Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

GE Challenge Problem Statement 2009

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

g GEAE GE Aircraft Engines

The Aircraft Engine Design Project- Engine Cycles


Design Problem Overview

Spring 2009 Ken Gould


Phil W
Weed
d
1
g Background GE Aircraft Engines

The Aircraft Engine Design Project- Engine Cycles


A new aircraft application is soliciting proposals for a candidate engine.
Your design team has been asked to put together a proposal that meets the
intended aircraft requirements. In addition, because of the significant costs
of jet fuel, your marketing team has learned that engine fuel burn capability
will be the tie breaking figure of merit in the airframer’s final decision.
Your company has a turbofan configuration that has been certified and is in
service. This engine or a modified version will be used as the basis for a
configuration to meet the aircraft/engine system requirements.

2
g GE Aircraft Engines

CFM56-3
3
g GE Aircraft Engines

Fan
Bypass Flow

Compressor HPT LPT


Inlet
Combustor
Air Flow Exit
HP Spool

LP Spool

1 2 23 25 3 4 5 9
19

Separated Flow Turbofan Cross-Section


with Booster Stages
Also for a Turbo-fan:
Bypass ratio= Bypass Flow/ Core Flow 4
g Problem Details GE Aircraft Engines

Aircraft Application Requirement


1. Aircraft Takeoff Thrust Requirement at Sea Level /MN =.0/Tamb=59F 36000 lbf
2. Maximum Specific Fuel Consumption (SFC) at takeoff 0.320 (lbm /hr)/lbf

E i D
Engine Design
i G Guidelines-
id li B
Baseline
li E Engine:
i S
Separated
t d Fl
Flow T
Turbofan
b f
1. Inlet- Isentropic with inlet Mach Number (M1) = 0.4
Inlet Diameter 50 inches
2. Fan: Pressure Ratio (station 23 to 2) 1.5
Adiabatic Efficiency .87
Bypass Ratio (BPR) 6.0
3. Booster stages: (station 25 to 23)
a. additional PR 2.0
b. adiabatic efficiency .87
4. Compressor Pressure Ratio 8.0
Adiabatic Efficiency .83
Maximum Compr Discharge Temp 1200 F
5. Combustor- no pressure drop 100% efficiency
6 Hi
6. HighhP Pressure TTurbine
bi
a. Adiabatic efficiency .87
b. High Pressure Turbine Inlet Temperature 2200 F
c. Uncooled blades
7. Low Pressure Turbine
a. Adiabatic efficiency .89
b. Uncooled turbine blades
8. Exhaust (core and bypass stream): isentropic expansion to ambient pressure 5
g GE Aircraft Engines

Design Team
Your design team has been formed to determine if the baseline engine can be used to meet
the intended aircraft application. If necessary, the team may consider certain cycle parameter
changes (see below and page 9) for the new design to meet the requirements.

Deliverables:
Part A: Preliminary Design Review- With the provided information and some appropriate
assumptions, determine if the baseline engine configuration meets the aircraft design
requirements Your team’s
requirements. team s first deliverable is a working cycle model (a tool that enables you
to calculate the thermodynamic cycle and engine performance) and the assessment of the
baseline engine configuration.

Part B: Final Design Review- Your marketing team has requested additional features to
enhance your chances of having the winning proposal. Consider different options using your
cycle deck to improve SFC (i.e. vary fan pressure ratio, bypass ratio, turbine inlet temperature
etc. within the design guidelines given on page 9). Define a configuration which minimizes
SFC for the target thrust level and explain your parameter choice from first principles
principles.

Note:
Due to time and budget constraints the upper management has decided that extensive multi-
dimensional optimizations cannot be considered – your managers are relying on your
knowledge and skills to apply thermodynamic principles to define the best solution
6
g GE Aircraft Engines

Deliverables continued:

Document all necessary assumptions as well as additional work or research you completed to
support your conclusions. Be prepared to present your findings to a panel of reviewers. The
presented material should include ...
- your conclusions,
- solution approach,
- supporting calculations,
- assumptions utilized,
- pertinent references used.

7
g Problem Details GE Aircraft Engines
Thermodynamic parameters
1. Gas properties
a. Gamma (function of temperature)
Use: γ = 1.4000 for inlet , fan, and compressor, bypass
γ = 1.3333 for combustor, HPT, LPT, and core exhaust
b. Specific heat
Use Cp (compressor) = .2400 BTU/(lbm-deg R)
Cp(combustor) = .2743 BTU/(lbm-deg R)
Cp(turbine) = .2743 BTU/(lbm-deg R)
2. Gas constant (R) 53.35 (ft-lbf)/(lbm-deg R)
3. Energy constant (J) 778 (ft-lbf)/BTU
4. Gravitational constant (gc) 32.17 (ft-lbm)/(lbf sec^2)
5. Fuel heating value (FHV) 18550 BTU/lbm
6. Sea level, ambient conditions
Ambient temperature (Tamb,Ts0) 59 F
Ambient pressure (Ps0) 14.696 psia

8
g GE Aircraft Engines

Part II: Design Guidelines


Consider varying the following parameters when improving your design:
- Inlet Diameter
- Bypass Ratio
- Fan Pressure Ratio
- Compressor Pressure Ratio
- High Pressure Turbine Inlet Temperature
For every 100 deg F increase, you must bleed 2% of the compressor exit
air to provide turbine cooling. You may consider this air available to do work
i th
in the llow pressure tturbine
bi
Limitations:
1. Maximum turbine exit temperature (T5) 1700 F
2. Compressor Discharge Maximum Temperature (T3) 1200 F
3. Maximum inlet diameter for Ground Clearance 62.0 inches.
4. Core size limitations: You may consider changing the core engine airflow in the
range of –20% to + 50% relative to the baseline engine.

9
g Attachment GE Aircraft Engines

Items for consideration at the Final Design Review

1. For each of the design parameters you have defined, discuss why you selected the value
you did
did. Provide a first-principles based explanation for why each individual parameter
results in an improvement over the baseline design (for example h-s or T-s diagrams
might be used to illustrate your changes in the cycle design and their implications).

2
2. Did you decide to change the physical size of the core engine? What did you consider
when making this decision? Discuss the relevant trade-offs that were considered.

3. Comment on what other unspecified physical or technological constraints may limit


the magnitude of changes to efficiencies,
efficiencies pressure ratios
ratios, or maximum temperature
levels.

10
g Helpful Resources GE Aircraft Engines

S
Suggested
t d References:
R f

1) 16.Unified “Thermodynamics & Propulsion” Lecture Notes

2) Cumpsty, N., “Jet Propulsion”, Cambridge University Press, 2002.

3) Jet Engine Concepts: www.geae.com/education/engines101

4) For some virtual reality pictures and movies: www.cfm56-airshow.com

GE Contacts if Needed:

1) kenneth.gould@ge.com
2) philip.weed@ge.com

www.gecareers.com
11

You might also like