
0 2492
23
24206 60%
%
2217
72
2146
67 21397 Rape Caases
20737
21000
0 1934
48 50%
%
33 18359
1823
15847 40%
% Offendeer
16000
0
Unknow wn
24.9% 30%
% to Victim
m
11000
0 Offendeer
Known to
13.1% 14.3
3% 13.6% 14.0%
% 20%
%
victim
6000
0 7.5% 9.0%
%
5.1%
6.8% 5.6% % 6.9%
4.5% 5.4% 10%
%
2.7%
% 1.8%
%
1000
0 0%
2003 200
04 2005 2006 2007 2008
8 2009 2010
0 2011 2012
2 2013 2014
4 2015 2016
6 2017
Data Source: Crime in India Report (2003-2017) National Crime Records Bureau
Publications, New Delhi.
Sub-section (1) Section 376 Punishment for rape, The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013.
2
40000 60%
56.2%
54.5% 54.7% 53.9%
35000 52.9% 53.2%
50.3% 50%
48.6% 47.9% 33707
46.7%
30000
Rape Cases
39.5% 40%
25000 35.3%
33.3% 33.5% 32.4% 34.0% Offender
32.0% Unknown
29.9% 29.4% 30.1% 30.1%
20000 27.7% 21467 21397
22172 24206 24923 30%
20737 Offender
19348 Parents/Family
18233 18359 Member
15000 24.9%
15847 Offender
20% Neighbours
10000 Offender
14.3% 13.6%
13% Relatives
Data Data
Source: Crime
Source: in in
Crime India
IndiaReport
Report (2003-2013) National
(2003-2013) National Crime
Crime Records
Records BureauBureau Publications,
Publications,
New New
Delhi.
Delhi.
INDIAN
TheJOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY
Figure 2 shows the involvement of- Volume 46 & 47 in 2018-2019
known offenders the form of parents/ family member,
neighbours, relatives and others. Other offenders are known to have bigger share in perpetrating
rape with the highest value at 56.2% in 2012. Neighbours have been placed second with the
highest value at 35.3% in 2010. Relatives have stood third in terms of their involvement with the
86
2010 over 2009, an increase of 9.4% in 2011 2014, unknown offenders increased to
over 2010, 2.7% increase in 2012 over 2011, 14%, which again decreased to less than
a whooping increase of 35.5% in 2013 over 7% in three consecutive years 2015, 2016
2012, an increase of 10.1% in 2014 over and 2017. The known offenders are much
2013, a decrease of 7.4% in 2015 over 2014, higher in number in perpetrating rape. The
an increase of 12.4% in 2016 over 2015 and figure shows that in year 2012, the known
a decrease of 16.4% in 2017 over 2016. In offender involvement was 98%, the highest
2017, there is a new category of data has and lowest 75% in 2006.
been added categorized as ‘repeated rape
The Figure 2 shows the involvement of
on same woman’.4 There are 1652 cases
known offenders in the form of parents/
reported under this new category ‘repeated
family member, neighbours, relatives and
rape on same woman’ on all India level.
others. Other offenders are known to have
From 2003-2006, more than 10% unknown bigger share in perpetrating rape with the
offenders have been involved in the highest value at 56.2% in 2012. Neighbours
rape case which increased to 25% in have been placed second with the highest
2006. There have been less than 10% of value at 35.3% in 2010. Relatives have
involvements of unknown offenders from stood third in terms of their involvement
2007-2013 with the lowest figure of just with the highest level at 7% in the year
2% in the year 2012. However, in the year 2007 and 2009. Parents/ family member are
Table 1. Rape Cases and Relationship of the Offender with the Victim in India.
Clause (n) of Sub-section (2) of Section 376 Punishment for rape, Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860)
4
50.2%
24915 50%
25000 24270 46.1
1%
222193 Rape Victim
ms
214855 21413
220771
40% <10 Yrs
20000 19365
18239 1837
76
10 -- 14 Yrs
15856 14 -- 18 Yrs
15000 30%
18 -- 30 Yrs
26.3
3% 30 -- 50 Yrs
10000 17.7% 17.5% 18.4% 117.0% 16.7% 177.0%
23.9% 20%
% > 50 Yrs
15.5% 14.6% 15.0% 12.8%13.8
8%
17.4% 19.1%
16.3%
%
16.1%
115.2%
5000 12.8% 13.6% 10%
11.3% 11.0% 8.2% 8.3% 8.4%
6.4% 6.5% 6
6.2% 6.3% 7.0
0%
6.00% 6.0% 5.6%
% 4.7%
3.3% 2.6% 3.6 6% 4.2%
2.44% 2.9% 3.0% 2.6% % 3.0% 3.0%
3
0 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% % 0.5% 00.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.8% % 0%
2003 2004 2005
5 2006 2
2007 2008 2009 20
010 2011 2012 20113
Data Source: Crime in India Report (2003-2013) National Crime Records Bureau
Data Souurce: Crime in India Report (2003-22013) Nationnal Crime Records
R Bureeau Publicattions,
Publications,
New Dellhi. New Delhi.
It can be seen from the Figure 3 that rape viictims have reported
r mixxed trend ovver the last fiifteen
years (20003-2016) in
n India, withh an increasee of 15% in 2004 over 2003,
2 an inccrease of 0.88% in
2005 ove
INDIAN JOURNAL OFer 2004, again an increase
CRIMINOLOGY of 5.4% in
- Volume i 462006
& over
47 r 2005, an inncrease of 7..3% in 2007 over
2018-2019
2006, an increase of 3.4% in 20008 over 20077, a decreasee of 0.3% inn 2009 over 2008,
2 an inccrease
of 3.6% in 2010 oveer 2009, a suubstantial inccrease of 9.44% in 2011 over 2010, 2.7% increaase in
2012 oveer 2011, a whhooping increase of 35.55% in 2013 over 2012, an a increase of
o 11.6% in 2014
over 2013, a decrease of 7.7% inn 2015 over 2014, an inccrease of 12.4% in 20166 over 2015 and a a
decrease of 13.8% inn 2017 over 2016 (2014--2017 data mentioned
m inn Table 3). The
T (18-30 years)
y
88
It can be seen from the Figure 3 that rape 18% in 2003 and 2005. The age group (10-
victims have reported mixed trend over the 14 years) has stood at fourth where 8% is
last fifteen years (2003-2016) in India, with recorded highest in three years, i.e. 2009,
an increase of 15% in 2004 over 2003, an 2012 and 2013. Age group (< 10 years) has
increase of 0.8% in 2005 over 2004, again stood at fourth with the highest 4.7% of
an increase of 5.4% in 2006 over 2005, victims in 2013. Among (<10 years) old and
an increase of 7.3% in 2007 over 2006, (10-14 years) old rape victims are showing a
an increase of 3.4% in 2008 over 2007, rising trend for last three consecutive years,
a decrease of 0.3% in 2009 over 2008, an i.e. 2011-2013. Very few rape victims were
increase of 3.6% in 2010 over 2009, a below 50 years. There may be more than
substantial increase of 9.4% in 2011 over one victim in some rape cases reported.
2010, 2.7% increase in 2012 over 2011, a The criteria for classification of age group of
whooping increase of 35.5% in 2013 over victims of rape has changed since 2014 and
2012, an increase of 11.6% in 2014 over the data has been provided in a separate
2013, a decrease of 7.7% in 2015 over table from 2014-2017 (See Table 3).
2014, an increase of 12.4% in 2016 over
In India, child rape cases has shown overall
2015 and a decrease of 13.8% in 2017 over
increasing trend from 2003 to 2016. With
2016 (2014-2017 data mentioned in Table
minor dip of less than 1% in year 2007, 2009
3). The (18-30 years) age group has figured
and 2010. In 2015, there was a significant
the most by occupying highest level at
5.5% dip but, in year 2016, these incidences
62% consecutively in 2003 and 2004. The
increased to 50.7%, a rise of 19.4% over
age group (14-18 years) has figured second
2015. There was 49.1% howling decrease
highest and stood highest at 26% in 2013.
in child rape cases in 2017. Usually, child
The third place has been occupied by the age
rapes constituted less than one fourth of
group (30-50 years) with the highest level at
total rape cases till 2010, since then, it has
Data Source: Crime in India Report (2014-2017) National Crime Records Bureau
Publications, New Delhi.
40000
0 389
947
37413
34651
35000
0 33707
32559
30000
0
24206 2492
23
25000
0
67 21397 2217
20737 2146
72 Rape Cases
1934
48 19
9765
20000
0 18233 18359 Child Rape Caases
15847
15000
0 13304 13
3766
10854 10059
10000
0 9082
7228
466 5382 55
957 5124 54
49 545
5000
0 626 4075
3112 36
0
2003 200
04 2005 200
06 2007 200
08 2009 2010 2011 20
012 2013 20
014 2015 20
016 2017
5 Table 4. Child
Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) Rapee Incidences
of Section 2. sDefinitions.
under Prottection
The of Chhildren from
Protection of m Sexual Of
Children ffences
from (POC
SexualCSO)
Offences Act, 2012.
Act, 20122 in India.
6
Section 4 Punishment for penetrative sexual assault and Section 6 Punishment for aggravated penetrative sexual
assault, Protection of YE
Children
EAR from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
Tw wenty paid
d
days off &
fleexible work
arrangements
Oc
ccupational
Re
ehabilitation
Source: Author
A
Source: Author
Social Reehabilitation
n
Social reehabilitation n would be achieved by b providingg both form mal and infoormal suppoort to
victims.Sub-section (1) and (2) of Section 154 Information in cognizable cases, The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
8
9
Proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 157 Procedure for investigation, The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, and proviso
to Sub-section (1) of Section 154 Information in cognizable cases, The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, The Criminal
Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 and New proviso to Sub-section (3) of Section 161 Examination of witnesses by police,
The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013.
10
Sub-section (2) of Section 160 Police Officer’s power to require attendance of witnesses, The Criminal Procedure
Code, 1973.
11
Section 357C Treatment of Victims, The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013.
12
Sub-section (1A) of Section 173 Report of police officer on completion of investigation, The Criminal Procedure Code,
1973.
13
Section 62 Summons how served, The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
14
Section 24(8) of The Criminal Procedure Code as amended by Section 3 of The Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment)
Act, 2009.
15
Sub-section (2) of Section 327 Court to be open, The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
16
Second Proviso to Sub-section (2) of Section 327 Court to be open, The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
17
Section 309 of The Criminal Procedure Code as amended by Section 21 of The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act,
2013.
18
Sub-section (4) of Section 353 Judgment, The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
19
Section 506 Punishment for criminal intimidation, The Indian Penal Code, 1860.
20
Section 357. Order to pay compensation and Section 357A Victim compensation Scheme, The Criminal Procedure
Code, 1973.
21
Section 357B Compensation to be in addition to fine under section 326A or section 376D of The Indian Penal Code,
The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013.
22
Section 66E Punishment for violation of privacy. (Inserted Vide ITA 2008), Section 67 Punishment for publishing or
transmitting obscene material in electronic form (Amended vide ITAA 2008), Section 67A Punishment for publishing
or transmitting of material containing sexually explicit act, etc. in electronic form (Inserted vide ITAA 2008), and
Section 67B Punishment for publishing or transmitting of material depicting children in sexually explicit act, etc. in
electronic form, The Information Technology Act, 2018.
Social
Re
ehabilitatiion
Formal Sup
pport Infformal Supp
port Soccial Services
R
Registration of
o FIR Inform
mal Social Neetworks Holisticc Sex Education
Freee Medical Trreatment Seelf Help Grou
up Pro
oper House
Au
uxiliary Prossecution Com
mmunity Meental Educaational Suppo
ort
H
Health Services
In camera Trial
T Skiills Training
Modiffying Larger Social
Viictim Compeensation Services Marriage, when reaady
Source:Author
Source: A Author
(c) NGOsiveand
Restorati educational
Justice: Relatively a New appliccation forRestorative
institutions, ReehabilitatingJustice:
g Victims Relatively
in India a New
private and public, should provide application for Rehabilitating Victims in
India doees notsensitive
gender have RestorativemarketJustice driven
Systtem till now w. The identiified limits of
India o the adverssarial
trial to tr
reat victims of sex crime
vocational courses and training to es appropria ately and sec
cure convicti ions, as well l as high attrrition
rates and d low rates of prosecuti ion has giveen rise India
to th
he does not
possibilityy of have restorative
using r Restorative Justice
juustice
victims so that they acquire needed
(Hudson,, 1998, 2002 2; Daly, 20022, 2006; Currtis-Fawley and Daly, 20004). The Restorative
System till now. The R
identified Juustice
limits of the
skills and knowledge to support them
System can c work both in paralleel with as weell as indepe endent of trial
adversarial the Criminal J
Justice
to treat victims Syste
of sexem crimes
in
in the rehabilitation process and also in
India in meeting
m victtims’ restoraative needs annd fostering g a credible deterrence
appropriately d and secure off sexual viollence. as
convictions,
Thefinding
aimss ofsuitable jobs.
Restorattive Justice necessarily
n i
involve resto
oration, presattrition
sumably torates s and
some pre-exi isting
well as high low rates of
4. emotiona
Trainal/psycholog gical state
victims in skills suchby y repairing
as thhe harm suff
bricklaying, fered by victi
prosecution imsgiven
has (Braithw waite,
rise to 1999) .
the possibility
engineering works, industrial cleaning, of using restorative justice (Hudson, 1998,
A woodworking,
restoraative perspecctive of crim
making me sees it as the ground
garments, 2002;for Daly,
necessar ry dialogue
2002, 2006;between vicctims, and
Curtis-Fawley
offenders s and the co
ommunity,
painting and interior decorating etc.a
arising from unresolved conflict, soo that its passt
Daly, 2004). The Restorative Justice effects maaySystem
be
addressedd (Elton and a Roybal,, 2003, p.550). Greater r victim p articipation, more
can work both in parallel with as well as offeender
5. accounta
Victimsability and abe
should larger deggreeonly
married of comm
whenmunity prottection are the t aims Reestorative Juustice
independent of the Criminal Justice System
professes
she is s tomentally,
achievee which is nearly
n
psychologically impos ssible withinn the traditional criminaal justice syystem
and
(Shenk, 2
2001/2002,
in and
India in meeting manating victims’from restorative
physically readyp.190-1). It addresses
cause marriage o
obligations
is not a responsiibilities, em m the
harms ass a result of crime
c comm needs and fostering a credible
mitted againsst victims annd communitties; emphassizes the neeeds of deterrence
rehabilitation.
of sexual violence. The aims of Restorative
Justice necessarily involve restoration,
presumably to some pre-existing emotional/
Saafety and
S
Security
Apology
Mean ningful
and
respoonse to
Offender
Justiice and
Accountab
bil
Repa aration
ity
Re
estorative
Justice
Validaation Rehabilittati
an
nd on of Victtim
Vindiccation and
for Vicctims Offendeer
Source: Author
Source: Author
A
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY - Volume 46 & 47 2018-2019
Reinteggration of Victims of
o Rape
99
dialogue, the balancing of the parties’ of justice for victims. Measures such as
interests and the principle of voluntariness restitution, community service, victim
(Dignan, 2002, p.172). The victims get the support, victim compensation and offender
opportunity to express their emotions, rehabilitation programmes are therefore
convey the psychological impact of regarded as restorative (Van Ness and Nolan,
victimization, and begin to heal from the 1998, p.54).
emotional and psychological impact of
Reintegration of Victims of Rape
victimization through restorative justice
processes (Arrigo and Williams, 2003). The Reintegration is the action or process of
victim-survivor may be able to construct the integrating victim back into society.
narrative of her violent experiences of rape
Sustainable Social Reintegration
into her life story, in turn feeling her with a
sense of whole-ness, and of a life before and Mentoring Scheme
after the assault (Brison, 2003, p.54). It can A form of reintegration is mentoring schemes
Theher
also help victito
im gain
needscontrol
a proper
p house
over inintrusions
good locaality and shoould be able to stay com mfortably for long,
and not forced to frequently
fr
aiming at sustainable social reintegration.
of harmful memories (Brison, ch hange it.
2003, Suuch a housee will also play
p.54). There
p
remains
an insttrumental roole in
a need to provide further
providingg stability to o victims.
The victim needs acknowledgement from counselling sessions with a social worker
her community
Sustainabbleof care od
Livelihoo for the harm she has or counselor to ensure a healthy state of
suffered, to suffer with
The varioous developm
her, anda to lament
mental and anti-poverty schemesvictim.
meeant for the general popuulation shouuld be
with hermadetheavaevil
ailablethat
to theehas been
victims, done.
booth The
in the reh
habilitation and
a reintegraation phase.
offenders are required to acknowledge Education and Training
Socialthey
the harms Reeintegration
caused n in order to make
Private and Government organizations
the victim feel
Meaningf vindicated
gful Interpers andonships
sonal Relatio also hear should also work together to develop
shaming messages about these behaviors partnership
When thhe victim is treated withh dignity annd respect b the familyy,with
by public
she will and private
feel valued.. The sector
form anemphasis
eminent s is part
on im of restorative
mproving justice
communicatio employers
ns, interact rin order s to
tions, and relationships amongprovide
faamily training/
proceedings
memberss(Braithwaite
and fosterin andsystem
ng a family s Mugford,
that better
b meets the needswork
facilitate of its victimizzed member
placement as. part of the
1994). In short, restorative dialogue matters reintegration process for victims. Due
becauseHealthy
it brings E
Environmen
about ttruth-telling and, as care should be taken to give ample choice
such, enhances
It’s impoortantthetolikelihood
invo of recognition
olve the fami ilies of victimms and the
to community
c victims by b soenhancing
thatg their awareeness
rehabilitation and
about rappe in general
for victimization andl and the
theim
mpact of rapee on the individual victim
offender’s m in order too foster a heealthy
environm ment for in
theturn
victim.
v reintegration becomes a holistic process.
responsibility. This delivers a sense
Figure 8.
8 Reintegratiion of Victim
ms of Rape.
Figure 8. Reintegration of Victims of Rape.
Reintegration
Sustainable
Social
Sociaal
Reintegratio
on
Reintegra
ation
Meaninggful
Mentoring Educattion and Proper Sustainable Healthy
Interpers
sonal
schemes Tra
aining Housing Liv
velihood Environment
E
Relations
ships
Source: Author
INDIANSource:
JOURNALA OF CRIMINOLOGY - Volume 46 & 47 2018-2019
Author
100
Proper Housing tailored to the needs of victims in light
of their mental, physical, psychological
The victim needs a proper house in
and environmental condition as much as
good locality and should be able to stay
possible. The factors such as the victim’s
comfortably for long, and not forced to
age, gender, race, ethnicity, and ability of
frequently change it. Such a house will
the victims should be taken into account by
also play an instrumental role in providing
the victim’s services and interventions to
stability to victims.
better respond to their needs for recovery
Sustainable Livelihood (Whitcomb, 2003) and also about victims’
histories of trauma and abuse. The latest
The various developmental and anti-poverty
development in the treatment programmes
schemes meant for the general population
and cure methods should also be included
should be made available to the victims,
as a part of regular procedures for healing
both in the rehabilitation and reintegration
the victims.
phase.
The research should be conducted on the
Social Reintegration
new trends of committing rape for making
Meaningful Interpersonal Relationships rape videos, or harassing the victims even
When the victim is treated with dignity after rape through their rape videos, and to
and respect by the family, she will feel find out innovative and practical solutions
valued. The emphasis is on improving for preventing and eliminating such
communications, interactions, and crimes from the society. The Government
relationships among family members and can persuade the Service providers like
fostering a family system that better meets Whatsapp and YouTube to agree to be more
the needs of its victimized member. vigilant towards suspicious pornographic
videos/rape videos and such videos if
Healthy Environment detected must be sent to law enforcement
It’s important to involve the families of agencies rather than to “Adult Content”
victims and the community by enhancing folders. Such apps should be developed
their awareness about rape in general and that give information on the organizations
the impact of rape on the individual victim providing services to victims, laws
in order to foster a healthy environment for concerning victims and witnesses, and on
the victim. victim assistance programs in India.
ABSTRACT
Prison Statistics of India has been revealing growing trends of incarcerated female population
year after year. Migration, extramarital relationship, financial struggles, domestic violence,
poor family background are some of the crucial factors that lead to the imprisonment of females
in India.On the other side, an increasingnumber of children who accompany the mothers to
prison every year indicating an alarming trend. Despite the fact of the overcrowded prison
population, most of the Indian prisons are not occupied with adequate facilities essential
to cater to the needs of the children who are under six years of age. If this is the case of
children who are counted with their mothers during mother’s incarceration period as per the
government record, many other children live in the community impeded to accompany their
mothers to prison due to socio-legal constrains. Such a group of children living as an invisible
vulnerable population in the society. They are at high risk to indulge in crime and abuse.
The study analysis the welfare issues of incarcerated mothers and their children within the
framework of policies, prison reforms and reintegration process during post-incarceration.
*PhD Scholar, Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi-110025
**Associate Professor, Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi-110025
ABSTRACT
This study was an exploratory endeavor which observed trends in bullying and sexual
harassment at a workplace. Total 212 samples who were working in Industrial and Academic
organizations were randomly taken from Gandhinagar, Gujarat. 106 samples were from
Industrial workplace and 106 samples from Academic workplace. The participants provided
demographic details and responded to NAQ-R and SEQ questionnaire to assess the bullying
and sexual harassment experience. The primary aim of the paper was to find out the existence
of bullying and sexual harassment at workplace, correlation between bullying and sexual
harassment and impact of workplace environment on bullying and sexual harassment,
overall, the results proved the existence of bullying and sexual harassment at workplace. It
was seen that bullying and sexual harassment are also negatively correlated to age. However,
a positive correlation between bullying and sexual harassment was seen. Lastly, there was
significant difference in bullying between academic and industrial workplace and there was
no significant difference in sexual harassment between academic and industrial workplace.
KEYWORDS
Workplace, Bullying, Sexual harassment
*PhD Scholar, Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi-110025
**Associate Professor, Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi-110025
The Indian Society of Criminology was founded in the year 1970 with the objects to advance the study
and application of criminology, criminological science (criminal biology, psychology, sociology and
penology) and forensic sciences for the welfare of society and to facilitate co-operation among persons
interested in the criminal phenomenon.
Membership is open to all persons interested in the study and application of criminology and forensic
sciences. The Society publishes the Indian Journal of Criminology which is a prized publication. For
procuring the Journal, Application for membership and all other correspondence should be addressed to:
PRESIDENT TREASURER
Prof. (Dr.) Arvind Tiwari, Dr. RanjitOomen Abraham,
Dean, School of Law, Assistant Professor (Senior Scale),
Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai. Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University,
Chennai.
CHAIRMAN
Prof. (Dr.) P. Madhava Soma Sundaram, EXECUTIVE COUNCIL MEMBERS
Professor, Department of Criminology and Criminal
Justice, Dr. M.D. Allen Selvakumar, Chennai.
Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli. Mr. S. Balu, Chennai.
Prof. (Dr.) Beulah Shekhar, Tirunelveli.
VICE CHAIRS Mr. S.R. Bhuvaneshwaran, Chennai.
Mr. G. Dhanasekar, Chennai.
Prof. (Dr.) Balraj Chauhan,
Mr. Muthukrishnan, Chennai.
Jabalpur
Dr. C. Muthuraja, Madurai.
Prof. (Dr.) K. Jaishankar,
Prof. (Dr.) M.V. Nagarajan, Madurai Branch.
Gujarat
Prof. (Dr.) Purvi Pokhariyal, Gujarat.
Prof. (Dr.) Mamta Patel,
Dr. C.L. Ramakrishnan, IPS (Retd.), Chennai.
Madhya Pradesh
Prof. (Dr.) D. Ramakrishnan, Madurai.
Prof. (Dr.) M. Srinivasan,
Dr. Roshni Nair-Shaikh, Mumbai.
Chennai
Mr. R. Sambath, Madurai.
Prof. (Dr.) Subash C. Raina,
Dr. Saurabh Anand, Gandhinagar.
Himachal Pradesh
Dr, Sony Kunjappan, Gujarat.
Prof. (Dr.) Vijay Raghavan,
Mr. V.S. Rajagopal, Chennai.
Mumbai