Bag. 2 Stabilitas Dan Ketidakstabilan
Bag. 2 Stabilitas Dan Ketidakstabilan
Bag. 2 Stabilitas Dan Ketidakstabilan
INSTABILITY, LABILITY
AND INERTNESS
in coordination compounds
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
Substitution reactions
MLn + L' MLn-1L' + L
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
Inert & Labile Complexes
– labile => exchange t1/2 less than 1 min. at room T
– inert => exchange t1/2 more than 1 min. at room T
According to TAUBE
Labile complexes:
1. if d e-s are in eg*
[Co(NH3)6] 2+ d7 (t2g5, eg2)
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
Inert complexes:
1. Octahedral d3
[Cr(OH2)3]3+ d3 (t2g3, eg0)
[Co(NO2)6]3- d6 octahedral
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
[Ni(CN)4]2- stable complex, tetapi cepat berubah menjadi
kompleks yang lain
fast
[Ni(CN)4]2- + 4C14N- [Ni(C14N)4]2- + 4CN- t ½ = 30 s
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
Compounds such as these that react rapidly are called labile. In
many cases, exchange of one ligand for another can take place in
the time of mixing the solutions. Taube' has suggested a reaction
half-life (the time of disappearance of half the initial compound) of
one minute or less as the criterion for lability.
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
Compound react more slowly are called inert.
A species such as [Fe(H2O)5(F)]2+ is very stable (has a
large equilibrium constant for formation), but it is also
labile. On the other hand, Hexaaminecobalt(3+) is
thermodynamically unstable in acid and can decompose to
the equilibrium mixture on the right but it reacts very
slowly (has a very high activation energy) and is
therefore called inert or robust.
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
[Cu(OH2 )3 NH3 ]2 [H 2O]
K1 2
[Cu(OH2 ) 4 ] [NH3 ]
[Cu(OH2 ) 2 (NH3 ) 2 ]2 [H 2O]
K2 2
[Cu(OH2 )3 (NH3 )] [NH3 ]
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
Labile or inert?
L
L L
M
L L
Ea
L
L L
L M
L L L L
M X
L L
X
DG
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
Why are some configurations inert and some are labile?
Inert !
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
bidentate ligands
bound to cobalt.
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
hexadentate ligand
bound to cobalt.
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
THE KINETIC CHELATE EFFECT
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
Substitution for a chelated ligand is generally a slower reaction than that for a
similar monodentate ligand.
Explanations for this effect center on two factors:
- the increased energy needed to remove the first bound atom
- and the probability of a reversal of this first step.
The reaction must have two dissociation steps for a bidentate ligand, one
for each bound atom (the addition of water in Steps 2 and 4 is likely to be
fast, because of its high concentration):
The uncoordinated nitrogen is held near the metal by the rest of the ligand,
making reattachment more likely. Overall, this kinetic chelate effect reduces
the rates of aquation reactions by factors from 20 to 105.
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
Hydrolysis reactions
Hydrolysis reaction of complexes in base solution can take place via
associative mechanism, but intermediate with 7 coordination number is
not stable
Rate of reaction:
[new complex]
kB[in complex][O H ]
dt
[(NH3)5CoOH]+2
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
fast
[(NH3)5 CoCl]+2 + OH- [(NH3)4Co(NH2)Cl]+ + H 2O
slow
[(NH3)4Co(NH2)Cl]+ [(NH3)4Co(NH2)]+2 + Cl-
fast
[(NH3)4Co(NH2)]+2 + H 2O [(NH3)5Co OH]+2
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
Hydrolysis reactions
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni
A conjugate base mechanism is expected in both cases, with the hydroxide
removing a proton from an ethylenediamine nitrogen, followed by loss of the
chloride trans to the deprotonated nitrogen. In the more concentrated base, the
higher concentration of ion pairs ([Co(en)2Cl2]+.OH-) is assumed to result in a water
molecule (from the OH- and the H+ removed from ethylenediamine) positioned for
easy addition with inversion of the chiral center.
8/26/2014
Rahmayeni