Nabl 209
Nabl 209
Nabl 209
3 10 NPF-3
10
Amendment Sheet 1
Contents 2
1. INTRODUCTION
It is presumed that the Lead Assessor, who has been nominated by the NABL Secretariat, is fully aware
of the NABL Accreditation process, its objectives and the on-site Assessment procedure. The Lead
Assessor shall have the overall responsibility of conducting the assessment and shall be responsible pre-
assessment of the laboratory and for conducting the on-site assessment of the concerned laboratory.
Towards the task of on-site assessment, the lead assessor shall be assisted by a team of assessors
commensurate with the scope of accreditation.
This document contains Pre-assessment forms and Checklist, which shall be used to report the pre-
assessment findings. The document shall guide the Lead Assessor in completing various forms &
checklists and compiling the report.
2. PRE-ASSESSMENT
After the laboratory has taken the corrective action on the concerns expressed in the adequacy report
after the document review and has submitted a report to the satisfaction of the NABL, NABL Secretariat
shall fix up a date for Pre-assessment (if desired by the laboratory as pre-assessment is optional) in
consultation with the laboratory and the Lead Assessor.
While the Lead Assessor proceeds to the laboratory for Pre-assessment, he should be in possession of
the laboratory’s Applications Forms, Quality Manual/ Management system document, Corrective action
report on the adequacy of document review and any other information supplied by NABL Secretariat.
i. check the overall implementation of the management system as per the documented Quality
Manual/ Management system document.
ii. study the scope of accreditation so that the time frame, number of assessors required in various
fields/ disciplines and visits to Site testing/ calibration facilities, if applicable, for the assessment
can be determined. The Lead Assessor shall also assess whether the Assessment is required to
be split, based on the location of laboratory or the number of fields/ disciplines and departments.
iii. check whether the laboratory has conducted a comprehensive Internal Audit in accordance with
ISO/ IEC 17025 .
iv. assess the degree of preparedness of the laboratory for the Assessment in terms of compliance
to NPF 1.
The Lead Assessor must review the Laboratory’s documented management system to verify compliance
with the requirements of ISO/ IEC 17025. He should complete the Checklist NPF 1 by recording his
observation – ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ (by marking a in the appropriate box), related to the requirements of
respective clause number of the checklist and offering brief comments. If the Lead Assessor has a doubt
in other area(s), even though not listed in the checklist, he is free to assess or go into details where he
feels and annex his findings, to the report.
All Non-Conformity (ies) must be identified and to be reported, in NPF 2. Additional sheets may be added,
if required. The Lead Assessor should finally summarise the conduct of Pre-Assessment and record the
recommendations in NPF 3. The Lead Assessor must carefully fill the forms and check list and sign all
pages of the Pre-Assessment Report. He should also obtain signature of the authorised person of the
laboratory on NPF 2 & 3. The report should be compiled in the order NPF 3, 2, 1 & Form 74 and any
other additional pages or annexure thereafter.
The Lead Assessor shall submit the Pre-Assessment Report to NABL Secretariat within 10 days of
completion of Pre-Assessment.
PRE-ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
4. Internal Audit
Availability of Audit Procedure
Availability of Audit Plan
All requirements of ISO/ IEC 17025 is applicable, covering all activities of
laboratory audited at least once in the last one year
Timely corrective action on non-conformities
Audit conducted by qualified, trained and Independent personnel
Comments on effectiveness of Internal Audit:
5. Management Review
Availability of Management review Procedure
All requirements of ISO/ IEC 17025 are incorporated in the agenda of review in
the last one year
Evidence of at least one Management review
Comments on effectiveness of Management review:
6. Personnel
4 days training programme for designated Quality Manager on ISO/ IEC 17025
(refer Policy document NABL 165)
Training programme on ISO/ IEC 17025, organised for laboratory personnel
Plan/ Schedule for imparting training to laboratory personnel for the current year
Suitability of persons authorised to sign test reports/ calibration certificates with
reference to the applied scope
Comments on Personnel and Training:
Signature/ Name of Authorised representative of Lab. & Date Signature/ Name of Lead Assessor & Date
Note: Use additional sheets of this form, if required
PRE-ASSESSMENT REPORT
Laboratory:
Quality Manager: Date(s) of Visit:
Field : Testing/ Calibration Discipline(s):
Applicable Standard: ISO/IEC 17025
NABL Specific Criteria (if applicable)-
Persons Contacted:
Signature/ Name of Authorised representative of Lab. & Date Signature/ Name of Lead Assessor & Date
Organisation
Address
CAB* Assessed
Date of
Assessment
Type of Document review / Pre-Assessment / Assessment / 1st Surveillance / Re-Assessment /
Assessment Supplementary visit
* CAB – Conformity Assessment Body (Testing / Medical / Calibration laboratory / Proficiency Testing Provider (PTP) / Reference Material Producer
(RMP))
I have not offered any consultancy, guidance, supervision or other services to the CAB (e.g. internal
audit), in any way.
I am / am not* an ex-employee of the CAB and am/ am not* related to any person of the management of
the CAB.
I got an opportunity to go through various documents like Quality Manual/ Management system
document, Procedural Manuals, Work instructions, Internal reports etc. of the above CAB and other
related information that might have been given by NABL. I undertake to maintain strict confidentiality of
the information acquired in course of discharge of my responsibility and shall not disclose to any person
other than that required by NABL.
Place : Signature