Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

PCC Case No. M-2018-006

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

PCC Case No.

M-2018-006

In the Matter of the Proposed Acquisition by Universal Robina Corporation of Assets of


Central Azucarera Don Pedro, Inc. and Roxas Holdings, Inc.

Universal Robina Corporation of Assets of Central Azucarera Don Pedro, Inc. and Roxas
Holdings, Inc.

Facts:

URC is a Philippine corporation engaged in a food related business which operates into 3
segments. One of those is the Sugar Division. URC’s UPE is JG Summit Holdings, Inc., a
Philippine Holding Company who has business in foods and agro-industrial, real estate, air
transportation, banking and others.

CADPI is a Philippine corporation engaged in producing and trading raw and refined sugars,
molasses and other related products. Its UPE is RHI is a publicly-listed Philippine holding
company engaged in manufacturing sugar and allied products. RHI owns 100% of CADPI’s
issued and outstanding capital stocks.

The transaction involves URC’s propose acquisition of all assets of CADPI and the parcel of
land owned by RHI where CADPI facilities are situated.

Issue: WON the transaction will substantially prevent, lessen or restrict competition in the
relevant market.

Held:

A merger gives rise to a substantial lessening of competition when it has a significant effect on
competition, and consequently, on the competitive pressures on firms to reduce prices, improve
quality, become more efficient or innovative.

Relevant product markets are sugar manufacturing and provision of sugar cane milling services
which is a distinct and unique.

The commission assessed that the acquisition is a merger to monopoly will substantially lessen
competition. It has unilateral effects (independently exercise unilateral power) and coordinated
effects (transaction leads to monopoly, no need to prove coordination).

Transaction will create market power for URC to control planter’s share in the planter-miller
sharing agreement.

Potential substitution outside of the relevant market is not sufficient to constrain URC from
exercising market power. Also, alternative crops are not practical.

Barriers to entry are high. Building a sugar plant would cost a lot.
RHI failed to provide detailed and verifiable evidence of supposed benefits that the transaction
is projected to bring about.

You might also like