Article 24
Article 24
Article 24
DOI 10.18551/rjoas.2019-02.24
ABSTRACT
This study aims to look at the effect of IFRS mandatory adoption role on earnings
management and to see the effect of political connections in influencing IFRS adoption of
earnings management. The data used in this study came from companies listed on Indonesia
Stock Exchange in 2010-2015. This research uses a quantitative approach, using
moderation regression and independent t-test to answer the research hypothesis.
Discretionary accruals are used as earnings management proxies. To test the influence of
political connections in strengthening IFRS adoption of earnings management, moderation
regression was used as the model. The independent t-test results showed that there are
insignificant differences in earning management after three years mandatory IFRS adoption
in Indonesia. The first regression equation result shows that adoption of IFRS in companies
listed on the IDX had a insignificant effect on earnings management. The results of the
second regression equation show that political connections have a significant influence on
management earnings. The third regression equation shows that political connection
moderation variables significantly influenced IFRS adoption of earnings management.
KEY WORDS
Adoption of IFRS, mandatory adoption, earning management, political connections,
moderation variable, moderation regression.
The impact of globalization Era which increases affects the investment market in
Indonesia from year to year. There are rapid growths of foreign companies investing in
Indonesia, many MNC (Multi National Corporate) companies that open branches in
Indonesia. There are difficulties arise due to differences in financial reporting standards used
by foreign investors in Indonesia and in the country of origin of investors, which lead it to
difficult situation for both parties involved in doing business in Indonesia.
The Comparability of a standard can be a comparable measure which is necessary,
because it will have an impact on the effectiveness of a capital market activity, in this case if
the standards apply internationally, the comparison of the company's financial performance
can be compared, and international capital markets become more effective (Janjean, 2008).
The use of global standards is not a condition that can create a common business
language, there are still several other important factors such as management incentives and
related institutional factors that have an important role in forming financial reporting
characteristics (Jeanjean & Stolowy 2008).In his research, Ball et al (2003) also stated that
High quality standards might be the conditions needed to form high quality information, but
this is not always be true.
IFRS refers more to the principle base, professional judgment, and more disclosure is
required, IASB said that IFRS can improve the quality of financial statements (source: TOT
FEB UGM Material). In its own practice there is research that states that adoption of IFRS is
not as expected as in China, after harmonizing Chinese GAAP with IFRS the timeliness of
reported earnings reports in China is getting worse than before harmonization, this happened
because the future expected earnings which increased after the effective implementation of
IFRS in 2009 in China (Wu, Li, & Lin, 2014).
The implementation of IFRS in several countries in Europe is different based on the
203
RJOAS, 2(86), February 2019
accounting system in each country, even though IFRS is applied in order to get comparable
reports, the output results remain different because there are different cultures and
environments in each country in Europe (Callao , Ferrer & Lainez, 2009).
Research conducted by Tendeloo & Vanstraelen (2005) in Germany states that there is
no change in earnings management between companies using German GAAP and
companies that adopt IFRS voluntary, this is because the code-law country base where
investor protection rights is still very low gives less reliable results.
Research related to IFRS adoption and earnings management occurs in various
countries in the world such as in the Asian continent such as China, Malaysia and those in
regions in various countries in continental Europe such as France, Americas such as Brazil.
Europe is one of the continents where countries on the continent show a fundamental
difference in results, that the results of IFRS are not necessarily the same in each country.
These differences depend on the legal structure (common law or code law), accounting
culture, politics, institutions and many other factors and this is supported by the statement of
Ball et al. (2003) that high quality standards are a necessary condition to obtain high quality
information, but this is not always true.
Facio (2010) explained in his research that companies are considered to have political
connections if at least one of the major shareholders or one of the company's leaders, CEO,
vice president and secretary are members of parliament, ministers or people related to
politics or commonly referred to as Politically exposed person (PEP). Political connections
also play an important role in explaining the variance in the selection of a company's
earnings management strategy (Braam, Nandy, & Lodh, 2015, p. 26).
The use of politics in the accounting world is introduced through the political cost
hypothesis in positive accounting theory (PAT), which states that high profitability can attract
the attention of mass media and consumers, which in turn can trigger political heat. Political
heat triggers the emergence of new regulations aimed at companies that have high
profitability (Scott 2005). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is an example of regulation
that arises from the impact of company profitability, because profitable companies are
considered to have social and environmental responsibilities in which the company is
located.
All accrual accounting includes opinions regarding future cash flow which results in a
lot of freedom in implementing accounting rules. Economists and local politicians who have
power or influence can determine how managers, auditors, court regulations and other
parties influence the implementation of regulations (Ball, 2006).
The idea to test political connections as a moderating variable refers to the statement
of Baron & Kenny, (1986) which states that moderators and predictors are at the same level
in their roles as causal variables, antecedent variables, or exogenous variables and
moderating variables also always function as independent variables. Judging from the results
of previous research Braam et al., (2015) and Harymawan et al., (2016) which state political
connections have the effect of earnings management.
Based on the Positive Accounting Theory proposed by Watts and Zimmerman (1990),
the selection of policies carried out by management is based on bonuses, debt contracts and
political costs which are the motivations of management in earning management.
LITERATURE REVIEW
204
RJOAS, 2(86), February 2019
IFRS will be carried out in three stages, namely the stages of IFRS adoption (2008-2010),
the final preparation stage in 2011, and the implementation stage of IFRS (2012) by
gradually implementing PSAK based on IFRS and comprehensive application of PSAK
(www.iaiglobal.or.id).
The Positive Accounting Theory is all things related to predicting situations, such as
management's response in choosing policies and implementing new accounting standards
(Scott p-304, 2005).Positive Accounting Theory or PAT has Three Hypotheses (Watts and
Zimmerman, 1990):
The Bonus Plan Hypothesis - in the bonus plan hypothesis, management chooses
accounting procedures that shift the existing profit in the future to be put at the moment. For
example, management bonus increases with increasing net income, so that management
gets a high bonus, management increases their bonus by increasing net income one of the
efforts made by choosing accounting policies that increase current earnings reports which
ultimately reduce profits existing in the future period.
The debt Hypothesis - in the corporate debt contract hypothesis that pays for
accounting based on debt contracts has a tendency to choose accounting procedures that
shift earnings in the current period. Future earnings shift to the current period will increase
net income and will reduce the likelihood that the compliance will meet the loan obligations,
because in a borrower's debt contract must meet the conditions of the agreement.
The Political Cost Hypothesis - in the political cost hypothesis, the more likely the
political costs faced by the company this period, the manager will choose an accounting
procedure that postpones / suspends the current period's earnings to the future period.
Political costs arise due to the high profitability of the company (Scott 2005), for example
high profitability can lead to the emergence of new regulations such as taxes etc, and
companies that have high profitability are large companies that will be faced with high
performance standards and responsibility for the environment around the company increase.
The company is said to have a political connection if at least one of the large
shareholders (someone who directly or indirectly controls at least 10% of the total voting
shares) or one of the leaders of the company (CEO, President Director, Vice President
Director, or secretary) is a member of parliament or a minister or head of state or very closely
related to the company.
Accrual methods are conceptually accruals whose values are determined by
management (discretion) policies. Technically, accrual itself is the differences between profit
and cash. Detection of the possibility of earnings management in financial statements is
generally investigated through the use of accruals, because accruals themselves are the
main components of profit making and their arrangement is based on certain estimates
determined by management.
Accrual accounting attempts to record the financial impact on an entity of transactions
and other events related to the consequences of cash for the entity in the period in which the
related transactions and events arise rather than only in the period where cash is received
and paid by the entity (FASB 1985, SFAC No. 6 Paragraph 139).
Nondiscretionary Accrual - Normal accrual or non-discretionary accrual is part of the
accrual that is naturally available in the process of preparing financial statements. Non-
discretionary accrual is a component of accrual that occurs along with changes in company
activities (Jones, 1991).
Discretionary Accrual - Discretionary accrual is an accrual component derived from
earning management by a manager. Discretionary accruals are equivalent to abnormal
accruals or commonly referred to as unexpected accruals. Discretionary accrual is an option
to choose the policy given to the manager.
Earning management is the selection of accounting policies or concrete actions that
affect earnings by management, to achieve specific goals in earnings reporting (Scott, 2009).
Earning Management arises when managers use valuation in financial reporting and in the
formation of transactions to change financial reporting to mislead stakeholders regarding the
performance of the company concerned or for contractual results that depend on the amount
of accounting reported (Healy & Wahlen, 1999).
205
RJOAS, 2(86), February 2019
Modified Jones model derived from Jones model (Jones, 1991) is used to determine
discretionary accruals, Modified Jones is a modification of the Jones model by adding
changes in revenue as a deduction of changes in receivable.
HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT
Until now, more than 100 countries have adopted IFRS as an accounting standard and
applied in companies in their country, even though there are used it voluntary or mandatory.
IFRS is claimed by the IASB to improve the quality of financial statements, but in practice the
use of IFRS in various countries has produced different results even though they are adopted
IFRS. Previously several studies have been conducted to see the difference after adopting
IFRS on earnings management. In his research, Capkun (2016) conducted research in 29
countries from 1994 to 2004 and the results showed no difference in earnings management
before and after the adoption of IFRS. Different results are shown by research conducted by
Lei Cai (2008). The study was conducted in 32 countries between 2000-2006 which stated
that there were differences in earning management in countries adopting IFRS.
The difference in the results of IFRS adoption in various countries was explained by
Barth in his research that the implementation of high quality standards such as IFRS also
depends on political, legal and accounting systems to get the full benefits of IFRS adoption.
Indonesia enforces mandatory IFRS adoption to be effective on 1 January 2012 but adoption
of IFRS in Indonesia itself has been carried out in stages since 2008. After mandatory
adoption of IFRS in 2012 is there a difference in earnings management after IFRS adoption
took effect in 2012 for companies that which is listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.
Based on the results of previous studies, the hypothesis can be made as follows:
H1: Earning management has changes after three years mandatory IFRS adoption
enforces in 2012 for companies listed on the IDX (Indonesia Stock Exchange).
Earning management practices can work because of the freedom of policy selection
made by management in making financial reports, but that freedom still refers to the
applicable standards, because IFRS is a high quality standard it is considered able to
improve the quality of financial statements.
Within a few years it was known that there was an increase in the quality of earnings
which meant that earnings management practices had been reduced after several years of
IFRS adoption in Malaysia (Adibah et al., 2013) and (Sellami et al., 2013), but this was
different from the results of the study conducted by (Wu et al., 2014) in China after adopting
IFRS the timeliness of earnings reporting worsened over time, this shows that the IFRS
advertisement actually decreases the quality of earnings before the PRC GAAP period in
China.
There are differences in results in some countries that adopt IFRS, there are countries
that do experience an increase in the quality of earnings but there are also in some other
countries that have not increased (Capkun et al., 2016) and (Daske et al., 2008). that the
effect of IFRS Adoption on earnings management will be different from each country and the
adoption period is carried out. Based on the results of previous studies, the hypothesis can
be made as follows:
H2: Adoption of IFRS has an effect on earnings management.
Theoretical research on political connections shows that companies benefit from their
connections because they can better understand the public policy process, gain direct
access to politicians, bureaucracies, and decision makers who influence political decisions
(Hillman, 2005).
In his research, Chaney et al. (2011) stated that the quality of earnings of companies
that have political connections is worse than companies that do not have political
connections. This happens because companies that have political connections do not
respond too much to the pressure from the capital market to improve their earnings
information quality and they also do not risk punishment because they show less quality
accounting information to the public.
In his research Braam et al., (2015) stated that political connections can influence
206
RJOAS, 2(86), February 2019
earnings management practices more than the earnings management strategies used. The
choice of strategy is more to when using accrual and real earnings management. In the
research conducted by Harymawan & Nowland, (2016), it shows that the quality of earnings
in companies that have a political relationship increases with increasing government
effectiveness and will tend to decline when the political environment is stable. So it can be
said that political connections have an influence on earnings management. Based on the
results of previous studies, the hypothesis can be made as follows:
H3: Political connection influences earnings management.
In his research Soderstrom & Sun, (2007) states that the system of legality and politics
affect accounting quality indirectly through accounting standards, which is explained that the
preparation of accounting standards is a political process. In its efforts to reduce political
influence, users of financial statements such as those authorized by tax, representatives of
banks, share holders are also involved in the process. The political system can also directly
affect the quality of accounting in countries that have a corrupt political system. Management
can bribe politicians to request government purchases, lower tax payments, and monopoly
status.
In a company in the ranks of top management the selection of policies regarding
accounting standards is determined by the Board of Directors and the Board of
Commissioners. Let's say that in one company, one of them is BOD and BOC has a political
connection, so they have more access to regulators as suggested by Hillman et al (2005) in
their research. This is of course a distinct advantage for companies that have political
connections compared to companies that have no political connections.
One of the advantages of companies that have political connections is explained in his
research Chaney et al (2011) that the company does not have the risk of penalties if it shows
a lack of quality accounting reports., so it can be said that even though the adoption of high
quality standards such as IFRS cannot be fully optimized because of the political connections
that BODs and BOCs have because political connections can also intervene indirectly in the
standard adoption process. If viewed from the results of the previous research had described
above, it can be concluded that if IFRS adoption interacts with political connections it can be
said that it can reduce the benefits of IFRS adoption in its objectives that improve the quality
of financial statements. And in this case the context of the quality of financial statements is
seen from earning management carried out by the company. Based on the results of the
above research, the following hypotheses can be made:
H4: Political connection moderating IFRS adoption of earnings management.
(M) Political
Connection
EM=AdoptionIFRS+FSIZE+LEV+GROWTH+YEAR+INDUSTRI .. .(1)
207
RJOAS, 2(86), February 2019
METHOD OF RESEARCH
The type of research used in this study is quantitative research. Quantitative research
focuses more on theories through testing variables with statistical procedures (Sekaran,
2006). The type of data in this study is secondary data because the data are financial reports
from the Indonesia Stock Exchange to measure IFRS adoption, discretionary accruals, firm
size, leverage, growth and summary financial statements to determine SIC (Sector Industry
Code) and the type of measure used is nominal data source from the research in the form of
audited financial statements obtained from the IDX website (www.idx.org). The research
sample is all companies listed on the IDX (Indonesia Stock Exchange) except all financial
sector companies such as the bank sub-sector, financial institutions, securities companies.
The population in this study must meet several criteria to avoid incomplete data or
misspecification. Criteria used include:
There are no financial statement data lost during the study period;
Companies that publish financial reports and annual reports in 2010-2015;
There are no data from companies engaged in financial, bank sub-sector, securities
companies (SIC 8);
There are no BUMN company in list (State-Owned Enterprise);
There are no new company was listed on the IDX in 2014 and 2015.
The independent variable in this study is IFRS adoption. The variables of IFRS
adoption are measured as in the research of Wan Ismail et al., (2013) and Rudra &
Bhattacharjee (2012) which are dummy variables consisting of values 0 and 1, worth 1 in
financial statements after 2012, mandatory IFRS is applied and has a value 0 before 2012.
The dependent variable in this study is earnings management. Earning management
variables were measured as in Dechow's research (1995) using discretionary accrual as
earnings management proxy and using modified Jones models as discretionary accrual
measurement models. Modified Jones models are the best testing model for measuring
earnings management compared to Healy De Angelo, standard Jones models and industry
models (Dechow et al 1995):
ASSET t-1
Where: TAit = Company Total accrual i in year t; = Total Asset in year t-1;
ΔREV it = Changes of sales company i in year t; ΔREC it = change of receivable company i
in year t; PPEit = Property Plant and Equipment company i in year t; α1, α2, α3 = firm-specific
parameters ; ΔCFO = Cash Flow from Operation activities.
The moderating variable in this study is political connection. In research, measuring
political connections is measured as in a study conducted by Harimawan et al (2017) using a
politically exposed person (PEP). Exposed person politic is categorized as president,
minister or equal position, governor, director of BUMN, head and political party, senior TNI or
Police, senior judiciary, and relations with parties who have political connections with one line
(parents, siblings, child). Value 1 if one of the BOD and BOC has one of the points above
and vice versa is worth 0 if it does not have the above category.
Measured firm size as in the study of Daniel Zeghal (2011) by using natural logarithms
from the total value of the company's assets:
208
RJOAS, 2(86), February 2019
Leverage is measured as in the Capkun (2016) study using a ratio by means of total liabilities
(current and long-term) divided by the total assets of the company:
Year is Year Fixed Effect is a fixed effect model in the formulation of regression. The
existing intercept panel data varies for each subject, but the slope of each sub-object
remains. So to distinguish one subject from another subject, dummy variables are used.
Industry is Industry fixed effect is a fixed effect model in the formulation of regression
similar to the year fixed effect. The existing intercept panel data varies for each subject, but
the slope of each subject remains. So to distinguish another subject, a dummy variable is
used.
Descriptive statistics provide a general description of the variables tested in the study.
Descriptive statistics provide information about the minimum, maximum, average and
standard deviations of these variables. This descriptive statistic comes from 1652
observations over a period of 6 years.
In table 1 is the result of the descriptive statistics of the research variables from the
2010-2015 year. There is 1652 Observation. Detail the results of descriptive statistics
explained as follows:
Variable A_IFRS Adoption of IFRS is a dummy variable that has an average value of
0.665 with a range of minimum and maximum values of 0 and 1, and has a standard
deviation value of 0.471;
KP variable or political connection here is a dummy variable that has an average
value of 0.274 and a standard deviation of 0.446 with a range of minimum and
maximum values of 0 and 1;
The average value of the ABS_DA variable or discretionary accrual is 0.7705 with
minimum and maximum values of 0.000 and 76.0425 with a standard deviation value
of 4.6382;
209
RJOAS, 2(86), February 2019
The average value of the firm size is 17.6091 and the minimum and maximum range
values are 6.5124 and 29.7041, and have a standard deviation of 3.2561;
The average value of leverage is 2170 with a minimum and maximum range of -51,
3327 and 3427, and has a standard deviation of 8441;
The average value of growth is 0.3042 with a minimum and maximum range of -1,000
and 215,1378, and has a standard deviation of 5,4329.
Independent t-test is used to see the differences between two categories by comparing
the mean values between variables. In this t-test the variables were categorized into two
groups, namely the category of pre-mandatory IFRS Adoption and 2013-2015 post-
mandatory IFRS Adoption.
210
RJOAS, 2(86), February 2019
after IFRS adoption (Christensen, 2008; Ahmed et al, 2010; Rudra et al., 2012). This result is
different from the results of previous studies stating that IFRS adoption has an influence in
reducing earnings management practices (Barth, Landsman, & Lang, 2008; Pelucio-Grecco
et al., 2014; Zéghal et al., 2011).
ABS_DA = -0,016328 - 0,213 A_IFRS – 0,171 FSIZE - 0,140 LEV - 0,006 GROWTH
211
RJOAS, 2(86), February 2019
be said that PAT and accrual accounting are interrelated because discretion or the selection
of accounting policies can affect the value of earnings of the company. Adoption of IFRS
affects earnings management not in theory because the management of IFRS-based policies
by the management does not affect the company's earnings management. The results of this
study differ may be influenced by other factors such as differences in legal and political
systems (Ball, 2006).
Result of Regression Equation 2:
ABS_DA = -0,0014269 – 0,213 A_IFRS – 0,098 KP - 0,177 FSIZE - 0,77 LEV - 0,004 GROWTH
The results of the equation regression two which examined the effect of political
connections on earnings management showed that the third hypothesis, refer to political
connections affecting earnings management, was accepted. Political connections have a
significant negative effect on earnings management. can be seen from the value of p value
KP against ABS_DA 0.002 smaller than 0.01 (0.002 <0.01), and the coefficient worth -0.770.
this shows that political connections can reduce the level of earnings management.
The regression results of equation 2 shows that political connections can influence
earnings management, these results are also obtained in previous studies (Faccio, 2010;
Braam et al., 2015; Harymawan et al., (2016); Jin lao (2015). Bram (2015) said that political
connections influence the selection of earnings management strategies used by companies.
In his research, Harymawan et al (2006) stated that earnings management increases with
government effectiveness, which means that regulations set by the government can affect
earnings management. regression test equation 2 shows that the third hypothesis is
accepted, because political connections affect earnings management significantly (0.002
<0.01) with a coefficient of -0.770.
The results of this study are different from the results of the research by Imashan
(2017). In a study conducted by Imanshan (2017) stating that there is no influence of political
connections on earnings management, the results of this difference may be due to
differences in political connection proxies used in imashan's research (2017) where political
connections are proxied through the government's share ownership of the company. The
political connection proxies are different from the proxies used in this study that use political
exposed person (PEP) as a proxy for political connections.
When the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners have positions in the
government or are state apparatus, as well as members of political parties that have
influence in regulating regulations. Then the BOD or BOC has the advantage of making
regulations which impact on policies that must be stabilized by company management which
can benefit them and weaken their business competitors. Profitable policies will certainly
affect the company's earnings. The strength of the political connection that BOD and BOC
has is in accordance with the bonus plan hypothesis in positive accounting theory, where if
earnings increase, bonuses also increase. It can be said that the bonus obtained by
management depends on the way the management manages profits, which makes political
connections influence the earnings management strategy used. So the political connection
affects the earnings management in accordance with the results of this study.
Result of Regression Equation 3:
ABS_DA = 0,2183 – 0,013 A_IFRSxKP – 0,218 A_IFRS – 0,108 KP - 0,1769 FSIZE - 0,142 LEV -
0,003 GROWTH
Based on the results regression equations three were conducted to examine the effect
of political connections in moderating the effect of IFRS adoption on earnings management,
indicating that political connections weakened the effect of IFRS adoption on earnings
management or moderated the effect of IFRS adoption on earnings management. Based on
the results of the regression test equation three shows that the fourth hypothesis is accepted.
Based from the p value A_IFRSxKP towards ABS_DA greater than 0.038 (0.038 <0.05)
and the coefficient vaue 1.0721, this indicates that the interaction variable A_IFRSxKP has a
212
RJOAS, 2(86), February 2019
Based on the results of the tests that have been obtained and as the discussion that
has been explained in the previous chapter, it can be concluded several things as follows:
there is no significant differences in earning management after three years mandatory IFRS
213
RJOAS, 2(86), February 2019
adoption in company listed in IDX this shows that adoption of IFRS still has not shown results
in reducing earnings management in IDX-listed companies. IFRS adoption has no effect on
earnings management. Adoption of IFRS has no effect on earnings management indicating
that adoption of IFRS cannot reduce earnings management practices. Political connections
have a negative effect on earnings management. This shows that political connections are
influential in reducing the practice of earnings management. The moderating variable
weakens the effect of IFRS adoption on earnings management. This shows that companies
that have political connections have a tendency to do earnings management for their own
benefit that make adoption of IFRS no fully optimal.
REFERENCES
1. Adibah Wan Ismail, W., Anuar Kamarudin, K., Van Zijl, T., & Dunstan, K. (2013). Earnings
quality and the adoption of IFRS-based accounting standards: Evidence from an
emerging market. Asian Review of Accounting, 21(1), 53–73.
2. Ball, R., Robin, A., & Wu, J. S. (2003). Incentives versus standards: properties of
accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics,
36(1), 235–270.
3. Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards
and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467–498.
4. Braam, G., Nandy, M., Weitzel, U., & Lodh, S. (2015). Accrual-based and real earnings
management and political connections. The International Journal of Accounting, 50(2),
111–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2013.10.009
5. C., Jarne, J. I., & Lainez, J. A. (2009). The impact of IFRS on the European Union: Is it
related to the accounting tradition of the countries? Journal of Applied Accounting
Research, 10(1), 33–55.
6. Capkun, V., Collins, D., & Jeanjean, T. (2016a). The effect of IAS/IFRS adoption on
earnings management (smoothing): a closer look at competing explanations. Journal of
Accounting and Public Policy, 35(4), 352–394.
7. Capkun, V., Collins, D., & Jeanjean, T. (2016b). The effect of IAS/IFRS adoption on
earnings management (smoothing): a closer look at competing explanations. Journal of
Accounting and Public Policy, 35(4), 352–394.
8. Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in
politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1-2), 58–76.
9. Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. (2008). Mandatory IFRS reporting around the
world: Early evidence on the economic consequences. Journal of Accounting Research,
46(5), 1085–1142.
10. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management.
Accounting Review, 193–225.
11. Doukakis, L. C. (2014). The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on real and accrual-based
earnings management activities. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(6), 551–
572.
12. Harymawan, I., Harymawan, I., Nowland, J., & Nowland, J. (2016). Political connections
and earnings quality: How do connected firms respond to changes in political stability and
government effectiveness? International Journal of Accounting & Information
Management, 24(4), 339–356.
13. Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and
its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383.
14. Hillman, A. J. (2005). Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the
bottom line? Journal of Management, 31(3), 464–481.
15. Iatridis, G., & Rouvolis, S. (2010). The post-adoption effects of the implementation of
International Financial Reporting Standards in Greece. Journal of International
Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 19(1), 55–65.
16. Jeanjean, T., & Stolowy, H. (2008). Do accounting standards matter? An exploratory
analysis of earnings management before and after IFRS adoption. Journal of Accounting
214
RJOAS, 2(86), February 2019
215