Modules Final
Modules Final
Modules Final
POLYTECHNIC STATE
Sta. COLLEGE
Maria Campus
MODULE
OVERVIEW on the MODULES for The Assessment in Learning I
MODULE
To keep you on track for the best use of the modules in Assessment in
Learning I, the study schedule is hereby presented for you to follow:
MODULE
ABCD of the Statement Self-Check instructor. You must have to
of objectives Activity get a perfect score before
Writing Learning proceeding to the next activity,
Objectives if not re-read the activity and
have a re-take.
Answer Answer the questions asked
questions in the in the study guide. Write your
Study Guide answers in short bond papers
for compilation.
Week 6 Module 3. Designing and Read Information Research more information or
to 9 Developing Assessments on the identified details regarding the topics.
topics in module Take note of the important
Types of Teacher-made 3 points and Write in your
Tests Notebook for Assessment in
Table of Specifications Learning 1.
Assessment
Answer/Perform Work on the intended
Development Cycle
the Intended learning activity / in-text
Test Item Formulation
Learning Activity questions and submit to your
Item Analysis
instructor. Place answers in
Reliability
an Activity Notebook.
Validity
Answer/research Work on the assignment then
/perform the submit to your instructor on
Assignment the specified date. Written
assignments will be placed in
an Assignment Notebook.
Answer Compare answers with the
Assessment or answer key from your
Self-Check instructor. You must have to
Activity get a perfect score before
proceeding to the next activity,
if not re-read the activity and
have a re-take.
Answer Answer the questions asked
questions in the in the study guide. Write your
Study Guide answers in short bond papers
for compilation.
Week Module 4. Analysis and Read Information Research more information or
10 to Interpretation of assessment on the identified details regarding the topics.
15 results topics in module Take note of the important
Presentation of 4 points and Write in your
Assessment Results Notebook for Assessment in
a. Textual Learning 1.
b. Tabular
Answer/Perform Work on the intended
c. Graphical
the Intended learning activity / in-text
Learning Activity questions and submit to your
Quantitative Analysis
instructor. Place answers in
and Interpretation
an Activity Notebook.
a. Levels of
measurement Answer/research Work on the assignment then
b. Measures of /perform the submit to your instructor on
Central Assignment the specified date. Written
Tendency assignments will be placed in
c. Measures of an Assignment Notebook.
Variability Answer Compare answers with the
d. Measures of Assessment or answer key from your
relative Self-Check instructor. You must have to
Position Activity get a perfect score before
proceeding to the next activity,
MODULE
if not re-read the activity and
have a re-take.
Answer Answer the questions asked
questions in the in the study guide. Write your
Study Guide answers in short bond papers
for compilation.
Week Module 5. Feedbacking and Read Information Research more information or
16 to Communicating Assessment on the identified details regarding the topics.
18 Results topics in module Take note of the important
5 points and Write in your
Qualitative Evaluation Notebook for Assessment in
Constructive Learning 1.
Feedbacking
Answer/Perform Work on the intended
Self-assessment
the Intended learning activity / in-text
Peer Evaluation
Learning Activity questions and submit to your
instructor. Place answers in
an Activity Notebook.
Answer/research Work on the assignment then
/perform the submit to your instructor on
Assignment the specified date. Written
assignments will be placed in
an Assignment Notebook.
Answer Compare answers with the
Assessment or answer key from your
Self-Check instructor. You must have to
Activity get a perfect score before
proceeding to the next activity,
if not re-read the activity and
have a re-take.
Answer Answer the questions asked
questions in the in the study guide. Write your
Study Guide answers in short bond papers
for compilation.
V. COURSE EVALUATION:
To pass the course, you must:
1. Submit all course requirements to include the following:
a. Activity Notebook with answers of the in-text questions
given in the five modules;
b. Assignment Notebook or Assignment Outputs
c. Evaluation Activities (checklist or self-test)
d. Compilation of Answers to the Study Guide for the five
modules.
2. Pass all examinations:
a. Quizzes
b. Midterm examination
c. Final examination
MODULE
There are a number of symbols in this module to guide you as you study:
This tells you there is an Intended Learning Activity for you to accomplish.
This tells you of the study guide for you to work upon.
MODULE
STEP 1
STEP 2
STEP 3
STEP 4
STEP 5
STEP 6
Welcome to MODULE 1:
Introduction to Educational Assessment and Recent Trends
MODULE
This module is designed for you who are enrolled in Assessment for
Learning 1. This is the first of a series of modules that will help and assist
you become an expert pre-service educator.
YOU WILL STUDY THE FOLLOWING TOPICS IN THIS MODULE:
1. Basic principles in educational assessment
2. Importance of assessment
3. Types of assessment
4. Users of educational assessment
5. Concepts on measurement, testing and evaluation
6. Types and distinction of tests
7. High quality assessment components
8. Recent trends related to educational assessments
Let us now proceed with the module, remember our study guide and
follow our study schedule.
BASIC PRINCIPLES IN EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT
What is assessment?
Derived from the Latin word “assidere” which means “to sit beside” (Wiggins,
1993).
The process of gathering evidence of student’s performance over a period of
time to determine learning and mastery of skills.
According to Linn and Miller (2005) assessment is any of a variety of
procedure used to obtain information about student performance
It refers to the full range of information gathered and synthesized by
teachers about their students and their classrooms (Arends, 1994).
It is a method of analyzing and evaluating student achievement or program
The overall goal of assessment is to improve student learning and provide
students, parents and teachers with reliable information regarding student
progress and extent of attainment of the expected learning outcomes.
IMPORTANCE OF ASSESSMENT
To find out what the students know (knowledge)
To find out what the students can do, and how well they can do it (skill;
performance)
MODULE
To find out how students go about the task of doing their work (process)
To find out how students feel about their work (motivation, effort)
APPROACHES TO ASSESSMENT
Assessment FOR learning is referred to as formative assessment,
assessment that is given during learning process. Assessment FOR learning
is the use of a task or an activity for the purpose of determining student
progress during a unit or block of instruction.
Assessment OF learning usually given at the end of a unit, grading period
or a term; it is meant to assess learning. It is referred to as Summative
assessment
Assessment AS learning is associated with self and peer assessment,
students get to assess their own work with the use of scoring rubrics or their
own targets. These tasks offer students the chance to set their own personal
goals and advocate for their own learning.
Activity # 1.
1. Create a concept map on the approaches to assessment.
Assignment # 1.
1. Discuss how educational assessment are being utilized by the listed users.
2. As a student, how do the different types of assessment affect you? Which do you
think must be given the greater weight and emphasis?
3. Research on the nature, purposes, relevance and roles of educational assessments?
COMMON TERMINOLOGIES
Measurement
A quantitative description of an object’s characteristic or attribute.
MODULE
It is a process of assigning numerals to objects, quantities or events in
order to give quantitative meaning to such qualities.
It is the process of determining or describing the attributes or
characteristics of physical objects generally in terms of quantity.
Measurement can be objective (as in testing) or subjective (as in
perceptions).
Testing
A formal, systematic procedure for gathering information. (Russell and
Airasian, 2012)
A tool comprised of a set of questions administered during a fixed
period of time under comparable conditions for all students. (miller,
Linn & Gronlund, 2009)
Educational tests may be used to measure the learning progress of a
student which is formative in purpose, or comprehensive covering a
more extended time frame which is summative.
Tests are traditional and are the most dominant form of assessment.
Evaluation
It is the process of judging the quality of a performance or course of
action (Russell and Airasian, 2012)
Adds the ingredient of value judgment to assessment. It is concerned
with the application of its findings and implies some judgement of the
effectiveness, social utility or desirability of a product, process or
progress in terms of carefully defined and agreed upon objectives or
values.
Includes recommendations for constructive action, thus, evaluation is
a qualitative measure of the prevailing situation and calls for evidence
of effectiveness, suitability or goodness of the program
The end result of evaluation is to adopt, reject or revise what has been
evaluated.
Evaluations are often divided into two broad categories: Formative
and Summative.
MODULE
phrased appropriately
3. Performance - activities that require students to demonstrate skills
tests / or ability to perform specific actions
performance - include performance-based activity, inquiry tasks,
assessment demonstration tasks, exhibits, presentation tasks,
capstone performances.
- the tasks are designed to be authentic, meaningful,
in-depth and multidimensional, however, cost and
efficiency are some of the drawbacks.
According to 1. objective test - can be corrected and quantified quite easily
Ease of - Scores can be readily compared
Quantification - the test items have a single or specific convergent
Response response
- includes alternative response, multiple choice,
completion, matching items
MODULE
choice items used to distinguish between students
2. non- - prepared by teachers who may not be adept at the
standardized principles of test construction
test - usually administered to one or a few classes to
measure subject or course achievement
- one or several test formats are used, hence items
may not be entirely objective
- scores are not subjected to any statistical procedure
to determine reliability
- It is not intended to be used repeatedly for a long
time
- there are no established standards for scoring and
interpreting results
According to 1. Tests that - are evaluative instruments that measure a student’s
Mode of yield norm- performance in relation to the performance of a group
Interpreting referenced on the same test. Comparisons are made and the
Results interpretations student’s relative position is determined.
- examples are teacher made survey tests and
interest inventories
- standardized achievement tests also fall under this
type
2. tests that - describe each student’s performance against an
allow criterion- agreed upon or pre-established criterion or level of
referenced performance. The criterion is not actually a cut-off
interpretation score but rather the domain of subject matter – the
range of well-defined instructional objectives or
outcomes.
According to 1. Personality - developed in 1920s, initially intended to aid in the
nature of tests selection of personnel in the armed forces
answer - it has no right or wrong answer, but it measures
one’s personality and behavior style
- it is used in recruitment as it aids employers in
determining how a potential employee will respond to
various work-related activities
- it is used in career guidance, in individual and
relationship counselling and in diagnosing
personality disorders
- in schools, it determines personality strengths and
weaknesses
2. achievement - measure students’ learning as a result of
tests instruction and training experiences
- when used summatively, they serve as basis for
promotion to the next grade
3. aptitude test - determines a students’ potential to learn and do
new tasks
- a career aptitude test aids in choosing the best line
of work for an individual based on his/her skills and
interests
MODULE
- contain items on verbal comprehension,
quantitative and abstract reasoning, among others, in
accordance with some recognized theory of
intelligence
- intelligence test taps into the three independent
aspects of intelligence: analytic, practical and creative
5. Sociometric - Measures interpersonal relationships in a social
test group
- introduce in the 1930s, the test allows learners to
express their preferences in terms of likes and
dislikes for other members of the group
- it includes peer nomination, peer rating and
sociometric rankings of social acceptance
6. trade or - assesses an individual’s knowledge, skills and
vocational test competence in a particular occupation
- a trade test may consist of a theory and a practical
test. Upon successful completion of the test, the
individual is given certification for qualification
- trade test can likewise be used to determine the
fruitfulness of training programs
FUNCTIONS OF TESTING
A. Instructional Functions
1. Tests facilitate the clarification of meaningful learning objectives.
2. Tests provide a means of feedback to the instructor and the student.
3. Tests can motivate learning.
4. Tests can facilitate learning.
5. Tests are useful means of overlearning.
B. Administrative Functions
1. Tests provide a mechanism of quality control.
2. Tests facilitate better classification and placement decisions.
3. Tests can increase the quality of selection decisions.
4. Tests can be a useful means of accreditation, mastery or
certification.
D. Guidance Functions
1. Tests can be of value in diagnosing an individual’s special aptitudes
and abilities.
MODULE
Activity # 2.
1. Using a Venn Diagram, present and discuss the relationship of
measurement, test and evaluation
2. Make at least three (3) memes each for formative and summative
evaluations. Give explanations for each meme.
Assignment # 2.
1. With suitable examples, Compare and contrast formative and summative
evaluations.
2. Distinguish between Assessment, Measurement and Evaluation.
3. Distinguish between objective and subjective type of measurement.
4. Surf the internet for other types and kinds of test and provide explanations
and examples of each.
5. Discuss the enumerated functions of testing by providing examples for
each item.
Assessment/Self-Check 1:
Inform/notify your instructor/professor that you are ready to take the
assessment or self-check activity through the group chat created for this class.
Instructions and the test/assessment questions will be provided to you upon receipt of
the notification.
MODULE
The following are the criteria for ensuring high-quality classroom
assessments:
1. Clear and appropriate learning targets or instructional objectives.
Teachers should always remember that a learning target should include both
what students should know and can do, and the criteria for judging student
performance. The one who is assessing should determine if the targets are at
the right level of difficulty to motivate students, if there is adequate balance
with different types of targets and if the targets are consistent with the
overall goals and the goals of the school. Also, it must be emphasized that
the targets should be comprehensive, covering all major dimensions that
require change and feedback. Moreover, the criteria for judging performance
should be clear.
MODULE
7. Practicality and efficiency. From the three qualities of a good test, validity,
reliability and usability, the latter is the counterpart of practicality and
efficiency. The only difference is that in usability, the factors involved are
time, money and effort. It is very important to balance these aspects of
assessment with other criteria earlier mentioned. Time is very precious with
teachers. It may be best to think of other forms of assessment tool if the one
being used takes away too much time from instruction or energy needed for
other activities. Other factors to consider include familiarity with the method
of assessment, the time required of students to complete the assessments,
the complexity of administering the assessment, the ease of scoring, the ease
of interpretation and the cost.
To set up a useful assessment system, we must begin with a clear notion of what to
measure, how to measure and why we want to measure in the first place. Only then it
will be possible for us to devise the best possible way to capture the attributes so as to
fulfill our purposes and needs.
Activity # 3.
In a concept map, present the criteria for ensuring high quality classroom assessment.
Assignment # 3.
1. Research on the importance, roles or functions of the different criteria for ensuring
high-quality classroom assessments.
2. What is motivation?
3. Compare and contrast intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation.
4. List twenty (20) terminologies related to high-quality classroom assessment and
define each.
Assessment/Self-Check 2:
Inform/notify your instructor/professor that you are ready to take the assessment or
self-check activity through the group chat created for this class. Instructions and the
test/assessment questions will be provided to you upon receipt of the notification
MODULE
1. Responsive
2. Flexible
3. Integrated
4. Informative
5. Multiple methods
6. Communicated
7. Technically sound
8. Systemic
Assignment # 4.
Research for the meaning, impact, importance/roles of the eight characteristics of the
21st Century assessment.
Standards-based Education
Outcomes-based Education
Characteristics of OBE:
It is student-centered, i.e., places the students at the center of the process
by focusing on Student Learning Outcomes (SLO)
It is faculty-driven, i.e., it encourages faculty responsibility for teaching,
assessing program outcomes and motivating participation from students;
It is meaningful, i.e., it provides data to guide the teacher in making valid
and continuing improvement in instruction and assessment activities
The Outcomes of Education:
Immediate outcomes – are competencies skills acquired upon completion of
an instruction, a subject, a grade level, a segment of the program or of the
program itself. These are referred to as instructional outcomes.
Deferred outcomes refer to the ability to apply cognitive, psychomotor and
affective skills/competencies in various situations many years after
completion of a degree program. These are referred to as institutional
outcomes
Institutional outcomes are statements of what the graduates of an
educational institution are supposed to be able to do beyond graduation.
MODULE
Program outcomes are what graduates of particular educational programs
or degree are able to do at the completion of the degree or program.
Course or subject outcomes are what students should be able to
demonstrate at the end of a course or subject.
Learning or instructional outcome are what students should be able to do
after a lesson or instruction.
Twenty-first century skills must be built on the core literacy and numeracy that all
students must master. Students need to think critically and creatively, communicate
and collaborate immediately, and work globally to be productive, accountable citizens
and leaders. These skills to be honed must be assessed, not just simply to get
numerical results but more so, to take the results of assessment as guide to take further
action.
Activity # 4.
1. Create a mind map on the 21st century assessment focusing on the main
characteristics and the sub-points of each characteristics.
2. Using a webbing graphic organizer, present the different outcomes of education.
Assessment/Self-check 3:
Inform/notify your instructor/professor that you are ready to take the assessment
or self-check activity through the group chat created for this class. Instructions and the
test/assessment questions will be provided to you upon receipt of the notification.
MODULE
- To find out how students go about the task of doing their work
(process)
- To find out how students feel about their work (motivation, effort)
Assessment FOR learning is referred to as FORmative assessment,
assessment that is given during learning process. Assessment FOR learning
is the use of a task or an activity for the purpose of determining student
progress during a unit or block of instruction
Assessment OF learning usually given at the end of a unit, grading
period or a term; it is meant to assess learning. It is referred to as
Summative assessment
Assessment AS learning is associated with self and peer assessment,
students get to assess their own work with the use of scoring rubrics
or their own targets. These tasks offer students the chance to set their
own personal goals and advocate for their own learning.
Measurement is seen as a process of assigning numbers to objects,
quantities or events in other to give quantitative meanings to such
qualities.
Evaluation is the estimation of the worth of a thing, process or
programs in order to
Evaluation could be formative or summative. The two serve different
purposes in the classroom.
A number of factors such as sampling techniques, organization,
objectivity and others must be considered for successful evaluation.
Testing is a tool comprised of a set of questions administered during a
fixed period of time under comparable conditions for all students.
(miller, Linn & Gronlund, 2009).
Functions of testing focuses on instructional; administrative; research
and evaluation and guidance
The types of tests are grouped according to:
a. Mode of Response (Oral test; Written test; Performance tests /
performance assessment)
b. Ease of Quantification Response (objective test; subjective test)
c. Mode of Administration (individual test; group test)
d. Test Constructor (standardized test; non-standardized test)
e. Mode of Interpreting Results (Tests that yield norm-referenced
interpretations; tests that allow criterion-referenced interpretation)
f. Nature of answer (Personality tests; achievement tests; aptitude test;
intelligence tests; Sociometric test; trade or vocational test)
High-quality assessment is focused on the use, consequences and
what the assessments get students to do, rather than on a detailed
inspection of the test itself.
Criteria for ensuring high quality assessment include: Clear and
appropriate learning targets or instructional objectives;
Appropriateness of assessment methods; Validity; Reliability; Fairness
/ Objectivity; Positive consequences; Practicality and efficiency.
The three qualities of a good test, validity, reliability and usability, the
latter is the counterpart of practicality and efficiency.
MODULE
The eight characteristics of 21 st century assessments are: Responsive;
Flexible; Integrated; Informative; Multiple methods; Communicated;
Technically sound and Systemic.
The characteristics of outcomes-based education include:
- It is student-centered, i.e., places the students at the center of the
process by focusing on Student Learning Outcomes (SLO)
- It is faculty-driven, i.e., it encourages faculty responsibility for teaching,
assessing program outcomes and motivating participation from students;
- It is meaningful, i.e., it provides data to guide the teacher in making valid
and continuing improvement in instruction and assessment activities
The outcomes of education include: Immediate outcomes; Deferred
outcomes; Institutional outcomes; Program outcomes; Course or
subject outcomes; Learning or instructional outcomes.
STUDY GUIDE:
Answer what is asked in the following. Place your answers in short bond papers for
compilation.
1. Define educational assessment. Give the importance and role of
assessment in the educational process.
2. What are the types of assessment? Define each.
3. Enumerate and describe at least five assessment activities conducted
in each of the type of assessment.
4. Why is understanding of what assessment provides and how it is used
important to the following: students, teachers, parents, administrators
and policy makers.
5. Define measurement. Give its importance and functions in
educational process.
6. Define testing; tests. Enumerate and discuss the types and distinction
of tests.
7. Give the functions of testing.
8. What is high-quality classroom assessment?
9. Enumerate the criteria for ensuring high-quality classroom
assessments and discuss each.
10. What are the recent trends in educational assessment? Discuss
each.
MODULE
REFERENCES:
o Azarcon, R.O. & Abanador P.D. (2009). High-Quality Classroom
Assessment Methods. TCS-Publishing House, Bulacan, Philippines
o Cajigal, Ronan M. & Mantuano, Maria Leflor D. (2014) Assessment of
Learning 2. AdriaPO0na Publishing Co. Inc. Quezon City, Philippines
o De Guzman, E.S. & Adamos, J.L., (2015) Assessment of Learning 1.
Adriana Publishing Co. Inc. Quezon City , Philippines
o Navarro, R.L., Santos, R.G., Corpuz, B.B. (2017) Assessment of
Learning 1, 2nd Ed, Lorimar Publishing, Inc., Quezon City,
Philippines
o Navarro, R.L., Santos, R.G., Corpuz, B.B. (2019) Assessment of
Learning 1, 2nd Ed, Lorimar Publishing, Inc., Quezon City,
Philippines
o Dobson, Graeme. (October 2003). A guide to Writing Competency-
Based Training Materials, National Volunter Skills Center, Retrieved
(January 10, 2019) from https://www.k4health.org.default.files
o Gagne, Robert. Conditions of Learning, Retrieved (January 2019) from
https://www.instructionaldesign.org.
o Onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/io.
o Edongami.wikispaces.com
o http://www.eduteka.org/TaxonomiaBloomDigital.php
o Dixson, D.D. & Worrell, F.C. (2016) Formative and Summative
assessment in the classroom. Theory into practice. Available online:
https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
o K12 Academics (2019) Education Assessment and evaluation.
Retrieved from https://www.k12academic.com/education-
assessment-evaluation
o McTighe, J., & Ferrara, S. (1998). Assessing Learning in the
Classroom. Student Assessment Series. NEA Professional Library,
Distribution Center, PO Box 2035, Anna Polis Junction. Available
online: https://files.eric.ed.gove/fulltext/ED429989.pdf
MODULE
Welcome to MODULE 2:
Target Setting
This module is designed for you who are enrolled in Assessment for Learning 1. This is the
second of a series of modules that will help and assist you become an expert pre-service educator.
1. Standard-based assessment
2. K-12 Assessment Guidelines
3. Characteristics of Objectives
4. Learning Domains and Objectives
5. Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (Anderson and Krathwohl, 2001)
6. SOLO Taxonomy (Briggs and Collins, 1982)
7. Marzano Taxonomy (Marzano and Kendall, 2007)
8. Principles of Good Practices in assessing Outcomes
INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES:
After studying and working with this module, you must be able to:
Are you now ready with the module? Remember our study guide and follow our
study schedule.
STANDARDS-BASED ASSESSMENT
Constructive Alignment
Constructive alignment is a principle used for devising teaching and learning activities, and
assessment tasks, that directly address the intended learning outcomes in a way not typically
achieved in traditional lectures, tutorial classes and examinations.
MODULE
DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015 released in April 1, 2015 stipulates the Policy Guidelines in Classroom
Assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. The following link will lead you to this DepEd
Order: https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DO_s2015_08.pdf
Note: Watch the video clip uploaded in your email or the group chat for this class. Answer
the following after viewing the video clip:
Make your own video clip or power point presentation about Writing Learning
Objectives /Outcomes.
The Three Types of Learning. Believing that there was more than one type of learning, Benjamin
Bloom and a committee of colleagues in 1956, identified three domains of educational activities; the
MODULE
cognitive, referring to mental skills; affective referring to growth in feelings or emotion; and
psychomotor, referring to manual or physical skills. These terms were regarded as too technical by
practicing teachers and so the domains were translated to simpler terms commonly used by
teachers: knowledge, skills and attitudes (KSA). These domains are organized into categories or
levels and arranged in hierarchical order from the simplest behavior to the most complex behavior.
To ensure that the learning outcomes are measurable, demonstrable and verifiable, the outcomes
should be stated as concrete and active verbs. In mid-nineties, a former student of Bloom, Lorin
Anderson, reviewed the cognitive domain of objectives and effected some changes. The two most
prominent of these are (a) changing the names in the six subdivisions from noun to verb and (b)
slightly re-arranging the order.
Cognitive Domain
MODULE
Research for the Bloom’s Taxonomy. Make a comparison between the revised Bloom’s
Taxonomy and the original Bloom’s Taxonomy by providing or tracing how Anderson
revised the taxonomy.
1. Factual Knowledge. This refers to essential facts, terminology, details or elements students
must know or be familiar with in order to understand a discipline or solve a problem in it.
2. Conceptual Knowledge. This refers to the interrelationship of facts. It is facts put together
within a larger structure that enable them to function together. It is knowledge of
classifications, principles, generalizations, theories, models or structures pertinent to a
particular disciplinary area.
4. Metacognitive Knowledge. This is knowing what you know. This is thinking about your own
thinking in a purposeful way. It is awareness and knowledge of one’s own cognition. It is a
reflective knowledge about how to go about solving problems and cognitive task. It includes
contextual and conditional knowledge and knowledge of self.
MODULE
Psychomotor Domain
In the early seventies, E. Simpson, Dave and A.S. Harrow recommended categories for the
Psychomotor Domain which included physical coordination, movement and use of the motor skills
body parts. Development of these skills requires constant practice in accuracy and speed. Simpson
contributed seven categories (Perception/awareness, Set, Guided Response, Mechanism – basic
proficiency, Complex Overt Response – expert, Adaptation, Origination. Dave provided five
categories (imitation, manipulation, precision, articulation, naturalization). And Harrow six
categories (Reflex Movements, Fundamental movements, Perceptual abilities, Physical abilities –
fitness, skilled movements, nondiscursive communication).
These contributions from Simpson, Dave and Harrow have been re-organized and simplified
into four categories or levels shown below.
Affective Domain
-refers to the way in which we deal with situations emotionally such as feelings, appreciation,
enthusiasm, motivation, values and attitude.
MODULE
In a column form, list the categories/levels of each domain of learning on the first column and give
the definition of each; list outcome verbs to be used for each category/level in the second column; and
write one learning outcome statement for each category/level in the third column.
OTHER TAXONOMIES
Kendall and Marzano instead of categorizing learning activities which Bloom and Anderson did,
reframed the three domains of knowledge (information, mental procedures and psychomotor
procedures) by describing six levels of processing knowledge. The first four levels of processing are
cognitive, beginning with the lowest (retrieval) then moving upward with increasing cognitive
complexity – comprehension, analysis and knowledge utilization. The fifth level of processing, the
metacognitive system, involves the learner’s specification of learning goals, monitoring of the
learner’s own learning process, clarity and accuracy of the learner’s learning. The highest level of
knowledge processing self-system, involves the learner’s examination of the importance oof learning
MODULE
task and his/her self-efficacy. It also involves the learner’s examining his/her emotional response and
his/her motivation of learning.
The structure of observed learning outcome (SOLO) taxonomy is a model that describes level of
increasing complexity in student understanding of subject. It encourages students to think about
where they are currently with their learning and what they need to do in order to progress. SOLO
taxonomy provides a simple and robust way to describe how learning outcomes grow in complexity
from surface to deep understanding.
Surf the internet for more comprehensive discussion about these other taxonomies of
learning. List other features you have discovered regarding these taxonomies.
Outcomes assessment is the process of gathering information on whether the instruction, services
and activities that the program provide are producing the desired student learning outcomes.
MODULE
1. The assessment of the students learning starts with the institution’s mission and core values.
There should be a clear statement on the kinds of learning that the institution values most
for its students.
2. Assessment works best when the program has clear statement of objectives aligned with the
institutional mission and core values.
3. Outcomes-based assessment focuses on the student activities that will still be relevant after
formal schooling concludes.
4. Assessment requires attention not only to outcomes but also and equally to the activities
and experiences that lead to the attainment of learning outcomes.
5. Assessment works best when it is continuous, ongoing and not episodic. Assessment should
be cumulative because improvement is best achieved through a linked series of activities
done over time in an instructional cycle.
6. Begin by specifying clearly and exactly what you want to assess.
7. The intended learning outcomes / lesson objective NOT CONTENT is the basis of the
assessment task. You use content in the development of the assessment tool and task but it
is the attainment of your learning outcome NOT content that you want to assess.
8. Set your criterion of success or acceptable standard of success. It is against this established
standard that you will interpret your assessment results. Example: Is a score of 7 out of 10
(the highest possible score) acceptable or considered success?
9. Make use of varied tools for assessment data-gathering and multiple sources of assessment
data. It is not pedagogically sound to rely on just one source of data gathered by only one
assessment tool. Consider multiple intelligences and learning styles.
10. Learners must be given feedback about their performances.
11. Assessment should be on real-world application and not on out-of-context drills.
12. Emphasize on the assessment of higher=order thinking.
13. Provide opportunities for self-assessment.
Describe the phases of outcomes assessment in the instructional cycle as shown in the Figure
above.
MODULE
Assessment/Self-Check.
REFERENCES:
MODULE
o Azarcon, R.O. & Abanador P.D. (2009). High-Quality Classroom Assessment Methods. TCS-
Publishing House, Bulacan, Philippines
o Cajigal, Ronan M. & Mantuano, Maria Leflor D. (2014) Assessment of Learning 2. Adriana
Publishing Co. Inc. Quezon City, Philippines
o De Guzman, E.S. & Adamos, J.L., (2015) Assessment of Learning 1. Adriana Publishing Co. Inc.
Quezon City , Philippines
o Navarro, R.L., Santos, R.G., Corpuz, B.B. (2017) Assessment of Learning 1, 2nd Ed, Lorimar
Publishing, Inc., Quezon City, Philippines
o Navarro, R.L., Santos, R.G., Corpuz, B.B. (2019) Assessment of Learning 1, 2nd Ed, Lorimar
Publishing, Inc., Quezon City, Philippines
o Dobson, Graeme. (October 2003). A guide to Writing Competency-Based Training Materials,
National Volunter Skills Center, Retrieved (January 10, 2019) from
https://www.k4health.org.default.files
o Gagne, Robert. Conditions of Learning, Retrieved (January 2019) from
https://www.instructionaldesign.org.
o Onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/io.
o Edongami.wikispaces.com
o http://www.eduteka.org/TaxonomiaBloomDigital.php
o Dixson, D.D. & Worrell, F.C. (2016) Formative and Summative assessment in the classroom.
Theory into practice. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
o K12 Academics (2019) Education Assessment and evaluation. Retrieved from
https://www.k12academic.com/education-assessment-evaluation
o McTighe, J., & Ferrara, S. (1998). Assessing Learning in the Classroom. Student Assessment
Series. NEA Professional Library, Distribution Center, PO Box 2035, Anna Polis Junction.
Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gove/fulltext/ED429989.pdf
Welcome to MODULE 3:
Designing and Developing Assessments
WHAT IS THE MODULE ALL ABOUT?
MODULE
This module is designed for you who are enrolled in Assessment for Learning 1. This is the
third of a series of modules that will help and assist you become an expert pre-service educator.
Let us now proceed with module 3, remember our study guide and
follow our study schedule.
ASSESSMENT TOOLS DEVELOPMENT
MODULE
conceptualization of intended student learning outcomes, (b) a description of how these outcomes
are assessed and measured, (c) a description of the results obtained from these measures, and (d) a
description of how these results validate current practices or point to changes needed to improve
student learning. Assessment – a cyclical process After you implement change, the assessment
process begins again, as you assess whether or not the changes you made had their intended effect
Assignment.
Discuss the Figure depicting the assessment development cycle..
Test Types
The figure above illustrates a general tree chart for test types. If there are other test types that do
not appear here, they may be variant of one subtype.
NOTE: Open the google drive for Educ 105 . Go through the slides in
the uploaded PowerPoint presentation on Assessment Methods for the
detailed discussion of the topic. Do the activity/activities required/asked Assessment
Methods.pptx
in the uploaded material.
Activity:
1. Answer the following questions as you focus on the tree chart presented earlier:
a. What are considered the three general types of test format? Discuss each.
b. Study the sub-type under each general type. What is the distinguishing feature of each
group?
What is expected of learners to do in each type?
2. The table below randomly lists several test types familiar to you. Create a tree chart or
concept map that organizes these types according to a grouping system you can think of. Use
TEST TYPES as your Key Concept. Provide labels for your set categories and explain your
group output.
MODULE
- A purposeful collection of student work that exhibits the student’s efforts, progress,
achievement in one or more areas,
The use of portfolio became popular in early to late 1980s in response to the growing clamor for
more reasonable and authentic means of assessing student’s growth and development in school.
Example, an accreditation of experience towards a degree.
The purpose of portfolio:
- To give students the opportunity to reflect on their growth over a period of time.
- to use as a basis for assigning grades
- Enhancing student learning
- Demonstrating progress
- showcasing student work
- documentation
Purposes of Portfolio Assessment:
- Monitor student progress.
- Assess student achievement.
- Determine student’s grades
Characteristics of portfolio
1. clearly defined purpose and learning targets
2. systematic and organized collection of student product
3. pre-established guidelines for what will be included
4. student selection of some works that will be included
5. student self-reflection and self-evaluation
progress documented with specific products and/or evaluation
6. portfolio conferences between student and teachers
Portfolio reflection contain:
as a student, your reflection should focus on:
1. what have done in the past
2. what have you learned in the past
3. what do you need to learn next?
MODULE
3. Working Portfolios
Consist of collection of day-to-day work of students.
They reflect the progress of a student in a particular area of learning.
Teachers can reflect on the effectiveness of his/her instruction through working
portfolios.
Provides opportunities to growth through self-reflection.
Working Portfolios may contain the following evidences:
1. Teacher-directed tasks
2. Teacher observations
3. Classroom activities
4. Self-assessment and self-reflections
5. Relevant learning outcomes
2. Documentation Portfolios
Collections of the best work of students assembled for assessment purposes.
Showcase the final products of student work.
Provide evidences that certain instructional goals are realized
Indicate students’ progress and weaknesses from one learning area to another.
3. Showcase Portfolios
Purposeful collections of limited amounts of student’s work.
Usually finished products to display the best he/she accomplished in a given period
May contain art projects, essay, stories, poetry, or research papers
Reflect the curriculum goals of the learning areas
Questions in Portfolio-making:
What is the purpose in making portfolio?
Who should make the portfolio?
How long will it take to assemble the entries in a portfolio?
How will it take to assemble the entries in a portfolio?
What entries will be included in the portfolio?
What criteria should be used to evaluate a portfolio?
What conclusions can be made as the result of the construction of portfolio?
How can we summarize evaluate data in a portfolio?
Activity:
SCORING RUBRICS
One of the alternative methods of rating the performance of the students aside from paper and
pencil test is the use of scoring rubrics or rubrics. Scoring rubrics are used when judging the quality
of the work of the learners on performance assessments.
SCORING RUBRICS are descriptive scoring schemes that are developed by teachers or other
evaluators to guide the analysis of the products or processes of students’ efforts (Brookhart, 1999 as
cited by Moskal, 2000).
MODULE
A rating system by which teachers can determine at what level of proficiency a student is able to
perform task or display knowledge of a concept and can define the different levels of proficiency for
each criterion (Airasian, 2000).
Important Elements of Rubrics
1. Criteria - One or more traits or dimensions that serve as the basis for judging the student
response.
2. Levels of performance - A scale of values on which to rate each dimension.
3. Descriptors Spell out what is expected of students at each level of performance for each
criterion.
Guidelines in Developing Rubrics
1. Identify the qualities and attributes that the teacher wishes to observe in students outputs
that would demonstrate their level of proficiency.
2. Decide what type of rubric to use, whether analytic or holistic.
3. Identify and define the standards of excellence for lowest level of performance.
4. Test whether the scoring rubrics is "reliable" by asking two or more teachers to score the
same set of projects or outputs and correlate their individual assessments.
Ways in Developing Rubrics
- Talk with colleagues.
- Gather sample rubrics.
- Keep it short and simple. Ideally, the entire rubric should fit on one sheet of paper.
- Each rubric item should focus on a different skill.
- Focus on how students develop and express their learning.
- Begin with describing the highest (or lowest) level. After you write the descriptors for the
highest level, note the words in that box that will vary from one student performance to
another. These words will be the one that you will be the one that you will change as you
write the next levels.
- As much as possible, avoid odd numbers in the rating scale. (Studies show the evaluators
tend to choose the neutral middle grade more often in odd numbered scales.
TYPES OF RUBRICS
1. HOLISTIC RUBRIC - A type of rubrics that requires the teacher to score the overall process or
product as a whole (Nitko, 2001; Mertler, 2001)
2. ANALYTIC RUBRIC - A type of rubric that provides information regarding performance in each
component part of a task, making it useful for diagnosing specific strengths and weaknesses of the
learners (Gareis and Grant, 2008).
ADVANTAGES OF USING THE RUBRICS
1. Allows assessment to become more objective and consistent;
2. Clarifies the criteria in specific terms;
3. Clearly shows the student how the work will be evaluated and what is expected;
4. Promotes students’ awareness of the criteria to be used in assessing peer performance;
5. Provides useful feedback regarding the effectiveness of the instruction; and
6. Provides benchmarks against which to measure and document progress.
DEVELOPMENT OF SCORING RUBRICS
Mertler (2001) suggested the different steps in developing rubrics used in the assessment of
performances, process, products or both process and product, for classroom use, in his article
“Designing Scoring Rubrics for Your Classroom.”
1. Reexamine the learning objectives to be addressed by the task.
2. Identify specific observable attributes that you want to see (as well as those you don’t want
to see) your students demonstrate in their product, process, or performance.
MODULE
3. Brainstorm characteristics that describe each attribute.
For holistic rubrics, write thorough narrative descriptions for excellent work and poor
work incorporating each attribute into the description.
For analytic rubrics, write thorough narrative descriptions for excellent work and poor
work for each individual attribute.
For holistic rubric, complete the rubric by describing other levels on the continuum
that ranges from excellent to poor work for the collective attributes.
For analytic rubric, complete the rubric by describing other levels on the continuum
that ranges from excellent to poor work for each attribute.
4. Collect samples of student work that exemplifying each level.
5. Revise the rubric, as necessary
Activity:
1. With a particular learning outcome in mind, construct a scoring rubric both holistic and
analytic.
MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES:
A theory states that we all experience and make sense of the
word through senses. The strengths each individual
possesses are different, as are the ways we use them to solve
problems.
Three categories of multiple intelligences;
- One’s ability to create a product of service valuable
to society
- A skill set used to solve problem
- And one’s potential to learn and find creative
solutions
Learners have multiple intelligences and varied learning
styles. Students must be given the opportunity to
demonstrate learning that is aligned to their multiple
intelligences and to their learning styles. It is good for
teachers to consider the multiple intelligences of learners to
demonstrate learning in a manner which makes them feel
comfortable and successful. Teachers truly consider learners’
multiple intelligences when they make use of a variety of
assessment tools.
MODULE
Compile numerical data, analyze data, and draw conclusions
Logical-Mathematical intelligence is the ability to calculate, quantify, consider
propositions and hypotheses, and carry out complete mathematical operations
It enables us to percieve relationships and connections and to use abstract, symbolic
thought; sequential reasoning skills;and inductive and deductive thingking patterns
Logical intelligence is usually well developed in mathematicians, scientists, and
detectives.
3. Bodily – Kinesthetic
Dramatize a situation or scene (active role playing)
Represent target concepts with body language and physical movement
Show relationships through Dance.
Bodily-Kinesthetic intelligence is the capacity to manipulate objects and use a variety
of physical skills.
4.Visual – Spatial
Create diagrams and charts representing target content
Build puzzles with graphic elements to reinforce critical concepts
Draw pictures or take photos construct a visual essay related to the unit of study
Spatial intelligence is the ability to think in three dimensions.
Core capacities includes mental imagery, spatial reasoning , image manipulation,
graphic and artistic skills, and an active imagination
5. Naturalist / Naturalistic
Record outdoor observations that serve as representative analogies for identified concepts
or target vocabulary
Develop a project that involves flora or fauna
Draw observations of the natural world
Naturalist intelligence designates the human ability to discriminate among living
things (plants,animals) as well as sensitivity to other features of the natural world
(clouds, rock configurations).
This ability was clearly of value in our evolutionary past as hunters, gatherers, and
farmers; it continues to be central in such roles as botanist or chef.
It is also speculated that much of our consumer society exploits the naturalist
intelligences, which can be mobilized in the discrimination among cars, sneakers,
kinds of makeup, and the like.
6. Musical – Rhythmical
Write a song with lyrics related to the unit of study
Present a rhythmical representations of target vocabulary, phrases, or “chunks” of language
Share an original rap song that reinforces important ideas in the unit
Musical intelligence is the capacity to discern pitch, rhythm, and tone.
This intelligence enable us to recognize, create, reproduce, and reflect on music, as
demonstrated by composer, conductors, musicians, vocalist, and sensitive listeners.
7. Interpersonal
Group story board to share unit concepts
Participation in short teaching episodes
Interviewing others to learn more about the target content
Interpersonal intelligence is the ability to understand and interact effectively with
others.
It involves effective verbal communication, to note distinction among others,sensitivity
to the moods and temperaments of others, and the ability to entertain multiple
perspective
MODULE
8. Intrapersonal
Samples from journal writing
Self-evaluation of selected items
Sketches (pictorial or linguistic) that relate personal experiences to target content
Intra-personal Intelligence is the capacity to understand oneself and one’s thoughts
and feelings, and to use such knowledge in planning and derectioning one’s life.
Intra-personal Intelligence involves not only an appreciation of the self, but also of the
human condition.
Assignment:
1. How do multiple intelligences affect assessment practice?
Assessment/Self-Check.
Inform/notify your instructor/professor that you are ready to take the assessment or
self-check activity through the group chat created for this class. Instructions and the
test/assessment questions will be provided to you upon receipt of the notification.
MODULE
*Analysis- breaking materials down into its parts and explaining the hierarchical relations.
*Synthesis producing something original after having broken the material down into its component
parts.
* Evaluation making a judgment based upon a pre-established set of criteria
2. Deciding on the Type of Test to be prepared. The test objective guides the kind of test that
will be designed and constructed by the teacher. For instance, for the first four levels, we may want
to construct a multiple-choice type of test while for application and judgment, we may opt to give an
essay test.
4. Constructing the Draft of the Test Items. The actual construction of the test items
follows the TOS. As a general rule, it is advised that the actual number of items to be constructed in
the draft should be double the desired number of items. The subsequent try-out and item analysis
will most likely eliminate many of the constructed items in the draft (either they are too difficult,
too easy or non-discrimination).
5. Trying Out and Validating. The test draft is tried out to a group of pupils. The purpose
of this try out is to determine the: a) item characteristics through item analysis and b)
characteristics of the test itself-validity, reliability and practicality.
Relating test types with levels of learning outcomes: A review of curricular frameworks of
educational systems across various countries shows common integral domains that govern
their content and performance standards in different subject areas. Basic in all are:
Knowledge, Skills and Processes, Understanding, Product, Affect (attitudes and values). The
assessment of these domains is realized by the appropriate selection and alignment of test
types and assessment tasks to their respective foci of learning.
Nitko (2001) gives categories of these lower-order thinking skills and some examples of
generic questions for assessing them as presented in the table below. The generic questions can be
useful in formatting completion or short answer items to assess simple understanding:
MODULE
Low-level Thinking Skills Examples of Generic Questions
Knowledge of terminologies What is a________?
Knowledge of specific facts When did ________happen?
Knowledge of conventions Where are ___________usually found?
Knowledge of trends and sequences Name the stage in ____________?
Knowledge of classifications and categories Which ____ does not belong with the others?
Knowledge of criteria By what criterion will you use to judge ____?
Knowledge of methods, principles and techniques When ___ increases, what happens to ____?
Comprehension What do you mean by the expression ________?
Simple interpretations What makes ________ interesting?
Solving numerical problems Use the data above to find __________?
Manipulating symbols equations Show that __________ equals ________
The Table below illustrates the relationships between learning outcomes and test types. can be
observed that tests types can be made flexible and versatile to test different levels of outcomes and
not to be limited or exclusive to only one cognitive level. The arrow suggests that supply or selection
MODULE
type can be used for both lower-level as well as higher-level outcomes. Knowledge and simple
understanding can be handled by objective supply type - i.e., completion and short answer items and
objective selection type – i.e. alternate choice, multiple choice and matching.
The sample stems presented in the table below which are categories of thought for deep
understanding (miller, Linn & Gronlund 2009) can be used in constructing test types, i.e., both supply
and selection type, that can elicit complex thinking skills. These types are used appropriately to essay
MODULE
types, either restricted or extended, which requires students to engage in various higher order
thinking processes.
COMPLEX THINKING SKILLS
Types of Thought Questions Sample Item Stems
Comparing Describe the similarities and differences between . . .
Relating cause and effect What are major causes of. . .?
What would be the most likely effects of . . .?
Justifying Which of the following alternatives would you favor and why?
Explain why you agree or disagree with the following statement.
Summarizing State the main points included in...
Briefly summarize the content of…
Generalizing Formulate several generalizations form the following data…
State a set of principles that can explain the following events:
Inferring In light of the facts presented, what is most likely to happen when…
How would Senator X be likely to react to the following issue?
Explaining Why did the candle go out shortly after it was covered by the jar?
Explain what the president meant when he said, “The buck stops with me”.
Persuading Write a letter to the principal to get approval for a class field trip to the
state capital.
Why the student newspaper should be allowed to decide what should be
printed without prior approval from teachers?
Classifying Group the following items according to…
What do the following items have in common?
Creating List as many ways as you can think of for…
Make up a story describing what would happen if…
Applying a principle Using the principle of … as a guide, describe how you would solve the
following situation.
Describe a situation that illustrates the principle of…
Performance tasks likewise assess higher-level learning outcomes involving complex thought
processes, e.g., analyzing, evaluating and creating. Angelo & Cross (1993) have extensively designed
classroom assessment tasks (CATs) for college level that are performance-based type in nature.
Some examples from their inventory are presented in the table below.
MODULE
2. Consider the type of response you want. Selected-response items like multiple choice, true-
false, and matching items require their answers to be picked from a list of options.
Constructed-response items like fill-in-the-blank, short answer, and essay items are provided
entirely by the student, and also include performance assessments and portfolios. Careful
consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of each type, along with the nature of the
objective you wish to assess, should be given before deciding which types of items to use
MODULE
- Make efforts to avoid unexpected interruptions
- Clarify students’ questions about the test without dropping hints
- Discourage all forms of cheating
Activity:
1. Construct a sample TOS for the midterm and final examination of EDUC 105.
2. Construct 10 item test for each of the types of assessment strategies based on the
topics learned in Modules 1, 2 and 3 of Educ 105. Provide an Answer Key test
items
Assignment:
Discuss the important steps in planning for a test giving emphasis on its importance,
procedures
and purposes.
Assessment/Self-Check.
Inform/notify your instructor/professor that you are ready to take the assessment or
self-check
activity through the group chat created for this class. Instructions and the
test/assessment
questions will be provided to you upon receipt of the notification
Item Analysis
A process which examines student response to individual test items (questions) in order to
assess the quality of those items and of the test as a whole.
It is a statistical technique which is used for selecting and rejecting the items of the test on
the basis of their difficulty value and discriminated power.
It provides the following:
1. the difficulty of the item or item difficulty
2. The discriminating power of the item
3. The affective of each alternative (for multiple choice type of test)
Difficulty Index
It refers to the ease or difficulty of a test item. It is defined as the number of students who are
able to answer the item correctly divided by the total number of students. The item difficulty is
usually expressed in percentage.
Formula: P = R/T
where: P – difficulty index
R – number of students with correct answers
T – total number of students
MODULE
Discrimination Index
The item’s ability to distinguish between those who know the answer and those who are merely
guessing.
It is the difference between the proportion of the top scorers who got an item correct and the
proportion of the lowest scorers who got the item right.
The discrimination index range is between -1 and +1. The closer the discrimination index is to +1, the
more effectively the item can discriminate or distinguish between the two groups of students. A
negative discrimination index means more from the lower group got the item correctly.
a. Positively discriminating item – proportion of high scoring group is greater than that of the
low scoring group
b. Negatively discriminating item – proportion of high scoring group is less than that of the low
scoring group
c. Not discriminating – proportion of high scoring group is equal to that of the low scoring
NOTE: Open the google drive for Educ 105. Go through the slides in the
uploaded PowerPoint presentation on Item Analysis and Validation for
more discussions/details regarding this topic and answer the activity Item analysis and
validation.pptx
required for you to do. If you need clarification do not hesitate to ask your
instructor.
It is the extent to which a test measure what it purports to measure or as referring to the
appropriateness, correctness, meaningfulness and usefulness of the specific decisions a teacher
makes based on the test results. A test is valid when it is aligned to the learning outcomes.
MODULE
- Divergent (or discriminant validity) occurs when constructs that are unrelated are in
reality observed not to be.
RELIABILITY
Reliability refers to the consistency of the scores obtained – how consistent they are for each
individual from one administration of an instrument to another and from one set of items to
another.
TYPES OF RELIABILITY
1. Test-retest reliability
2. Parallel forms reliability
3. inter-rater reliability
4. internal consistency reliability
NOTE: Open the google drive for Educ 105. Go through the slides in the
uploaded PowerPoint presentation on Validity and Reliability for more
VALIDITY AND
discussions/details regarding this topic and answer the activity required RELIABILITY.pptx
for you to do. If you need clarification do not hesitate to ask your
instructor.
MODULE
7. A portfolio is a “collection of a student work that has been selected and organized. A
portfolio’s content may be any of the following: 1) evidences of individual student’s work; 2)
evidences of group work.
8. Types of Portfolios: 1) Working Portfolio, 2) Documentation Portfolios, 3) Showcase
Portfolios
9. Scoring Rubrics are descriptive scoring schemes that are developed by teachers or other
evaluators to guide the analysis of the products or processes of students’ efforts (Brookhart,
1999 as cited by Moskal, 2000). It is a rating system by which teachers can determine at what
level of proficiency a student is able to perform task or display knowledge of a concept and
can define the different levels of proficiency for each criterion (Airasian, 2000
10. Types of rubrics: Holistic and Analytic
11. Multiple Intelligences: 1. Linguistic; 2. Logical – Mathematical; 3. Bodily – Kinesthetic; 4.
Visual – Spatial; 5. Naturalist / Naturalistic; 6. Musical – Rhythmical; 7. Interpersonal; 8.
Intrapersonal
12. Table of Specifications (TOS) is a plan prepared by a classroom teacher as a basis for test
construction especially a periodic test. It is a two-way chart which describes the topics to be
covered by a test and the number of items or points which will be associated with each
topic. A table of specifications (TOS) is a test map that guides the teacher in constructing a
test. It ensures that there is a balance between items that test lower order thinking skills
(LOTS) and those which higher order thinking skills (HOTS)
13. Important Steps in Planning for a Test
a. Identifying Test Objectives
b. Deciding on the Type of Test to be prepared.
c. Preparing a Table of Specifications.
d. Constructing the Draft of the Test Items.
e. Trying Out and Validating.
14. Item Analysis is a process which examines student response to individual test items
(questions) in order to assess the quality of those items and of the test as a whole. It is a
statistical technique which is used for selecting and rejecting the items of the test on the
basis of their difficulty value and discriminated power.
15. Difficulty Index refers to the ease or difficulty of a test item. It is defined as the number of
students who are able to answer the item correctly divided by the total number of students.
The item difficulty is usually expressed in percentage.
Formula: P = R/T
where: P – difficulty index
R – number of students with correct answers
T – total number of students
16. Discrimination Index is the item’s ability to distinguish between those who know the answer
and those who are merely guessing. It is the difference between the proportion of the top
scorers who got an item correct and the proportion of the lowest scorers who got the item
right. The discrimination index range is between -1 and +1. The closer the discrimination
index is to +1, the more effectively the item can discriminate or distinguish between the two
groups of students. A negative discrimination index means more from the lower group got
the item correctly.
17. Validity is the extent to which a test measure what it purports to measure or as referring to
the appropriateness, correctness, meaningfulness and usefulness of the specific decisions a
MODULE
teacher makes based on the test results. A test is valid when it is aligned to the learning
outcomes.
18. Content-related evidence of validity
- Face validity – characteristic of a test that appears to adequately measure the learning
outcomes and content. It looks at the superficial face value of the instrument.
- Instructional Validity – the extent to which an assessment is systematically sensitive to
the nature of instruction offered.
STUDY GUIDE:
Answer what is asked in the following. Place your answers in short bond papers for
compilation.
1. Enumerate the types of test and give a description for each type.
2. List the guidelines to follow in each type of test.
3. What is table of specifications? Why is it important to construct Table of Specifications?
4. What is portfolio? Compare and contrast the types of portfolio.
5. What are scoring rubrics? Why is it important to make and use a scoring rubric?
6. Why is it important to understand the multiple intelligences in the construction of
assessments??
7. Why is it important to align learning outcomes to test types?
8. Discuss comprehensively the following giving the definitions; importance/purposes/
uses; types; formulas; steps or procedures to follow using a matrix/table format:
a. Item analysis
b. Difficulty index
c. Discriminating index
d. Validity
e. Reliability
MODULE
REFERENCES:
o Azarcon, R.O. & Abanador P.D. (2009). High-Quality Classroom Assessment Methods. TCS-
Publishing House, Bulacan, Philippines
o Cajigal, Ronan M. & Mantuano, Maria Leflor D. (2014) Assessment of Learning 2. Adriana
Publishing Co. Inc. Quezon City, Philippines
o De Guzman, E.S. & Adamos, J.L., (2015) Assessment of Learning 1. Adriana Publishing Co. Inc.
Quezon City , Philippines
o Navarro, R.L., Santos, R.G., Corpuz, B.B. (2017) Assessment of Learning 1, 2nd Ed, Lorimar
Publishing, Inc., Quezon City, Philippines
o Navarro, R.L., Santos, R.G., Corpuz, B.B. (2019) Assessment of Learning 1, 2nd Ed, Lorimar
Publishing, Inc., Quezon City, Philippines
o Dobson, Graeme. (October 2003). A guide to Writing Competency-Based Training Materials,
National Volunter Skills Center, Retrieved (January 10, 2019) from
https://www.k4health.org.default.files
o Gagne, Robert. Conditions of Learning, Retrieved (January 2019) from
https://www.instructionaldesign.org.
o Onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/io.
o Edongami.wikispaces.com
o http://www.eduteka.org/TaxonomiaBloomDigital.php
o Dixson, D.D. & Worrell, F.C. (2016) Formative and Summative assessment in the classroom.
Theory into practice. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
o K12 Academics (2019) Education Assessment and evaluation. Retrieved from
https://www.k12academic.com/education-assessment-evaluation
o McTighe, J., & Ferrara, S. (1998). Assessing Learning in the Classroom. Student Assessment
Series. NEA Professional Library, Distribution Center, PO Box 2035, Anna Polis Junction.
Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gove/fulltext/ED429989.pdf
Welcome to MODULE 5:
MODULE
Feedbacking and Communicating Assessment
Results
This module is designed for you who are enrolled in Assessment for Learning 1. This is the
last of a series of modules that will help and assist you become an expert pre-service educator.
1. Constructive Feedbacking
2. K to 12 Grading of Learning Outcomes
3. Grading and Reporting Methods
4. Developing Effective Reporting System
5. Planning and Implementing Parent-Teacher Conference
6. Self-assessment
7. Peer Evaluation
INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES:
After studying and working with this module, you must be able to:
Let us now proceed with the last module, always remember our study
guide and follow our study schedule.
One of the challenges in grading is summarizing the variety of collected information from
different types of assessment and come up with a standardized numerical grade or descriptive letter
rating or brief report.
The guiding premises in developing grading and reporting systems are as follows:
In developing and implementing the grading and reporting systems, these premises must be
taken into consideration to have a meaningful output and help in the attainment of the
student learning objectives, to which the assessment objectives cascaded.
CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACKING
MODULE
Feedback is a key element of the incremental process of ongoing learning and assessment.
Providing frequent and ongoing feedback is a significant means of improving achievement in
learning. It involves the provision of information about aspects of understanding and performance
and can be given by practitioners/teachers, peers, oneself and from learners to
practitioners/teachers. Effective feedback assists the learner to reflect on their learning and their
learning strategies so they can make adjustments to make better progress in their learning .
Feedback provides the teacher and learner with evidence about current knowledge and skill
development. Understanding about the learner's progress and level of achievement enables the
teacher to make decisions about the next steps to plan in the learning program. It enables the
learner to reflect on their learning strategies to confirm them or make changes to improve their
learning.
MODULE
The process of giving feedback begins with the teacher and learner clarifying the
learning intentions (or goals) for the activities they are undertaking and the success criteria by
which they will assess the level of achievement to be demonstrated by learners. This enables the
learners to measure their performance in terms of both mastery of the set task and the
processes inherent in it. It also helps them to be clear about future goals.
Effective feedback informs the learner about their progress towards meeting the success
criteria. A useful model for feedback is presented by Hattie as ‘Feed Up, Feed Back, Feed
Forward. In this model the learner considers three questions:
Feedback is timely
Feedback needs to be timely. It needs to be given while there is still time for the learners
to act on it and to monitor and adjust their own learning. It can be ‘in-the-moment' in the case
of classroom dialogue and discussion. The teacher will receive feedback from the way learners
answer questions and the questions asked by them. In order to effectively gather evidence from
questioning about who does and who does not understand it may be necessary to vary the way
questions are asked in the classroom to ensure all learners are able to participate and provide
evidence of their level of understanding. This evidence should indicate whether it is necessary to
reteach, provide more varied discussion and practice, use peer teaching or move the learners
forward.
MODULE
incorrect, where a mistake has been made in mathematical workings or an idea or situation has
been misunderstood.
Effective feedback is understood by the recipient and motivates them to want to learn more
effectively.
MODULE
has consequences, so that it engages students by requiring them to attend to the feedback
as part of the assessment
is efficient, so that staff can manage it effectively.
The K to 12 curricula has specific assessment requirements and design catering to the
delivery modes of learning, i.e., the formal education and alternative learning system.
The K to 12 curriculum prescribes that the assessment process should utilize the wide variety
of traditional and authentic assessment tools and techniques for a valid, reliable, and realistic
assessment of learning. Traditional and authentic assessments complement each other though they
are not mutually exclusive. Furthermore, it gives greater importance on assessing understanding and
skills development rather than on mere accumulation of content.
The assigned weight per level of assessment are shown in the following table:
Level of assessment Percentage weight
Knowledge 15%
Process of skills 25%
Understanding 30%
Product/Performances 30%
TOTAL 100%
Source: DepEd Order 31, s. 2012
MODULE
At the end of the quarter, the student’s performance will be described based on the
prescribed level of proficiency which has equivalent numerical values. Proficiency level is computed
from the sum of all the performances of students in various levels of assessment. Each level is
described as follows:
Beginning. The student at this level struggles with his/her understanding or prerequisite and
fundamental knowledge skills that have not been acquired or developed adequately.
Developing. The student at this level possesses the minimum knowledge and skills and core
understanding but needs help throughout the performance of authentic tasks.
Approaching Proficiency. The student at this level has developed the fundamental
knowledge and skills and core understandings and with little guidance from the teacher
and/or some assistance from peers, can transfer these understandings through authentic
performance tasks.
Proficient. The student at this level has developed the fundamental knowledge and skills
and core understandings, and can transfer them independently though authentic
performance tasks.
Advanced. The student at this level exceeds the core requirements in terms of knowledge,
skills and core understandings and can transfer them automatically and flexibly through
authentic performance tasks.
Translating these proficiency level into its numerical value is described in the following table:
Assignment:
Research more about the grading and reporting system in the K to 12 curriculum and the
grading and reporting system under CHED.
MODULE
Major Purposes of Grading and Reporting
To communicate the achievement status of students to parents and others
To provide information that students can use for self-evaluation
To select, identify or group students for certain educational paths or programs
To provide incentives for students to learn
To evaluate the effectiveness of instructional programs
To provide evidence of student’s lack of effort or inappropriate responsibility
MODULE
command of only at the class average improvement on
basic concepts or skills some targets
- Mastery of some
targets
- Meets some
standards
D - Making progress or Poor: below the Below average or weak: Making progress:
developing class average minimum performance minimal progress on
- Lacks knowledge of for passing most targets
some content
- Mastery of only few
targets
- Meets only a few
standards
F - Unsatisfactory: lacks Unsatisfactory: far Unsatisfactory: lacks Unsatisfactory: no
knowledge of content; below average; sufficient knowledge to improvement on any
- No mastery of targets among the worst in pass targets
- Does not meet any the class
standards
Source: McMillan, 2007
2. Percentage Grades
Are the ultimate multi-category grading method
Can range from 0 to 100
Generally, more popular among high school teachers than elementary teachers
Advantages:
- Allows for maximum discrimination in evaluation of students’ achievement and performance
- Maximizes the variation among students, making it easier to choose students for honors or
representative for special programs.
Disadvantages:
- Requires a great deal of abstraction
- Interpretation of meaning of a percentage grade extremely difficult
- The cut-offs are no less arbitrary but a lot more
- Because of a large number of grade categories, it is less reliable and more subjective
3. Standards-Based Grading. In an effort to bring greater clarity and specificity to the grading
process, many schools-initiated standards-based grading procedures and reporting forms.
Guskey and Bailey (2001) identify four steps in developing standards-based grading. These
steps are:
a. Identify the major learning goals or standards that students will be expected to
achieve at each grade level or in each course of study.
b. Establish performance indicators for the learning goals.
c. Determine graduated level of quality (benchmarks) for assessing each goal or
standard.
d. Develop reporting tools that communicate teacher’s judgements of students’
learning progress and culminating achievement in relation to the learning goals and
standards.
Advantages:
- When clear learning goals or standards are established, standards-based grading offers
meaningful information about students’ achievement and performance to students, parents and
to others
MODULE
- If information is detailed, it can be useful for diagnostic and prescriptive purposes
- Facilitates teaching and learning processes better than any other grading method
Disadvantages:
- Takes a lot of effort
- Often too complicated for parents to understand
- May not communicate the appropriateness of students’ progress.
4. Pass/Fail Grading. Simplest alternative grading method available to educators reduces the
number of grade categories to just two: Pass or fail. In the late 1800s Pass/Fail grading was
originally introduced in the college-level courses in order for students to give more
importance to learning and less to grades they attained. By lessening the emphasis on
grades, many educators believed that students would be encouraged to take more
challenging subjects.
Pass/Fail was popular in most universities and colleges in 1970s. these universities and
colleges utilized this pass/fail grading to various programs.
Advantages:
- Simplifies the grading process for teachers and students.
- Use of a single-minimal cut-off and only two grade categories improve the reliability of grade
assignments.
- Pass/Fail grading has the potential to make learning environments more relaxed by focusing
students’ attention on learning rather than on grade (Goldstein & Tilker, 1971).
- Pass/Fail grading is what students will face in many real-life situations.
Disadvantages:
- Students gain very little prescriptive information
- Students spend less time studying if pass/fail grading is used than when a wider range of grading
system is utilized.
- Students only study to attain minimum passing level and show less effort in striving for
excellence
The table below provides a summary of the different grading methods discussed:
Method Advantages Disadvantages
Letter Grade - convenient - broad, sometimes unclear indication of
- concise performance
- familiar - often includes a jumble of factors including
effort and improvement
Percentage Grade - easy to calculate, record and - broad, sometimes unclear indication of
combine performance, false sense of difference between
- familiar close scores
- high scores not necessarily signifies mastery
Standard-based - focus on high standards - may not reflect student learning in many
for all students; areas
- pre-established - does not include effort or improvement
performance levels
Pass/Fail - simple - little discrimination in performance
- consistent with mastery of - less emphasis on high performance
learning
MODULE
The parent-teacher conference is the most common way teachers communicate with
parents about student progress. It is typically a face-to-face discussion, though phone conferences
and calls can also be used. Parent-teacher conferences may be initiated by either the teacher or the
parent, based on purpose.
MODULE
1. Group Conferences. These are conducted in the beginning of the year to communicate
school and class policies, class content, evaluation procedures, expectations and procedures
for getting in touch with teachers.
2. Individual Conferences. These are conducted to discuss the individual student’s
achievement, progress or difficulties.
It is important to plan the conference to be prepared. It means having all the information well
organized in advance and knowing what to achieve from the conference. It will include a list of areas
pertaining to student that need to be discussed with parents. The conference is an ideal time to
discuss and point out specific areas of strength and weaknesses that is not communicated through
the report card. Note that conference is not a lecture type gathering or meeting, it is a conversation.
Listening is the primary key to understanding. Listening to parents will help the teacher understand
the student better.
McMillan (2007) shared the following checklist in preparing for parent-teacher conferences:
MODULE
locations, such as church or each parent that recognizes evaluation of the conference
community centers for parents as partners and encourage them to make
parents’ convenience o Provide resources materials suggestions
o Print conference schedules that parents might use at o Debrief with colleagues for
and materials in multiple home to strengthen students’ ways to improve future
languages, if necessary skills conferences
SELF ASSESSMENT. Self-evaluation is a procedure to systematically observe, analyze and value “your
own” professional action and its results in order to stabilize or improve it. This can take place on an
individual or on an organizational level. To self-evaluate means that people explore and evaluate
their own professional work
PEER EVALUATION. Peer evaluation is an effective collaborative learning strategy. Related to self-
assessment, peer evaluation encourages students to critically examine a task and its performance,
then communicate constructive suggestions for improvement. In the process of examining the work
of peers, students reflect on the meaning of quality work in general, especially when consulting a
detailed rubric or checklist as a guide.
Assignment:
1. Plan a Parent-Teacher Conference. Create a list of questions that you would want
to clarify with parents which you will ask during the conference. Provide also the
key ideas and topics that you need to discuss during the conference.
2. Research the importance of self-assessment and peer evaluation towards grading.
MODULE
1. The guiding premises in developing grading and reporting systems are as follows:
a. The primary goal of grading and reporting is communication.
b. Grading and reporting are integral parts of the instructional process.
c. Good reporting is based on good evidence.
d. Changes in grading and reporting are best accomplished through the
development of a comprehensive reporting system.
2. Feedback is a key element of the incremental process of ongoing learning and
assessment. Providing frequent and ongoing feedback is a significant means of
improving achievement in learning. It involves the provision of information about
aspects of understanding and performance and can be given by practitioners/teachers,
peers, oneself and from learners to practitioners/teachers. Effective feedback assists the
learner to reflect on their learning and their learning strategies so they can make
adjustments to make better progress in their learning .
3. Feedback provides the teacher and learner with evidence about current knowledge and
skill development. Understanding about the learner's progress and level of achievement
enables the teacher to make decisions about the next steps to plan in the learning
program. It enables the learner to reflect on their learning strategies to confirm them or
make changes to improve their learning.
4. Effective feedback is designed to determine a learner's level of understanding and skill
development in order to plan the next steps towards achieving the learning intentions or
goals.
5. Characteristics of effective feedback:
a. Feedback improves learning
b. Feedback starts with learning intentions
c. Feedback is timely
d. Feedback is clear and focuses on improvement strategies
e. Feedback encourages reflection
f. Feedback is more than a grade
6. Tips for giving effective feedback to learners:
Explain to the learners that you are focusing on helping them to understand assessment of
their learning
Encourage learners to ask questions about their feedback
Make a regular time to discuss feedback with learners on an individual or small group basis
Advise learners that they will have an opportunity to ask questions about their assessment
Encourage them to note down their questions
Try to give feedback as close to the learning and assessment task as possible
Be specific and explicit about feedback, providing examples where possible
Establish that the student understands what is being discussed
Ask the student what they think they need to improve on
Offer your advice about future steps for improvement
Invite conversations by asking learners to discuss the work with you and/or with their peers
7. The main objectives of feedback are to:
justify to students how their mark or grade was derived
MODULE
identify and reward specific qualities in student work
guide students on what steps to take to improve
motivate them to act on their assessment
develop their capability to monitor, evaluate and regulate their own learning (Nicol, 2010).
a. Knowledge refers to the essential content of the curriculum, the facts and
information that the student acquires.
b. Process refers to cognitive acts that the student does on facts and information
to come up with meanings and understandings.
c. Understanding refers to lasting big ideas, principles, generalizations that are
fundamental to the discipline which may be assessed using the facets of
understanding.
d. Product/Performances refers to real-life application of understanding as shown
by the student’s performance of authentic tasks.
12. Major Purposes of Grading and Reporting
To communicate the achievement status of students to parents and others
To provide information that students can use for self-evaluation
To select, identify or group students for certain educational paths or programs
To provide incentives for students to learn
To evaluate the effectiveness of instructional programs
To provide evidence of student’s lack of effort or inappropriate responsibility
13. Grading and Reporting Methods:
a. Letter Grades
b. Percentage Grades
c. Standards-Based Grading.
d. Pass/Fail Grading
14. Two types of parent-teacher conferences based on two purposes:
a. Group Conferences. These are conducted in the beginning of the year to
communicate school and class policies, class content, evaluation procedures,
expectations and procedures for getting in touch with teachers.
b. Individual Conferences. These are conducted to discuss the individual student’s
achievement, progress or difficulties.
15. Tools for comprehensive reporting system:
a. Report Cards
MODULE
b. Notes, attached to report cards
c. Standardized Assessment Report
d. Phone Calls to parents
e. Weekly/Monthly Progress report
f. School Open-Houses
g. Newsletter to Parents
h. Personal Letter to Parents
i. Evaluated Projects/Assignments
j. Portfolio or Exhibits of Student’s Work
k. Homework/Assignments
l. Homework Hotlines
m. School Web Pages
n. Parent-teacher Conferences
o. Student-Teacher Conferences
p. Student-Led Conferences
16. Self-evaluation is a procedure to systematically observe, analyze and value “your own”
professional action and its results in order to stabilize or improve it. This can take place
on an individual or on an organizational level. To self-evaluate means that people
explore and evaluate their own professional work.
17. Peer evaluation is an effective collaborative learning strategy. Related to self-
assessment, peer evaluation encourages students to critically examine a task and its
performance, then communicate constructive suggestions for improvement. In the
process of examining the work of peers, students reflect on the meaning of quality work
in general, especially when consulting a detailed rubric or checklist as a guide.
STUDY GUIDE:
Answer what is asked in the following. Place your answers in short bond papers for
compilation.
1. What is constructive feedbacking? Why is it important?
2. Enumerate and discuss the characteristics of effective feedback.
3. Discuss why and how can feedback become:
a. Constructive
b. Timely
c. meaningful
4. compare and contrast:
a. assessment FOR learning vs. assessment AS learning vs. assessment OF learning
b. the four-KPUP levels
c. the different proficiency levels of assessment
d. the grading and reporting methods
e. the two types of parent-teacher conference
5. enumerate the different tools for comprehensive reporting system and give the importance or
uses of each tool.
MODULE
Congratulations! You have successfully completed all the modules for
your course Assessment for Learning 1. Remember to keep on improving
to attain quality assessment. Please complete the Post-test from your
instructor.
To finally culminate our modular instruction in Educ 105, kindly read the
following topic and work on the activity ask for you to do. Your action
regarding this activity will form part of your assessment and will provide a great
contribution for instructional material evaluation.
Here is a more detailed explanation of the seven Rs. Study carefully so that you can
very well evaluate and give feedback on the curriculum material (Modules) that you have
used in this course. Curriculum material as mentioned here refers to the series of Modules
utilized in studying the course The Teacher and the School Curriculum.
MODULE
Rigorous. A curriculum material/module is rigorous if it provides students opportunities to
develop higher order thinking skills, decision-making and deep understanding. It also points
the direction for learning but opens for students understanding beyond a minimal outcome.
Do the activities in the lessons allow students to develop higher order thinking? How do the
activities launch learning?
Real. A curriculum material/module is real if it builds understanding to engage in real life
activities related to becoming teachers. Are the topics significant or important to the life of
the students to become future teachers? How do the topics intersect their lives as students
and as future teachers?
Requires Independence. A curriculum material/module requires independence if students
are given opportunities to make appropriate choices, like who to interview or what class to
observe and when to do it, or what topics or examples are to be provided for identified
activities and how to present it. This will make students engage in deep learning and also
allow students to learn from their mistakes.
Rich in Thinking. A curriculum material/module is rich in thinking if it asks students more
than just memorization or repetition. The curriculum materials make students do
observations, ask questions, consider alternatives, evaluate outcomes, reflect and make
judgement based on evidence.
Revealing. A quality curriculum material/module is revealing if it seeks to show what the
students do and do not understand, but how they understand it. Does the curriculum
material reveal what they understand from their activities, self-check and self-reflection?
Rewarding. A quality curriculum material/module is rewarding if students can articulate
what they are learning, if they can share clearly the results of their individual and group
tasks. This is indicative of the students’ effort which is directed toward a well-defined
learning goal. The sense of purpose is shown in their work as the intrinsic rewards they gain.
In short, they are happy with what they are doing.
Reflective. A quality curriculum material/module is reflective if it allows students to think
about one’s learning not only about feelings. For example, the statement “I used to think. . .
but now I think. . .”
These are the seven Rs of quality curriculum material/module. They collectively focus on the
topics to be covered, skills to be mastered, fats to be learned and outcomes to be achieved.
These are the aspects of quality material/module.
Activity:
1. Based on your experiences in using the Modules in Educ 105, rate on a scale of 1 to 5
(with 1 as the lowest and 5 as the highest) the different Rs that describe this
instructional material.
7 Rs Key Statements Ratings:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Rigorous 1. The curriculum material/module requires me to have a
MODULE
higher level of understanding and thinking
Real 2. The curriculum material/module replicates the activities
for a teacher
Requires 3. The curriculum material/module allows me to make
Independence choices
Rich in Thinking 4. The curriculum material/module makes me think more
and memorize less
Revealing 5. The curriculum material/module makes me reveal my level
of understanding
Rewarding 6. The curriculum material/module inspires me to study
more
Reflective 7. The curriculum material/module allows me to reflect on
learning
2. In a column form write the following: Column A, the things you like most in the
course; Column B, things that you least like in the course; Column C, things/topics
that you want to be included in the course and Column D, things/topics you want to
be deleted in the module presentations. Please include the reasons for each item.
o Azarcon, R.O. & Abanador P.D. (2009). High-Quality Classroom Assessment Methods. TCS-
Publishing House, Bulacan, Philippines
o Cajigal, Ronan M. & Mantuano, Maria Leflor D. (2014) Assessment of Learning 2. Adriana
Publishing Co. Inc. Quezon City, Philippines
o De Guzman, E.S. & Adamos, J.L., (2015) Assessment of Learning 1. Adriana Publishing Co. Inc.
Quezon City , Philippines
o Navarro, R.L., Santos, R.G., Corpuz, B.B. (2017) Assessment of Learning 1, 2nd Ed, Lorimar
Publishing, Inc., Quezon City, Philippines
o Navarro, R.L., Santos, R.G., Corpuz, B.B. (2019) Assessment of Learning 1, 2nd Ed, Lorimar
Publishing, Inc., Quezon City, Philippines
o Dobson, Graeme. (October 2003). A guide to Writing Competency-Based Training Materials,
National Volunter Skills Center, Retrieved (January 10, 2019) from
https://www.k4health.org.default.files
o Gagne, Robert. Conditions of Learning, Retrieved (January 2019) from
https://www.instructionaldesign.org.
o Onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/io.
o Edongami.wikispaces.com
o http://www.eduteka.org/TaxonomiaBloomDigital.php
MODULE
o Dixson, D.D. & Worrell, F.C. (2016) Formative and Summative assessment in the classroom.
Theory into practice. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
o K12 Academics (2019) Education Assessment and evaluation. Retrieved from
https://www.k12academic.com/education-assessment-evaluation
o McTighe, J., & Ferrara, S. (1998). Assessing Learning in the Classroom. Student Assessment
Series. NEA Professional Library, Distribution Center, PO Box 2035, Anna Polis Junction.
Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gove/fulltext/ED429989.pdf