Kelompok 40 - Impact FIX
Kelompok 40 - Impact FIX
Kelompok 40 - Impact FIX
Disusun oleh
Dosen Pembimbing
Budi Agung Kurniawan, S.T.M.Sc
2
LEMBAR PENGESAHAN
OLEH :
Ahmad Fath Aziz Nugraha 02511940000076
I Gusti Firmansyah Kurniawan 02511940000140
Dewi Puspa Ningrum 02511940000143
Koordinator
Praktikum Metalurgi I
Menyetujui,
Dosen Pengampu
Mata Kuliah
SURABAYA
2020
i
PREFACE
Thank God for his blessing, because we can complete the practice report of Metallurgy 1 course
on time and correctly. Let us also not forget to thank the lecturers Budi Agung Kurniawan S.T.
and Mr. M.Sc of the "Metallurgy 1" course, as well as the metallurgical laboratory graders who
guided our group to complete this practice and report.
This "Metallurgy 1" practicum report is based on the results of practical internship materials.
The report includes all the materials in the "Metallurgy 1" practical activities, which consists of
three materials, namely tensile test, hardness test and impact test.
We realize that this report is far from perfect. therefore, we apologize and will accept all input
given for the perfection of this report. Lastly, we hope this report can be of use to both readers and
writers.
Group 40
ii
ABSTRACT
Impact testing is a method used to determine the strength, hardness and ductility of materials.
Therefore, impact testing is widely used in the field of testing the mechanical properties of
materials. In order to evaluate the resistance of materials to brittle fracture, it is necessary to test
and consider the dynamic factors that may affect brittle fracture, including tensile speed, notch,
plate thickness, residual stress, etc. The steel strip AISI 1045 treats each sample differently. The
purpose of the experiment is to explain the principle of the impact test, describe the difference
between Charpy and Izod methods, and describe the fracture mode and the value of the determined
temperature impact test result. The material used in this test method is a strip steel 1045. The test
standard is the ASTM E23 standard. After using ASTM E23 to prepare the material and perform
the actual operation, there will be such results. For example, the lower the impact strength of the
material, it will become brittle, and the higher the impact strength of the material, it will become
ductile. Sample strip 1045 without treatment impact strength value is 1.23 Kgm/mm2, the impact
energy is 107.19 Kgm, and the brittle fracture is 47.5%. Then, for the strip sample steel 1045, the
impact strength value of dry ice is 0.52 Kgm/mm2, the impact energy is 50.35 Kgm, and the brittle
fracture is 100%. Finally, the impact strength of the sample strip steel 1045 in boiling water is 1.33
Kgm/mm2, the impact energy is 114.87 Kgm, and the brittle fracture is 0%. Temperature used in
untreated samples; dry ice specimens, boiling water specimens, such as 29.6°C; -26.4°C; 73.6°C.
The temperature of the material will affect its impact strength. If the temperature of the material
decreases, the grains of the material will be very tight, so there is no room for elastic deformation
And the impact strength is small so it is brittle. At the same time, when the temperature rises, the
crystal grains of the material will be stretched and the occurrence of deformation will increase,
and the impact strength will become larger and larger. So it is ductile.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LEMBAR PENGESAHAN ....................................................................................................... I
PREFACE ............................................................................................................................... II
ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... III
TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................... IV
TABLE OF FIGURE ............................................................................................................... V
TABLE OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. VI
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................1
I.1 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................1
I.2 EXPERIMENT PROBLEM ................................................................................................1
I.3 EXPERIMENT OBJECTIVE .............................................................................................1
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW .................................................................................3
II.1 STEEL ................................................................................................................................3
II.1.1 DEFINITION OF STEEL ...............................................................................................3
II.1.2 CLASSIFICATION OF CARBON STEEL ...................................................................3
II.2 STEEL STRIP ....................................................................................................................3
II.3 IMPACT TEST...................................................................................................................4
II.4 CHARPHY METHOD .......................................................................................................4
II.5 IZOD METHOD .................................................................................................................5
II.6 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES ........................................................................................5
II.7 TRANSITION CURVE ......................................................................................................6
II.8 DUCTILE AND BRITTLE FRACTURE ..........................................................................7
II.8.1 DEFINITION DUCTILE AND BRITTLE FRACTURE ..............................................7
II.8.2 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DUCTILE AND BRITTLE FRACTURE ......................7
CHAPTER III EXPERIMENTAL METHODS ......................................................................9
III.1 FLOWCHART ..................................................................................................................9
III.2 EXPERIMENTAL TOOLS AND MATERIALS .............................................................9
III.2.1 MATERIALS .................................................................................................................9
III.2.2 TOOLS ...........................................................................................................................9
III.3 TABLE OF TREATMENT............................................................................................. 10
III.4 TESTING STANDARD .................................................................................................. 10
III.5 TRIAL PROCEDURE .................................................................................................... 10
III.6 EXPERIMENTAL SCHEME ........................................................................................ 11
CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION ....................................................... 13
IV.1 DATA ANALYSIS .......................................................................................................... 13
IV.1.1 TABLE OF EXPERIMENTAL RESULT .................................................................. 13
IV.1.2 IMPACT ENERGY CALCULATION........................................................................ 13
IV.1.3 IMPACT STRENGTH CALCULATION ................................................................... 13
IV.1.4 FRACTURE PERCENTAGE ..................................................................................... 14
IV.1.5 FATT AND TEMPERATURE-ENERGY CURVE.................................................... 14
IV.1.6 TEMPERATURE ON ENERGY IMPACT EFFECT................................................ 15
IV.1.7 IMPACT STRENGTH ................................................................................................ 15
IV.1.8 FRACTURE PATTERN .............................................................................................. 16
IV.1.9 FATT CURVE ............................................................................................................. 16
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION ................................................................................................ 19
V.1 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 19
V.2 SUGGESTION.................................................................................................................. 19
BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................. VII
SPECIMEN OF IMPACT TEST ....................................................................................... VIII
iv
TABLE OF FIGURE
Figure II.1 Simple Beam Key-hole Notched Charpy Type .........................................................5
Figure II.2 Contilever Beam Izod Type ......................................................................................5
Figure II.3 Ductile and Brittle Transition Curve Scheme ............................................................7
Figure II.4 Ductile Fracture........................................................................................................8
Figure II.5 Brittle Fracture .........................................................................................................8
Figure III.1 The Flowchart Of Tensile Test ................................................................................9
Figure III.2 Specimen Dimensions and Notch Shape Variations Based On ASTM E23............ 10
Figure III.3 Experimental Scheme Of Impact Test ................................................................... 11
Figure IV.1 Fatt and Temperature-Energy Curve...................................................................... 14
Figure IV.2 Fracture Pattren ..................................................................................................... 16
v
TABLE OF TABLES
Table III.1 Treatment of Impact Test Specimen ....................................................................... 10
Table IV.1 Experimental Data and Result................................................................................. 13
vi
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
I.1 Background
Recently, the demand for metal materials is increasing. Steel is one of the most sought-after
metal materials today, especially as a basic material for construction products (such as buildings,
automobiles, etc.). The existence of this metal is very important in life, so we will always be able
to see the quality of the metal that will be processed into finished products, and conduct research
and innovation to make the quality of this metal better, so that it can be used effectively it. better.
In each metal, the metal itself has different metal mechanical properties. Examples of mechanical
properties are stiffness (stiffness), ductility, toughness, tensile (tensile test) and Brinell hardness
(hardness).
The notch hit test or so-called impact test is a test used to determine the resistance of metals to
impact loads and to determine the sensitivity of metals to notches. Steel used for large building
materials often causes shocking tingling sensations, such as sudden breaking of pressure vessels
and cranes. This is due to the brittleness not seen in the tensile test, and the result is very dangerous.
Impact testing is very necessary and important in a series of engineering tests, because it is
necessary to find out one of the mechanical properties of the material, that is, the toughness of the
material, so that we can predict the effect or what unexpected impact will actually be experienced
after the material is obtained. Design dynamic testing (ie, tactical hit testing) requires impact
testing. As a student of the Department of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, it is strongly
recommended that you understand this test and understand its mechanism so that we can later
discover whether there are embrittlement symptoms in the metal.
1
LAPORAN PRAKTIKUM METALURGI I
DEPARTEMEN TEKNIK MATERIAL ITS
(Blank Page)
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
II.1 Steel
II.1.1 Definition of Steel
Steel is an iron-carbon alloy and may contain about 1.7%. There is another considerable
concentration of alloying elements, there are thousands of alloys with different compositions or
heat treatments. Mechanical properties are sensitive to carbon content, which is usually less than
1.0% by weight. According to the carbon concentration, some of the more common steels are
divided into low carbon, medium carbon and high carbon types. According to the concentration of
other alloying elements, there are sub-categories in each group. In addition to carbon and a small
amount of manganese, ordinary carbon steel only contains other impurities. For alloy steel, more
alloying elements are deliberately added at a certain concentration.
(Callister, 2014)
3
LAPORAN PRAKTIKUM METALURGI I
DEPARTEMEN TEKNIK MATERIAL ITS
this type of steel is flat floor products (sheets or strips) that are usually used under cold forming
and annealing conditions.
(ASM Handbook, 1993)
Steel belts also have some characteristics and advantages that make them often selected to
support the construction process. First, strip steel is easy to shape due to its low carbon
composition, and therefore tends to soften the texture. Secondly, it is corrosion resistant, so strip
steel is usually used in shipbuilding. Third, it is strong and durable. Fourth, because the steel belt
is easy to shape, it can save time and money, so the processing process is fast.
(Wiguna, 2015)
The components contained in this type of steel have extremely low high carbon content, less
than 0.10% C and up to 0.4% Mn. For plates and cross-sections of rolled steel structures, the
carbon content can be increased to about 0.30%, and the Mn height can reach 1.5%.
Common uses are in auto body panels, lead plates, and wire products. For plates and
applications for stamps, forgings, seamless tubes, and boiler plates to use in building contours.
(ASM Handbook, 1993)
5
standard height depending upon the type of specimen tested. At that height, with reference to the
vise, the pendulum has a definite amount of potential energy. When the pendulum is released, this
energy is converted to kinetic energy until it strikes the specimen. The Charpy specimen will be
hit behind the V notch.
(Callister, 2014)
(Callister, 2014)
Below is the picture of ductile and brittle fracture:
Start
Study of Literature
Data Analysis
Conclusion
Finish
III.2.2 Tools
Below are the tools needed for the experiment
1. Impact test machine…….………………………………………………………………(1 piece)
2. Pemanas (Heater)…….…………………………………………………………………(1 piece)
3. File………………………………………………………………………………….…..(1 piece)
4. Clamp……………………………………………………...............................................(1 piece)
5. Thermometer……………………………………………………………………………(1 piece)
9
LAPORAN PRAKTIKUM METALURGI I
DEPARTEMEN TEKNIK MATERIAL ITS
10
III.3 Table of treatment
The treatment table on the impact test practicum is as follows :
Figure III.2 Specimen Dimensions and Notch Shape Variations Based On ASTM E23
11
III.6 Experimental Scheme
1. 2. 3. 4.
5. 6. 7.
12
(Blank Page)
CHAPTER IV
DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
IV.1 Data Analysis
IV.1.1 Table of experimental result
Below is the table of experimental result that has been done,
Without Treatment :
! = (166.6 × 0.88(cos 92 − cos 140)) = 107.19 Kgm
Dry Ice :
! = (166.6 × 0.88(cos 115 − cos 140)) = 50.35 Kgm
Hot Water
! = (166.6 × 0.88(cos 89 − cos 140)) = 114.87 Kgm
13
LAPORAN PRAKTIKUM METALURGI I
DEPARTEMEN TEKNIK MATERIAL ITS
14
! − 8,65
A=
F
Without Treatment :
107.19 − 8.65
A= = 1.23 NOP/PPR
80
Dry Ice :
50.35 − 8.65
A= = 0.52 NOP/PPR
80
Hot Water :
114.87 − 8.65
A= = 1.33 NOP/PPR
80
Dry Ice :
80
%UVW(XYVZ = × 100% = 100%
80
Hot Water :
0
%UVW(XYVZ = × 100% = 0%
80
IV.2 Discussion
This impact test experiment was carried out on strip steel with variations in specimen
temperature. The first specimen is strip steel with 29.6 ℃ Temperature, the second is strip steel
LAPORAN PRAKTIKUM METALURGI I
DEPARTEMEN TEKNIK MATERIAL ITS
15
with a temperature of -26.4 ℃ and the third is strip steel and the third specimen is steel with a
temperature of 73.6 ℃. In the first experiment using a specimen with a room temperature of 29.6 ℃
with dimensions of 8 mm high and 10 mm wide. This specimen had an initial angle of 140 ° after
impact testing and an end angle of 92 °. In addition, there was also an impact energy of 107.19
Kgm, and an impact strength of 1.23 Kg.m.mm-2.
In the second experiment, it was placed on dry ice until the specimen reached a temperature
of -26.4 ℃. The dimensions of the specimen are 8 mm high and 10 mm wide and the initial angle
of the pendulum is 140 °. After impact testing, the final angle was 115 °. In addition, there was
also an impact energy of 50.35 Kgm, and an impact strength of 0.52 Kg.m.mm-2.
In the third experiment, it was placed in Boiling water until the specimen reached a
temperature of 73.6 ℃. The dimensions of the specimen are 8mm high and 10mm wide with a
pendulum starting angle of 140 °. After impact testing, a final angle of 89 ° was obtained. In
addition, it also obtained an impact energy of 114,87 Kgm, an impact strength of 1.33 Kg.m.mm2.
16
to the impact strength, so the wider the size, the smaller the impact strength. Conversely, the
smaller the size, the greater the value of impact strength.
(Zuchry, 2012)
17
Temperature transition is the range of temperature that when a specimen have the temperature in
the range of temperature transition, the brittle/ductile transition occurs because some materials
development plastic zone is temperature dependant. The temperature transition range is 25°C-
35°C. High-temperature samples can absorb higher energy, because high-temperature samples
have relatively high ductility, so they require a lot of energy to break. One of the main functions
of Charpy and Izod tests is to determine whether a material undergoes a ductile to brittle transition
(if so) as the temperature decreases, and to determine the temperature range in which the material
occurs. The ductile to brittle transition is related to the temperature dependence of the measured
impact energy absorption. These transitions are represented by the curves in Picture IV.1. At higher
temperatures, CVN energy is relatively large, corresponding to ductile fracture mode, the
temperature is lowered so the impact energy drop suddenly In a relatively narrow temperature
range, below this temperature range, the energy has a constant but small value, that is, the fracture
mode is very brittle.
(Callister, 2014)
LAPORAN PRAKTIKUM METALURGI I
DEPARTEMEN TEKNIK MATERIAL ITS
18
(Blank Page)
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION
V.1 Conclusion
From the experiment that has been done, we can conclude that:
1. Impact strength determined the resistance of a material to a sudden load or force. The higher the
impact strength, the more ductile it is. The lower the impact strength, the more brittle the materials.
Specimen steel AISI 1045 without treatment impact strength value is 1.23 Kgm /mm², the impact
energy is 107.19 Kgm, and Brittle fracture is 47.5%. Then, for the AISI 1045, dry ice has impact
strength The value is 0.52 Kgm /mm², the impact energy is 50.35 Kgm, and the brittle fracture is
100%. At last, The impact strength of test bar steel 1045 in hot water is 1.33 Kgm /mm², and the
impact energy is 114.87 Kgm, and the brittle fracture is 0%.
2. Due to the gap, the grain size can improve the sensitivity and resistance of the metal. Therefore,
since the material is brittle, the notch sensitivity is higher. Since the material is ductile, less notch
sensitivity.
3. The temperature of the material will affect its impact strength. If the temperature of the material
is lowered, the grains of the material will be very compact, so there is no room for elastic
deformation and the impact strength is also very small. At the same time, when the temperature
increases, the grains of the material will be stretched and the occurrence of deformation will
increase, and the impact strength will also increase.
V.2 Suggestion
To minimize the errors and increase the better test result that we get from the experiment, the
suggestion are:
1. Practicioner has to prepare the specimen better to minimize the error image or data that we get
from the experiment
2. More precise at looking the data or processing the data so we have less errors and be more
careful when doing the experiment
19
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Avner, S. H. (1974). Introduction to physical metallurgy (Vol. 2, pp. 481-497). New York:
McGraw-hill.
Callister, W. D. (2014). Materials science and engineering an introduction. John Wiley.
Miracle, D. B., Donaldson, S. L., Henry, S. D., Moosbrugger, C., Anton, G. J., Sanders, B. R., ...
& Scott Jr, W. W. (2001). ASM handbook (Vol. 21, pp. 107-119). Materials Park, OH: ASM
international.
Rothon, R., & DeArmitt, C. (2017). Fillers (including fiber reinforcements). In Brydson's Plastics
Materials (pp. 169-204). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Zuhaimi, Z. (2016). Kekuatan impak baja ST 60 di bawah temperatur ekstrim. Jurnal Polimesin,
14(2), 33-40.
vii
SPECIMEN OF IMPACT TEST
viii