Ipsative Assessment PPT Hughes
Ipsative Assessment PPT Hughes
Ipsative Assessment PPT Hughes
2
Ipsative assessment as an alternative
to criteria-referenced assessment
3
Personal best
4
What is ipsative assessment ?
An ipsative assessment compares current performance with a previous
performance.
Ipsative feedback on progress
Ipsative grades awarded for progress
Hughes, G. 2011. Aiming for Personal Best: a Case for Introducing Ipsative Assessment in Higher
Education Studies in Higher Education 36 (3): 353 - 367
5
Possible benefits of ipsative
assessment
• Improves self-esteem and confidence by rewarding progress (particularly
for those who do not achieve high grades)
6
MA in Applied Educational
Leadership and Management
1. Phase 1 of study in 2009-2010 showed that ipsative feedback was
rare
2. However, both students and tutors felt that ipsative feedback would
be beneficial
3. Ipsative grades were perceived to be problematic and so not
developed for the next phase of the study-focus on ipsative
feedback.
http://cdelondon.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/use-of-ipsative-assessment-in-distance-learning/
7
Ipsative cumulative scheme for 3
sequential assessments
Feed forward 1 Feed forward 2
8
Excerpt from the new form
Please indicate what feedback you were given, for your last
assignment, in terms of how you could improve:
Please indicate what feedback you were given for your draft of
this assignment, in terms of how you could improve (if
applicable):
9
MA in Applied Educational
Leadership and Management
1. Students submit a draft pieces of work for feedback
2. Students fill in a new Assignment Submission form when they
submit their work for assessment identifying actions arising from
previous feedback (self assessment)
3. Students received ipsative feedback from tutors on how well they
have addressed the feedback (self-referential assessment)
4. Students’ previous assignments and feedback were made available
in the VLE for consultation.
10
Evaluation methods
• The written feedback given to 28 students was analysed
• The 3 main tutors were interviewed about the new approach to giving
feedback (2 others were part-time and declined to be interviewed)
11
Excerpt from the new form
Please indicate what feedback you were given, for your draft of
this assignment, in terms of how you could improve (if
applicable): - Methodology:clearer statement on exact nature of
research
-To identify and use a clearer narrative thread (student 22)
Please comment on the extent to which you feel you have
responded to feedback: -In the methodology section I have
added more detail and have given further thought to sampling
and validity of data
-tried to use more signposts to direct the reader through the
narrative more clearly (student 22)
12
Analysis of use of the form and
written feedback
• Not all students used the form – some were unable to access it
• Some who filled in the form were at the box-ticking end of the
spectrum e.g.
13
Ipsative Feedback to students from
tutors
‘It is clear that you took careful note of the advice you received on the
draft and the previous assignment. You have worked hard to improve
the narrative flow and have taken steps to develop your critical
engagement with the sources.’ (Tutor A)
‘It is a pity you did not have the chance to revise your assignment on
the basis of the feedback provided earlier, as this would probably
result in a better grade.’ (Tutor C)
14
Analysis of use of the form and
written feedback
• Some tutors used the form to provide ipsative feedback
• One tutor gave ipsative feedback when students did not use the
form
15
Reaction to the new approach to
feedback – the students
• The form helped students to reflect on how and to what extent they
had responded to tutor’s comments
‘It [the form] allowed me to show how I had attempted to improve on
my last assignment and also encouraged me to reflect more deeply
on my submission.’ (Student 22)
‘…the tutor reminded me of not having addressed an issue raised
about my first draft. I did email the tutor and highlighted an extract
from the final essay where I had covered the suggestion made. I
believe the tutor had missed that point and the comment was then
removed from my final feedback. I was told, however, that this would
17 not result in a revised mark.’ (Student 13)
Reaction to the new approach to
feedback – the tutors
• The form helped tutors write feedback
‘I was already on the journey to that approach. When providing
feedback I tended to approach it in my normal way and then made
sure that I adapted things to meet the requirements of the new front
sheet.’ (Tutor A)
19
The challenges for implementing
ipsative feedback
• Ipsative feedback is new and needs time to be accepted
20
21
References
•Broadfoot, P. 1996. Education, Assessment and Society. Buckingham:
Open University Press.
•Carless, D. 2006. Differing perceptions in the feedback process.
Studies in Higher Education. 3, no. 2: 219-233.
•Hughes, G. (2011) Aiming for Personal Best: a Case for Introducing
Ipsative Assessment in Higher Education Studies in Higher Education
36 (3): 353 – 367
•Hughes, G. Wood, E. & Okumoto, K. 2009 Use of ipsative assessment
in distance learning Centre for Distance Education Report, University
of London. http://cdelondon.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/use-of-ipsative-
assessment-in-distance-learning/ Institute of Education
• Nicol, D. & Macfarlane,-Dick, D. 2006. Formative assessment and self University of London
regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback 20 Bedford Way
practice. Studies in Higher Education 31 no. 2: 199-218. London WC1H 0AL
Tel +44 (0)20 7612 6000
Fax +44 (0)20 7612 6126
Email info@ioe.ac.uk
22
Web www.ioe.ac.uk