Illustrative Case
Illustrative Case
Illustrative Case
Every partner must account to the partnership for any benefit, and hold
as trustee for it any profits derived from him without the consent of the partners from any
transaction connected with the formation, conduct, or liquidation of the partnership or from
any use by him of his property.
Fiduciary duties
The relation between the partners is essentially fiduciary involving trust and confidence,
each partner considered in law, as he is, in fact, the confidential agent of the others. The duties
of a partner are analogous to those of a trustee.
Held: No. In this case, when Rody redeemed the property in question, he became a trustee for
the benefit of his co-partner Leni, subject to his right to demand from Leni her contribution to the
redemption price plus the legal interest.
Article 1808. The capitalist partners cannot engage for their own account in any operation,
which is of the kind of business in which the partnership is engaged, unless there is a stipulation
to the contrary.
Any capitalist partner violating this prohibition shall bring to the common funds any
profit accruing to him from his transactions and shall personally bear all the losses.
The prohibition against the capital partner to engage in any business is relative unlike the
industrial partner who is absolutely prohibited from engaging in any business for himself.
General rule: The law does not prohibit a partner from engaging in enterprises in his own
behalf during the period that he is a partner but permits him to carry a business or activity not
connected or competing with that of partnership.
Exception: The partnership agreement prohibits such activity.
Note: The law is silent on whether a capitalist partner can engage in the same line of business
for the account of another. It is believed that the prohibition applies.
Effects of violation
(1) The violator shall bring to the partnership all the profits illegally obtained.
(2) He shall bear all the losses.
(3) The violator can be ousted from the firm on the ground of loss of trust and confidence
This course would result in the dissolution of the partnership.
Article 1809. Any partner shall have the right to a formal account as partnership affairs:
(1) If he is wrongfully excluded from the partnership business or possession of its property
by his co-partner;
(2) If the right exists under the terms of any agreement;
(3) Provided by article 1807;
(4) Whenever other circumstances render it just and reasonable, Right of the partner to a
formal account.
General rule: During existence of partnership, a partner is not entitled to a formal account of
partnership affairs.
Reason: Rights of partner amply protected in Art.1805 and 1806. In addition, it would cause
much inconvenience and unnecessary waste of time.
Exception: In the special and unusual situations enumerated under Art. 1809.
Article 1811. A partner is co-owner with his partners of specific partnership property.
The incidents of his co-ownership is that:
1. A partner, subject to the provisions of this Title and to any agreement between the
partners, has an equal right with his partners to possess specific partnership
property for partnership purposes; but he has no right to possess such property for
any other purpose without the consent of his partners;
2. A partner's right in specific partnership property is not assignable except in
connection with the assignment of rights of all the partners in the same property;
3. A partner's right in specific partnership property is not subject to attachment or
execution, except on a claim against the partnership. When partnership property is
attached for a partnership debt, the partners, or any of them, or the representatives
of a deceased partner, cannot claim any right under the homestead or exemption
laws;
4. A partner's right in specific partnership property is not subject to legal support under
article 291. (Civil Code; Republic Act No. 386)
Note: Article 1811 contemplates tangible property but not intangible things. A partner is a
co-owner with his partners of specific partnership property, but the rules on co-ownership
do not necessarily apply. The legal incidents of this tenancy in partnership are
distinctively characteristic of the partnership relation. They are as follows:
Illustrative Example:
In Partnership ABC, Partner A, B, or C cannot assign his right to the land but all of
them can assign their rights in the same property.
Reason for impossibility:
Each partner, having a beneficial interest in the partnership property
considered as a whole, has a beneficial interest in each part.
Note: The law allows a retiring partner to assign his rights in partnership property to
the partner(s) continuing the business.
3. Attachment or Execution
A partnership property may be subject to attachment or execution only on claim against
the partnership and not of the partners.
Illustrative Example:
In the same example above, the land is not considered the separate property of A, B,
and C. It belongs to the partnership as a juridical person and a partner has no interest
in it but his share of what remains after all partnership debts are paid. Consequently,
the land is not subject to attachment or execution except a claim against partnership.
4. Legal support
In the same example above, the right of A, B, and C to the land is not subject to any
legal support. But their interest in the partnership is of course, subject to legal support.
Surplus: Tthe assets of the partnership after partnership debts and liabilities are paid
and settled and the rights of the partners among themselves are adjusted. It is the excess of
assets over liabilities. If the liabilities are more than the assets, the difference represents the
extent of the loss.
Article 1813. A conveyance by a partner of his whole interest in the partnership does not of itself
dissolve the partnership, or, as against the other partners in the absence of agreement, entitle the
assignee, during the continuance of the partnership, to interfere in the management or
administration of the partnership business or affairs, or to require any information or account of
partnership transactions, or to inspect the partnership books; but it merely entitles the assignee to
receive in accordance with his contract the profits to which the assigning partner would otherwise be
entitled. However, in case of fraud in the management of the partnership, the assignee may avail
himself of the usual remedies.
In case of a dissolution of the partnership, the assignee is entitled to receive his assignor's
interest and may require an account from the date only of the last account agreed to by all the
partners.
Note: The assignment does not divest the assignor of his status and rights as a partner nor
operate as dissolution.
Note: The mere assignment of a partner's interest does not dissolve the partnership.
Article 1814. Without prejudice to the preferred rights of partnership creditors under article
1827, on due application to a competent court by any judgment creditor of a partner, the court
which entered the judgment, or any other court, may charge the interest of the debtor partner
with payment of the unsatisfied amount of such judgment debt with interest thereon; and may
then or later appoint a receiver of his share of the profits, and of any other money due or to fall
due to him in respect of the partnership, and make all other orders, directions, accounts and
inquiries which the debtor partner might have made, or which the circumstances of the case
may require.
The interest charged may be redeemed at any time before foreclosure, or in case of a
sale being directed by the court, may be purchased without thereby causing a dissolution:
(1) With separate property, by any one or more of the partners; or
(2) With partnership property, by any one or more of the partners with the consent of all
the partners whose interests are not so charged or sold.
Nothing in this Title shall be held to deprive a partner of his right, if any, under the
exemption laws, as regards his interest in the partnership.
Illustrative example:
Facts: Xi recovers a judgement against Rody, a member of partnership PH composed of Rody
and Leni, on Rody’s individual liability. The partnership is very profitable and Leni is solvent, but
Rody is in deep financial trouble.
Isuue: May Xi attach any portion of the partnership property or execute against the same, or go
after A’s share of the partnership assets/
Held: No. Xi’s remedy is to apply for a charging order from a court against the partnership. No
specific property is attached. The partnership continues and Xi’s judgment is satisfied out of
partnership assets. Under the charging order, Rody’s share in the profits is paid to Xi until the
claims of Xi are fully paid. The partnership need not be necessarily dissolved. Leni is protected.
Rody, the debtor, only suffers.
Redemption or purchase of interest charged.
1. Redemptioner- The interest of the debtor-partner so charged may be redeemed with
the separate property of anyone or more of the or with partnership property but with the
consent of all the partners whose interests are not so charged or sold.
2. Redemption price- In an ordinary sale the price of the thing sold theoretically
represents its market or actual value. However, in a foreclosure sale, it will be dependent
on the amount of the unsatisfied judgment debt.
Article 1815. Every partnership shall operate under a firm name, which may or may not
include the name of one or more of the partners, those who, not being members of the
partnership, include their names in the firm name, shall be subject to liability of a partner.
Meaning of word “firm” – The name, title, or style under which a company
transacts business; a partnership of two or more persons; a commercial house. In its
common acceptation, the term implies a partnership. The term is also used as synonymous
with “company,” “house,” and “concern.”
General Rule: The partners have the freedom in the selection of partnership name.
Exception: The name chosen is not similar to a name which was previously adopted by any
other entity, or interfere with the rights of others, or is contrary to law.
Note: The used of names of deceased partners is permissible provided that the firm indicates in
all communications that said partner is deceased.
Illustrative Example:
SGV & Co. is an example of firm who uses names of deceased persons as their firm name.
SyCip, Gorres, and Velayo were all deceased.
Liability inclusion of name in the firm name
Persons who, not being partners, include their names in the firm name do not acquire the rights
of a partner but shall be subject to the liability of a partner insofar as third persons without notice
are concerned. Such persons become partners by estoppel.
Note: Article 1815 does not cover the case of a limited partner who allows his name to be
included in the firm name, or of a person continuing the business of a partnership
after dissolution, who uses the name of the dissolved partnership or the name of a deceased
partner as part thereof.
Article 1816. All partners, including industrial ones, shall be liable pro rata with all their property
and after all the partnership assets have been exhausted, for the contracts which may be
entered into in the name and for the account of the partnership, under its signature and by a
person authorized to act for the partnership. However, any partner may enter into a separate
obligation to perform a partnership contract.
General Rule: The partner has the right to make all partners liable for contracts he makes for
the partnership in the name and for the account of partnership.
Exception: A partner may make himself solidarily liable when he assumes a separate
undertaking in his name with a third party to perform a partnership contract.
Illustrative Example:
U and I are capitalist partners, with X as an industrial partner. U and I contributed P10,000
each to the capital of the partnership. A contractual liability of P26,000 was incurred by the
partnership in favor D.
Under Article 1816, Creditor D, can sue the firm and all the partners including X, the
industrial partner. The capital assets of P20,000 shall be first exhausted thereby leaving an
unsatisfied liability of P6,000. D can recover the amount from partners U, I, and D jointly or
pro rata at P2,000 each. After the payment, X can recover for reimbursement of P1,000
each from Partners U and I.
I. True or False
1. Each partner, under the rule of law, is considered a confidential agent of
the other partners.
2. A capitalist partner is absolutely prohibited to engage in any other
business.
3. A partner has a right to constantly demand for formal account as to
partnership affairs.
4. The assignee cannot avail himself of the usual remedies in case of fraud
in the management.
5. A partner’s right in a specific property is subject to legal support.
6. Surplus is the net income of the partnership for a given period of time.
7. The assignment of a partner's interest does not dissolve the partnership.
8. As a general rule, all partners shall be liable pro rata for the partnership
liability.
9. An assignee can interfere in the management with consent of the
assignor.
10. A partner can assign his right to a specific partnership property.
II. Enumeration
1. Principal rights of a partner (3)
2. Partner’s interest in the partnership (2)
3. Rights withheld from the assignee (3)
Answer Key
I. True or False
1, 7, 8 True
2-6,9,10 False
II. Enumeration
1. Principal rights of a partner
(a) His rights in specific partnership property
(b) His interest in the partnership
(c) His right to participate in the management, extent of property rights of a partner