The Investigation of The Corrosion Resistance of The Tension Clamps Skl14
The Investigation of The Corrosion Resistance of The Tension Clamps Skl14
The Investigation of The Corrosion Resistance of The Tension Clamps Skl14
M. Pětioký et al.: The investigation of the corrosion resistance of the tension clamps Skl14 95
This copy of the article was downloaded from http://www.mateng.sk , online version of Materials Engineering - Materiálové inžinierstvo (MEMI)
journal, ISSN 1335-0803 (print version), ISSN 1338-6174 (online version). Online version of the journal is supported by www.websupport.sk .
2. Samples of the tension clamps Skl14 was the neutral spray test according
For the investigation, both new tension to ČSN EN ISO 9227 [5]. This test is used
clamps Skl14 without anticorrosion surface for the simulation of surroundings with
protection and the tension clamps with increased chloride content, eg. seaside areas
the anticorrosion surface protection KTL were or salted roads. The test is used for acceleration
used. of corrosion with the action of NaCl,
the increased humidity and the elevated
temperature. For the test, corrosion chamber
SKB 400 A-TR of manufacturer Gebr. Liebish
GmgH&Co, Bielefeld, Germany was used.
The manufacturer of the tension clamps
uses the neutral salt spray test according
to EN ISO 9227 too.
For the purposes of the neutral salt spray
test, forty samples of the tension clamps Skl14
were used, twenty samples without
anticorrosion surface protection and twenty
Fig.1. The corroded tension clamp at the level crossing. samples with the anticorrosion surface
(full colour version available online) protection KTL. The samples in the corrosion
chamber are shown in Fig. 2.
Both surfaces were examined for
purposes of a comparison and checking
wheather the tension clamps with
the anticorrosion protection KTL are really
more resistant against corrosion surroundings.
KTL is the cataphoretic method of the corrosion
protection of metal parts using dipping
in a bath. Cleaned metal parts are phosphated
and subsequently coated with KTL. In this
method, the molecules are used. The resin
molecules are adapted so that are soluble
in water at the required extent [4]. The surface
Fig. 2. The samples in corrosion chamber.
treatment that should be very resistant against (full colour version available online)
corrosion is the result of the process.
The tension clamps that are treated with 3.1 The procedure of the neutral salt spray test
the method mentioned above are used at level
The procedure was in accordance
crossings and in tunnels.
with [5]. The test was carried out in twelve-hour
For the investigation two methods were cycles. For six hours, the samples were exposed
used. The first method was the neutral salt spray to 5 % NaCl salt mist at 35 ± 1 °C followed
test and the second method was the immersion by two-hour drying at 28 °C and the cycle was
test in electrolyte solution. completed with four-hour condensation
at 40 °C. During the test, the samples were
3. The neutral salt spray test monitored continuously and the photo shoots
The first method that was used were taken. The photos were taken in order
for corrosion influencing of the tension clamps to document the increase of the corrosion
products at the surfaces of the tension clamps.
Materials Engineering - Materiálové inžinierstvo 22 (2015) 95-100
M. Pětioký et al.: The investigation of the corrosion resistance of the tension clamps Skl14 97
Total time of the test was counted by the corrosion chamber. Total time of the test
was 1728 h. After 1728 h it was decided
to terminate the neutral salt spray test. While
checking the samples in the corrosion chamber
the increase of the corrosion products
on the surfaces of tension clamps was not
significant in two consecutive cycles.
The barrier effect of the corrosion products
on the surfaces of the tension clamps without
the anticorrosion protection was the biggest
reason of above mentioned. These corrosion
products on the surfaces of tension clamps
partially prevent transmission of corrosion
surroundings to the material of tension
clamps. According to requirements
of ČSN EN ISO 9227 it was impossible
to remove corrosion products from the surfaces
of tension clamps. Moreover, it was not possible
to perform the laboratory simulation
of the combination of corrosion surroundings
and the repeated dynamic loading. If this was
possible, as in the operated railway track,
the action of the corrosion surroundings would
cause corrosion of the tension clamps Skl14.
On their surfaces the corrosion products would
be produced but due to the dynamic strain
of the clamps the corrosion products would
be peeled and sloughed. The combination
of these stresses could then achieve the greater
corrosive effect. At the tension clamps with
the anticorrosion surface protection KTL
corrosion traces appeared only locally.
As mentioned above (the barrier
of the corrosion products) it was proceeded
to the immersion test in electrolyte solution.
The samples were subjected to the long- Fig. 6 shows the same sample but more detail.
term exposition to corrosion surroundings. The investigation showed that tension clamps
Firstly, it was the neutral salt test spray with this anticorrosion protection are
according to ČSN EN ISO 9227 followed significantly more resistant to corrosion
by immersion in electrolyte solution. The final compared to the tension clamps without
appearance of the samples is shown in Fig. 4, anticorrosion surface protection. Due
Fig. 5 and Fig. 6. to the statistical evaluation of corrosion
Fig. 4 shows the sample without decrease of the material of tension clamps,
anticorrosion surface protection. The figure the new tension clamps and the tension
shows that the transport varnish was completely clamps after the corrosion investigation were
removed. loaded. The results are shown in Table 1.
Fig. 4. The tension clamp without anticorrosion Fig. 5 The tension clamp with anticorrosion
protection after corrosion loading. protection KTL after corrosion loading.
(full colour version available online) (full colour version available online)
Table 1
Weights and weight losses of tension clamps.
Weight (g) Weight loss
New After the corrosion loading (%)
The tension clamps without
498.95 459.20 8.66
anticorrosion protection
The tension clamps with
498.59 494.71 0.78
anticorrosion protection KTL
6. Conclusions
From the above mentioned it is possible
to state that the tension clamps with
the anticorrosion protection KTL have very
good corrosion resistance compared
to the tension clamps without anticorrosion
protection. However, it is necessary
to be noted that the tension clamps were
exposed only to corrosion surroundings
without the dynamic loading. It can
be assumed that dynamic loading can affect
resistance of the surface layer of tension
clamps. This surface layer can be distorted and
corrosion can then easily penetrate the material
of tension clamps. Moreover, the dynamic
loading can remove the barrier effect
of the corrosion products. This assumption will
be verified within the next investigation. Other
measurements and investigations of tension
Fig. 6. The tension clamp with anticorrosion
protection KTL after corrosion loading clamps were made by author of the paper.
– detail of the corrosion. It means especially fractography of cracked
(full colour version available online) surface and metalography of the tension clamp.
Details can be found in [9 - 11]. Other
The average weight of new clamps measurements and investigations will
without the anticorrosion protection was be presented in next paper.
498.95 g. The average weight of new clamps
with the anticorrosion protection KTL was References
498.59 g. The average weight of clamps without [1] Products - Concrete sleepers - W14. Vossloh-
the anticorrosion protection after the corrosion fastenings-systems. http://www.vossloh-
loading was 459.21 g and clamps with fastening-
the anticorrosion protection KTL was 494.71 g. systems.com/en/produkte_2010/betonschwellen/
From the results it is evident that, after loading, w_14/w_14.html.
the weight loss of the clamp without [2] Vyhláška č. 104/1997 Sb. Ministerstva dopravy
the anticorrosion surface protection a spojů ze dne 23. dubna 1997, kterou se provádí
zákon o pozemních komunikacích. (Ministerial
is approximately 8.65 %, while at the clamp
regulation no. 104/1997. Ministry of Transport
with the anticorrosion protection KTL is only and Communications from 23. April 1997)
0.8 %, almost 11 times less. (in Czech).
[3] M. Pětioký, B. Culek, A. Kalendová, M. Kohl: testing of organic coatings properties, part 1,
In: Proc. of 20th Jubilee International PhD. Corrosion-inhibitory effectivity of organic
students' seminar SEMDOK 2015, Terchová coatings) 1st edition Univerzita Pardubice:
2015, pp. 157-160. Fakulta chemicko-technologická Ústav
[4] VOSSLOH. KTL: Katoforézní metoda polymerních materiálů, 2001 (in Czech).
antikorozní ochrany kovových součástí mačením [8] D. Veselý, A. Kalendová: Prog. Org. Coat. 62
v lázni. (Catophoresic method for metallic (1) (2008) 5–20.
components anticorrosive protection by bath
souse), Prague (in Czech). [9] M. Pětioký, E. Schidová, B. Culek, P. Hanus:
In: IC-ARE’15 International Congress
[5] ČSN EN ISO 9227. Korozní zkoušky v umělých
atmosférách: Zkoušky solnou mlhou. (Corrosion on Advanced Railway Engineering, Istanbul
tests in artificial atmospheres: salt mist tests) 2015, pp.102-106.
Prague: Český normalizační institut, (Czech [10] M. Pětioký, E. Schmidová, P. Hanus, B. Culek:
Institute of Normalization) 2007 (in Czech). In: International Masaryk Conference for Ph.D.
[6] Paint and Coating Testing Manual, 14th edition Students and Young Researchers, Hradec
of the Gardner-Sward Handbook, Ed: Králové 2014.
J.V. Koleske, Bridgeport, NJ, 2012. [11] M, Pětioký, E. Schmidová, P. Hanus, B. Culek.
[7] A. Kalendová: Metody testování vlastností Fraktografie pružné svěrky Skl14 (Fractography
organických povlaků díl 1.: Korozně-inhibiční of spring clip Skl 14). Brno: VUT Brno, 2015
účinnost organických povlaků. (Methods of (in Czech).