Gas Power Cycles
Gas Power Cycles
Gas Power Cycles
WEEK 7
Devices intended to produce net mechanical power out (for example, automotive shaft power
or jet propulsion) are often called engines. These devices may be said to operate on thermodynamic
Power cycles (as opposed to Refrigeration Cycles). They use heat (thermal energy transfer) as
a source of energy, so may be called heat engines. TD power cycles operating with a working fluid
that remains always in the gas phase—i.e., that never condenses to a saturated mixture or liquid
phase—are called Gas Power Cycles. (Although a liquid fuel is mixed into and vaporized in the
working fluid of most of the internal combustion engines, the TD effect of the liquid phase is
apparently negligible, and the idealized and actual cycles of these engines are grouped with the other
gas power cycle engines.)
For closed cycles, the working fluid is recirculated and returns to the starting place and
state. In open cycles, such as typical internal
combustion engines, the engine operates on a full
mechanical cycle, but the working fluid is exhausted to the
environment and renewed at the end of each cycle, thus
the engine does not go through a complete TD cycle.
In TD analysis of various cycles, we typically start
with totally reversible idealized cycles (e.g., Carnot,
Rankine, Brayton, Diesel, Otto, Stirling, etc.). These
theoretical cycles cannot be attained in actual (real)
devices—they have performance characteristics that can be
approached to some extent but never fully achieved.
Nevertheless, the ideal cycles, like the Carnot cycle, present
an optimal or best-case scenario. They have the maximum
possible thermal efficiency and performance for the
conditions and consist of reversible processes with no
friction, etc. In the P-v diagram to the right, an ideal but unachievable cycle path with reversible
processes is depicted, as well as the cycle path of a real actual device.1 It appears to be common
practice to refer to a real device as operating in one of the named ideal cycles, even though in actuality
it deviates substantially from the ideal, with lower efficiency and higher entropy generation, etc.
Thermal efficiency for an ideal reversible heat engine, as mentioned before, can be no better
than that of the Carnot cycle:
Actual cycle efficiency compared to idealized cycle thermal efficiency is reduced by many
factors: friction, operation under rapidly changing non-equilibrium conditions, heat losses resulting
from inadequate insulation, and other irreversible factors.
All processes are reversible for the ideal steady-state Carnot cycle, just as they are with the
classic ideal Carnot cycle (discussed earlier):
Isothermal Qin at 1-2 and adiabatic isentropic expansion at 2-3 produce Workout .
Workin (source not shown) along with Qout is needed to produce isothermal
compression at 3-4, and further Workin (source not shown) is required to produce adiabatic
isentropic compression at 4-1.
Net Workout (shaft work here) = Workout - Workin
Although it leads to a simple efficiency calculation, and establishes the principle that the TH
should be maximal (limited by materials heat tolerance) and TL should be minimal (limited by available
cooling), the steady-state ideal Carnot cycle is impractical and unsuitable for actual heat engines.
Otto Cycle
This is the idealized cycle for spark-ignition internal combustion (SI IC) reciprocating engines
(used in automobiles, lawn mowers, etc.) The typical larger SI IC engine, such as is found in autos, has a
four-process cycle named after Nikolaus A. Otto (1832-1891). The term Otto Cycle appears to be
applied to the ideal cycle as well as to real actual approximations of the ideal cycle. Otto cycle engines,
like many of the other power cycle engine types in this summary, are a highly diverse and mature
technology, and here I describe only the thermodynamic basics plus a few interesting details.
Diesel Cycle
This is the idealized cycle for actual 4-stroke compression ignition internal combustion engines
(CI IC engines), and actual CI IC engines are described as operating on the Diesel Cycle. These were first
developed by Rudolph Diesel in the 1880s and 1890s.4 These engines are similar to SI IC engines.
However, fuel is injected near TDC at a point where high compression has already raised the T above
the autoignition temperature. Thus the fuel air mixture spontaneously ignites and burns as further fuel
is injected.
Ideal Diesel Cycle Ideal Diesel Cycle
In the ideal Diesel cycle (diagrams immediately above), “The p–V diagram is a simplified and idealized
representation of the events involved in a Diesel engine cycle, arranged to illustrate the similarity with
a Carnot cycle. Starting at 1, the piston [at V1] is at bottom dead center and both valves are closed at
the start of the compression stroke; the cylinder contains air at atmospheric pressure. Between 1 and
2 the air is compressed adiabatically (isentropically)... by the rising piston. (This is only approximately
true since there will be some heat exchange with the cylinder walls.) During this compression, the
volume is reduced [to V2],
the pressure and temperature both rise. At or slightly before 2 (TDC) fuel is injected and burns
in the compressed hot air. Chemical energy is released and this constitutes an injection of thermal
energy (heat) into the compressed gas. Combustion and heating occur between 2 and 3. In this
interval the pressure remains constant since the piston descends, and the volume increases [producing
workout]; the temperature rises as a consequence of the energy of combustion. At 3 fuel injection and
combustion are complete, and the cylinder contains gas at a higher temperature than at 2. Between 3
and 4 this hot gas expands, again approximately adiabatically [and isentropically]. [Workout] is done on
the system to which the engine is connected [during 3-4]. During this expansion phase the volume of
the gas rises [from V3 to V4], and its temperature and pressure both fall. At 4 the exhaust valve opens,
and the pressure falls abruptly to atmospheric (approximately). This is unresisted expansion and no
useful work is done by it. Ideally the adiabatic expansion should continue, extending the line 3–4 to
the right until the pressure falls to that of the surrounding air, but the loss of efficiency caused by this
unresisted expansion is justified by the practical difficulties involved in recovering it (the engine would
have to be much larger).
After the opening of the exhaust valve, the exhaust stroke follows, but this (and the following
induction stroke) are not shown on the diagram. If shown, they would be represented by a low-
pressure loop at the bottom of the diagram [similar to the actual Otto Cycle above].
At 1 it is assumed that the exhaust and induction strokes have been completed, and the cylinder
is again filled with air. The piston-cylinder system absorbs energy [workin] between 1 and 2—this is the
work needed to compress the air in the cylinder, and is provided by mechanical kinetic energy stored in
the flywheel of the engine. Work output [workout] is done by the piston-cylinder combination between
2 and 4. The difference between these two increments of work [workout - workin] is the indicated work
output per cycle [worknet,out], and is represented by the area enclosed by the p–V loop. The adiabatic
expansion [3-4] is in a higher pressure range than that of the compression [1-2] because the gas in the
cylinder is hotter during expansion than during compression. It is for this reason that the loop has a
finite area, and the net output of work during a cycle is positive.5
The T-s diagram6 for the ideal Diesel cycle is also shown, making clear that 1-2 and 3-4 are
isentropic adiabatic processes.
There is also a two-stroke version of the Diesel engine, but I have not studied these.
where r = compression
ratio, rc = cutoff ratio (rc = V3/V2
= v3/v2) k = cp/cv for air at
room T.
The quantity in the square brackets is always > 1. Thus, comparing with the ideal Otto cycle,
ηth,Otto is always greater than ηth,Diesel for the same values of r and k. However, the much higher
compression ratios possible in diesel engines (with r range of approximately 12 ≤ r ≤ 23) substantially
improve ideal and actual diesel engine efficiency.
As with the Otto cycle, thermal efficiency also improves with rising k and rising rc. Real engines
improve in efficiency also by relatively slow, more complete combustion, and higher air/fuel mass
ratio. Fuels for diesel engines need not be as highly refined as for SI IC engines.
Diesel Cycle Engine Advantages and Disadvantages Compared to Otto Cycle Engines
Advantages
Have higher actual efficiency than Otto cycle (see above)
Scalable to very large size and power output
No high voltage electrical ignition system (improving
reliability) Increased longevity and durability
Fuel is inherently lubricating
Can run on renewable biodiesel fuel
Can accept super-charging or turbo-charging
pressures Generate relatively low CO2 and CO emissions.
Disadvantages
Must be more rugged to withstand higher compression, thus heavier and more costly to
build
More noisy (producing diesel “clatter”)
Fuel is no longer cheaper than gasoline
Produce smelly exhaust laden with toxic air contaminants216 including aerosols of
soot and other particles, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), various other
carcinogens, and greater NOx.