Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Positive Implicative BCK-algebras With Condition (S) and Implicative Semilattices

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266161589

Positive implicative BCK-algebras with


condition (S) and implicative semilattices

Article in Bulletin of the Section of Logic · January 1999

CITATIONS READS

0 17

1 author:

Jānis Cīrulis
University of Latvia
109 PUBLICATIONS 119 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Orders on rings of operators and Rickart-like rings and semigroups View project

Betweenness spaces View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Jānis Cīrulis on 07 October 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Bulletin of the Section of Logic
Volume 28/3 (1999), pp. 131–133

Jānis Cı̄rulis

POSITIVE IMPLICATIVE BCK-ALGEBRAS WITH CON-


DITION (S) AND IMPLICATIVE SEMILATTICES

Abstract
As J. Meng, Y.B. Jun and S.M. Hong have recently proved the classes of algebras
mentioned in the title are equal up to duality. We present here a short proof of
their theorem.

1.
The following two facts on BCK-algebras have belonged to the folklore of
algebraic logic for a long time:
A: The positive implicative BCK-algebras (pBCK-algebras,
for short) are the duals of Hilbert algebras.
B: The implicative BCK-algebras are the duals of implication,
or Tarski, algebras.
The former has been recently proved in [6]. We remind that Hilbert al-
gebras were introduced, in dual form, by L.Henkin in [3] under the name
‘implicative models’. (In [7], [8] the the same term is used for dualized
Henkin algebras, i.e. for Hilbert algebras). In turn, B is an immediate
consequence of A.
A little earlier, the following result was obtained in [9]:
C: The pBCK-algebras with condition (S) are the duals of
implicative semilattices.
Its proof rests on lengthy calculations in implicative semilattices and pBCK-
algebras with condition (S). Dual implicative semilattices are also known
132 Jānis Cı̄rulis

as subtractive semilattices [2]. The following fact is, in effect, a particu-


lar case of a result proved in [1] for a certain class of partial subtractive
semilattices.

D: An algebra (L, ∨, −, 0) is a subtractive semilattice iff (L, −, 0)


is a Henkin algebra and the operations ∨ and − are related to
each other by the condition

x ≤ y ∨ z iff x − y ≤ z.

Of course, C and D are equivalent in virtue of A. Regretfully, demonstra-


tion of that general result in [1] also required lengthy calculations.
In this note we show that, using two simple facts known in literature,
C can be obtained from A without effort.

2.
The following fact comes back to [7]. It is also stated in [8]; however, the
relevant item (iii) of Theorem 11 in [8] contains sad misprints.

E: Suppose that (L, →, 1) is a Hilbert algebra in which any pair


of elements x and y has the meet x ∧ y. Then (L, ∧, →, 1) is an
implicative semilattice iff the operation ∧ satisfies the condition

x ∧ y ≤ z iff x ≤ y → z.

By the way, several equivalent conditions are also given in [7], [8]. We
reformulate E as follows:
F: An algebra (L, ∧, →, 1) is an implicative semilattice iff (i)
(L, →, 1) is a Hilbert algebra, (ii) x ∧ y is the least element z
such that x ≤ y → z, (iii) x ∧ y is the meet of x and y in L.
Dualizing F on the ground of A, we get:
G: An algebra (L, ◦, ∗, 0) is the dual of an implicative semilat-
tice iff (i) (L, ∗, 0) is a pBCK-algebra, (ii) (L, ∗, 0) satisfies the
condition (S), and ◦ is the S-operation on L, (iii) x ◦ y is the
join of x and y in L.
View publication stats

Positive Implicative BCK-algebras with Condition (S) 133

It is readily checked that the condition (iii) here (and, hence, also in F)
may be dropped (see [4]; this also follows from Theorems 1 and 5 of [5]).
So G reduces to C.

References
[1] J. Cı̄rulis, Subtractive nearsemilattices, Proc. Latvian Acad.
Sci., Sect. B, vol. 52 (1998), pp. 228–233.
[2] H.B. Curry, Foundations of Mathematical logic, McGraw-Hill
Publ. Co, New York e.a., 1973.
[3] L. Henkin, An algebraic characterization of quantifiers, Fund.
Math., vol. 37 (1950), pp. 63–74.
[4] K. Iséki, Some results on positive implicative BCK-algebras with
condition (S), Math. Seminar Notes Kobe Univ., vol. 7 (1979), 437–
440.
[5] K. Iséki, BCK-algebras with condition (S), Math. Japon., vol.
24 (1979), pp. 107–119.
[6] M. Kondo, Hilbert algebras are dual isomorphic to positive im-
plicative BCK-algebras, Math. Japon., vol. 49 (1999), pp. 265–268.
[7] E.L. Marsden, Compatible elements in implicative models, J. Phi-
los. Log., vol. 1 (1972), pp. 156–161.
[8] E.L. Marsden, A note on implicative models, Notre Dame J.
Formal Log., vol. 14 (1973), pp. 139–144.
[9] J. Meng, Y.B. Jun, S.M. Hong, Implicative semilattices are equiva-
lent to positive implicative BCK-algebras with condition (S), Math.
Japon., vol. 48 (1998), pp. 251–255.

Department of Computer Science


University of Latvia
Raiņa b., 19
Riga LV-1586
Latvia
e-mail: jc@lanet.lv

You might also like