Detail Design and Advanced Analysis of e PDF
Detail Design and Advanced Analysis of e PDF
Detail Design and Advanced Analysis of e PDF
Prepared by
Mahesh Raj Bhatt (11520412 )
Mukesh Kumar Swarnkar (11520414 )
Raju Khatri ( 11520422)
Ram Krishna Acharya(11480068 )
Sadhana Tiwari(11520430)
Sanju Sharma (11520431)
Sundar Adhikari (11520436)
2014
ABSTRACT
This project mainly focuses on earthquake resistant building design and is titled as
DETAIL DESIGN AND ADVANCED ANALYSIS OF EARTHQUAKE
RESISTANT HOSPITAL BUILDING AT LEKHNATH”. This project is prepared
as per the syllabus of 8th semester prescribed by Pokhara University. This report
includes all the works related to analysis, design, drawing and structural detailing of
earthquake resistant hospital building.
Manual analysis and design of each critical frame was done block wise and overall
structural analysis and design was done using designing tools.
Here, we mainly focused on structural analysis and design of multi storied frame
structure. Materials properties are assumed as per the common practice and soil
bearing capacity is also assumed suitably. The design of elements was done by using
limit state design philosophy which is economic, safe and reliable. The designing tools
used in this project are SAP2000,AUTOCAD and STAAD.pro.
Due to unavailability of time only manual calculation of the design of critical member
is presented here. The analysis, design and detailing of other structural members can
be carried out following the same procedure. Earthquake forces are applied as per IS
1893:2002
I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are highly indebted to the help of our project supervisor Dr. Govinda Prasad
Lamichhane, Dean, Faculty of Science and Technology, Pokhara University.It
would have been impossible to accomplish this project without his valuable
suggestion.
We wish thanks to All faculties of SOE Pokhara Uniiversity for providing support
during the project period. We wish thanks to all classmates and staff of SOE who
helped us to carry out this project.
Finally, we want to express our heartily thanks to all those who directly or indirectly
provided us their cooperation in the completion of this project.
At last but not the least, we also have high sense of appreciation to our own project
group for a unit co-ordination among the group during the project work.
Team Members
Mahesh Raj Bhatt
Mukesh Kumar Swarnkar
Raju Khatri
Ram Krishna Acharya
Sadhana Tiwari
Sanju Sharma
Sundar Adhikari
II
PREFACE
This project surely help us to design the safe, economic stable and efficient
structure.The design of earthquake resistant building is mostly needed
nowadays.Earthquake resistant design helps to minimize the loss of lives and structure
itself during seismic disasters.
This project work also helped us to develop co-operation and coordination for the
long-term work and getting through the problems effectively.
To reduce the volume of the report sample calculations are provided in detail.
Numerous figures and sketches have been introduced to illustrate the theories.
References to the appropriate clauses of standard codes of practices have been made
wherever necessary.
We were very glad to work under the guidance of our project supervisor
Asso.Prof.Dr.Govinda Prasad Lamichhane who always guided us with valuable tips
while tackling the problem and gave great knowledge of structural engineering.
We have tried our best to make the report error free.We are sorry for any mistakes and
misprints.Any comments and critics are highly appreciated.
III
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1
1.1 Background .............................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Why Hospital Building ............................................................................................ 1
1.3 Literature Review..................................................................................................... 1
1.4 Objective of the project ............................................................................................ 2
1.5 Limitation of the Project .......................................................................................... 2
1.6 Project Description................................................................................................... 3
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 5
2.1 Preliminary design ................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Preliminary vertical load analysis ............................................................................ 5
2.3 End-Moments in Beams ........................................................................................... 5
2.3.1 Mid-Span Moments in Beams .......................................................................... 5
2.3.2 Column-End Moments ...................................................................................... 6
2.4 Preliminary lateral load analysis .............................................................................. 6
2.4.1 Preliminary load analysis of beam and column ................................................ 6
2.5 Analysis.................................................................................................................... 7
2.6 Gravity load ............................................................................................................. 7
2.7 Dead Loads .............................................................................................................. 7
2.8 Live Loads ............................................................................................................... 8
2.8.1 Eccentricity of Vertical Loads .......................................................................... 8
2.8.2 Earthquake Load ............................................................................................... 8
2.8.3 Other Loads ....................................................................................................... 9
2.8.4 Lateral Loads .................................................................................................... 9
2.8.5 Estimation of Earthquake Loads ....................................................................... 9
CHAPTER 3 EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & SEISMOLOGY ......................... 12
3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 12
3.2 Causes of Earthquake ............................................................................................. 14
3.3 Seismicity of a Region ........................................................................................... 14
3.4 Intensity of Earthquake .......................................................................................... 15
3.5 Magnitude of Earthquake ....................................................................................... 15
3.6 Centre of Mass (C.M.) ........................................................................................... 15
3.7 Centre of Stiffness (C.S) ........................................................................................ 15
3.8 Types of Earthquake .............................................................................................. 16
3.8.1 Recent earthquake in Nepal ............................................................................ 16
3.8.2 Effects due to Earthquakes.............................................................................. 16
Direct Effects ....................................................................................................... 17
IV
Indirect affects/Consequential Phenomena .......................................................... 17
3.8.3 General Goals in Earthquake-Resistant Design and Construction ................. 18
CHAPTER 4 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND PROGRAM ................................. 19
4.1 Analysis.................................................................................................................. 19
4.2 Load combination .................................................................................................. 19
4.3 SAP 2000 ............................................................................................................... 20
Applications ......................................................................................................... 20
Sap Calculations................................................................................................... 20
Sap Analysis Monitor .......................................................................................... 21
SAP Tables........................................................................................................... 21
4.4 Auto-CAD .............................................................................................................. 21
Objectives of Auto-CAD ..................................................................................... 21
4.5 IS: 456-2000........................................................................................................... 21
4.6 SP-16 ...................................................................................................................... 22
CHAPTER 5 LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS .......................................................... 23
5.1 Lump Mass Calculation ......................................................................................... 23
5.1.1 Wall Load Calculation .................................................................................... 23
3.1.2 Lumped Mass of Beam .................................................................................. 24
5.1.3 Lumped Mass of Colum.................................................................................. 26
5.1.4 Lumped Mass of Slab ..................................................................................... 28
5.1.5 Lumped Mass of Wall ..................................................................................... 29
CHAPTER 6 DESIGN OF SLAB .............................................................................. 32
6.1 Design of slab ........................................................................................................ 32
6.1.1 One long edge discontinuous (7m*5m) .............................................................. 32
6.1.2 Interior panel (6m*5m) ....................................................................................... 36
CHAPTER 7 DESIGN OF BEAM ............................................................................. 42
7.1 Beam ...................................................................................................................... 42
7.2 Flow chart of beam design ..................................................................................... 44
7.2.1 Design of Beam............................................................................................. 45
CHAPTER 8 DESIGN OF COLUMN .............................................................. 48
8.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 48
8.2 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐦𝐧 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐦𝐚𝐱𝐢𝐦𝐮𝐦 𝐀𝐱𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐋𝐨𝐚𝐝 from SAP .................................. 49
CAHAPTER 9 DESIGN OF STAIRCASE .......................................................... 55
9.1 STAIRCASE .......................................................................................................... 55
9.2 INTRODUCTION OF STAIRCASE .................................................................... 55
9.2.1. TYPES OF STAIRCASE ......................................................................... 55
9.3 DESIGN CONSIDERATION ............................................................................... 55
V
9.4 Staircase design ...................................................................................................... 56
9.5 Second staircase design.......................................................................................... 62
CHAPTER 10 DESIGN OF FOOTING ............................................................... 66
10.1 Raft foundation of one critical block was analyzed ............................................. 66
CHAPTER 11 CONCLUSION ................................................................................. 71
CHAPTER 12 DRAWINGS ................................................................................... 72
CHAPTER 13 BIBLOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES ........................................ 73
VI
List of Abbreviations
Ac = Area of concrete
Ag = Gross area of the section
Ast = Area of the tensile section
Ast1 = Area of balanced tensile steel
Ast2 = Area of tensile steel in excess of the balanced steel
Asc = Area of compression steel
Asv = Area of vertical stirrups
BM = Bending moment
b = Breadth of beam or shorter dimension of rectangular column also the breadth of
unit length of slab
bf = Effective width of flange section
bw = Breadth of the web in T or L section
C = Coefficient depending upon the flexibility of the structures that depend on number
of storey and time period (t)
D = Overall depth of the beam or slab longer dimension of column
DL = Dead load
Φ = Diameter of the bar
d = Effective depth of the slab
d’= Effective cover
Df =Thickness of the flange T or L section
emin =Minimum eccentricity
ex, ey=Eccentricity about X and Y axis respectively
EL= Earthquake load
Ec= Youngs modulus of elasticity of concrete
Es =Young’s modulus of elasticity of steel
σmax= Maximum stress
σmin =Minimum stress
σck= Characteristics compressive strength of concrete
σy= Characteristics yield strength of steel
σsc =Design stress in compression steel at the level of centroid of compression steel
VII
σcc=Design stress in concrete at the level of centroid of compression
I =Importance factor of the structure
Ix, Iy= Moment of inertia about X and Y axis respectively
hi= Height of the first floor above base of the frame
K = Performance factor depending upon the structural framing system and for
brittleness or
ductility of the construction
leff =Effective length of element
lx= Span of the slab in the shorter direction
ly =Span of the slab in the longer direction
l = Unsupported length or clear span of elements
Lo= Distance between points of inflection
LL = Live load
Mu =Factored moment, designed moment for limit state design
Mu,lim=Maximum uni-axial moment capacity of the section with axial load
Mux = Factored moment axis about X-X axis
Muy= Factored moment axis about Y-Y axis
Mux1= Maximum uni-axial moment capacity of the section with axial load, bending
about maximum uni-axial moment capacity of the section with axial load,
bending about X-axis
Muy1= Maximum uni-axial moment capacity of the section with axial load, bending
about maximum uni-axial moment capacity of the section with axial load,
bending about Y- axis
P = Axial load in the element
Pu= factored axial load, designed axial load for the limit state design
Pc = Percentage of compression reinforcement
Pt=Percentage of tension reinforcement
Po =Perimeter
Qi =Base shear distributed in the ith floor
Sv= Spacing of stirrup
S = Spacing of the main bar
T =Estimated natural or fundamental time period of the building in seconds
V = Shear force
Vu =Design shear force for limit state, factored shear force
VIII
Vus=Strength of shear reinforcement in the limit state design
Vb=Total base shear
Wi =Lump load on the ith floor
Xu=Depth of the natural axis at the limit state of the collapse
Xu,max=Maximum depth of the neutral axis in the limit state design
Zx, Zy= Section modulus along respective axis
Ah=Design horizontal seismic coefficient
αo=Basic horizontal seismic coefficient
αx, αy =Coefficient for moment in slab
𝜏bd=Design bond stress
𝜏c=Shear strength of concrete
𝜏c’ =Maximum shear strength of concrete with shear reinforcement
𝜏v= Nominal shear stress
IX
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Simply building means the place where we live. Building provides us the space to do
works, reflects the social, economical, cultural and other aspects of the whole area.
Once a building is constructed, it remains for several years. So, it is utmost important
to have a good planning before constructing any building.
The growth of population in the world especially in major cities has created many
problems of land settlement. So, it is necessary to build multi-storeyed building.
Hospital is a place where treatment for sick people is available. The rapid
development in the field of technology not only benefitted us but it also arises many
problems. The people of this modern age suffers from many diseases. For the
treatment of these diseases, it is necessary to construct hospital building at many
places.
Nepal is disaster prone country. The various causes for the disaster are landslides
epidemic and fires which causes considerable losses to life and property in Nepal
every year. But out of this entire earthquake is most devastating through it is not so
frequent. Nepal is a seismic prone country and the risk it faces from earthquake is very
high. So, the design of earthquake resistance structure is important.
1
concentrates on a range of earthquake engineering topics and structural modelling
aspects. For the understanding of seismic capacity, a review of literature is required in
experimental testing, current design practice, theoretical strength evaluation and
modelling techniques such as finite element modelling. The literature review begins
with a coverage of general earthquake engineering topics, which serves to set the
context of the research. Following are the few topics we reviewed during our project
work.
The 8 storied hospital building including one basement dealt here is located at
Dhungepatan, Lekhnath. This project deals with the various structural members of
hospital building. Design of various structural members such as slab, beam, column,
footing and staircase are done in sequential manner in this project work.
Concept of space allocation for Ramp and lift is also a part of this project. This project
comprises of the method of analysis, design and the working drawings details.
2
prove to be helpful in the design of similar type of structure such as commercial
complexes, residential buildings, hospitals, administrative buildings, commercials
malls etc.
There are some criteria within which the scope of the project is limited which is listed
below :
1. This project work is limited to the structural analysis and the design only.
2. Design and layout of the building services like water supply
pipelines,electrical appliances, sanitary and sewage are not covered.
3. Design of parking facilities is not concerned in this project, hower basement
floor can be used as parking space.
4. Soil survey is not carried out for the bearing capacity of the soil.
5. The environmental, socio-economic condition of that locality is not taken into
consideration.
6. Cost estimate of the project is not included in this report.
3
Concrete : M30
Steel grade (fy) : Fe415
14. Space management and SAP modeling of ramp and Lift.
Note: as our project , hospital building contains dimension longer than 30.0 m. so
provision of expansion joint is done. So our hospital building contains six blocks
named partI ,partII(two), partIII and partIV (two).
4
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY
Load calculation is done using IS 456:2000 and IS 1983(part I):2002 as reference. The
exact value of unit weight of materials from code is used in calculation. Thickness of
section is taken as per design requirements.
5
2.3.2 Column-End Moments
Neglect such moments in internal columns. In the external column, the moment at
each end may be taken as of the fixed end moment of the beam connected, except
for at the top end of the top-storey column.
Too many variations in the sizes of the beams and columns, widths and depths
are not desirable from both aesthetic and economic point of view. It is
common to adopt widths and columns and vary their depths to some extent as
required.
6
Frequently the column vertical steel may clash with the longitudinal steel of
beams crossing it from one or two directions. Also the requirements of the
clear cover for columns and beams in the codes are usually different. It may be
useful to keep columns wider than the beams and the nos. of bar is kept, even
in column and odd in beam or vice-versa so that the bars of the beam pass
through the gaps in the bars of the column.
The section work out as a result of preliminary design should now be recorded,
discussed with the architect and finalized before undertaking the further final analysis
which is time consuming as well as more expensive.
Loading pattern from slab to beam is obtained by drawing 450 offset lines from each
corner. Then obtained trapezoidal as well as triangular loading are converted into
equivalent UDL as described in respective section.
2.5 Analysis
Structural grids are analyzed from different load combinations as mentioned above.
The entire grids are for the calculation manually.
7
additions result in the overloading of certain 10 components or the re-design of the
structure. Such situations should be avoided by careful initial planning.
The correct sizes of structural member i.e. slab beams and columns, cannot be
ascertained before the structural the structural analysis and design are finalized. Thus,
some sizes need to be assigned by experience and architectural to begin with, checked
and modified during preliminary design and finalized during detailed analysis and
checking.
8
as to ensure that they remain elastic and damage-free is not considered economically
prudent. Instead, reliance is placed on kinetic energy dissipation in the structure
through plastic deformation of elements and joints. The design forces are reduced
accordingly. Thus, the philosophy of a seismic design is to obtain a no- collapse
structure rather than a no-damage structure. This is a sound economic proportion for
not only the poor and developing countries, but even for the developed only as well.
To achieve a greater degree of protection, the critical and important buildings are
designed for higher seismic factors by using an importance factor, I Also the effect of
local soil and type of foundation is considered by another factor, β. Since buildings
with different structural system have down varied behavior during past earthquake, a
performance factor, k, is also introduced.
Thus, there is lot of possibility of variation is specifying the design seismic values for
the building in various seismic countries of the world and Nepal has to make a choice
depending on her economical situation, skills is design her construction practices.
9
Where,
Ah=Design horizontal acceleration spectrum value.
𝑍∗I∗S
Ah= 2∗R∗ga
Where,
Qi =Design Lateral force at floor i,
Wi= Seismic weight of floor i,
hi= Height of the floor i, measured from base and
n= Number of storey in the building
10
Calculation of base shear
Seismic Base shear
Design seismic base shear
According to IS 1893(Part 1):2002 CI .No.6.4.2 the design horizontal seismic
coefficient Ah for a structure shall be determine by the following expression
𝑍𝐼𝑆
Ah = 2𝑅𝑔𝑎
Where,
Z= zone factor given by IS 1893(Part 1):2002 tabel 2, Here for zone V,Z=0.36
I= importance factor,I=1.5 for important service and hospital building (form table 6)
R= Response reduction factor given by IS 1893(Part 1):2002 tabel 7 ,
R=5.0
𝑆𝑎
= 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑤𝑖𝑐 depends on fundamental
𝑔
11
CHAPTER 3 EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & SEISMOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
An earthquake is a sudden movement of the Earth, caused by the abrupt release of
strain that has accumulated over a long time. Earthquakes last a few seconds but in
that time it can change people’s lives forever. Earthquake in Nepal is a fact of life and
we must accept this fact. We cannot prevent an earthquake from happening but we can
prepare for one.
Preparation saves lives and eases hardships during the aftermath. It therefore becomes
one’s responsibility to plan ahead and prepare for such an eventuality. Nepal is located
in between the two major tectonic plates namely Indian and Tibetan plates, which
have been moving towards each other for long time. It is recorded that plates move
inner with the speed of 2 cm per year. Most of the Nepali building is not Earthquake
Resistant. The Earthquake gone last year in Eastern part of Nepal damages some
residential building in hilly area like in Taplejung district.
But we have to agree the fact that, Earthquake does not kill people but none properly
designed constructions do. Earthquake engineering is the study of the behavior of
buildings and structures subject to seismic loading. It is a subset of both structural and
civil engineering. Earthquake Engineering can be defined as the branch of engineering
devoted to mitigating earthquake hazards. In this broad sense, earthquake engineering
covers the investigation and solution of the problems created by damaging
earthquakes, and consequently the work involved in the practical application of these
solutions, i.e. in planning, designing, constructing and managing earthquake-resistant
structures and facilities.
12
Seismology is the scientific study of earthquakes and the propagation of elastic waves
through the Earth. The field also includes studies of earthquake effects, such as
tsunamis as well as diverse seismic sources such as volcanic, tectonic, oceanic,
atmospheric, and artificial processes (such as explosions).
Major 7-7.9 18
Source: http::/neic.usgs.gov/neis/eqlists/eqstats.html
During an earthquake, the surface of the earth deforms due to the wave coming from
the focus then all ground based and manmade systems are subjected to vibrations
through ground
displacements. So, shaking of the earth's surface caused by the waves coming from a
source of disturbance inside the earth is known as earthquake.
13
3.2 Causes of Earthquake
Volcanic activity keeps on taking place in several parts of the world. Volcanic
eruption, landslides, and formation of caves can cause small earthquake in localized
areas. Explosions of chemical or nuclear devices may produce seismic waves.
Collapse of cave roof or mine bursts can cause small earthquakes. At the last time
some seismologists are arguing that seismicity of the area increases significantly after
the construction of dam and reservoirs. All these earthquake are of local nature and
they affect only small area. But the large earthquake affecting the wide area are due to
sudden release of strain energy by rupture of the rock at plate boundaries and this is
the primary cause of seismic activity around the world.
According to the theory of plate tectonics, the crust is made of rocks and divided into
many plates. These plates are constantly in motion in different speed. The rock
forming crust has strain energy stored in them. The sudden slip at the faults results in
the release of strain energy in the form of seismic wave.
II 0.1
III 0.16
IV 0.24
V 0.36
14
3.4 Intensity of Earthquake
Intensity of Earthquake may be defined as the rating of an earthquake based on the
actual effects produced by the quake on the earth. This observed effect may range
from simple harmless vibration through mild jerks. It is indicated by a number
according to modified Mercalli Scale or MKS scale of seismic intensities. Hence
intensity is the degree of damage, effect of an earthquake on human being and
structures. It is site based measurement in modified Mercalli Scale. This is 12 point
scale ranging from I to XII. Intensity of Earthquake depends upon various factors such
as earthquake magnitude, distance from hypocenter to epicenter, types of foundation
material, building style etc.
Log10(E)=11.4+1.5M Where,
E=Energy released
M=Magnitude of Richter scale.
15
3.8 Types of Earthquake
Earthquake is classified based on various parameters. In general they are classified
based on the magnitude as below:
Minor <= 5
Moderate 5<M<=7
Major >7
16
Direct Effects
Tsunamis
Seiches
Landslides
Floods
Fires
The seismic effect or damage that usually concerns the structural engineer, and which
is taken into account by code seismic-resistant design provisions, is the vibration of
the structure in response to ground shaking at its foundation. Although damage due to
other effects may exceed that due to vibration, procedures for gauging the probability
of these effects and for coping with them are outside the scope of the structural
engineering discipline and so are usually not included in seismic-resistant codes.
Nonetheless, the structural engineer should be aware of the different seismic hazards
and should advise the client of potential damage involved in locating structures at
certain sites. Thus the first step in the design procedure of a future structure should be
the analysis of the suitability of the site selected with proper consideration for the
potential of any one of the above types of damage.
17
3.8.3 General Goals in Earthquake-Resistant Design and Construction
The philosophy of earthquake design for structures other than essential facilities has
been well established and proposed as follows:
18
CHAPTER 4 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND PROGRAM
4.1 Analysis
For the purpose of seismic analysis of our building, we used the structural analysis
program SAP 2000 V14. It has a special option for modeling horizontal rigid floor
diaphragm system. A floor diaphragm is modeled as a rigid horizontal plane parallel
to global X-Y plane, so that all points on any floor diaphragm cannot displace
relative to each other in X-Y plane.
This type of modeling is very useful in the seismic analysis of building. The base
shear and earthquake lateral force are calculated as per code IS 1893 (part 1) 2002 as
calculated before and are applied at each frame joint in every storey of the building in
X-Y directions respectively.
Various load combinations has been adopted as per IS 1893 (part 1): 2002, clauses
6.3.1.2. They are as follows:
19
Following load combinations are adopted
1. 1.5(D.L+L.L+OTHER)
2. 1.2(D.L + L.L+ OTHER + Eqx)
3. 1.2(D.L+L.L+OTHER-Eqx)
4. 1.2(D.L+L.L+OTHER+Eqy)
5. 1.2(D.L+L.L+OTHER-Eqy)
6. 1.5(D.L+OTHER+Eqx)
7. 1.5(D.L+OTHER-Eqx)
8. 1.5(D.L+OTHER+Eqy)
9. 1.5(D.L+OTHER-Eqy)
10. 0.9(D.L+OTHER)+1.5 Eqx
11. 0.9(D.L+OTHER)-1.5 Eqx
12. 0.9(D.L+OTHER)+ Eqy
13. 0.9(D.L+OTHER)- Eqy
Applications
Sap Calculations
After the calculation of the dead load, live load and earthquake load now the load are
assigned in the SAP2000. Also, the dead load of slab, ramp, stair and wall projection
are assigned in the SAP2000. Similarly the live load in the slab, projection, ramp, stair
etc is also assigned. Then the earthquake loads are assigned and the program is run.
The software calculates the loads and the final value can be taken from the table from
which the designs of beam, column, foundation etc are done.
20
Sap Analysis Monitor
After the loads are assigned in the SAP, then it is analyzed. If the work bears mistake
then we are notified through SAP analysis monitor. The table below shows that our
modeling is successfully performed.
SAP Tables
After the SAP analysis SAP tables are obtained which is very important for design
purpose. Two tables of Element force tables and Joint reaction tables are obtained
from the SAP. From the table we find the maximum load and design. For the frame to
design we will find the maximum load and moment from the nine combination. The
tables can be displayed in the MS excel also. Detail tables are at the last of the report.
4.4 Auto-CAD
Auto CAD is a useful program for all kinds of engineering works. As a civil engineer,
Auto CAD is used for drawing like building, highway, alignment, etc. it is an
important tools for drawing the different elements with high accuracy and minimizing
the error and time.
Objectives of Auto-CAD
It contains different types of tools which help to setup a work area, edit object
and layout of a drawing.
It organize object with block and groups which will explore some tools unique
to CAD like symbols, blocks and layers.
It provides a chance to make some drawing that we can use in future project
of own.
21
concrete”, thus enlarging the scope of use of this code to structure other than general
building construction also. The third revision was published in 1978, and it includes
limit state approach to design. This is the fourth revision of the standard. This revision
was taken out with a view to keeping abreast with the rapid development in the field
of concrete technology and to be in further modification/improvements in the light of
experience gained while using the earlier version of the standard. In recent year,
durability of the concrete structure has become the cause to concern to all concrete
technologists. This has led to the need to codify the durability and the requirements
world over.
4.6 SP-16
The charts and tables included in the design aids where selected after consultation
with some user of the India. The design aids cover the following:
22
CHAPTER 5 LATERAL LOAD ANALYSIS
5.1 Lump Mass Calculation
Self weight of beam:
Cross section of beam = 500 mm*350 mm ( Block I, III, IV and V )
Cross section of beam = 600 mm*400 mm ( Block II and VI )
Self weight of beam = 0.5*0.35*25 =4.375 KN/m ( Block I, III, IV and V )
Self weight of beam =0.6*0.4*25 =6.00 KN/m ( Block II and VI )
23
c. Main Outside Brick Wall (350mm thick) ( Block I, III, IV and V )
24
II Z =0 7 14 6 588 2138.7
6 7 6 252
5 29 6 870
4.5 6 6 162
3.5 6 6 126
3.35 7 6 140.7
II Z =3.6 to 7 14 6 588 2138.7@6
Z=25.2 6 7 6 252 =12832.2
5 29 6 870
4.5 3 6 81
3.5 7 6 147
3.35 7 6 140.7
Cantilever 1 10 6 60
II Z =28.2 7 8 6 336 628.2
6 2 6 72
3.5 2 6 42
3.35 2 6 40.2
Cantilever 1 23 6 138
III Z =0 to Z 5 21 4.375 459.375 1295 @7
=25.2 4.5 8 4.375 157.5 =9065
4.25 10 4.375 185.9375
4 18 4.375 315
3.25 10 4.375 142.1875
Cantilever 1 8 4.375 35
III Z =28.2 5 4 4.375 87.5 157.5
4 4 4.375 70
IV Z =0 to Z 5 32 4.375 700 1023.444@7
=25.2 4.5 7 4.375 137.8125 =7164.11
4 5 4.375 87.5
7.07 1 4.375 30.93125
6.36 1 4.375 27.825
Cantilever 1 9 4.375 39.375
V Z= 0 to Z 1023.444@7
=25.2 =7164.11
VI Z= 0 to Z 15599.1
=28.2
25
5.1.3 Lumped Mass of Colum
Total 9331.2
26
Z=18 to 40 40@1.8*6.25=450 40@1.8*6.25=450 900
Z=21.6
Z =14.4 to Z 40 40@1.8*6.25=450 40@1.8*6.25=450 900
=18
Z =10.8 to Z 40 40@1.8*6.25=450 40@1.8*6.25=450 900
=14.4
Z=7.2 to Z 40 40@1.8*6.25=450 40@1.8*6.25=450 900
=10.8
Z= 3.6 to Z 40 40@1.8*6.25=450 40@1.8*6.25=450 900
=7.2
Z= 0 to Z =3.6 40 40@1.8*6.25=450 40@1.8*6.25=450 900
Total 6000
Total 4410
27
5.1.4 Lumped Mass of Slab
Total load
Block Floor Area (m2) (D.L+L.LD) KN/m2 Total load (KN)
Z =3.6 427.9 8.5 3637.15
Z =7.2 427.9 8.5 3637.15
Z =10.8 427.9 8.5 3637.15
I Z =14.4 427.9 8.5 3637.15
Z =18 427.9 8.5 3637.15
Z =21.6 427.9 8.5 3637.15
Z =25.2 427.9 8.5 3637.15
Total =25460.05
28
Z =3.6 to Z
V =25.2 467.2 8.5 Total =27798.4
Z =3.6 to Z
VI =25.2 665.62 8.5 39604.39
Z =28.2 175.635 8.5 1492.8975
Total =41097.2875
Block I
Z =0
a. Outside wall (350mm)
Along x-x & y-y direction total load =((4.25-0.5)+(3.25-0.5))*13.201 =85.807 KN
b. Inner wall (230mm)
Along x-x & y-y direction total load =((7-0.5)*8+(6-0.5)*6+(3.35-0.5)+(4.25-
0.5)*4+(3.25-0.5)*2+(7.25-0.5)*2))*8.994 =1095.919 KN
Total load = 85.807+1095.919 =1181.726 KN
Block II
Z =0
c. Outside wall (350mm)
Along x-x & y-y direction total load =((5-0.6)*6*12.775) +((25-0.5)*6*12.775)
=2023.56 KN
d. Inner wall (230mm)
Along x-x & y-y direction total load =(16*46*8.704)+((6*6+11*7)-10.8)*8.704
=7295.694 KN
Total load =2023.56+7295.694 =7295.693 KN
Block III
Z =0
e. Outside wall (350mm)
Along x-x & y-y direction total load =((4.25-0.5)*2+(3.25-0.5)*2+(4-
0.5)*2+(5=0.5))*13.201 =323.425 KN
f. Inner wall (230mm)
Along x-x & y-y direction total load =((5-0.5)*12+(4.5-0.5)*6+(4.25-0.5)*3+(3.25-
0.5)*4+(4-0.5)*4+(4-0.5)*3+(3.25-0.5)*3+(4.25-0.5)*3+(7.25-0.5)*1)8.994
=1358.094 KN
Total load = 323.425 +1358.094 =1681.519 KN
29
Block IV
Z =0
g. Outside wall (350mm)
Along x-x & y-y direction total load =((5-0.5)*5+(4-0.5)+(7.03-0.5)+(6.26-
0.5))*13.201 =505.466 KN
h. Inner wall (230mm)
Along x-x & y-y direction total load =((5-0.5)*2+(4.5-0.5)+(6.26-0.5)+(7-0.3-
0.5)*2+(5-0.5)*13+(5-0.5)*2+(4.5-0.5)*2)*8.994 =965.236 KN
Total load = 505.466 + 965.236 =1470.702 KN
5.2 Total lumped mass of wall in each floor is as shown in table ( Critical Block II
Only )
5.3 Calculation Of Total Lumped Mass In Each Floor ( Critical Block II Only )
Load due to
Beam Column
Block Floor Slab (KN) (KN) (KN) Wall (KN) Total load (KN)
Z=0 0 2138.7 0 9319.254 11457.954
Z=3.6 5657.77 2138.7 1360.8 9319.254 18476.524
Z=7.2 5657.77 2138.7 1360.8 9319.254 18476.524
II
Z=10.8 5657.77 2138.7 1360.8 9319.254 18476.524
Z=14.4 5657.77 2138.7 1360.8 9319.254 18476.524
Z=18 5657.77 2138.7 1360.8 9319.254 18476.524
30
Z=21.6 5657.77 2138.7 1360.8 9319.254 18476.524
Z=25.2 5657.77 2138.7 923.4 9319.254 18039.124
Z=28.2 1492.8975 628.2 243 0 2364.0975
Total
=142720.3195
31
CHAPTER 6 DESIGN OF SLAB
Live load=4KN/M2
Clear span of slab along the shorter span, lex=5.0m
Clear span of slab along the longer span, ley=7.0m
𝑙𝑒𝑥 7
∴ = = 1.4 < 2 𝑠𝑜 𝑡𝑤𝑜 𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏
𝑙𝑒𝑦 5
% of steel (0.1-0.4)% So,we assume as 0.4%
𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
≤ 𝛼𝛽𝛾𝛿𝜆
𝑑
𝛼 = 26
𝛽=1
𝛿=1
𝜆=1
𝛾 can be calculated as
𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑥 − 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑
𝑓𝑠 = 0.58 ∗ 𝑓𝑦 ∗
𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑥 − 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑
=0.58*415*1
=240.7N/mm2
From graphs IS 456:2000 clause :23.2 e
𝛾 = 1.25
32
5000
≤ 26 ∗ 1 ∗ 1 ∗ 1 ∗ 1.25
𝑑
Therefore, d=153.85mm
Providing 10mm∅ 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑 15𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟
∴ 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡 𝐷 = 153.85 + 5 + 15 = 173.85𝑚𝑚
Hence adopt the overall depth of slab =170 mm
Load calculation
1. 110mm thick partation wall =2.101 KN/M2
2. 3mm thick cement punning =0.061 KN/M2
3. 47mm thick screeding 1:4 =0.959 KN/M2
4. 170mm thick RCC slab =25*0.17=4.24 KN/M2
5. 12.5mm thick cement plaster 1:4 =0.255 KN/M2
TOTAL =7.626 KN/M2
Live load =4 KN/M2
∴ 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 11.626 KN/M2
Factor load=1.5*11.626 =17.439 KN/M2
Calculation of moment coefficient (One long edge discontinuous)
-ve moment at continuous edge 𝛼 x=0.063, 𝛼y= 0.037
+ve moment at mid span 𝛼x=0.047 , 𝛼 y= 0.028
Moment Calculation :
Mx= 𝛼 x ∗ 𝑤 ∗ 𝑙 2ex
My = 𝛼 y ∗ 𝑤 ∗ 𝑙 2ex
∴ Mx (-ve ) = 0.063 ∗ 17.439 ∗ 52 =27.466 KN-M
∴ Mx (+ve ) = 0.047 ∗ 17.439 ∗ 52 =13.951 KN-M
∴ My (-ve ) = 0.037 ∗ 17.439 ∗ 52 =16.131 KN-M
∴ My (+ve ) = 0.028 ∗ 17.439 ∗ 52 =12.207 KN-M
Detail design two way slab: (7m*5m)
𝐵𝑀 = 0.138 ∗ 𝑓𝑐𝑘 ∗ 𝑏 ∗ 𝑑 2
27.466 ∗106 = 0.138* 30* 1000* d2
∴ d= 81.451 mm< depth taken from deflection criteria
Provided depth (d)= 160 mm (from deflection criteria)
Over all depth (D)= 160+5+15 =180 mm
33
Calculation of steel along the short span :
1) At the support
𝜎𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝐵𝑀 = 0.87 ∗ 𝜎𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑑 −
𝜎𝑐𝑘 ∗ 𝑏
415 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡
27.466 ∗ 106 = 0.87 ∗ 415 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 160 −
30 ∗ 1000
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 =496.79 mm2
Hence provided 10mm ∅ bar 7 nos. @ 142.85mm c/c
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 =550 mm2
2) At the mid span
𝜎𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝐵𝑀 = 0.87 ∗ 𝜎𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑑 −
𝜎𝑐𝑘 ∗ 𝑏
415 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡
20.491 ∗ 106 = 0.87 ∗ 415 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 160 −
30 ∗ 1000
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 =366.31 mm2
Hence provided 10mm ∅ bar 5nos. @ 200 mm c/c
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 = 393 mm2
34
Spacing < 300, so use 300 mm c/c
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 =339 mm2
Check for minimum reinforcement
As per IS 456-2000 art 26.5.2.1
𝐴𝑠𝑡 minimum = 0.12% of theoretical x- sectional area
0.12
= ∗ 180 ∗ 1000 = 216.00 mm2 < actual reinforcement provided
100
Hence OK
Check for shear
On the short span( at support edge)
𝑊 𝐿𝑒𝑥 17.439∗5
Maximum shear force at face of support (Vu) = = =43.598 KN
2 2
𝑉 43.598∗10 3
Nominal shear stress (𝜏𝑣 ) =𝑏𝑑𝑢′ = = 0.291N/mm2
1000 ∗150
𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 100∗550
% of steel = 100 * = 1000 ∗160 = o.344%
𝑏∗𝑑
% Ast 𝜏𝑐 (M 30)
0.25 0.37
0.344 𝜏𝑐
0.5 0.5
0.37−0.29
𝜏𝑐 - 0.29=0.25−0.15 ∗ 0.246 − 0.15
∴ 𝜏𝑐 = 0.419 N/mm2
𝜏𝑐 ' =k*𝜏𝑐
For D= 180 mm
K=1.3
∴ 𝜏𝑐 ' =k*𝜏𝑐 =1.3*0.419 =0.545 N/mm2
35
𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 100∗393
% of steel = 100 * = =0.246 %
𝑏∗𝑑 1000 ∗160
𝛼 =26
𝛽 =1
𝛿 =1
𝜆= 1
Now from the graph of modification factor of tension reinforcement,
𝛾 =2 (from figure 4 modification factor IS code 456-2000)
366.31
𝜎𝑠 =0.58*451* =224.35 N/mm2
393
𝑙
Allowable = 𝛼 ∗ 𝛽 ∗ 𝛾 ∗ 𝛿 ∗ ℵ = 26*1*1*1*1.9=49.4
𝑑
𝑙 5000 𝑙
Actual = 160 = 31.250 ≤ Allowable 𝑑 Hence OK
𝑑
= 15.508 KNm
0.87∗𝜎𝑦 ∗∅ 𝑀1
≤ ( 1.3 +L0)
4∗𝜏 𝑏𝑑 𝑉𝑢
36
Clear span of slab along the longer span, ley=6.0m
% of steel (0.1-0.4)% So,we assume as 0.4%
𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
≤ 𝛼𝛽𝛾𝛿𝜆
𝑑
𝛼 = 26
𝛽=1
𝛿=1
𝜆 =1
𝛾 can be calculated as :
𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑥 − 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑
𝑓𝑠 = 0.58 ∗ 𝑓𝑦 ∗
𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑥 − 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑
=0.58*415*1
=240.7N/mm2
From graphs IS 456:2000 clause :23.2 e
𝛾 = 1.25
5000
≤ 26 ∗ 1 ∗ 1 ∗ 1 ∗ 1.25
𝑑
Therefore, d=153.85mm
Providing 10mm∅ 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑 15𝑚𝑚 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟
∴ 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡 𝐷 = 153.85 + 5 + 15 = 173.85𝑚𝑚
Hence adopt the overall depth of slab =170mm
Load calculation
1. 110mm thick partation wall =2.101 KN/M2
2. 3mm thick cement punning =0.061 KN/M2
3. 47mm thick screeding 1:4 =0.959 KN/M2
4. 170mm thick RCC slab =25*0.17=4.24 KN/M2
5. 12.5mm thick cement plaster 1:4 =0.255 KN/M2
TOTAL =7.626 KN/M2
Live load =4 KN/M2
∴ 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 11.626 KN/M2
Factor load=1.5*11.626 =17.439 KN/M2
Calculation of moment coefficient (interior panel)
37
+ve moment at mid span 𝛼x=0.032 , 𝛼 y= 0.024
Moment Calculation :
Mx= 𝛼 x ∗ 𝑤 ∗ 𝑙 2ex
My = 𝛼 y ∗ 𝑤 ∗ 𝑙 2ex
∴ Mx (-ve ) = 0.043 ∗ 17.439 ∗ 52 =18.747 KN-M
∴ Mx (+ve ) = 0.032 ∗ 17.439 ∗ 52 =13.951 KN-M
∴ My (-ve ) = 0.032 ∗ 17.439 ∗ 52 =13.951 KN-M
∴ My (+ve ) = 0.024 ∗ 17.439 ∗ 52 =10.463 KN-M
Detail design two way slab (interior panel) (6m*5m)
𝐵𝑀 = 0.138 ∗ 𝑓𝑐𝑘 ∗ 𝑏 ∗ 𝑑 2
18.747 ∗106 = 0.138* 30* 1000* d2
∴ d= 67.292 mm< depth taken from deflection criteria
Provided depth (d)= 160 mm (from deflection criteria)
Over all depth (D)= 160+5+15 =180 mm
Calculation of steel along the short span
5) At the support
𝜎𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝐵𝑀 = 0.87 ∗ 𝜎𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑑 −
𝜎𝑐𝑘 ∗ 𝑏
415 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡
18.747 ∗ 106 = 0.87 ∗ 415 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 160 −
30 ∗ 1000
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 =334.18 mm2
Hence provided 10mm ∅ bar 5 nos. @ 200mm c/c
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 =393 mm2
6) At the mid span
𝜎𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝐵𝑀 = 0.87 ∗ 𝜎𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑑 −
𝜎𝑐𝑘 ∗ 𝑏
415 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡
13.951 ∗ 106 = 0.87 ∗ 415 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 160 −
30 ∗ 1000
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 =246.77 mm2
Hence provided 10mm ∅ bar 4nos. @ 250mm c/c
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 =314 mm2
Calculation of steel along the long span
d' = d-5-5 =160-10=150 mm
38
7) At the support
𝜎𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝐵𝑀 = 0.87 ∗ 𝜎𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑑 ′ −
𝜎𝑐𝑘 ∗ 𝑏
415 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡
13.951 ∗ 106 = 0.87 ∗ 415 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 150 −
30 ∗ 1000
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 =264.03 mm2
Hence provided 10mm ∅ bar 4nos. @ 250mm c/c
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 =314 mm2
8) At the mid span
𝜎𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝐵𝑀 = 0.87 ∗ 𝜎𝑦 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑑 ′ −
𝜎𝑐𝑘 ∗ 𝑏
415 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡
10.463 ∗ 106 = 0.87 ∗ 415 ∗ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 150 −
30 ∗ 1000
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 =196.77 mm2
Hence provided 10mm ∅ bar 3nos. @ 333.33mm c/c
Spacing < 300, so use 300 mm c/c
∴ 𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 =236 mm2
Check for minimum reinforcement
As per IS 456-2000 art 26.5.2.1
𝐴𝑠𝑡 minimum = 0.12% of theoretical x- sectional area
0.12
= ∗ 180 ∗ 1000 = 216.00 mm2 < actual reinforcement provided
100
Hence Ok.
Check for shear
On the short span( at support edge)
𝑊 𝐿𝑒𝑥 17.439∗5
Maximum shear force at face of support (Vu) = = =43.598 KN
2 2
𝑉 43.598∗10 3
Nominal shear stress (𝜏𝑣 ) =𝑏𝑑𝑢′ = = 0.291N/mm2
1000 ∗150
𝐴𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 100∗393
% of steel = 100 * = 1000 ∗160 = o.246%
𝑏∗𝑑
39
As Per IS 456-2000 table 19
% Ast 𝜏𝑐 (M 30)
0.15 0.29
0.246 𝜏𝑐
0.25 0.37
0.37−0.29
𝜏𝑐 - 0.29= ∗ 0.246 − 0.15
0.25−0.15
∴ 𝜏𝑐 = 0.367 N/mm2
𝜏𝑐 ' =k*𝜏𝑐
For D= 180 mm
K=1.3
∴ 𝜏𝑐 ' =k*𝜏𝑐 =1.3*0.367 =0.477 N/mm2
∴ 𝜏𝑐 ' > 𝜏𝑣 Hecne Ok.
𝛼 =26
𝛽 =1
𝛿 =1
𝜆 =1
Now from the graph of modification factor of tension reinforcement,
𝛾 =2 (from figure 4 modification factor IS code 456-2000)
246.77
𝜎𝑠 =0.58*451* =189.16 N/mm2
314
𝑙
Allowable = 𝛼 ∗ 𝛽 ∗ 𝛾 ∗ 𝛿 ∗ ℵ = 26*1*1*1*2 =52
𝑑
𝑙 5000 𝑙
Acutal = 160 = 31.250 ≤ Allowable 𝑑 Hence OK.
𝑑
40
Development length check
At support (short span)
𝑀1
Ld ≤ 1.3 +L0
𝑉𝑢
415∗0.5∗393
𝑀1 = (0.87 ∗ 415 ∗ 393 ∗ 0.5 ∗ 160 − ) /106
30∗1000
= 11.158 KNm
0.87∗𝜎𝑦 ∗∅ 𝑀1
≤ ( 1.3 +L0)
4∗𝜏 𝑏𝑑 𝑉𝑢
41
CHAPTER 7 DESIGN OF BEAM
7.1 Beam
The design of beam requires the determination of steel for the section fixed from the
preliminary design. The design of the section may result as singly or doubly
reinforcement which may be ascertained by comparing the design moment (Mu) with
the moment of resistance of balanced section (Mul) and the section is usually design as
under reinforced section.
There are two types of reinforced concrete beams in our case.
A) Singly reinforced beams
B) Doubly reinforced beams
A) Singly Reinforced Beams
In singly reinforced simply supported beams, reinforcing steel bars are placed
near the bottom of the beams, which is the position where they are most effective
in resisting the tensile stresses. In singly reinforced cantilever beams, reinforcing
bars are placed near the top of the beam for the same reason.
If Mu<Mu1, then it is singly reinforced section and the area of steel Ast is
determined by
Mu lim
Ast1=
0.87 fy d 0.42 Xu lim
Where, Xu=neutral axis depth
B) Doubly Reinforced Beams
In doubly reinforced concrete section is reinforced in both compression and tension
regions. The section of the beam may be rectangular, T and L sections. The necessity
of using steel in the compression region arises due to two main reasons.
a) When depth of section is restricted, the strength available for the single
reinforced section is inadequate.
b) At a support of a continuous beam where bending moment changes sign, such
a situation may also arise in design of a beam circular in plan.
If Mu > Mu1, then it is doubly reinforced section and the area of tensile reinforcement
Ast is determined as,
Ast= (A st1 + A st 2 )
Ast1=
Mu lim
+
Mu Mu lim
0.87 fy d 0.42 Xu lim 0.87 fy d d '
42
The area of compression reinforcement (Asc) is determined as,
Asc=
Mu Mu lim
fsc fcc d d '
Where, d , = effective cover to reinforcement
f sc , f cc = stresses in compression steel and Concrete respectively
Corresponding to strain e=
M Mu lim =0.0035(Xu- d’)/Xu
fsc fcc d d '
M u1 =0.133 f ck ×b×d 2 (For Fe 500 steel)
43
7.2 Flow chart of beam design
Calcualte Mlim
Mlim=0.138𝜎ckbd2
Mlim=0.133fckbd2
SRB design
Ast >Ast min=
0.12% 0f bD
Calcualte Ast from
Mu= 0.87fy Ast(d-0.42xu)
Calculate Ast2 by
Ast2=M/(0.87*𝜎y*(d-d’))
Calculate numbers of
bars = Ast/Abar Calculate Ast =Ast1 + Ast2
Ast>Astmin= 0.12%
of bD
Calculate numbers of bars
= Ast/Abar
44
7.2.1 Design of Beam
Rectangular Beam (775)
MU = -327.53 KNm
VU = 225.2 KN
Assume d′ =50 mm
Width of beam (w) =400 mm
Overall depth of beam(D) =600 mm
Effective depth of beam (d) =600 – 50 =550 mm
Ultimate moment of resistance,
Mu,lim =0.36*fck*b*xm*(d – 0.42xm)
= 0.36*30*400*0.48*550*(550 – 0.42*0.48*550)
= 500.80 KNm > Mu
Therefore, the section must be designed as singly reinforced section.
Now,
Force of tension = force of compression
0.87*fy*Ast = 0.36*fck*b*xm
0.36∗30∗400∗0.48∗550
Or,Ast =
0.87∗415
= 3159 mm2
Use 11-20 mmϕ bar.
Ast provided = 3456 mm2
Check for minimum and maximum reinforcement
For minimum reinforcement
0.85∗𝑏∗𝑑
A0 =
𝑓𝑦
0.85∗400∗550
=
415
45
0.87∗415∗20
=
4∗1.6∗1.5
= 752.18 mm ≈ 755 mm
Theoretical cutoff point(TCP) =780 mm
Actual cut off point(ACP) = TCP + (d or 12ϕ) ,whichever is greater
= 780 + 550
= 1330 mm
Then cut off bar at 1.33 m from support.
Check for development length
1.3∗𝑀1
Ld ≤ + L0
𝑉
𝑓 𝑦 ∗𝐴 𝑠𝑡
M1 =0.87*fy*Ast*(d - )
𝑓 𝑐𝑘 ∗𝑏
415∗3159
=0.87*415*3159*(550 - )
30∗400
= 502.70 KNm
V = 225.2 KN
L0 = 8ϕ + 100 =8*20 + 100 = 260 mm
1.3∗𝑀1
Ld ≤ + L0
𝑉
1.3∗502.70∗10 3
37.6ϕ ≤ + 260
225.2
Φ ≤ 84 mm Ok.
Check for shear reinforcement
Vu = 225.2KN
𝑉𝑈 225.2∗1000
Nominal shear stress (𝜏𝑣 ) = = = 1.023 N/mm2
𝑏∗𝑑 400∗550
100∗𝐴𝑠𝑡 10083159
% of tension steel (Pt) = = = 1.435 %
𝑏∗𝑑 400∗550
From IS456 -2000
Shear strength for M30 concrete,
% steel 𝜏𝑐 (N/mm2)
1.25 0.71
1.435 ?
1.5 0.76
46
By interpolation,
𝜏𝑐 = 0.747 N/mm2
𝜏𝑐 𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 3.5 N/mm2
𝜏𝑐 𝑚𝑎𝑥 > 𝜏𝑣 > 𝜏𝑐 ok..
Hence shear reinforcement must be designed for shear value ( 𝜏𝑣 - 𝜏𝑐 )*b*d
= 327.038 mm
47
CHAPTER 8 DESIGN OF COLUMN
8.1 INTRODUCTION
48
Assumptions for limit state of collapse in compression
1. Plane sections normal to the axis remain plane after bending .
2. The relationship between stress –strain distribution in concrete is assumed to
be parabolic .The maximum compressive stress is equal to 0.67fck/1.5 or
0.446 fck.
3. The tensile strength of concrete is ignored .
4. The stresses in reinforcement are derived from the representative stress- strain
curve for the type of the steel used.
5. The maximum compressive strain in concrete in axial compression is taken as
0.002.
6. The maximum compression strain at the highly compressed extreme fiber in
concrete subjected to axial compression and bending, but when there is no
tension on the section, is taken as 0.0035 minus 0.75 times the strain at the
least compressed extreme fiber .
7. The maximum compressive strain at the highly compressed extreme fiber in
concrete subjected to axial compression and bending ,when part of section is
taken as 0.0035. In limiting case when the neutral axis is along one edge of the
section, the strain varies from 0.0035 at the highly compressed edge to zero at
the opposite edges.
𝐿𝑒𝑥 𝐿𝑒𝑦
𝑎𝑛𝑑 < 12, 𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
𝐷 𝑏
𝐿𝑒𝑥 𝐿𝑒𝑦
𝑎𝑛𝑑 > 12, 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
𝐷 𝑏
Unsupported length (L)=3600-500
=3100mm
49
Effective length (Le)=0.8*L
=0.8*3100=2480mm
𝒍𝒆 𝒍 𝟐𝟒𝟖𝟎
= 𝒃𝒆 = 𝟓𝟎𝟎 = 4.96 < 12
𝒅
50
Pu
For value of = 0.516 from chart we get αn = 1.527
Puz
Check,
M M uy
(M ux )αn + (M )αn ≤ 1
ux 1 uy 1
91.43 1 277.9 1
Or, ( ) +( ) ≤1
506.25 506.25
0.473 ≤ 1 Ok
The column is safe.
Area of reinforcement required in column (Asc) = 3.6% of (500)2 = 9000 mm2
Provide 12-32mm ∅ bar
Ast provided = 9651mm2 > Asc required Ok.
Since, Manual calculation accepts less than 3.6 % area of steel without eccentricity,
But SAP 2000 calculated w dfith eccentricity so, so we prefer the SAP analysis.
According To SAP 2000; Section = 500X500
% of Steel =3.6%
3.6
Area of Stell = ∗ 500 ∗ 500 = 9000 mm2
100
∴ 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝟏𝟐 − 𝟑𝟐 𝐦𝐦∅ 𝐛𝐚𝐫𝐬
51
Calculation of Pitch
P not grater than 500 mm
P not grater than 16 ∗ 32 = 512 mm
P not grater than 300 mm
𝐇
∴ 𝐏𝐢𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐏 = 𝟑𝟎𝟎 𝐦𝐦 𝐦𝐢𝐝𝐝𝐥𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭
𝟑
P 3.6
= = 0.120
σck 30
52
d′ 60
Assume = = 0.1
D 600
P 5087 ∗ 1000
= = 0.471
σck bd 30 ∗ 600 ∗ 600
mux1
From IS: 456 − 1987, Chart − 44, We get = 0.13
σck bD2
Uniaxial Moment = Mux 1 = Muy 1 = (0.13 ∗ 30 ∗ 600 ∗ 6002 )/106
Mux 1 = Muy 1 = 842.4 KN − m
Mux 1 MUX 1
= = 0.13
σck bD2 20 ∗ 600 ∗ 6002
Muy 1 MUY 1
2
= = 0.13
σck bD 20 ∗ 600 ∗ 6002
Puz = 0.45σck Ac + 0.75σy Asc
Puz = 0.45 ∗ 30 ∗ 6002 + 0.75 ∗ 415 ∗ 0.036 ∗ 6002
= 8893.80
Pu 5087
= = 0.571
Puz 8893.8
Pu
For value of = 0.571 from chart we get αn = 1.618
Puz
Check
Mux αn Muy αn
( ) +( ) ≤1
Mux 1 Muy 1
67.5 1.618 2.037 1.618
Or, ( ) +( ) ≤1
842.4 842.4
∴ 0.016 ≤ 1 Ok
Since, Manual calculation accepts less than 3.6 % area of steel without eccentricity,
But SAP 2000 calculated with eccentricity so, so we prefer the SAP analysis.
53
According To SAP 2000; Section = 600X600
% of Steel =3.6%
3.6
Area of Stell = ∗ 600 ∗ 600 = 12960𝑚𝑚2
100
Calculation of Pitch
P not grater than 500 mm
P not grater than 16*32= 512mm
P not grater than 300 mm
𝐻
Pitch P = 300 mm middle 3 height
54
CAHAPTER 9 DESIGN OF STAIRCASE
9.1 STAIRCASE
Staircase is an inclined structural system for movement from one level to another
(from lower level to higher level or vice versa).
55
9.4 Staircase design
56
1. Dead load of flight
Step section =1/2 * 0.3 *0.15 =0.023 m2
Inclined slab =0.335 * 0.2 =0.067 m2
Finish =(0.3+0.15) *0.030 = 0.014 m2
Total area = 0.104 m2
Density of concrete =25KN/m2
Dead load of step section , 1 m in width and 300 mm in length =25*0.104= 2.6 KN/m
Dead load per m2 on plan =2.6 *1000/300 =8.667 KN/m2
Live load per m2 on plan =4 KN/m2
Total load =12 667 m2
Factored load =1.5*12.667 =19.001 KN/m2
Taking 1.35 m width of slab,
Load=1.35*19.001 =25.651 KN/m
2. Landing A
Self weight of slab =0.2*25=5KN/m2
Finish =0.03*25 =0.75 KN/m2
Live load =4 KN/m2
Total load =9.75 KN/m2
Factored load =1.5 *9.75 =14.625 KN/m2
Taking 1.35 m width of slab,
Load =1.35 * 14.625=19.744 KN/ m
3. For landing B
Width of beam= 350 mm
In a distance of 1025 mm ,the total factored load will be same as on landing A, that is
19.744 KN/m.In a distance of 150 mm from the wall, there will be no live load in
accordance with clause 33.2 of the code.In a distance equal to 150 mm from the wall
and a distance equal t o 75 mm inside the wall only dead load will be considered.
Total factored load =1.5*5.75*1.35 =11.644 KN/m
57
∑MA=0
RB *5.9=(19.744*1.352/2) +25.651*3.3* (1.35 +3.3/2)
+19.744*1.025*(1.35+3.3+1.025/2) +11.644*0.225*(1.35+3.3+1.025+0.225/2)
0r, RB =66.368 KN
Now, RA =19.744*1.35 +25.651*3.3 +19.744*1.025 +11.644*0.225 -RB
=67.792 KN
Let point of zero SF occurs at distance x from A
67.792 – 19.744*1.35 – 25.651*(x – 1.35) =0
or, 1.603=x -1.35
So, x= 2.953 m
Therefore, maximum BM occurs at distance 2.953 m from A.
Maximum BM=67.792*2.953 – 19.744*1.35*(2.953 – 1.35/2) – 25.651*1.6032/2
=200.189 – 60.718 – 32.956
=106.515 KNm
Effective depth of slab is given as,
BM=0.138*fck*b*d2
106.515∗10 6
d=
0.138∗30∗1350
=138.05 mm
58
Adopt effective depth of slab as 165 mm and overall depth as 190 mm.Area of tension
steel is given as
BM=0.87 *fy*Ast*(d – 0.42 xm)
=0.695*fy*Ast*d (xm = 0.48d)
106.515∗10 6
Ast=
0.695∗415∗165
=2238.17 mm2
Use 20 -12mm bars equally spaced in 1.35 m width.
Ast provided =113*20 =2260 mm2
Check for shear
𝑉𝑢 67.792∗1000
Nominal shear stress 𝜏v = = = 0.304 N/mm2
𝑏∗𝑑 1350 ∗165
100∗𝐴𝑠𝑡 100∗2260
Percent tension steel = = =1.015 %
𝑏∗𝑑 1350 ∗165
Shear strength for M30 concrete for 1.015 % steel,𝜏c= 0.66 N/ mm2
59
Design of landing slab A
𝑡(𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙 ) 𝑡(𝑤𝑎𝑙𝑙 )
Effective span =2.75 + +
2 2
=2.75 +0.1+0.1
=2.95 m
Width = 1.35 m
Factored load per m2 = 14.625 KN/m2
Total load = 14.625 * 1.35 *2.95
= 58.244 KN
Reaction from one flight
25.651∗3.3∗2.9+9.744∗1.025∗0.737+11.644∗0.225 2 /2
=
5.9
=44.184 KN
= 54.06 KNm
(88.36+58.244)
Maximum SF =
2
= 73.302 KN
Effective depth = 165 mm
𝑓𝑦 ∗𝐴𝑠𝑡
Area of steel is given by BM = 0.87*fy*Ast (d- )
𝑓𝑐𝑘 ∗𝑏
415∗𝐴𝑠𝑡
Or, 54.06*106 = 0.87*415*Ast *(165 - )
30∗1350
Ast = 965.32mm2
Use 9-12mm bars in 1.35m width.
Ast = 1018mm2.
Check for landing slab
Shear check
𝑉𝑢 66.368∗1000
Nominal shear(𝜏𝑣 ) = = = 0.297 N/mm2
𝑏∗𝑑 1350 ∗165
100∗𝐴𝑠𝑡
Percentage of tension steel =
𝑏∗𝑑
60
100∗1018
=
1350 ∗165
= 0.457%
From IS 456, 𝜏𝑐 = 0.477N/mm2
% steel 𝜏𝑐 (N/mm2)
0.25 0.37
0.457 ?
0.5 0.5
0.5−0.37
𝜏𝑐 - 0.37 = *(0.457-0.25)
0.5−0.25
𝜏𝑐 = 0.477 N/mm2
Shear strength (𝜏𝑐 ′) = K𝜏𝑐
= 1.30*0.477
= 0.62 N/mm2>𝜏𝑣 ok.
= 312 mm ≥ 12 mm ok.
0.87∗𝑓𝑦 ∗𝜙
Ld =
4𝜏 𝑏𝑑
0.87∗415∗12
=
4∗1.6∗1.5
= 451.3 mm
61
9.5 Second staircase design
size of staircase=7m * 5m
floor to floor height= 3.6 m
width of tread (G)= 0.3 m
height of riser (R)=0.15 m
fck =30 KN/m2
fy =415 KN/m2
live load =4 KN/m2
assume thickness of waist slab =200 mm
l = (0.152 +0.32 )0.5 = 0.335 m
Dead load of flight
Step section =1/2 * 0.3 *0.15 =0.023 m2
Inclined slab =0.335 * 0.2 =0.067 m2
Finish =(0.3+0.15) *0.030 = 0.014 m2
Total area = (0.0225+0.067+0.01455) =0.10705m2
Density of concrete =25KN/m2
Dead load of step section , 1 m in width and 300 mm in length =25*0.1075= 22.7625
KN/m
Dead load per m2 on plan =2.67 *1000/300 =8.9 KN/m2
Live load per m2 on plan =4 KN/m2
Total load =12.9 KN/ m2
Factored load =1.5*12.9 =19.35 KN/m2
Taking 1.85 m width of slab,
Load=1.85*19.35 =35.79 KN/m
62
Landing A
Self weight of slab =0.2*25=5KN/m2
Finish =0.03*25 =0.75 KN/m2
Live load =4 KN/m2
Total load =9.75 KN/m2
Factored load =1.5 *9.75 =14.625 KN/m2
Taking 1.85 m width of slab,
Load =1.85 * 14.625=21.93 KN/ m
For landing B
Width of beam= 350 mm
In a distance of 1200 mm ,the total factored load will be same as on landing A, that is
21.93 KN/m.In a distance of 150 mm from the wall, there will be no live load in
accordance with clause 33.2 of the code.In a distance equal to 150 mm from the wall
and a distance equal t o 75 mm inside the wall only dead load will be considered.
Total factored load =1.5*5*1.85 =13.875KN/m
∑MA=0
RB *6.9=(21.93*1.852/2) +35.79*3.3* (1.85 +3.3/2)
+21.93*1.525*(1.85+3.3+1.525/2) +13.875*0.225*(1.85+3.3+1.525+0.225/2)
0r, RB =97.074 KN
Now, RA =21.93*1.85 +35.79*3.3 +21.93*1.525 +13.875*0.225 -RB
=98.168 KN
Let point of zero SF occurs at distance x from A
98.168 – 21.93*1.85 – 35.79*(x – 1.85) =0
or, 1.609=x -1.85
So, x= 3.459 m
Therefore, maximum BM occurs at distance 3.459 m from A.
63
Maximum BM=98.168*3.459 – 21.93*1.85*(3.459 – 1.85/2) – 35.79*1.6092/2
=339.59 – 102.80 – 46.32
=190.47 KNm
Effective depth of slab is given as,
BM=0.138*fck*b*d2
190.47∗10 6
d= 0.138∗30∗1850
=157.69 mm
Adopt effective depth of slab as 165 mm and overall depth as 190 mm.Area of tension
steel is given as
BM=0.87 *fy*Ast*(d – 0.42 xm)
=0.695*fy*Ast*d (xm = 0.48d)
190.47∗10 6
Ast= 0.695∗415∗165
=4002 mm2
Use 38 -12mm bars equally spaced in 1.85 m width.
Ast provided =4294 mm2
Check for shear
𝑉𝑢 98.168∗1000
Nominal shear stress 𝜏v = = = 0.32 N/mm2
𝑏∗𝑑 1850 ∗165
100∗𝐴𝑠𝑡 100∗4294
Percent tension steel = = 1850 ∗165 =1.406 %
𝑏∗𝑑
Shear strength for M30 concrete for 1.406 % steel, 𝜏c = 0.741 N/ mm2
Shear strength for slab 𝜏c′ = k *𝜏c
=1.2 * 0.741 = 0.88 N/mm2 > 𝜏v ok.
Check for development length
Development length for 12 mm bar(Ld)= 37.6ϕ =451.2 mm ≈ 500 mm
Moment of resistance of 38 -12mm bar,
4294
M1 =190.47*4002 =204.36 KNm
V = 97.074 KN
Let L0 =0
1.3∗𝑀1
Ld ≤ +LO
𝑉
1.3∗204.36∗1000
37.6 ϕ ≤ +0
97.074
Φ ≤ 72.78 mm
12 ≤ 72.78 mm Ok.
64
Temperature reinforcement
Provide 1-10 mm bar as temperature reinforcement in each riser.In the waist slab
provide 0.12 % steel.
0.12
= 100 *19*100 = 2.28 cm2/m
=4.5 +0.1+0.1
=4.7 m
Width = 1.85 m
Factored load per m2 = 14.625 KN/m2
Total load = 14.625 * 1.85 *4.7
= 127.164 KN
Reaction from one flight
35.79∗3.3∗3.4+21.93∗1.525∗0.9875+13.875∗0.225 2 /2
= 6.9
=63.03 KN
∴ Reaction from two flight = 2*63.03 = 126.06 KN
𝑊𝑢𝐿
Maximum BM = 8
126.06+127.164 ∗4.7
= 8
= 148.76 KNm
(126.06+127.164)
Maximum SF = 2
= 126.612 KN
Effective depth = 165 mm
Area of steel is given by
𝑓𝑦 ∗𝐴𝑠𝑡
BM = 0.87*fy*Ast (d- )
𝑓𝑐𝑘 ∗𝑏
415∗𝐴𝑠𝑡
Or, 148.76*106 = 0.87*415*Ast *(165 - 30∗1380 )
Ast = 2870mm2
Use 26-12mm bars in 1.85m width.
Ast =113*26 = 2938mm2.
Provide 0.12% temperature reinfforcement in landing slab also.
65
CHAPTER 10 DESIGN OF FOOTING
Foundations are structural elements that transfer loads from the buildings or
individuals columns to the earth. Foundations must be designed to prevent excessive
settlement or rotation, to minimize differential settlement. Foundations are classified
as:
a. Isolated footing
b. Combined footing
c. Raft or mat foundation
d. Pile foundation
The type of foundations to be used in a given situation depends on a number of
factors,
a. Soil strata
b. Bearing capacity of soil
c. Type of structure
𝐼 𝐵𝐷 3 30.30∗27.65 3
𝑋= = =53376 .09𝑀 4
12 12
𝐼 𝐷𝐵 3 27.65∗30.33
𝑌= = =64097 .06𝑀 4
12 12
30.3
X= = 15.15𝑚
2
27.65
X= = 13.825m
2
∈ 𝑃 = 141259 𝐾𝑁
Load at C.G
0.4∗18850 +4.9∗23592 +9.9∗21724 +14.9∗21318 +19.9∗21251 +24.9∗19671 +29.9∗14853
X= 141259
=14.2479
0.4∗25856 +6.4∗22709 +9.75∗21578 +16.75∗28130 +23.75∗27148 +27.25∗15838
Y= 141259
66
=13.54
𝑒𝑥 = 14.2479 − 15.15 = −0.9021
𝑒𝑦 = 13.54 − 13.825 = −0.85
𝑀𝑋 = 𝑃 ∗ 𝑒𝑦 = 141259 ∗ −0.285 = −40258.81
𝑀𝑦 = 𝑃 ∗ 𝑒𝑥 = 141259 ∗ (−0.9021) = −127429.74
𝑀𝑋 −40258.81
= = 0.7542
𝐼𝑋 53376.09
𝑀𝑦 −127429.75
= = 1.988
𝐼𝑦 64097.60
Stress Calculation
𝑃 𝑀𝑋 𝑀𝑦
𝜎= ± ∗𝑦± ∗𝑥
𝐴 𝐼𝑋 𝐼𝑦
𝑃 141259
= 837.795 = 168.60
𝐴
67
14 F-3 5.25 -13.325 168.61 < SBC=ok
15 F-4 0.25 -13.325 158.67 < SBC=ok
16 F-5 -4.75 -13.325 148.73 < SBC=ok
17 F-6 -9.75 -13.325 138.79 < SBC=ok
18 F-7 -15.15 -13.325 128.05 < SBC=ok
68
Moment Calculation
X-Direction
Moment(KN-
SN Strip stress(w)(KN/m2) Span(m) m)
1 A-A 209.145 5 522.8625
2 B-B 206.57 5 516.425
3 C-C 202.9 5 507.25
4 D-D 198.9 5 497.25
5 E-E 193.5 5 483.75
Y-Direction
SN strip stress(w) Span moment
1 1-1 209.145 7 1024.811
2 2-2 204.27 7 1000.923
3 3-3 194.4 7 952.56
4 4-4 184.5 7 904.05
5 5-5 174.55 7 855.295
6 6-6 164.62 7 806.638
3812 ∗10 3
= 𝑑+1400 ∗𝑑
Equating 𝜏𝑣 = 𝜏𝑐
𝜏𝑣 = 0.25√20 =1.118 N/mm2
3812000
= 1.118
𝑑 2 + 1400𝑑
∴ d=1.274m
D=128+5=133cm=1330mm
Checking depth @ edge column
PU=4995KN
Perimeter (b0)=(200+2d)
69
Equating 𝜏𝑣 = 𝜏𝑐
𝜏𝑣 = 0.25√20 =1.118 N/mm2
4995000
= 1.118
2000 + 2𝑑 ∗ 𝑑
d=1076.04mm
Checking depth @ centre column
Pu=5300KN
Perimeter (b0)=(2400+4d)
5300000
= 1.118
2400 + 2𝑑 ∗ 𝑑
d =829.226mm
Conclusion : Highest depth is for corner column
SO,adopt d=1280mm+50mm=1330mm
∴ Over all depth =1330mm
Rebar Calculation
𝜎𝑦 Ast
Mmax at x- direction =507.25KNm=0.87𝜎𝑦 Ast (𝑑 − )
𝜎 𝑐𝑘 𝑏
A =2303mm2
0.12 0.12
∴ 12 nos 16mm 80mm c/c , A min= ∗ 𝑏𝐷 = ∗ 1000 ∗1330=1536mm2 <2303
100 100
Ok.
70
CHAPTER 11 CONCLUSION
The project is entitled " DETAIL DESIGN AND ADVANCED ANALYSIS OF
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT HOSPITAL BUILDING AT LEKHNATH” was
carried out by the group of seven students of final year.The analysis of buildingwas
done using appropriate method of analysis.The detailing of structure was done as per
relevant IS Codes as well as building design codes.The tools used in this project are
SAP 2000 V14 ,AUTOCAD.The structural members are designed to restrain the dead
load, live load and earthquake loads.
This project has indeed widened our knowledge regarding the analysis and design of
multi-storied frame structures.This project work mainly focuses towards earthquake
resistant structural analysis and design only.The detail design and drawings are
presented as per the calculation.The principle and methodology applied while
analyzing and designing the multi-storied frame structure is universally valid for any
type of framed structures.
A continuous sincerity and devotion to the work by the project group and the valuable
suggestion and guidance of the supervisor made it possible to bring the project work
to this level.
Finally, we wish our project report will become the guidance to the junior students
and other designers.We hope that project work will prove much useful to us in our
carrer.
71
CHAPTER 12 DRAWINGS
72
CHAPTER 13 BIBLOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES
1. A.K. JAIN, “Reinforced Concrete (Limit State Design)”, Nem Chand &
Bros,6th Edition, Reprinted on 2010.
2. S.N. Singh, “Reinforced Concrete Design”, Tata Mc-Graw Hill Publishing
Company, New Delhi,India,2nd Edition,1996.
3. IS1893-2002 for seismic analysis.
4. SP-16
5. Bureau of Indian Standards,“Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice
(IS-456:2000)”,Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi,India,2000.
6. Nepal Building Code (National Building Code)105 :1994
7. IS:875 (Part 1) – 1987 (for load calculation)
8. Previous Project Report
9. Civil Engineering Website:theconstructor.org
73