Notes: A Presumed Greek Stone Anchor Stock Recovered Off Venice, Italy

The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology (2006) 35.
1: 137–140
doi: 10.1111/j.1095-9270.2005.00087.x
Notes
A Presumed Greek Stone Anchor Stock Recovered off Venice,

NAUTICAL
A PRESUMED
Blackwell ARCHAEOLOGY,
GREEK
Publishing Ltd STONE35.1
ANCHOR STOCK RECOVERED
Italy
I
n the Adriatic sea off the Lagoon of Venice, but we have no proof either of the presence of
probably in the 1970s, a stone anchor stock Greek merchants or of the passage of Hellenic
was recovered by a ship of the Italian Navy.1 ships in the zone.2
At present, the find is displayed on the first floor
of the Museo Navale of Venice, in a section
dedicated to antiquity. The stock is 950 mm long,
Discussion
with a maximum section of 155 × 85 mm. It shows Although there is no archaeological evidence, it
the classic ‘banana shape’ (to be distinguished is reasonably and commonly believed that stone
from the ‘cigar shape’) and the typical narrowing anchor stocks were part of a wooden anchor.
in the centre to accommodate a wooden shank.
Although it has been heavily deteriorated by
marine borers, on one extremity one may still
notice that the stone has been cut on two faces
(Fig. 1). Considering the lively debate about
Greek presence in the Upper Adriatic Sea and,
in particular, about the passage of Greek ships
along the littoral of the Veneto region (Braccesi,
1979; Braccesi and Luni, 2004), it seemed
interesting to try to understand whether this
object could have belonged to a Hellenic vessel.
In fact, although in the second half of the 6th
century BC the presence of Greek merchants is
already documented in Adria and San Basilio
(Rovigo) and from the beginning of the following
century the emporium of Spina became an
important centre for maritime traffic between the
Greek world (especially Athens) and the
population living in Veneto (Capuis, 1993: 175–
7), there is no clear evidence for the presence of
Greeks north of these sites (Fig. 2). For example,
since the 5th cent. BC we have evidence of
importation of Greek objects in the city of Altino
(north of Venice) (Capuis and Gambacurta, 2003), Figure 2. Map of the North Adriatic western littoral.
Figure 1. Stone anchor stock in the Museo Navale, Venice. (C. Beltrame)
© 2005 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2005 The Nautical Archaeology Society.
Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA.
NAUTICAL ARCHAEOLOGY, 35.1
identification cannot prove the exact quarry of

origin, which is the most important information.
In the case of marble stocks, thanks to the
available data-bank, there is a good chance of
arriving at a clear result (Lazzarini, 2004).
Results of petrographic examination

Figure 3. Proposed reconstruction of a wooden anchor with Study of the thin section of a small sample from
stone stock. (after Kapitän, 1984, fig. 2) the anchor allowed the classification of its stone
as biocalcarenite, more specifically a poorly-washed
This, in Kapitän’s 1984 reconstruction, would have biosparite (Folk, 1962) or grainstone (Dunham,
been composed of two symmetrical elements— 1962). The bioclasts contained belong mainly to
each provided with an arm—jointed together bivalves, algae, mono- and biseriate microphora-
(Fig. 3). The dating of this kind of anchor varies miniphera, whose chambers are sometimes filled
from the 7th to the 4th century BC (Gianfrotta by phosphates (Fig. 4): micritic intraclasts are also
and Pomey, 1981: 301–4), although we propose present. The silico-clastic fraction is composed
to exclude the 7th century for which there seems of: abundant plagioclase in single, twinned and
to be no archaeological evidence (Gianfrotta, often zoned individuals (Fig. 5) of andesinic
1977: 289). The contexts of finding are: composition; a few small crystals of greenish
Shipwrecks: Punta Braccetto (Ragusa) (?), clinopyroxene; some flakes of corroded, partly
Giglio Isle (Tuscany region), Pointe du Dattier chloritized biotite; rare glauconite granules;
(Baie de Cavalaire), El Sec (Mallorca). sparse opaque minerals, and several clasts of a
Isolated conditions in the sea; fine-grained vulcanite. The cement is mostly
Sanctuaries as ex-voto: Bamboula (Cyprus), microsparitic.
Egina, Crotone (?), Gravisca, Selinunte; Rocks such as this are abundant in all the
Sanctuaries, perhaps as aniconic cults (argoi central Mediterranean areas, from Spain to
lithoi) in the Greek city of Metaponto (Boetto, Syria, including Sicily, Crete and Asia Minor;
1997 and references); they are mostly of Miocenic age, and being
Necropolis as presumed memorial stones: in soft limestones were much used in antiquity as
Valle Trebba near the Greek city of Spina (Ferrara) building materials. The type considered here,
(Gianfrotta, 1982); owing to its vulcanoclastic fraction, may be
Re-used elements in buildings: in the emporium formed in the Eastern Aegean, where the famous
of Gravisca—attended by Greek merchants, in volcanic arc has produced a large series of lavas
the indigenous sanctuary of Punta Ristola (Santa and volcanoclastic rocks often present in the
Maria di Leuca), and in the Greek sanctuary of silico-clastic fraction of local biocalcarenites.
Locri Epizefiri.
These contexts, together with the inscriptions
found on some of the stocks, suggest a Greek
Conclusion
origin for these objects. This conclusion is also Archaeometric study has concluded that the site
indicated by the kind of stone used to make them, of quarrying of the stone cannot be located on
which often seems to be marble from Greek the Adriatic coasts, but has to be found in the
quarries (Gianfrotta, 1977: 291). We believe that central or eastern Mediterranean. From this we
their traditional attribution as Greek should be may suppose that the stock was not worked by
proved by the identification of the stone-type a pre-Roman population living in the Veneto
and of the location of its quarry. To achieve region, like the Paleoveneti, who would more
this scientifically demands archaeometric analysis: probably have used a local stone. This supports
very rarely has such investigation been carried the idea that this anchor stock found off Venice
out on ancient anchor stocks. A rare case is the belonged to a Greek ship navigating not far from
identification of the stocks from Secca del Bagno, the coast, between the 6th and the 4th century
Lipari (Agnesi et al., 2002: 203). Almost always, BC. In the light of the lack of other similar Greek
after archaeometric analysis, the visual identification finds from the Italian North Adriatic sea, this
turns out to be wrong or too generic (Renfrew evidence is of great importance and a useful
and Springer Peacy, 1968); in addition, visual addition to the reconstructive study both of the
138 © 2005 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2005 The Nautical Archaeology Society
NOTES
Figure 4. Micrograph of the thin section of the anchor showing bioclasts of bivalves and of a uniseriate microphoram with
phosphate filling, together with opaque minerals, in a microspatrictic cement. N//, 66 X. (L. Lazzarini)
Figure 5. As above, but N * and showing a twinned and a zoned plagioclase. (L. Lazzarini)
© 2005 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2005 The Nautical Archaeology Society 139
NAUTICAL ARCHAEOLOGY, 35.1
presence of Greeks in the North Eastern region we hope the results will be of greater importance
of Italy and of navigation in the Adriatic sea because of the easiness of recognizing marble
before the arrival of the Romans. quarries from the Greek period.3
As regards a possible methodological approach,
this study can give an idea of the potentialities of Carlo Beltrame
archaeometric analyses of the stone to identify its Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità e del Vicino
original quarry. Further studies will take into Oriente
consideration geological maps of the Aegean area Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, I-30123, Italy
to have a glimpse of the possible provenancing
zone for our anchor. We will also consider several Lorenzo Lazzarini
other marble anchors found in Italy. In this case, Laboratorio di Analisi dei Materiali Antichi, DSA
given the existence of a good reference database, Università Iuav di Venezia, I-30125, Italy
Acknowledgements
We want to thank Dr M. De Min and L. Fozzati (Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici del Veneto,
NAUSICAA), for permission to study this find, and Admiral Lorenzo Sferra, Keeper of the Museo
Navale di Venezia, for his kindness in allowing us to analyse it.
Notes
1. Information from the archives of the Museo Navale, Venice.
2. The only maritime evidence known is the wreck of a cargo of amphoras from Megale Hellas lying off the lagoon of Grado
(Tortorici, 2000), which has been dated in the middle of late 3rd century BC, that is probably when the Romans were
already controlling southern Italy.
3. The archaeological observations have been written by C. Beltrame while the archaeometric analysis was conducted by L.
Lazzarini.
References
Agnesi, V., Consiglio, M., Sardella, A., and Vanaria, M. G., 2002, Indagini archeologiche e geomorfologiche sul Banco del
Bagno (Isola di Lipari), Archeologia subacquea. Studi, ricerche e documenti, III, 187–207.
Boetto, G., 1997, Ceppi litici ‘Sacri’ e culti aniconici a Metaponto e a Locri, Archeologia subacquea. Studi, ricerche e
documenti, II, 51– 64.
Braccesi, L., 1979, Grecità adriatiche. Un capitolo della colonizzazione greca in occidente. Bologna.
Braccesi, L. and Luni, M. (eds), 2004, I greci in Adriatico. Rome.
Capuis, L. 1993, I Veneti. Società e cultura di un popolo dell’Italia preromana. Milan.
Capuis, L. and Gambacurta, G., 2003, Altino: importazioni e direttrici commerciali in epoca preromana, in G. Cresci
Marrone and M. Tirelli (eds), Produzioni, merci e commerci in Altino preromana e romana, 27–45. Atti del convegno,
dicembre 2001. Rome.
Dunham, R. J., 1962, Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture, in W. E. Ham (ed.), Classification
of Carbonate Rocks, 108 – 21. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 1, Tulsa.
Folk, R. L., 1962, Spectral subdivision of limestones types, in W. E. Ham (ed.), Classification of Carbonate Rocks, 62–4.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 1, Tulsa.
Gianfrotta, P. A., 1977, First elements for the dating of stone anchors stocks, IJNA 6: 285–92.
Gianfrotta, P. A., 1982, L’ancora di Klutikuna (ovvero, considerazioni sulla tomba n. 245 di Valle Trebba), Bollettino Annuale
dei Musei Ferraresi 12: 59 – 62.
Gianfrotta, P. A. and Pomey, P., 1981, Archeologia subacquea. Storia, tecniche, scoperte e relitti. Milan.
Kapitän, G., 1984, Ancient anchors — technology and classification, IJNA 13.1: 33–44.
Lazzarini, L., 2004, Archaeometric aspects of white and coloured marbles used in antiquity: the state of the art, Periodico di
Mineralogia (An International Journal of Mineralogy, Crystallography, Geochemistry, Ore Deposits, Petrology, Volcanology) 73:
113 – 25.
Renfrew, C. and Springer Peacy, J., 1968, Aegean marble: a petrological study, Annual of the British School at Athens 63:
45 –66.
Tortorici, E., 2000, Un nuovo relitto di età repubblicana nel mare di Grado, Archeologia delle acque 4: 91–8.
Animal
F. TiboniFigureheads on Nuragic Bronze Boat Models
140 © 2005 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2005 The Nautical Archaeology Society

Notes: A Presumed Greek Stone Anchor Stock Recovered Off Venice, Italy

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Notes: A Presumed Greek Stone Anchor Stock Recovered Off Venice, Italy

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Notes: A Presumed Greek Stone Anchor Stock Recovered Off Venice, Italy

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology (2006) 35.

A Presumed Greek Stone Anchor Stock Recovered off Venice,

identification cannot prove the exact quarry of

Results of petrographic examination

You might also like