US v. Barrias
US v. Barrias
US v. Barrias
Barrias
G.R. No. 4349, September 24, 1908
J. Tracey
Case Summary: Barrias was charged and convicted before CFI with a violation of some
regulations of the Insular Collector of Customs. Hence, this petition. Barrias claims that
such regulations constitute an undue delegation of legislative power.
The Supreme Court ruled that the said regulations do not constitute an undue delegation
of legislative power. Under Act No. 1235, the Collector is empowered to make suitable
regulations and to fix penalties for violations thereof.
Doctrine: Harbor regulations are in the nature of police regulations. Hence, they do not
involve an undue grant of legislative power
FACTS
• Aniceto Barrias was charged before CFI with a violation of Pars. 70 and 83,
Circular No. 397 of the Insular Collector of Customs
RULE
APPLICATION
• The regulation of the Collector is valid under Sec. 5, Act No. 1136
• Here, Lighterage is the very business in which the vessel was engaged
• The vessel, heavily laden with hemp, was navigating the Pasig River below the
Bridge of Spain, Manila
o This spot is near the mouth of the river where the docks are used for the
purpose of taking on and discharging freight
o Hence, in a sense, it was part of the harbor
• Such a delegated power constitutes not only a right but a duty to be performed by
the delegate by the instrumentality of his own judgment acting immediately upon
the matter of legislation and not through the intervening mind of another
RULING
Petition DENIED.