The Importance of The IPs
The Importance of The IPs
The Importance of The IPs
The culture of indigenous peoples have long existed even before the development of the modern social
sciences. As the international body of the United Nations developed the Sustainable Development
Goals (SDG), indigenous communities have longed practiced a way of life that is embodies
environmental sustainability and grounded production (insert citation). Even so, indigenous
communities while at a minority remains stumped in economic poverty and health insecurity.
-They are descendants of a people which lived in the region prior to the arrival of settlers coming in from
the outside, settlers who have since become the dominant population;
-they have maintained a culture which is different in significant respects from that of the dominant
population;
-they are, as a group, in an inferior position in the country concerned, in political and economic aspects.
-The term ‘‘indigenous’’ has emerged in practice over the years and (like the term ‘‘peoples’’) has no
accepted definition. Usually, a group is defined as indigenous group if it fulfils any of the following
criteria (Eide, 1988: 28):
-The culture of indigenous peoples have long existed even before the development of the modern social
sciences.
-Even so, indigenous communities while at a minority remains stumped in economic poverty and health
insecurity.
-Worldwide, there are about 370 million Indigenous Peoples and ethnic minorities living in more than 90
countries worldwide.
-INDIGENOUS PEOPLES are inheritors and practitioners of unique cultures and ways of relating to others,
and to the environment.
From India to Peru, indigenous women are less likely to use healthcare facilities for childbirth
because of discrimination, mistreatment, and a lack of respect for cultural practices.
The Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples draws attention to the needs and rights of
indigenous women and calls for action to protect them from violence.
The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) was adopted by
the General Assembly on Thursday, 13 September 2007, by a majority of 144 states in favour, 4
votes against (Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States) and 11 abstentions
(Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Burundi, Colombia, Georgia, Kenya, Nigeria, Russian
Federation, Samoa and Ukraine).Click here to view the voting record.
Years later the four countries that voted against have reversed their position and now support
the UN Declaration. Today the Declaration is the most comprehensive international instrument
on the rights of indigenous peoples. It establishes a universal framework of minimum standards
for the survival, dignity and well-being of the indigenous peoples of the world and it elaborates
on existing human rights standards and fundamental freedoms as they apply to the specific
situation of indigenous peoples.
The culture of indigenous peoples have long existed even before the development of the modern social
sciences. As the international body of the United Nations developed the Sustainable Development
Goals (SDG), indigenous communities have longed practiced a way of life that is embodies
environmental sustainability and grounded production (insert citation). Even so, indigenous
communities while at a minority remains stumped in economic poverty and health insecurity.
The indigenous peoples have been called many names throughout the literature: indies, natives,
cultural minorities, national minorities, ethnic groups, and more. This section will explore the social
history of its literature and why the various definitions related to indigenous peoples remain
controversial.
The term “indigenous” has prevailed as a generic term for many years. In some countries, there may be
preference for other terms including tribes, first peoples/nations, aboriginals, ethnic groups, adivasi,
janajati.
Occupational and geographical terms like hunter-gatherers, nomads, peasants, hill people, etc., also
exist and for all practical purposes can be used interchangeably with “indigenous peoples”.
ABORIGINALS
NOTE: The Latin name was variously interpreted by ancient authors, though modern etymologies tend
to claim that the word is a parasynthetic derivative from the phrase ab origine, "from the beginning/first
appearance."
1. Aboriginal refers to a group of people who first inhabited the land, WHILE
Indigenous refers to the original inhabitants of a particular place.
2. Aboriginal is mainly used to refer to indigenous people of Australia and Canada, WHILE
Indigenous is used to refer to indigenous people of many countries
3. Aboriginal may have negative association, WHILE
Indigenous, the more accepted, politically correct term
INDIANS
Exploration of these regions by European powers first began in the late 15th century and early
16th century led by the Portuguese explorers. The Portuguese described the entire region they
discovered as the Indies.
The MŽtis in Canada are recognized by the constitution as a separate ÒaboriginalÓ people, a
designation that might not be accepted internationally. Some indigenous groups have absorbed
a relatively large number of nonindigenous people. Such racial mixture, on its own, is not seen
as ending the indigenous status of the collectivity.
NOTE: Almost everywhere the indigenous peoples are easily identifiable as distinct from settler
or mestizo population
“regarded as indigenous on account of their descent from the populations which inhabited the country,
or a geographical region to which the country belongs, at the time of conquest or colonisation.”
- It has been changed since then, and many other organizations gave their own definitions like World
Bank.
Self- identification as indigenous peoples at the individual level and accepted by the community
as their member.
Historical continuity with pre-colonial and/or pre-settler societies
Strong link to territories and surrounding natural resources
Distinct social, economic or political systems
Distinct language, culture and beliefs
Form non-dominant groups of society
Resolve to maintain and reproduce their ancestral environments and systems as distinctive
peoples and communities.
According to the UN, the most fruitful approach is to identify, rather than define indigenous
peoples. This is based on the fundamental criterion of self-identification as underlined in a
number of human rights documents.
In many cases, the notion of being termed “indigenous” has negative connotations and some
people may choose not to reveal or define their origin. Others must respect such choices, while
at the same time working against the discrimination of indigenous peoples.
RATIONALE
History brush up
“All lands of the public domain, waters, minerals, coal, petroleum, and other mineral oils, all
forces of potential energy, fisheries, forests or timber, wildlife, flora or fauna, and other natural
resources are owned by the State.”
RA 8371
“An Act to Recognize, Protect and Promote the Rights of Indigenous Cultural Communities/
Indigenous Peoples, Creating a National Commission on Indigenous Peoples, Establishing
implementing mechanisms, Appropriating funds therefor and for other purposes”
October 29, 1997
1. Recognize, Protect and Promote the Rights of Indigenous Cultural Communities/ Indigenous
Peoples,
2. Appropriating funds therefor and for other purposes
3. Create a National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP)
4. Establish implementing mechanisms
3. Through resistance to political, social and cultural inroads of colonization, became historically
differentiated from majority of Filipinos
4. continuously lived as organized community on a communally bounded and defined territory under
claim of ownership since time immemorial
Ancestral Domain: under claim of
ownership by themselves/ through
their ancestors since time
immemorial, continuously up to
present (UNLESS, interrupted by
force majeure or force, stealth, deceit,
government projects)
Ancestral Domain: under claim of
ownership by themselves/ through
their ancestors since time
immemorial, continuously up to
present (UNLESS, interrupted by
force majeure or force, stealth,
deceit, government projects)
Ancestral Domain: under claim of
ownership by themselves/ through
their ancestors since time
immemorial, continuously up to
present (UNLESS, interrupted by
force majeure or force, stealth,
deceit, government projects)
Ancestral Domain: under claim of
ownership by themselves/ through
their ancestors since time
immemorial, continuously up to
present (UNLESS, interrupted by
force majeure or force, stealth,
deceit, government projects)
Ancestral Domain: under claim of
ownership by themselves/ through
their ancestors since time
immemorial, continuously up to
present (UNLESS, interrupted by
force majeure or force, stealth,
deceit, government projects)
Ancestral Domain: under claim of
ownership by themselves/ through
their ancestors since time
immemorial, continuously up to
present (UNLESS, interrupted by
force majeure or force, stealth,
deceit, government projects)
Ancestral Domain: under claim of
ownership by themselves/ through
their ancestors since time
immemorial, continuously up to
present (UNLESS, interrupted by
force majeure or force, stealth,
deceit, government projects)