Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
294 views1 page

Philippine Double Murder Case Review

(1) Five men were accused of killing two brothers, Cesario and Rogelio Ilac, after encountering them near a river late at night. (2) The court found the confessions of the five accused men to be more credible than the testimony of the sole eyewitness, the brother of the victims. (3) The Supreme Court ruled that two of the accused, Charles and Juan, were guilty of homicide aggravated by abuse of superiority and cruelty for the killing of Rogelio Ilac. Weighting down and tying the victims' bodies before disposing of them in the river constituted an outrage to the corpses under the law.

Uploaded by

Lotsee Elauria
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
294 views1 page

Philippine Double Murder Case Review

(1) Five men were accused of killing two brothers, Cesario and Rogelio Ilac, after encountering them near a river late at night. (2) The court found the confessions of the five accused men to be more credible than the testimony of the sole eyewitness, the brother of the victims. (3) The Supreme Court ruled that two of the accused, Charles and Juan, were guilty of homicide aggravated by abuse of superiority and cruelty for the killing of Rogelio Ilac. Weighting down and tying the victims' bodies before disposing of them in the river constituted an outrage to the corpses under the law.

Uploaded by

Lotsee Elauria
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

G.R. No.

L-36446 September 9, 1983


THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUAN C. MAGUDDATU,
EDIPOLO L. MAGUDDATU, CHARLES A. MAGUDDATU, PEDRO MAGUDDATU and
ANTONIO CABAYU, Accused whose death sentences are under review.
(p. 502, Reyes)
FACTS
The Court held that the confessions of the five accused were more valid, than the single
uncorroborated testimony of Reynaldo Ilac, 20, the brother of the victims, who was the
only alleged eyewitness of the killing. According to this version, on the night in question,
while they were returning from Barrio Sirit, Abulug, where they attended a dance, and
when the motorized banca wherein they were riding was at Sitio Cabaritan, Barrio
Dana-ili, they saw on the bank three persons leading a carabao. Suspecting them to be
cattle rustlers, they stopped the banca and landed on the bank. Edipolo, armed with a
bolo (duckial), pursued one of the three men whom he killed because he resisted. He
did not know the mans name (he was Cesario Ilac). Charles, armed with a carbine, and
Juan, armed with a bolo (immuko), killed their quarry whose name they also did not
know (he was Regelio Ilac). Pedro and Antonio chased the third man who was able to
escape. Then, Charles, Juan and Edipolo tied the two dead bodies with wire and nylon
rope, weighted them with a piece of cement and scrap iron, placed the cadavers in the
boat and submerged the same in the river near Sitio Gandia. The five accused are
related to each other and to Mayor Inocencio Maguddatu of Abulug.
ISSUE
W/N the act of defendants constitute an outrage to the corpses as contemplated in
article 248(6) of the Revised Penal Code as distinguished from article 14(21) which
speaks merely of deliberately augmenting the wrong not necessary to its commission
RULING CFI Cagayan
CFI found Pedro, Juan, Edipolo and Charles, all surnamed Maguddatu, and Antonio
Cabayu guilty of double murder, imposing on each of them two death penalties and
requiring them to pay solidarily the heirs of the victims, the brothers Rogelio Ilac and
Cesario Ilac, an indemnity of P50,000 (Criminal Case No. 183-S). Edipolo and Pedro
died in prison on September 29, 1976 and June 17, 1983, respectively.
RULING SC
For the killing of Rogelio Ilac, Charles and Juan are guilty of homicide aggravated by
abuse of superiority, use of the motorized banca (in disposing of the corpse) and cruelty.
Weighting the victims bodies with a cement boulder and hub cap and tying their wrist
and ankles with nylon cord and wire constitute an outrage their corpses as
contemplated in article 248(6) of the Revised Penal Code as distinguished from article
14(21) which speaks merely of deliberately augmenting the wrong not necessary to its
commission. They are entitled to the mitigating circumstances of voluntary surrender to
the authorities.

You might also like