MASONARY
MASONARY
MASONARY
|
|
prestressed masonry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICS 91.080.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO COPYING WITHOUT BSI PERMISSION EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW
|
|
|
|
BS 5628-2:2000
Contents
Page
Committees responsible Inside front cover
Foreword iii
1 Scope 1
2 Normative references 1
3 Terms and definitions 2
4 Symbols 3
5 Alternative materials and methods of design and construction 5
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
BSI 11-2000 i
BS 5628-2:2000
Page
Table 14 Ð Selection of reinforcement for durability 43
Table 15 Ð Minimum concrete cover for carbon steel reinforcement 44
Table 15a Ð Adjustments to minimum cement contents for aggregates other
than 20 mm nominal maximum size 44
Table D.1 Ð Value of k 55
Table D.2 Ð Value of reduction factor to allow for ratio h/t 55
ii BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
Foreword
This part of BS 5628 has been prepared under the direction of Technical
Subcommittee B/525/6. It supersedes BS 5628-2:1995, which is withdrawn.
This edition of BS 5628-2 introduces technical changes but it does not reflect a full
review or revision of the standard which will be undertaken in due course.
The recommendations in this code are based on existing experience and practice in
the UK and overseas and on the results of recent research. However, compared with
reinforced masonry, there are relatively few examples of prestressed masonry at
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
Summary of pages
This document comprises a front cover, an inside front cover, pages i to iv, pages 1
to 59 and a back cover.
The BSI copyright notice displayed in this document indicates when the document was
last issued.
blank
iv
BS 5628-2:2000
1 Scope
This part of BS 5628 gives recommendations for the structural design of reinforced and prestressed masonry
constructed of brick or block masonry or masonry of square dressed natural stone.
NOTE 1 The partial safety factors given in this code are based on the assumption that the special category of construction
control (see 3.1) will be specified by the designer. If this is considered to be impracticable, higher partial safety factors should be used.
NOTE 2 The dimensions of a member determined from strength considerations may not always be sufficient to satisfy requirements for
other properties of the member such as resistance to fire and thermal insulation, and reference should be made to other appropriate
standards.
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
2 Normative references
The following normative documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute
provisions of this part of this British Standard. For dated references, subsequent amendments to, or revisions
of, any of these publications do not apply. For undated references, the latest edition of the publication
referred to applies.
BS 12:1996, Specification for Portland cement.
BS 146:1996, Specification for Portland blastfurnace cements.
BS 187:1978, Specification for calcium silicate (sandlime and flintlime) bricks.
BS 410:1986, Specification for test sieves.
BS 729:1971, Specification for hot dip galvanized coatings on iron and steel articles.
BS 970-1:1996, Specification for wrought steels for mechanical and allied engineering purposes Ð
Part 1: General inspection and testing procedures and specific requirements for carbon, carbon manganese,
alloy and stainless steels.
BS 1014: 1975, Specification for pigments for Portland cement and Portland cement products.
BS 1243: 1978, Specification for metal ties for cavity wall construction.
BS 1881-102:1983, Testing concrete Ð Part 102: Method for determination of slump.
BS 1881-115:1986, Testing concrete Ð Part 115: Specification for compression testing machines for concrete.
BS 1881-116:1983, Testing concrete Ð Part 116: Method for determination of compressive strength of
concrete cubes.
BS 3921:1985, Specification for clay bricks.
BS 4027:1996, Specification for sulfate-resisting Portland cement.
BS 4449:1997, Specification for carbon steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete.
BS 4466:1989, Specification for scheduling, dimensioning, bending and cutting of steel reinforcement for
concrete.
BS 4482:1985, Specification for cold reduced steel wire for the reinforcement of concrete.
BS 4483:1985, Specification for steel fabric for the reinforcement of concrete.
BS 4486:1980, Specification for hot rolled and hot rolled and processed high tensile alloy steel bars for the
prestressing of concrete.
BS 4721:1981, Specification for ready-mixed building mortars.
BS 4729:1990, Specification for dimensions of bricks of special shapes and sizes.
BS 4887-1:1986, Mortar admixtures Ð Part 1: Specification for air-entraining (plasticizing) admixtures.
BS 5075-1:1982, Concrete admixturesÐ Part 1: Specification for accelerating admixtures, retarding
admixtures and water reducing admixtures.
BS 5075-2:1982, Concrete admixtures Ð Part 2: Specification for air entraining admixtures.
BS 5328-1:1997, Concrete Ð Part 1: Guide to specifying concrete.
BS 5328-2:1997, Concrete Ð Part 2: Methods for specifying concrete mixes.
BS 5390:1976, Code of practice for stone masonry.
BS 5628-1:1992, Code of practice for use of masonry Ð Part 1: Structural use of unreinforced masonry.
BS 5628-3:1985, Code of practice for use of masonry Ð Part 3: Materials and components, design and
workmanship.
BS 5896:1980, Specification for high tensile steel wire and strand for the prestressing of concrete.
BS 6073-1:1981, Precast concrete masonry units Ð Part 1: Specification for precast concrete masonry units.
BSI 11-2000 1
BS 5628-2:2000
BS 6073-2:1981, Precast concrete masonry units Ð Part 2: Method for specifying precast concrete masonry
units.
BS 6399-1:1996, Loading for buildings Ð Part 1: Code of practice for dead and imposed loads.
BS 6399-2:1997, Loading for buildings Ð Part 2: Code of practice for wind loads.
BS 6399-3:1998, Loading for buildings Ð Part 3: Code of practice for imposed roof loads.
BS 6457:1984, Specification for reconstructed stone masonry units.
BS 6649:1985, Specification for clay and calcium silicate modular bricks.
BS 8002:1994, Code of practice for earth retaining structures.
2 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
3.5
prestressing tendon
high tensile steel wire, strand or bar pre-tensioned or post-tensioned to prestress masonry
3.6
shear connector
bed joint connector used to bond structural units together in a cross-section in lieu of masonry bonding
3.7
effective depth
depth, in members in bending, from the compression face to the centroid of the longitudinal tensile
reinforcement or prestressing tendons
3.8
shear span
ratio of maximum design bending moment to maximum design shear force
4 Symbols
The following symbols are used in this standard.
Am cross-sectional area of masonry (in mm2)
Aps area of prestressing tendons (in mm2)
As cross-sectional area of primary reinforcing steel (in mm2)
As1 area of compression reinforcement in the most compressed face (in mm2)
As2 area of reinforcement in the least compressed face (in mm2)
Asv cross-sectional area of reinforcing steel resisting shear forces (in mm2)
a shear span (in mm)
av distance from face of support to the nearest edge of a principal load (in mm)
b width of section (in mm)
bc width of compression face midway between restraints (in mm)
bt width of section at level of the tension reinforcement (in mm)
c lever arm factor
d effective depth (in mm) (see 3.7)
dc depth of masonry in compression (in mm)
do overall depth of section (in mm)
d1 the depth from the surface to the reinforcement in the more highly compressed face (in mm)
d2 the depth of the centroid of the reinforcement from the least compressed face (in mm)
Ec modulus of elasticity of concrete (kN/mm2)
Em modulus of elasticity of masonry (in kN/mm2)
Eu worst credible earth or water load (in N) (see 7.3)
Es modulus of elasticity of steel (in kN/mm2)
ex resultant eccentricity in plane of bending (in mm)
BSI 11-2000 3
BS 5628-2:2000
fb characteristic anchorage bond strength between mortar or concrete infill and steel (in N/mm2)
fci strength of concrete at transfer (in N/mm2)
fk characteristic compressive strength of masonry (in N/mm2)
fkx characteristic flexural strength (tension) of masonry (in N/mm2)
fp stress due to prestress at the centroid of the section (in N/mm2)
fpb stress in tendon at the design moment of resistance of the section (in N/mm2)
fpe effective prestress in tendon after all losses have occurred (in N/mm2)
M9x effective uniaxial design moment about the x axis (in N´mm)
4 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
gmb partial safety factor for bond strength between mortar or concrete infill and steel
gmm partial safety factor for compressive strength of masonry
gms partial safety factor for shear strength of masonry
r As/bd
n nominal diameter of tendon
Selection of units should follow the recommendations contained in BS 5628-3 or BS 5390, as appropriate, in
respect of durability and other considerations.
The tables and graphs in this part of BS 5628 cover masonry units of compressive strength 7 N/mm2 or
more1). However, this should not be taken to preclude the use of masonry units of lower strength for certain
applications.
Masonry units that have been previously used should not be reused in reinforced and prestressed masonry
unless they have been thoroughly cleaned and follow the recommendations of this code for similar new
materials.
1)Based on gross area for solid concrete blocks and net area for hollow concrete blocks (see C.2 of BS 6073-2: 1981) and on the area of
bed for clay, calcium silicate and concrete bricks.
BSI 11-2000 5
BS 5628-2:2000
6.3 Steel
6.3.1 Reinforcing steel
Reinforcing steel, including bed joint reinforcement, should conform to the relevant British Standard listed
below.
Reinforcement may be galvanized after manufacture in accordance with BS 729 or clad with a layer of
austenitic stainless steel of nominal thickness not less than 1 mm.
6.3.2 Prestressing steel
Prestressing wire, strands and bars should conform to BS 4486 or BS 5896.
6.4 Damp-proof courses
Damp-proof courses (d.p.c.) should conform to one of the British Standards, as appropriate, specified
in BS 5628-3:1985, clause 10.
Designers should pay particular attention to the characteristics of the materials chosen for d.p.c. Materials
that squeeze out are undesirable in highly stressed walls, and the effect of sliding at the d.p.c. should be
considered especially in relation to lateral loading. In general, advice on the resistance to compression,
tension, sliding and shear should be sought from the manufacturers of the d.p.c.
6.5 Wall ties
Wall ties for low-lift grouted-cavity construction (see 11.2.2.2) should be the vertical-twist type conforming
to the requirements of BS 1243, except for those for length.
Details of a tie for high-lift grouted cavity walls that is suitable for resisting the bursting forces which occur
during the cavity filling and compaction operations are given in annex B. Protection against corrosion should
follow the recommendations of 10.1.2.8.
6.6 Cements
Cement should conform to BS 12, BS 146 or BS 4027. Masonry cement or high alumina cement should never
be used.
6.7 Aggregate
Aggregate for mortar should follow the recommendations of BS 5628-3:1985, 6.3.
Aggregate for concrete should be in accordance with BS 5328-1.
6.8 Mortars
6.8.1 General
The mixing and use of mortars should follow the recommendations of BS 5628-3 or BS 5390, as appropriate.
The proportions of the materials and mean compressive strengths required are given in Table 1. When testing
is required, it should be in accordance with BS 5628-1:1992, A.1.
6 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
BSI 11-2000 7
BS 5628-2:2000
6.11 Admixtures
6.11.1 General
For the purposes of this code an admixture is taken to be as defined in BS 4887 or BS 5075-1, including
superplasticizers for infill concrete and mortar plasticizer.
Calcium chloride should never be used. Other admixtures should be used only with the written permission of
the designer. If admixtures are used, it is important to ensure that the manufacturer's instructions about
quality and mixing times are carefully followed.
Admixtures should conform to the relevant British Standard listed below.
Where there is no appropriate British Standard, the suitability and effectiveness of an admixture should be to
the satisfaction of the designer.
If two or more admixtures are to be used simultaneously in the same mix, data should be sought to assess
their interaction and to ensure their compatibility.
The effect of admixtures on durability of concrete or mortar should be carefully assessed, with particular
reference to whether they will combine with the ingredients to form harmful compounds or increase the risk
of corrosion of the reinforcement.
The chloride ion content by mass of admixtures should not exceed 2 % (m/m) of the admixtures
or 0.03 % (m/m) of the cement.
6.11.2 Chlorides
6.11.2.1 Chlorides in sands
The chloride ion content by mass of dry building sand should not exceed 0.15 % (m/m) of the cement.
6.11.2.2 Chlorides in mixes
The total chloride content of concrete and mortar mixes arising from aggregates and any other sources
should not exceed the limits given in Table 2.
8 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
The deflection of the structure or any part of it should not adversely affect the performance of the structure
or any applied finishes, particularly in respect of weather resistance.
The design should be such that deflections are not excessive, with regard to the requirements of the
particular structure, taking account of the following recommendations.
a) The final deflection (including the effects of temperature, creep and shrinkage) of all elements should
not, in general, exceed length/125 for cantilevers or span/250 for all other elements.
b) Consideration should be given to the effect on partitions and finishes of that part of the deflection of
the structure taking place after their construction. A limiting deflection of span/500 or 20 mm, whichever is
the lesser, is suggested.
c) If finishes are to be applied to prestressed masonry members, the total upward deflection, before the
application of finishes, should not exceed span/300 unless uniformity of camber between adjacent units
can be ensured.
In any calculation of deflections (see annex C) the design loads and the design properties of materials should
be those recommended for the serviceability limit state in 7.3 to 7.5. For reinforcement, stresses lower than
the characteristic strengths given in Table 4 may need to be used to reduce deflection or control cracking.
7.1.2.2.2 Cracking
Fine cracking or opening up of joints can occur in reinforced masonry structures. However, cracking should
not be such as to adversely affect the appearance or durability of the structure. The effects of temperature,
creep, shrinkage and moisture movement will require the provision of movement joints (see BS 5628-3:1985,
clause 20) or other precautions.
7.2 Stability
7.2.1 General considerations
The designer responsible for the overall stability of the structure should ensure the compatibility of the
design and details of parts and components. There should be no doubt as to who has responsibility for
overall stability when some or all of the design and detailing is carried out by more than one designer.
To ensure a robust and stable design it will be necessary to consider the layout of the structure on plan, the
interaction of the masonry elements and their interaction with other parts of the structure.
As well as the above general considerations, attention should be given to the following recommendations.
a) Buildings should be designed so that at any level they are capable of resisting a uniformly distributed
horizontal load equal to 1.5 % of the total characteristic dead load above that level. This force may be
apportioned between the structural elements according to their stiffness.
b) Robust connections should be provided between elements of the structure, particularly at floors and
roofs. For guidance, see BS 5628-1:1992, annex C.
c) Consideration should be given to connections between elements of different materials to ensure that
any differences in their structural behaviour do not adversely affect the stability of the elements.
When bed joints are to be raked out for pointing, the designer should allow for the resulting loss of strength.
Care should be taken in the use of d.p.c. materials that might reduce the bending and shear strengths of the
masonry. Recommended test methods are given in DD 86-1.
BSI 11-2000 9
BS 5628-2:2000
10 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
7.4.1.1.3 Value of fk where the compressive force is perpendicular to the bed face of the unit
Where no specific tests are carried out (see 7.4.1.1.2) the value of fk for a given masonry defined in terms of
the compressive strength of the structural units and the mortar designation may be taken to be the
characteristic compressive strength of masonry constructed with units laid in the normal way under
laboratory conditions and tested at an age of 28 days under axial compression in such a manner that the
effects of slenderness may be neglected (see Table 3 and Figure 1).
The value of fk should be taken from the appropriate section of the table or figure, using the following
guidelines.
a) Table 3a) and Figure 1a) apply to masonry built with bricks or other structural units with a ratio of
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
BSI 11-2000 11
BS 5628-2:2000
7.4.1.1.5 Value of fk for units of unusual format or for unusual bonding patterns
The value of fk for masonry constructed with units of unusual formats, or with an unusual bonding pattern,
may be taken as follows:
a) for brick masonry, the values determined by test in accordance with 7.4.1.1.2, provided that the value
of fk is not taken to be greater than the appropriate value given in Table 3;
b) for block masonry, the value given in Table 3, using the strength of the block determined in the
appropriate aspect.
7.4.1.2 Characteristic compressive strength of masonry in bending
p = As/bd;
As is the cross-sectional area of primary reinforcing steel;
b is the width of section;
d is the effective depth see 3.4);
12 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
26
24
22
i)
on(
20
n ati
e sig
18 rd
rta
Mo ii)
strength of masonary (N/mm2)
16 ati on (
sign
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
Characteristic compressive
de
tar
14 Mor
12
10
8
6
4
2
0 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
26
24
22
i)
o n(
20 nati
e sig
strength of masonary (N/mm2)
18 rd (ii)
rta on
Mo ti
Characteristic compressive
g na
16 desi
rtar
14 Mo
12
10
0 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Compressive strength of unit (N/mm2)
b) Block masonry constructed with solid blocks having a ratio of height to least horizontal dimension of 1.0 [see Table 3b)]
BSI 11-2000 13
BS 5628-2:2000
40
38
36
34
32 (i)
n
tio
22
Characteristic compressive
20
18
16
14
12
10
0 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Compressive strength of unit (N/mm2)
c) Block masonry constructed with solid blocks having a ratio of height to least horizontal dimension of
between 2.0 and 4.0 [see Table 3c)]
Figure 1 Ð Characteristic compressive strength, f k, of masonry (continued)
14 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
20
18
16
i)
on( n (i
i)
ati
strength of masonary (N/mm2)
14 tio
ign gna
de
s esi
Characteristic compressive
12 ar ard
ort M ort
M
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
10
0 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
BSI 11-2000 15
BS 5628-2:2000
NOTE If stainless steel bars are welded, the characteristic strength in the heat affected zone should be reduced to the following
values:
16 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
NOTE The recommendations in this clause might not apply to walls incorporating bed joint reinforcement to enhance lateral load
resistance (see annex A).
BSI 11-2000 17
BS 5628-2:2000
20 24
25 25
30 26
40 28
50 30
60 32
c) for all steel reinforcement and all types of loading, the elastic modulus Es = 200 kN/mm2;
d) for prestressing tendons, the appropriate value of Es as given in Figure 5.
7.4.2 Analysis of structure
When analyzing any cross-section within the structure, the properties of the materials should be assumed to
be those associated with their design strengths appropriate to the limit state being considered. Due
allowance should be made when materials with different properties are used in combination. Where the
member to be designed forms part of an indeterminate structure, the method of analysis employed to
determine the forces in the member should be based on as accurate a representation of the behaviour of the
structure as is practicable.
When elastic analysis is used to determine the force distribution throughout the structure, the relative
stiffnesses of the members may be based throughout on any one of the following cross-sections:
a) the entire masonry section, ignoring the reinforcement;
b) the entire masonry section including the reinforcement on the basis of the modular ratio derived from
the appropriate values of modulus of elasticity given in 7.4.1.7;
c) the compression area of the masonry cross-section combined with the reinforcement on the basis of the
modular ratio as derived in b).
7.5 Partial safety factors
7.5.1 General
The partial safety factors for materials (gmm, etc) make allowance for the variation in the quality of the
materials and for the possible difference between the strength of masonry constructed under site conditions
and that of specimens built in the laboratory for the purpose of establishing its physical properties. The
values used in this code assume that the special category of construction control (see 11.3.1) will be
specified by the designer.
The values of partial safety factor for loads, gf, used in this code are based on those adopted in BS 5628-1.
The factor gf is introduced to take account of:
a) possible unusual increases in load beyond those considered in deriving the characteristic load;
b) inaccurate assessment of effects of loading and unforeseen stress redistribution within the structure;
c) the variations in dimensional accuracy achieved in construction.
18 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
In the particular case of freestanding walls and laterally loaded wall panels, whose removal would in no
way affect the stability of the remaining structure, gf applied on the wind load may be taken as 1.2.
c) Dead, imposed and wind load
d) Accidental forces (see 7.2.3). For this load case, reference should be made to BS 5628-1:1992, 22d).
For all these cases:
In design, each of the load combinations a) to d) should be considered and that giving the most severe
conditions should be adopted.
When considering the overall stability of a structure other than a retaining wall, the design horizontal load
should be taken to be the design wind load, for the case being considered, or 0.015Gk, for conformity
to 7.2.1a), whichever is the greater.
In certain circumstances other values of gf may be appropriate, e.g. in farm buildings. Reference should be
made to the relevant British Standards, e.g. BS 5502-22.
Where a detailed investigation of soil conditions has been made and account has been taken of possible
soil-structure interaction in the assessment of earth loads, it may be appropriate to derive design values
for earth and water loads by different procedures. In this case, additional consideration should be given to
conditions in the structure under serviceability loads.
BSI 11-2000 19
BS 5628-2:2000
7.5.2.2 Materials
The design strength of a material is the characteristic strength divided by the appropriate partial safety
factor, i.e. gmm for compressive strength of masonry (see Table 7), gmv for shear strength of masonry (see
Table 8), gmb for bond strength between infill concrete or mortar and steel (see Table 8) and gms for strength
of steel (see Table 8).
The values given in Tables 7 and 8 assume that all the recommendations in clause 11 for the special quality
of control will be followed. If any of the recommendations of clause 7 cannot be followed, e.g. in masonry
incorporating bed joint reinforcement (see annex A), higher partial safety factors for material strength should
be used.
The different categories of manufacturing control as used in Table 7 are defined as follows.
a) Normal category This category should be assumed when the supplier is able to conform to the
requirements for compressive strength in the appropriate British Standard, but does not conform to the
recommendations for the special category detailed in b).
b) Special category. This category may be assumed where the manufacturer:
1) agrees to supply consignments of structural units to a specified strength limit, referred to as the
ªacceptance limitº for compressive strength, such that the compressive strength of a sample of structural
units, taken from any consignment and tested in accordance with the appropriate British Standard, has a
probability of not more than 2.5 % of being below the acceptance limit; and
2) operates a quality control scheme, the results of which can be made available to demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the purchaser that the acceptance limit is consistently being met in practice, with the
probability of failing to meet the limit being never greater than that stated in 1).
Table 8 Ð Partial safety factors gmv, gm and gms :ultimate limit state
Partial safety factor Value
Shear strength of masonry, gmv 2.0
Bond strength between concrete infill or mortar and
steel, gmb 1.5
Strength of steel, gms 1.15
When considering the effects of accidental loads or localized damage, the values of gmm and gmv may be
halved. The values of gmb and gms should then be taken as 1.0.
20 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
where
In assessing short-term deflections, each of the load combinations a) to c) should be considered and that
giving the most severe conditions should be adopted.
It may also be necessary to examine additional time-dependent deflections due to creep, moisture
movements and temperature, and their effect on the structure as a whole, with particular reference to
cracking and other forms of local damage (see 8.3.5).
7.5.3.2 Materials
The value of gmm for masonry should be taken as 1.5 and that of gms for steel as 1.0, for deflection
calculations and for assessing the stresses or crack widths at any section within a structure.
7.5.4 Moments and forces in continuous members
In the analysis of continuous members it will be sufficient to consider the following arrangements of load:
a) alternate spans loaded with the design load (1.4Gk + 1.6Qk) and all other spans loaded with the
minimum design dead load (0.9Gk);
b) all spans loaded with the design load (1.4Gk + 1.6Qk)
where
BSI 11-2000 21
BS 5628-2:2000
8.2.3.3 Beams
The limiting ratios of span to effective depth for beams with various end conditions may be taken from
Table 10.
22 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
To ensure lateral stability of a simply supported or continuous beam, it should be proportioned so that the
clear distance between lateral restraints does not exceed:
60bc or 250bc2/d, whichever is the lesser
where
For a cantilever with lateral restraint provided only at the support, the clear distance from the end of the
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
fy/γ ms
Tension
0.83 fy/γ ms
0.8 fy/γ Compression
ms
Stress (N/mm2)
200 kN/mm2
Strain
Figure 2 Ð Short-term design stress-strain curve for reinforcement
BSI 11-2000 23
BS 5628-2:2000
z = d 1 2
0.5 Asfygmm
bdfkgms
8.2.4.2.2 The expression for the lever arm given in 8.2.4.2.1 cannot be used directly to calculate the area of
reinforcement, As. It is more convenient to express the design moment of resistance, Md, in terms of a
moment of resistance factor, Q, such that:
Md = Qbd2
where
Q = 2c(1 2 c)fk/gmm
where
24 BSI 11-2000
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
BSI 11-2000
Table 11 Ð Values of the moment of resistance factor, Q, for various values of fk/gmm and lever arm factor, c
c fk/gmm
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 20
0.95 0.095 0.190 0.285 0.380 0.475 0.570 0.665 0.760 0.855 0.950 1.045 1.140 1.235 1.425 1.900
0.94 0.113 0.226 0.338 0.451 0.564 0.677 0.790 0.902 1.015 1.128 1.241 1.354 1.466 1.692 2.256
0.93 0.130 0.260 0.391 0.521 0.651 0.781 0.911 1.042 1.172 1.302 1.432 1.562 1.693 1.953 2.604
0.92 0.147 0.294 0.442 0.589 0.736 0.883 1.030 1.178 1.325 1.472 1.619 1.766 1.914 2.208 2.944
0.91 0.164 0.328 0.491 0.655 0.819 0.983 1.147 1.310 1.474 1.638 1.802 1.966 2.129 2.457 3.276
0.90 0.180 0.360 0.540 0.720 0.900 1.080 1.260 1.440 1.620 1.800 1.980 2.160 2.340 2.700 3.600
0.89 0.196 0.392 0.587 0.783 0.979 1.175 1.371 1.566 1.762 1.958 2.154 2.350 2.545 2.937 3.916
0.88 0.211 0.422 0.634 0.845 1.056 1.267 1.478 1.690 1.901 2.112 2.323 2.534 2.746 3.168 4.224
0.87 0.226 0.452 0.679 0.905 1.131 1.357 1.583 1.810 2.036 2.262 2.488 2.714 2.941 3.393 4.524
0.86 0.241 0.482 0.722 0.963 1.204 1.445 1.686 1.926 2.167 2.408 2.649 2.890 3.130 3.612 4.816
0.85 0.255 0.510 0.765 1.020 1.275 1.530 1.785 2.040 2.295 2.550 2.805 3.060 3.315 3.825 5.100
0.84 0.269 0.538 0.806 1.075 1.344 1.613 1.882 2.150 2.419 2.688 2.957 3.226 3.494 4.032 5.376
0.83 0.282 0.564 0.847 1.129 1.411 1.693 1.975 2.258 2.540 2.822 3.104 3.386 3.669 4.233 5.644
0.82 0.295 0.590 0.886 1.181 1.476 1.771 2.066 2.362 2.657 2.952 3.247 3.542 3.838 4.428 5.904
0.81 0.308 0.616 0.923 1.231 1.539 1.847 2.155 2.462 2.770 3.078 3.386 3.694 4.001 4.617 6.156
0.80 0.320 0.640 0.960 1.280 1.600 1.920 2.240 2.560 2.880 3.200 3.520 3.840 4.160 4.800 6.400
0.79 0.332 0.664 0.995 1.327 1.659 1.991 2.323 2.654 2.986 3.318 3.650 3.982 4.313 4.977 6.636
0.78 0.343 0.686 1.030 1.373 1.716 2.059 2.402 2.746 3.089 3.432 3.775 4.118 4.462 5.148 6.684
0.77 0.354 0.708 1.063 1.417 1.771 2.125 2.479 2.834 3.188 3.542 3.896 4.250 4.605 5.313 7.084
0.76 0.365 0.730 1.094 1.459 1.824 2.189 2.554 2.918 3.283 3.648 4.013 4.378 4.742 5.472 7.296
0.75 0.375 0.750 1.125 1.500 1.875 2.250 2.625 3.000 3.375 3.750 4.125 4.500 4.875 5.625 7.500
0.74 0.385 0.770 1.154 1.539 1.924 2.309 2.694 3.078 3.463 3.848 4.233 4.618 5.002 5.772 7.696
0.73 0.394 0.788 1.183 1.577 1.971 2.365 2.759 3.154 3.548 3.942 4.336 4.730 5.125 5.193 7.884
0.72 0.403 0.806 1.210 1.613 2.016 2.419 2.822 3.226 3.629 4.032 4.435 4.838 5.242 6.048 8.064
BS 5628-2:2000
25
26
BS 5628-2:2000
8
b
7 dc 0 .72
c=
d 0 .75
z = cd c=
6
0
0.8
c=
Md = Qbd2 fk
5 Q = 2c(1-c) γ mm
5
0.8
c=
Q (N/mm2)
.90
c=0
3
2
c = 0.95
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
fk/γ mm (N/mm)
BSI 11-2000
8.2.4.3 Design formulae for walls with the reinforcement concentrated locally
8.2.4.3.1 Flanged members
Where the reinforcement in a section is concentrated locally such that the section can act as a flanged beam,
the thickness of the flange, tf, should be taken as the thickness of the masonry but in no case greater
than 0.5d, where d is the effective depth.
The width of the flange should be taken as the least of:
a) for pocket-type walls, the width of the pocket or rib plus 12 times the thickness of the flanges;
b) the spacing of the pockets or ribs;
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
Where the spacing of the pocket or ribs exceeds 1 m, the ability of the masonry to span horizontally between
the ribs should be checked.
8.2.4.3.2 Locally reinforced hollow blockwork
When the reinforcement in a section is concentrated locally such that the section cannot act as a flanged
member, the reinforced section should be considered as having a width of three times the thickness of the
blockwork.
8.2.5 Shear resistance of elements
8.2.5.1 Shear stresses and reinforcement in members in bending
The shear stress, v, due to design loads at any cross-section in a member in bending should be calculated
from the equation:
V
v=
bd
where
Where the shear stress calculated from this equation is less than the characteristic shear strength of
masonry, fv, divided by the partial safety factor, gmv, shear reinforcement is not generally needed. In beams,
however, the designer should consider the use of nominal links, bearing in mind the sudden nature of shear
failure. If required, they should be provided in accordance with 8.6.5.2.
BSI 11-2000 27
BS 5628-2:2000
Where the shear stress, v, exceeds fv/gmv shear reinforcement should be provided. The following
recommendation should be satisfied:
Asv b(v 2 fv/gmv)gms
<<
sv fy
where
If this reduction is used, fv, which is taken from 7.4.1.3b), should be based on the reduced steel area
As 2 Asi, where Asi is the sectional area of the inclined bars.
Where the main reinforcement is not lapped at the same effective depth, as, for example, in the case of
stepped pocket type retaining walls, sufficient shear reinforcement (e.g. links) should be provided to transfer
the shear force.
8.2.5.3 Concentrated loads near supports
Where the distance from the face of a support to the nearest edge of the principal load, av, is less than twice
the effective depth, d, the main reinforcement should be provided with an anchorage in accordance
with 8.6.9. Any concentrated load (or loads) should be treated as a principal load when it contributes more
than 70 % of the total shear force at a support.
8.2.6 Deflection
Deflection of members may be calculated (see annex C) and compared with the recommendations for
serviceability given in 7.1.2.2.1 but in all normal cases the deflection will not be excessive if the member has
a span/depth ratio within the limits given in 8.2.3.
8.2.7 Cracking
In most cases the recommendations for detailing reinforcement given in 8.6 will ensure that cracking in
members is not excessive.
28 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
The slenderness ratio of walls and columns should not exceed 27, except in the case of cantilever walls and
columns, when it should not exceed 18. Special consideration should be given to deflection where the
percentage of reinforcement in cantilever walls or columns exceeds 0.5 % of the cross-sectional area obtained
by multiplying the effective depth by the breadth of the section.
8.3.2.2 Lateral support
A lateral support should be capable of transmitting to the elements of construction that provide lateral
stability to the structure as a whole, the sum of the following design lateral forces:
a) the simple static reactions to the total applied design horizontal forces at the line of lateral support; and
b) 2.5 % of the total design vertical load that the wall or column is designed to carry at the line of lateral
support. The elements of construction that provide lateral stability to the structure as a whole need not be
designed to support this force.
However, the designer should satisfy himself that loads applied to lateral supports will be transmitted to the
elements of construction providing stability, e.g. by the floors or roofs acting as horizontal girders.
Simple resistance to lateral movement may be assumed for a lateral support if the forces defined in a) and b)
can be transmitted.
Enhanced resistance to lateral movement for walls may be assumed where floors or roofs of any form of
construction span on to the wall from both sides at the same level or where an in situ concrete or reinforced
masonry floor or roof, or a precast concrete floor or roof giving equivalent restraint, irrespective of their
direction of span, has a bearing of at least one-half the thickness of the wall on to which it spans but in no
case less than 90 mm.
Further information on lateral supports is given in section 4 of BS 5628-1:1992.
8.3.2.3 Effective height
The effective height, hef, of a wall, panel or column should preferably be assessed by structural analysis.
Alternatively, the values given in Table 12 may be adopted, where h is the clear distance between lateral
supports.
BSI 11-2000 29
BS 5628-2:2000
NOTE This formula does not cover cases where the resultant eccentricity:
M
ex =
N
exceeds 0.5t, where M is the bending moment due to design load.
b) Where the design vertical load, N, is greater than that given by the equation in a) the strength of the
section may be assessed by using the following equations and the relation fs1 = 0.83fy.
f f A f A
Nd = k bdc + s1 s1 2 s2 s2
gmm gms gms
0.5fk 0.83fy f
Md = bd (t 2 dc) + A (0.5t 2d1) + s2 As2 (0.5t 2 d2)
gmm c gms s1 gms
30 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
where
As1 is the area of compression reinforcement in the more highly compressed face;
As2 is the area of the reinforcement nearer the least compressed face; this may be considered as being
in compression, inactive or in tension, depending on the resultant eccentricity of the load;
b is the width of the section;
d1 is the depth from the surface to the reinforcement in the more highly compressed face;
dc is the depth of masonry in compression;
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
The designer should choose a value of dc which ensures that both the design vertical load resistance, Nd,
and the moment of resistance, Md, obtained from these equations exceed the design vertical load, N, and
the design bending moment, M. The choice of dc establishes the assumed strain distribution in the section.
Appropriate values for the stresses in the reinforcement may be determined from the stress-strain
relationship given in Figure 2 or as follows:
1) where dc is chosen as t, then fs2 varies linearly between 0 and 20.83 fy;
2) where dc is chosen between (t 2 d2) and t, then fs2 = 0;
3) where dc is chosen between (t 2 d2) and t/2, and fs2 varies linearly between 0 and fy;
4) where dc is chosen between t/2 and 2d1, fs2 may be taken as +fy;
5) dc should not be chosen as less than 2d1.
c) As an alternative to b) when the resultant eccentricity is greater than (t/2 2 d1), the vertical load may be
ignored and the section designed to resist an increased moment, Ma, given by:
Ma = M + N(t/2 2 d1)
The area of tension reinforcement necessary to provide resistance to this increased moment may be
reduced by:
Ngms/fy
BSI 11-2000 31
BS 5628-2:2000
The cross-section may be analyzed using the assumptions given in 8.2.4.1 to determine its design moment of
resistance and design vertical load resistance. As an alternative, slender columns subjected to bending about
one axis only may be designed using the equations given in 8.3.3.1.1 but including the additional bending
moment, Ma, determined by the equation given in this subclause in the design bending moment.
32 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
including in the design bending moment the additional bending moment, Ma, determined in
accordance 8.3.3.1.3.
8.3.4 Deflection
Within the limiting dimensions given in 8.2, it may be assumed that the lateral deflection of a wall is
acceptable.
8.3.5 Cracking
Unacceptable cracking due to bending is unlikely to occur in a wall or column where the design vertical load
exceeds:
Amfk/2
where
A more lightly loaded column should be treated as a beam for the purposes of crack control and reinforced
in accordance with the recommendations of 8.6.
8.4 Reinforced masonry subjected to axial compressive loading
Reinforced masonry walls or columns subjected to axial loading or vertical loading having a resultant
eccentricity not exceeding 0.05 times the thickness of the member in the direction of the eccentricity, may
either be designed as described in BS 5628-1:1992, clause 32, i.e. taking no account of the reinforcement, or
using the methods given in 8.3 of this code. In the latter case the following should be used:
a) design axial load resistance, Nd, determined in accordance with 8.3.3.1.1b), in conjunction with;
b) the design moment of resistance, Md, determined in accordance with 8.3.3.1.1b) and;
c) the increase in moment due to slenderness, Ma, determined in accordance with 8.3.3.1.3, where the
slenderness ratio of the element exceeds 12.
Walls subjected to concentrated loads should be designed following the recommendations of BS 5628-1:1992,
clause 34.
BSI 11-2000 33
BS 5628-2:2000
8.5 Reinforced masonry subjected to horizontal forces in the plane of the element
8.5.1 Racking shear
8.5.1.1 Where a vertically reinforced wall resists horizontal forces acting in its plane, adequate provision
against the ultimate limit state in shear being reached may be assumed if the following relationship is
satisfied:
f
v< v
gmv
V
v=
tL
where
8.5.1.2 Where the relationship given in 8.5.1.1 is not satisfied, horizontal shear reinforcement should be
provided but in no case should v exceed 2.0 /gmv N/mm2.
Where horizontal reinforcement is provided, the following requirement should be satisfied:
Asv t(v 2 fv /gmv)
$
sv fy /gms
where
8.5.2 Bending
When the bending is in the plane of the wall, the analysis and design of the wall should follow the
recommendations for beams given in 8.2. Where the slenderness ratio exceeds 12 in any direction, it is
essential also to take account of the slenderness at right angles to the plane of the wall by calculating the
maximum compressive stress in the wall and checking that the recommendations for slender columns
described in 8.3.3.1.3 are satisfied.
8.6 Detailing reinforced masonry
8.6.1 Area of main reinforcement
Designers should consider whether the area of main reinforcement is such that the recommendations for
unreinforced masonry given in BS 5628-1 would be more appropriate than the recommendations given in this
part of BS 5628.
34 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
Some or all of the secondary reinforcement may be used to help control cracking due to shrinkage or
expansion, thermal and moisture movements.
8.6.4 Spacing of main and secondary reinforcement
The minimum clear horizontal or vertical distance between individual parallel bars should be equal to the
maximum size of aggregate plus 5 mm or the bar diameter, whichever is greater, but in no case less
than 10 mm.
The maximum spacing of main secondary tension reinforcement should not exceed 500 mm.
Where the main reinforcement is concentrated in cores or pockets, e.g. in pocket-type walls, the maximum
spacing centre-to-centre between the concentrations of main reinforcement may exceed these
recommendations.
In vertical pockets or cores less than 125 mm 3 125 mm, only one reinforcing bar should be used, except at
laps.
Where shear reinforcement is provided, the spacing of the bars in the direction of the span should not
exceed 0.75d, where d is the effective depth.
8.6.5 Anchorage, minimum area, size and spacing of links
8.6.5.1 Anchorage of links
A link may be considered to be fully anchored if it passes round another bar of at least its own diameter
through an angle of 908 and continues beyond for a minimum length of eight times its own diameter, or
through 1808 and continues for a minimum length of four times its own diameter. In no case should the
radius of any bend in a link be less than twice the radius of the test bend guaranteed by the manufacturer of
the reinforcement.
8.6.5.2 Beam links
Where nominal shear reinforcement is required (see 8.2.5.1) it should be provided throughout the span such
that:
Asv
= 0.002bt for mild steel; or
sv
Asv
= 0.0012bt for high yield steel
sv
where
Asv is the cross-sectional area of reinforcing steel resisting shear forces;
bt is the width of beam at the level of the tension reinforcement;
sv is the spacing of shear reinforcement, which should not exceed 0.75d, where d is the effective depth.
8.6.5.3 Column links
In columns where the area of steel, As, is greater than 0.25 % of the area of the masonry, Am, links should be
provided if more than 25 % of the design axial load resistance is to be used. In columns where As is not
greater than 0.25 % of Am, links need not be provided.
Where links are required, they should be not less than 6 mm in diameter. The spacing of these links should
not exceed the least of:
a) the least dimension of the column;
b) 50 3 link diameter;
c) 20 3 main bar diameter.
Where links are provided, they should surround the main vertical steel. Every vertical corner bar should be
supported by an internal angle at every link spacing and this angle should not exceed 1358. Internal vertical
bars need only be supported by the internal angles at alternate link spacings.
BSI 11-2000 35
BS 5628-2:2000
Face of support
Figure 4 Ð Hooks and bends
36 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
where
b) The design shear capacity at the section where the reinforcement stops, is greater than twice the shear
force due to design loads, at that section.
c) The continuing bars at the section where the reinforcement stops provide double the area required to
resist the moment at that section.
At a simply supported end of a member each tension bar should be anchored by one of the following:
1) an effective anchorage equivalent to 12 times the bar size beyond the centre line of the support,
where no bend or hook begins before the centre of the support;
2) an effective anchorage equivalent to 12 times the bar size plus d/2 from the face of the support,
where d is the effective depth of the member, and no bend begins before d/2 inside the face of the
support.
Where the distance, av, from the face of a support to the nearest edge of a principal load (see 8.2.5.3) is less
than twice the effective depth, d, all the main reinforcement should continue to the support and be provided
with an anchorage equivalent to 20 times the bar diameter.
BSI 11-2000 37
BS 5628-2:2000
Where tendons and anchorages are made from materials that could degrade and are not inspectable and
replaceable, they should be robustly and reliably protected from the agents that cause that degradation. Such
protection should be resistant to disruption from subsequent operations.
Clause 9 covers the design of all prestressed masonry. As it is not possible to assume that a particular limit
state will always be critical, design methods are given to ensure that the recommendations for both the
ultimate and the serviceability limit states are satisfied.
9.2 Design for the ultimate limit state
9.2.1 Bending
In members with unbonded tendons the strain induced in the tendons by the applied moment is not the
same as that in the adjacent masonry. For such members with rectangular compression zones, and
with gmm = 2, values of fpb and x, the neutral axis depth, may be obtained from the following equations:
fpb = fpe + 700 3 (d/l) 3 {1 2 1.4 (fpu/fk) 3 (Aps/bd)}
x = 2(fpu/fk) 3 (fpb/fpu) 3 (Aps/bd)d
where
38 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
NOTE Members built with full masonry bonding rely for their shear strength on the masonry, while members that use metal shear
connectors in the bed joints for bonding rely on the strength of the shear connectors.
V is the shear force due to design loads at the section being considered;
do is the overall depth of the section;
b is the width of the section resisting shear;
ft is the diagonal tensile strength of masonry;
fp is the stress due to prestress at the centroid of the section;
gmv is the partial safety factor for shear strength of masonry.
The characteristic diagonal tensile strength of masonry, ft, may be taken as:
ft = 1.3 2 0.275M/Vdo
where
M is the bending moment due to design loads at the section being considered with:
0.2 N/mm2 < ft < 0.75 N/mm2 for dense aggregate solid concrete blockwork masonry; and
0.2 N/mm2 < ft < 1.60 N/mm2 for brickwork masonry.
For members which are cracked in flexure the above relationships for determining design shear strength
may be used with the additional beneficial effects of the increase in the prestressing force due to the flexural
cracking also being taken into account by using an enhanced value of fp.
The shear stress, v, should not exceed the design shear strength.
9.2.3.2 Shear connectors
The size and spacing of the shear connectors may be calculated using the following formula:
ru = 12twsv/(0.87fy)
where
The shear connectors should be of flat metal section and should also conform to the recommendations for
wall ties in respect of anchorage and embedment length.
BSI 11-2000 39
BS 5628-2:2000
40 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
fpu/ γ ms
0.8 fpu
γ ms
Stress (N/mm2)
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
Es
0.005
Strain
Es 205 kN/mm2 for cold drawn wire conforming to BS 5896
195 kN/mm2 for strand conforming to BS 5896
165 kN/mm2 for rolled and stretched bars conforming to BS 4486
206 kN/mm2 for rolled and as rolled streched and tempered bars conforming to BS 4486
fpu is the characteristic tensile strength of prestressing tendons
gms is the partial safety factor for strength of steel
Figure 5 Ð Typical short-term design stress-strain curves
for normal and low relaxation tendons
BSI 11-2000 41
BS 5628-2:2000
a) plain or indented wire (including crimped wire with a small wave height): Kt = 600;
b) crimped wire with a total wave height not less than 0.15f: Kt = 400;
c) 7-wire standard or super strand: Kt = 240;
d) 7-wire drawn strand: Kt = 360.
9.5 Detailing prestressed masonry
9.5.1 Tendons
For vertically spanning post-tensioned members bar tendons should be sufficiently stiff to stand vertically
without lateral support so that the masonry can be built around them. Where strands or wires are used they
should be suspended from scaffolding or placed in vertically standing ducts. Tendon anchorages should be
correctly positioned.
For pretensioned masonry where tendons or groups of tendons are surrounded by concrete, the distance
between individual tendons or groups of tendons should not be less than the maximum aggregate size
plus 5 mm to allow for adequate compaction of the concrete.
To prevent overstressing of the masonry, it is essential for the designer to specify the correct tensioning
sequence for the tendons and the compressive strength of the masonry at transfer.
9.5.2 Anchorage in reinforced concrete
Where tendon anchorages are embedded in reinforced concrete, this may form part of a foundation, wall
coping or column capital. In such circumstances the reinforced concrete needs to be designed to sustain all
the forces it is subjected to, both internal (from the anchorages) and external (from, for example, floors, roof
and ground). Where bending stresses arise from the reinforced concrete spanning over voids or spaces in the
masonry cross-section, to avoid the development of splitting cracks in the masonry near the anchorage, the
design tensile stress in the reinforcement should be limited to 85 N/mm2. The reinforced concrete should be
designed to distribute the prestress from the anchorages to the wall to prevent local overstressing of the
masonry.
42 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
BSI 11-2000 43
BS 5628-2:2000
Table 15a Ð Adjustments to minimum cement contents for aggregates other than 20 mm
nominal maximum size
Nominal maximum aggregate size Adjustments to minimum cement contents in Table 15
mm kg/m3
10 +40
14 +20
20 0
44 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
accordance with BS 5328, taking into account minimum cement content, maximum free water/cement ratio
and cover as given in Table 15.
For grouted cavity and Quetta bond reinforced masonry construction the concrete infill may consist, at the
option of the designer, of a 1:0 to ï:3:2 cement:lime:sand:10 mm nominal maximum size aggregate mix, or a
mortar infill, as appropriate to the exposure situation and reinforcement type, in accordance with the
requirements of Table 14 and 10.1.2.6. Where high lift grouted cavity construction (see 11.2.2.3) or Quetta
bond is employed, the infill concrete mix, if required to provide durability protection to the reinforcement,
should contain an expanding agent or other suitable measures to avoid early age shrinkage.
Concrete infill for pre-tensioned masonry should be of minimum grade C content, maximum free
water/cement ratio and cover as given in Table 15.
Concrete infill for post-tensioned masonry should be of minimum grade C30 or equivalent and be specified in
accordance with BS 5328, taking into account minimum cement content and maximum free water/cement
ratio as given in Table 15. This recommendation is nominal as the durability of post-tensioned masonry is
usually assured by direct protection of the tendons.
10.1.2.6 Cover
Where austenitic stainless steel, or steel coated with at least 1 mm of austenitic stainless steel, is used, there
is no minimum cover required to ensure durability. However, some cover will be required for the full
development of bond stress (see 8.6.6).
Where reinforcement is placed in bed joints, the minimum depth of mortar cover to the exposed face of the
masonry should be 15 mm.
For grouted-cavity or Quetta bond construction, the minimum cover for reinforcement selected using
Table 14 should be as follows:
a) carbon steel reinforcement used in internal walls and exposure situation E1: 20 mm mortar or concrete;
b) carbon steel reinforcement used in exposure situation E2: 20 mm concrete;
c) galvanized steel reinforcement: 20 mm mortar or concrete;
d) stainless steel reinforcement: not required for durability.
Figure 6 shows the minimum concrete cover recommended for carbon steel reinforcement in pocket-type
walls and in reinforced hollow blockwork walls.
The cut ends of all bars, except those of solid stainless steel, should have the same cover as that appropriate
to carbon steel in the exposure situation being considered, unless alternative means of protection are used.
10.1.2.7 Prestressing tendons
Where tendons are placed in pockets, cores or cavities that are filled with concrete or mortar, the
recommendations given in 10.1.2.1, 10.1.2.5 and 10.1.2.6 should be followed.
Where carbon steel tendons or bars are installed in open cavities, pocket or ducts they should be suitably
protected.
NOTE Under certain circumstances, galvanizing may lead to hydrogen enbrittlement and should therefore be avoided.
Ducts for unbonded tendons should be suitably drained.
NOTE Where carbon steel is protected in grouted ducts, it is essential to ensure that the protection is complete. Generally this type of
protection should be avoided unless this is carried out in accordance with BS 8110-1:1997, 8.9.
BSI 11-2000 45
BS 5628-2:2000
Recommended minimum
cover given in table 14
b) Reinforced hollow blockwork wall
46 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
the full height of the earth retained. Preferably, perforated land drains should be laid behind retaining walls
and be provided with a positive outfall to suitable drainage positions. Weepholes can be used as drainage
condition indicators, but their positioning should be carefully considered in order to avoid uncontrolled
overflow onto hard areas where there is pedestrian or vehicular public access.
To minimize salts ingress and other staining of the exposed masonry face in service, all walls retaining earth
should be painted with a waterproofing compound on the face in contact with the earth. Where practicable,
a layer of self-adhesive bituminous sheet, with all joints lapped, may be applied in place of the waterproofing
compound. Waterproofing compounds and sheeting should be protected before backfilling.
Where it is not practicable to provide retaining walls with weepholes or land drains, e.g. in basement walls,
or where the wall is designed to resist a permanent water pressure, asphalt tanking or a similar positive
waterproofing layer should be applied and protected before backfilling.
At vertical movement joints where anything other than minor movement is anticipated, a water bar may be
used.
BS 8102:1990 gives guidance on the waterproofing of structures below ground level.
10.6 D.p.c. and copings
The provision of d.p.c. and copings should follow the recommendations of BS 5628-3:1985, clause 21 having
regard to the material of the d.p.c. and its effect on the bending and shear strength of the member.
11 Work on site
11.1 Materials
All materials used in reinforced and prestressed masonry should follow the recommendations of clause 6.
11.2 Construction
11.2.1 General
Work should generally conform with BS 5628-3 and BS 5390.
Storage and handling of masonry units and storage and mixing of materials for mortars should follow the
recommendations of BS 5628-3:2000, A.4. Storage and mixing of materials for concrete and storage, handling
fixing, and positioning of reinforcement and prestressing tendons should follow the recommendations of
sections 6, 7 and 8 of BS 8110-1:1997.
For laying of structural units in reinforced and prestressed masonry, plumbness and alignment of the
masonry and precautions to protect the work in adverse weather conditions and when the work is
temporarily stopped, reference should be made to section 4 of BS 5628-3:1985.
The maximum height of masonry that should normally be built in a day is 1.5 m.
Infill concrete should be in accordance with 6.9. Special consideration should be given to the workability of
the infill concrete and the height of pour when filling small sections, to ensure that complete filling is
achieved.
Reinforcement should be in accordance with 6.3 and fixed as shown on the detail drawings. Care should be
taken to ensure that the specified cover to the reinforcement is maintained, e.g. by using spacers. Where
spacers are used or where bed joint reinforcement crosses voids or pockets that contain reinforcement and
are to be filled with concrete, the spacers should be of such a type and the reinforcement so positioned that
compaction of the infill concrete is not prevented.
Reinforcement should be free from mud, oil, paint, retarders, loose rust, loose mill scale, snow, ice, grease or
any other substance which may affect adversely the steel or concrete chemically, or reduce the bond.
Normal handling prior to embedment is usually sufficient for the removal of loose rust and scale from
reinforcement. Bed joint reinforcement should be completely surrounded with mortar.
Anchorages, bar couplings and other supports to prestressing tendons should be positioned and aligned so
that the tendons are not kinked or bent beyond the manufacturer's recommendations.
BSI 11-2000 47
BS 5628-2:2000
48 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
BSI 11-2000 49
BS 5628-2:2000
Annex A (normative)
Design method for walls incorporating bed joint reinforcement to enhance lateral
load resistance
A.1 General
Recommendations for the design of unreinforced walls subjected to lateral loads are given in BS 5628-1:1992,
clause 36. The use of bedjoint reinforcement enhances the capacity of walls to resist lateral loading. This annex
is based on the restricted amount of research available and includes four alternative approaches to design which
50 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
It is essential to ensure that the wall ties are capable of transmitting the required forces. Recommendations for
the use of wall ties as panel supports are given in BS 5628-1:1992, clause 36.
The maximum enhancement of lateral load resistance above that for the equivalent unreinforced wall, which may
include some element of two-way spanning, should be taken to be 50 % unless a serviceability and deflection
check is carried out in accordance with A.6.
A.4 Method 2: design with reinforced section carrying extra load only
Single-leaf walls may be designed to span horizontally between supports on the basis that the enhancement in
lateral load resistance above that for the unreinforced wall is derived from the reinforced section.
The reinforced section should be designed using the equation in 8.2.4.2.1. The maximum enhancement of load
capacity above that for the unreinforced wall should be limited to 30 % unless a serviceability and deflection
check is carried out in accordance with A.6 (see note).
NOTE This approach to design cannot be rigorously justified in theoretical terms as it combines the flexural resistance of the
uncracked unreinforced section spanning two ways with the design resistance of the reinforced section, which may be cracked,
spanning one way.
fkx is the characteristic flexural strength of the masonry when the plane of failure is parallel to the bed
joints given in BS 5628-1:1992, clause 24;
gm is the partial safety factor for strength of masonry given in BS 5628-1:1992, clause 27;
Z is the section modulus per unit length of the bed joint.
The design moment of resistance about the vertical axis is as given in 8.2.4.2.
The design moment in the panel is found using the appropriate bending moment coefficient
in BS 5628-1:1992, Table 9. The design moment of resistance of the panel is determined from 8.2.4.2.
For cavity walls the recommendations of BS 5628-1:1992, 36.4.5 should be followed.
The maximum enhancement of lateral load resistance above that for the equivalent unreinforced wall should be
taken to be 50 %, unless a serviceability and deflection check is carried out in accordance with A.6.
A.6 Method 4: design based on cracking load
Since the load causing cracking of a single-leaf wall containing bed joint reinforcement is at least as large as the
ultimate load of a similar unreinforced wall, the cracking load may be used to assess whether the wall conforms
to the serviceability requirements, up to the design strength of the reinforced section.
The failure strength of the wall, excluding reinforcement, should be calculated in accordance
with BS 5628-1:1992, 36.4, taking the value of gm as 1.0. The service strength is then determined by dividing this
strength by the partial safety factor for masonry for the serviceabililty limit state taken from 7.5.3.2.
BSI 11-2000 51
BS 5628-2:2000
To ensure that there is an adequate margin of safety against reaching the ultimate limit state the wall should be
designed as described in A.3, A.4 or A.5 but with no limitation on the load enhancement. The appropriate partial
safety factor, gf, should be obtained from 7.5.2.1, bearing in mind the recommendations of A.2.6. However, the
designer should ensure that in service the deflection will not be excessive; the deflection at service load may be
calculated assuming that the wall acts as an elastic plate.
A.7 Cavity walls
Where cavity walls have both leaves reinforced to increase lateral load capacity, the enhancement in design
lateral strength of each leaf should be limited to the values given in A.3 to A.6. The total load capacity of the
Annex B (informative)
Wall tie for high-lift cavity walls
Figure B.1 illustrates a wall-tie that may be used in the construction of high-lift grouted walls. The ties should be
provided at the spacings given in 10.4, and should be of 6 mm diameter galvanized low carbon steel, resin coated
galvanized low carbon steel or austenitic stainless steel (see 10.1.2.8) bent to the shape and nominal size shown
in Figure B.1. For galvanized ties, the minimum mass of zinc should be as given in Table 14. The cover should be
that recommended for carbon steel reinforcement in Table 15.
100 Cover
Figure B.1 Ð Wall tie for high-lift grouted-cavity wall
Annex C (informative)
Estimation of deflection
When deflection of reinforced members is calculated, it should be realized that there are a number of factors
which may be difficult to allow for in the calculation but which can have a considerable effect on its reliability,
examples of which are as follows.
a) Estimates of the restraints provided by supports are based on simplified and often inaccurate assumptions.
b) The precise loading, or that part of it which is of long duration, is unknown.
c) Considerable differences will occur in the deflections, depending on whether the member has or has not
cracked.
52 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
An elastic analysis should be used to estimate deflections. The following assumptions may be made.
1) The section to be used for the calculation of stiffness is the gross cross-section of the masonry, no
allowance being made for the reinforcement.
2) Plane sections remain plane.
3) The reinforcement, whether in tension or compression, is elastic.
4) The masonry in compression is elastic. Under short term loading the moduli of elasticity may be taken as
the appropriate values given in 7.4.1.7. The long term elastic modulus, Em, allowing for creep and shrinkage
where appropriate, may be taken as:
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
The deflection at the appropriate applied bending moment may be estimated directly or from the estimated
curvature.
Annex D (normative)
Method for determination of characteristic strength of brick masonry, fk
D.1 General
This test is for the determination of the characteristic compressive strength of brick masonry used in reinforced
and prestressed elements, stressed in the direction corresponding to that obtaining in the element or elements
concerned.
D.2 Apparatus
Testing machine conforming to BS 1881-115.
D.3 Test specimen
D.3.1 Materials
D.3.1.1 General
Materials for specimens should be representative of the materials to be used on site. Bricks should be sampled as
described in the appropriate standard.
D.3.1.2 Condition of materials
The moisture content of the bricks at the time of laying and the consistency of the mortar should conform to the
specification for the material to be used in the element.
D.3.2 Preparation of specimens
D.3.2.1 Number of specimens
Not less than five specimens should be tested.
D.3.2.2 Form of specimens
Specimens should be built in such a way that they represent the brickwork in the compressive zone of the
element having regard to the direction of stressing. They should be built in the same attitude as they would be
on site.
The ratio of height to thickness of the specimen should preferably be five. However, other ratios not less than
two may be used provided the results are adjusted as described in D.5.3.
Typical specimens are shown in Figure D.1.
D.3.2.3 Building specimens
In building specimens, care should be taken to ensure that all joints are completely filled and of uniform, 10 mm
thickness. The specimens should be constructed on a level surface, square to the base and such that the top
surface is parallel to the base, as determined by means of a spirit level.
BSI 11-2000 53
BS 5628-2:2000
Grout
Grout
54 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
√
(y12 + y22 + y32 + ...) 2 (y1 + y2 + y3 + ...) 2/n
s=
n21
where
Then
yc = yÅ 2 ks
where
k is a coefficient which varies according to the number of results used for the calculation as given in
Table D.1;
Characteristic strength = antilog (yc)
In addition, a reduction factor, as given in Table D.2, should be applied to the calculated characteristic strength to
allow for the height, h, to thickness, t, ratio of the specimen.
BSI 11-2000 55
BS 5628-2:2000
Annex E (informative)
Durability recommendations for various construction types
Table E.1 gives the recommendations for durability for various construction types.
56 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
Bibliography
Standards publications
BS 1199, 1200:1976, Specification for building sands from natural sources.
BS 3148:1980, Methods of test for water for making concrete (including notes on the suitability of the water).
BS 4551-1:1998, Methods of testing mortars, screeds and plasters Ð Part 1: Physical testing.
BS 4551-2:1998, Methods of testing mortars, screeds and plasters Ð Part 2: Chemical analysis and aggregate
grading.
BS 5075-3:1985, Concrete admixtures Ð Part 3: Specification for superplasticizing admixtures.
Licensed Copy: Giorgio Cavalieri, ALSTOM, 14-Mar-01, Uncontrolled Copy. © BSI
BS 5502-22:1993, Buildings and structures for agriculture Ð Part 22: Code of practice for design, construction
and loading.
BS 8102:1990, Code of practice for protection of structures against water from the ground
DD 86-1:1983, Damp-proof courses Ð Part 1: Methods of test for flexural bond strength and short term shear
strength.
DD 86-2:1984, Damp-proof courses Ð Part 2: Method of test for creep deformation.
BSI 11-2000 57
BS 5628-2:2000
Index
In this index references are to clause, annex and table numbers.
58 BSI 11-2000
BS 5628-2:2000
BSI 11-2000 59
BS 5628-2:2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BSI Ð British Standards Institution
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BSI is the independent national body responsible for preparing British Standards. It
|
| presents the UK view on standards in Europe and at the international level. It is
| incorporated by Royal Charter.
|
|
| Revisions
|
|
| British Standards are updated by amendment or revision. Users of British Standards
|
| should make sure that they possess the latest amendments or editions.
|
|
| It is the constant aim of BSI to improve the quality of our products and services. We
|
| would be grateful if anyone finding an inaccuracy or ambiguity while using this