Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

NTSB LJ 071017 Probable Cause

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

National Transportation Safety Board Printed on : 11/19/2010 5:47:08 PM

Washington, DC 20594

Brief of Accident

Adopted 12/24/2008

DEN08LA013
File No. 24600 10/17/2007 Goodland, KS Aircraft Reg No. N31MC Time (Local): 10:10 MDT

Make/Model: Learjet / 35A Fatal Serious Minor/None


Engine Make/Model: Honeywell / TFE 731-2-2B Crew 0 0 2
Aircraft Damage: Substantial Pass 0 0 0
Number of Engines: 2
Operating Certificate(s): None
Type of Flight Operation: Business
Reg. Flight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation

Last Depart. Point: Forth Worth, TX Condition of Light: Day


Destination: Same as Accident/Incident Location Weather Info Src: Weather Observation Facility
Airport Proximity: On Airport/Airstrip Basic Weather: Instrument Conditions
Airport Name: Renner Field Lowest Ceiling: 200 Ft. AGL, Overcast
Runway Identification: 30 Visibility: 1.25 SM
Runway Length/Width (Ft): 5499 / 100 Wind Dir/Speed: 330 / 009 Kts
Runway Surface: Concrete; Snow Temperature (°C): 6
Runway Surface Condition: Dry Precip/Obscuration: Mist

Pilot-in-Command Age: 67 Flight Time (Hours)

Certificate(s)/Rating(s) Total All Aircraft: 20000


Airline Transport; Flight Instructor; Commercial; Multi-engine Land; Single-engine Land; Single-engine Sea; Helicopter Last 90 Days: 17
Total Make/Model: 7000
Instrument Ratings Total Instrument Time: UnK/Nr
Airplane

According to the flight crew, they exited the clouds approximately 250 feet above ground level, slightly left of the runway centerline.
The pilot not flying took control of the airplane and adjusted the course to the right. The airplane rolled hard to the right and when
the pilot corrected to the left, the airplane rolled hard to the left. The airplane impacted the ground in a right wing low attitude,
resulting in substantial damage. Further examination and testing revealed anomalies with the yaw damper and spoileron computer. According
to the manufacturer, these anomalies would not have prevented control of the airplane. Greater control wheel displacement and force to
achieve a desired roll rate when compared with an operative spoileron system would be required. The result would be a slightly higher
workload for the pilot, particularly in turbulence or crosswind conditions. An examination of the remaining systems revealed no anomalies.
Updated at Dec 24 2008 10:30AM
Brief of Accident (Continued)

DEN08LA013
File No. 24600 10/17/2007 Goodland, KS Aircraft Reg No. N31MC Time (Local): 10:10 MDT

Occurrence #1: LOSS OF CONTROL - IN FLIGHT


Phase of Operation: LANDING - FLARE/TOUCHDOWN

Findings
1. FLT CONTROL SYST,WING SPOILER SYSTEM - INOPERATIVE
2. MISCELLANEOUS,BOLT/NUT/FASTENER/CLAMP/SPRING - MISSING
3. (C) AIRCRAFT CONTROL - NOT MAINTAINED - PILOT IN COMMAND
----------

Occurrence #2: IN FLIGHT COLLISION WITH TERRAIN/WATER


Phase of Operation: LANDING - FLARE/TOUCHDOWN

Findings
4. TERRAIN CONDITION - GROUND

Findings Legend: (C) = Cause, (F) = Factor


__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows.
The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during the landing.

You might also like