Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Mayamot National High School Learning and Development Needs Assessment Plan Background and Rationale

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
CITY SCHOOLS DIVISION OF ANTIPOLO
MAYAMOT NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ASSESSMENT PLAN

Background and Rationale:

As an institution of learning, the Department of Education (DepEd) works to protect and promote the right of Filipinos to quality basic education
that is equitable, culture-based, and complete, and allows them to realize their potential and contribute meaningfully to building the nation. The
investment of the DepEd in the development of human potential is a commitment it makes not only to its learners but also its teachers. Towards this
end, the DepEd fully supports the continuing professional development of its teaching personnel based on the principle of lifelong learning and the
view of the teaching profession as one that “requires teachers expert knowledge and specialized skills, acquired and maintained through rigorous and
continuing study” (UNESCO 1966).

In line with the implementation of Republic Act No. 10533, or the Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013, the Department of Education
(DepEd) issues the enclosed policy on The Learning Action Cell (LAC) as a K to 12 Basic Education Program School-Based Continuing
Professional Development Strategy for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning. In this policy, the DepEd institutionalizes Learning Action
Cells (LACs) that aim to develop and support successful teachers by nurturing their knowledge, attitudes, and competencies in terms of curriculum,
instruction, and assessment in their work stations. Since the quality of learning is contingent on quality teaching, enhancing teacher quality becomes
of utmost importance for the long term and sustainable nation-building. Thus, the LAC Session which can also be seen in the school’s SIP/AIP,
support the DepEd’s vision, mission, and strategic goals of ensuring teachers with capacity building activities to attain quality, relevant, and
complete Basic Education for learners. From the said LAC Sessions, Math teachers will have collaborations on how their performance be improved
better by means of ICT approach. It will be in a form of virtual meeting.
LNA Objective/s:
At the end of the LAC Sessions, the participants are expected to

1. Enhance the knowledge and skills of mathematics teachers on the use of ICT in the delivery of the lesson,
2. Develop supplementary learning resources and utilize blended modality to improve classroom teaching, and
3. Craft digital Informative System tools to evaluate the teaching and learning in mathematics.

LAC SESSION
Target Participants Office Position
1. LICO, AARON JAMES D. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Head Teacher I
2. ANDRES, GERALD S. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
3. BLASON, REA T. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
4. CABALSA, GLORIA B. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher II
5. ESTORNINOS, ANALE V. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
6. GIMANTOG, MARIA KRISTINE E. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
7. GOLLES, IMELDA B. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher III
8. GUEVARRA, GILBERT M. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
9. JANER, REYNALDO C. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
10. LEYSON, CEASARAH M. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
11. LOPEZ, LENIE A. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
12. MARCES, JOHN MARK E. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
13. MITRA, ANNIVIE C. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
14. NAVAJA, ARIEL G. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
15. NOCIDO, ROSALINA R. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
16. OFALSA, RONEL F. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
17. QUIJANO, JOEMELYN A. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
18. REMPILLO, YORADEL S. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
19. YAP, BABY M. Mayamot NHS – Math Dept. Teacher I
Data Required LNA Methods LNA Tools Respondents
Indicators that needs to be addressed Consolidation of the SAT Results Self-Assessment Tool HT and Teachers
FGD and midyear assessment results

Implementation Details
Activities Responsible Person/s Time Frame Remarks
nd
1. Planning and Design Program Management Team 2 week of April Completed
2. Data Collection and Analysis Program Management Team 3rd week of April Completed
3. Submission of proposal Program Management Team 4th week of April Completed
4. Program Implementation Program Management Team, Facilitators, May 12, 2021 Not yet done
TWG, and Resource Speakers
5. Documentation, Assessment and Documentation Committee After the LAC Session Not yet done
Evaluation
6. Program Review Program Management Team, Facilitators, After the LAC Session Not yet done
TWG and M & E Personnel

You might also like