People Vs Reyes Digest

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, vs.
DOMINGO REYES y PAJE, ALVIN ARNALDO y AVENA

and JOSELITO FLORES y VICTORIO, accused-appellants.
G.R. No. 178300
March 17, 2009
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
FACTS:
APPEAL from a decision and resolution of the Court of Appeals.
On 16 July 1999, at about 11:00 p.m., the Yao family, onboard a Mazda MVP van, arrived at their
poultry farm in Barangay Sto. Cristo, San Jose del Monte, Bulacan. Prior to entering they were
threatened at gunpoint by the appellant Reyes and Pataray, Arnaldo and Flores with 2 others also
arrived and entered the vehicle where they restrained and blindfolded the family. The suspects drove
the van. After 30 minutes dropped off Chua Ong Ping Sim, Robert, Raymond and Jona Abagatnan while
Yao San, Lenny ,Matthew, Charlene and Josephine remained in the van. They then told Yao San to
produce 5,000,000 pesos for ransom. The 4 hostages were transported on foot to their safehouse
situated in the mountainous part of San Jose Del Monte, Bulacan where they spent the whole night.
The next morning when the suspects failed to contact Yao San they sent Jona and later Robert to
find Yao San to remind him to pay the 5,000,000 pesos ransom. On 18 July 1999, Yao San talked to the
kidnappers and agreed to pay the ransom, he was allowed to talk to his wife. On 19 July 1999, appellants
again called Yao San via a cellular phone and threatened to kill Chua Ong Ping Sim and Raymond
because of newspaper and radio reports regarding the incident. Yao San clarified that he did not inform
the media. Appellants then instructed Yao bring with him the ransom of P5 million at 3:00 p.m. in the
Usan dumpsite, Litex Road, Fairview, Quezon City. Yao San arrived at the designated place of the pay-off
at 4:00 p.m, none of the appellants showed up. On 23 July 1999, the corpses of Chua Ong Ping Sim and
Raymond were found at the La Mesa Dam, Novaliches,Quezon City. Both died of asphyxia by
strangulation.
On 26 July 1999, appellant Arnaldo surrendered to the Presidential Anti-Organized Crime Task
Force (PAOCTF)at Camp Crame, Quezon City. Arnaldo executed a written extra-judicial confession
narrating his participationin the incident. Appellant Arnaldo identified appellants Reyes and Flores,
Pataray and a certain Tata and Akey as his co-participants in the incident. Appellant Arnaldo also
described the physical features of his cohorts and revealed their locations. The suspects were arrested
and identified by the victims. Flores later also executed an extra judicial confession. The suspects then
presented their alibis. After trial, the RTC rendered a Decision dated 26 February 2002 convicting
appellants of the special complex crime of kidnapping for ransom with double homicide and sentencing
them to Death and to pay for civil and moral damages (150,000 and 500,000). The case was then raised
to the SC but passed the case first to the CA which reduced the sentence to reclusion perpetua and
lessen the damages to 100,000 indemnity and 100,000 for damages.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the appellants are guilty of the crime?

RULING:
Yes, on the following accounts:

a.) Prosecution witnesses Abagatnan, Robert, and Yao San positively identified appellants and their
cohorts as their kidnappers during a police line-up and also during trial.
b.) The 2 attorneys provided by the PAOCTF were not contested by Flores and Arnaldo, their rights
were properly explained to them and they were not coerced or forced to confess. These
statements are, therefore, admissible as corroborative and circumstantial evidence to prove
appellant Reyes’ guilt.
c.) Held that alibi and the defense of frame-up become less plausible when they are corroborated
only by relatives and friends because of perceived partiality.
WHEREFORE, the Decision, dated 14 August 2006, and Resolution, dated 18 October 2006, of the Court
of Appeals in CA-G.R. CR-H.C. No. 02301 is hereby AFFIRMED with the following MODIFICATIONS: (1) the
total amount of civil indemnity is P150,000.00; (2) the total amount of exemplary damages is
P700,000.00; (3) the total amount of moral damages is P700,000.00; and (4) the appropriate
denomination of the crime committed by appellants is the special complex crime of kidnapping for
ransom with homicide.
SO ORDERED.

People Vs Reyes Digest

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

People Vs Reyes Digest

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

People Vs Reyes Digest

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, vs.

DOMINGO REYES y PAJE, ALVIN ARNALDO y AVENA

APPEAL from a decision and resolution of the Court of Appeals.

Whether or not the appellants are guilty of the crime?

Yes, on the following accounts:

You might also like