The document outlines a scoring rubric for evaluating interactive science notebooks, with scores ranging from 1 to 6. A score of 6 reflects a notebook with complete, well-organized contents that goes beyond basic requirements, uses effective diagrams and color, and shows impressive self-reflection. Lower scores are assigned for notebooks with incomplete contents, inconsistent or unorganized layout, minimal use of diagrams and color, limited understanding of topics, and little self-reflection.
The document outlines a scoring rubric for evaluating interactive science notebooks, with scores ranging from 1 to 6. A score of 6 reflects a notebook with complete, well-organized contents that goes beyond basic requirements, uses effective diagrams and color, and shows impressive self-reflection. Lower scores are assigned for notebooks with incomplete contents, inconsistent or unorganized layout, minimal use of diagrams and color, limited understanding of topics, and little self-reflection.
The document outlines a scoring rubric for evaluating interactive science notebooks, with scores ranging from 1 to 6. A score of 6 reflects a notebook with complete, well-organized contents that goes beyond basic requirements, uses effective diagrams and color, and shows impressive self-reflection. Lower scores are assigned for notebooks with incomplete contents, inconsistent or unorganized layout, minimal use of diagrams and color, limited understanding of topics, and little self-reflection.
The document outlines a scoring rubric for evaluating interactive science notebooks, with scores ranging from 1 to 6. A score of 6 reflects a notebook with complete, well-organized contents that goes beyond basic requirements, uses effective diagrams and color, and shows impressive self-reflection. Lower scores are assigned for notebooks with incomplete contents, inconsistent or unorganized layout, minimal use of diagrams and color, limited understanding of topics, and little self-reflection.
6 Excellent • Notebook contents are complete, dated & labeled • Pages are numbered (odd: RIGHT-side even: LEFT-side) • Right-side/Left-side topics are correct & contents organized • Textbook notes/ writing goes beyond basic requirements • Uses color and effective diagrams • Notebook is neat and shows attention to detail. • Shows impressive, in-depth self-reflection about the work.
5 Above Average • Notebook contents are complete, dated & labeled • Pages are numbered (odd: RIGHT-side even: LEFT-side) • Right-side/Left-side topics are correct & contents organized • Uses color and effective diagrams • Most areas meet requirements, but don't go beyond. • Includes most of the traits of a "6", but lacks excellence in all areas. • Shows in-depth self-reflection.
4 Average • Notebook contents are complete (at least 90%) dated & labeled. • Pages are numbered (odd: RIGHT-side even: LEFT-side) • Right-side/Left-side topics are correct & contents organized • Uses color and some diagrams • Information shows a basic understanding of content topics • Some areas meet requirements, but don't go beyond. • Shows limited, but real, self-reflection.
3 Below Average • Notebook contents are complete (at least 80%) dated & labeled. • Pages are numbered (odd: RIGHT-side even: LEFT-side) • Right-side/Left-side topics are somewhat organized • Uses minimal color and few diagrams • Information shows a limited understanding of content topics • Few areas meet all requirements. • Shows some real self-reflection.
2 Inadequate • Notebook contents are incomplete. • Some attempt at dating and labeling of entries is made. • Right-side/left-side is inconsistent and contents are unorganized. • Information and concepts show only a superficial understanding of the subject matter and/or show serious inaccuracies. • Notebook is not neatly written, sloppiness prevails. • Shows little real self-reflection.
1 Incomplete Notebook turned in, but too incomplete to evaluate.
