PRM Self Study Guide - Exam III: The Professional Risk Manager (PRM) Certification Program
PRM Self Study Guide - Exam III: The Professional Risk Manager (PRM) Certification Program
PRM Self Study Guide - Exam III: The Professional Risk Manager (PRM) Certification Program
2 0 11 ED ITIO N
UPDAT ED- JANUARY-2014
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
■ ASSOCIATE PRM CERTIFICATE – Covers the core concepts of risk management, allowing
non-specialists to interpret risk management information and reports, make critical
assessments, and evaluate the implications and the limitations of such results.
J oin thousands of other risk professionals dedicated to advancing the standards of the risk pro-
fession worldwide by becoming a Sustaining member of PRMIA. This exclusive membership
provides the highest level of benefits, discounts, and opportunities available. Visit
http://www.prmia.org/membership or email support@prmia.org to become a member or
to learn more.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TM
PRM SELF-STUDY GUIDE – EXAM III
Risk Management Practices, Market Risk, Credit Risk, Operational Risk
OVERVIEW
E
TM
xam III of the PRM certification tests a candidate’s knowledge and understanding of the modern
risk management practices.
Exam III is split into three parts, which address market risk, credit risk and operational risk in turn. These
three are the main components of risk borne by any organization, although the relative importance of the
mix varies.
You can use this Self-Study Guide to focus your study on the key Learning Outcome Statements from each
chapter. These Learning Outcome Statements form the basis for the questions asked during the examina-
TM
tion that you will take as Exam III of the PRM certification program. We recommend that you first read the
chapter, then review the Learning Outcome Statements, then re-read the chapter with particular emphasis
on these points.
We recommend strongly that you do not simply read the Learning Outcome Statements and then try to find
the information about each in the books as a short-cut way of preparing for the exam. Real-life risk manage-
ment requires your ability to assemble information from many simultaneous inputs and you can expect that
some exam questions will draw from multiple Learning Outcome Statements.
After studying the book for this section (PRM Handbook Volume III) and the seven additional supplemental
papers, becoming comfortable with your knowledge and understanding of each Learning Outcome State-
ment, and working through the Study Questions and the Sample Exam Questions, you will have read the
TM
materials necessary for passing Exam III of the PRM Certification program. You may then wish to pur-
chase access to online Sample Exams (Diagnostics) via the PRMIA website to assess your readiness.
TM
Taking the PRM qualification, as well as working as a risk officer, requires a certain amount of mathemati-
cal expertise. This is not excessive. Anyone who was passed mathematics studies at advanced high school
level, or who has completed the first year of a university degree in a mathematical-based qualification
(physics, economics, engineering, etc) should have no problem with the requirements. For others, we
recommend that they take tuition in the mathematics required and that they focus on this as the first part
TM
of their studies for the PRM .
Please note that testing conditions, your state of mind and various factors can make your TABLE OF CONTENTS
performance on the actual exams somewhat less strong than on the Sample Exams. If your
Sample Exam scores are near to the passing mark, you may wish to study the subject Overview p. 1
materials even further. Risk Management
Practices p. 4
TM
Please remember that the exams of the PRM certification are very challenging. After all Market Risk p. 5
it’s “a higher standard in risk certification” and you would expect nothing less. There is
Credit Risk p. 7
no guarantee that using the Self-Study Guide, in combination with the reading materials
and Sample Exams will give you a passing score. But, they should all provide you with Operational Risk p. 10
assistance in doing your best. We wish you much success in your effort to become certified Study Questions p. 14
as a Professional Risk Manager!
1
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WORD DEFINITIONS
In this guide, we use the Command Words that the CFA Institute uses, and a few additional words, to indicate
levels of ability expected from successful candidates on each Learning Outcome Statement.
STUDY TIME
Preparation time will vary greatly according to your knowledge and understanding of the subject matter prior
to your self-study, your ability to commit dedicated and uninterrupted time to your study and other factors. In
TM
general, candidates who prepare for the exams of the PRM certification program allocate about three months
to preparation for each exam.
You may spend three hours each week in study, or as much as ten or more, each week to ready yourself. Follow
the suggestions above regarding the use of the Learning Outcome Statements and Sample Exams. Once you are
comfortable with your readiness, it’s time to register for the exam.
TM
2 PRM SELF -ST UDY GUI DE — E XAM I I I
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TESTING STRATEGIES
All questions are multiple-choice and there are no penalties for incorrect answers. Bear in mind that it is vitally
important to finish the exam in the time allotted. Do not linger over questions longer than is sensible.
For example, if the exam has 30 questions in 90 minutes, do not spend longer than three minutes per question.
If at the end of three minutes you have not answered the question, decide on the best answer you can (ignoring
the obviously wrong), mark your answer and move on. If you do have any spare time at the end of the exam you
can always go back and review the answer. However, make absolutely sure that you have an answer for every
question at the end of the exam!
Another strategy would be to go through all the questions answering the ones you find easier ones first. Then
after a first pass, divide the remaining questions by the time remaining and proceed as above.
1. Download the Pearson Vue Tutorial & Practice Exam by clicking here – if the link does not work, cut and paste
this in your browser: http://www.pearsonvue.com/athena/PearsonVueTutorialDemo.msi
2. Click "run" if you have that option otherwise click "save file"
3. Open the saved file. (If you clicked "Run" skip this step)
4. Follow the Software Installation prompts
5. Run the installed software
6. Check the box for the Practice Exam
7. Click on the "next" button until you get to the screen with the calculator icon in the upper left hand corner of
the screen.
8. Click on the calculator icon to be able practice with the TI308XS calculator.
STUDY QUESTIONS
A few questions, with answers, have been provided to help the candidate understand some of the concepts of
TM
the PRM Handbook. These study questions are not comprehensive of all concepts in the exam, nor are they
necessarily questions of a similar type to those in the exam. They are provided in good faith as a study aid.
O VE RVIEW 3
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T he practice of risk management is evolving at a rapid pace, especially with the implementation of, and
revisions to, Basel II. Aside from these regulatory pressures, shareholders and other stakeholders in-
creasingly demand higher standards of risk management and disclosure of risk. In fact, it would not be an
overstatement to say that risk consciousness is one of the defining features of modern business. Inter-
est in risk management is at an unprecedented level as institutions gather data, upgrade their models
and systems, train their staff, review their remuneration systems, adapt their business practices and scru-
tinise controls for this new era.
The last line of defence against risk is capital, as it ensures that a firm can continue as a going concern even if
substantial and unexpected losses are incurred. Accordingly, one of the major themes of Exam III is how to deter-
mine the appropriate size of this capital buffer. How much capital is enough to withstand unusual losses in each
of the three areas of risk? The measurement of risk has further important implications for risk management as it
is increasingly incorporated into the performance evaluation process. Since resources are allocated and bonuses
paid on the basis of performance measures, it is essential that they be appropriately adjusted for risk. Only then
will appropriate incentives be created for behaviour that is beneficial for shareholders and other stakeholders.
CHAPTER 1 (III.0) explores this fundamental idea at general level, since it is relevant for each of the three risk
areas that follow.
Capital Allocation
■ Explain Risk Adjusted Performance Measurement (RAPM)
TM
4 PRM SELF -ST UDY GUI DE — E XAM I I I
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MARKET RISK
CHAPTER 2 (III.A.1) introduces the topic of market risk as it is practiced by bankers, fund managers and corpo-
rate treasurers. It explains the four major tasks of risk management (identification, assessment, monitoring and
control/mitigation), thus setting the scene for the quantitative chapters that follow.
These days one of the major tasks of risk managers is to measure the risk using value-at-risk (VaR) models.
The basic VaR models for market risk are covered in CHAPTER 3 (III.A.2).
MA RKET RI SK 5
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CHAPTER 4 (III.A.3) covers advanced VaR models for market risk along with some other advanced topics such as
risk decomposition.
The main challenge for risk managers is to model the empirical characteristics observed in the market, especially
volatility clustering. The advanced models are generally more successful in this regard, although the basic ver-
sions are easier to implement. Realistically, there will never be a perfect VaR model, which is one of the reasons
why stress tests are a popular tool. They can be considered an ad hoc solution to the problem of model risk.
CHAPTER 5 (III.A.4) explains the need for stress tests and how they might usefully be constructed.
TM
6 PRM SELF -ST UDY GUI DE — E XAM I I I
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This section introduces the topic of Liquidity Risk Management; and details some of the fundamental
tools and methodologies involved in the identification, management and reporting of the components
of Liquidity Risk. In addition to various sections of PRM Handbook Volume III, read paper Funding Liquidity:
Risk Analysis and Management found in “My Library” of the PRMIA website. Must purchase PRM Handbook Vol-
ume III to receive access.
considerations
■ Identify the processes concerning collateral management
■ Identify, and design, the requirements of Stress Testing and a liquidity buffer
■ Demonstrate the purpose, and effect of liquidity gap reports, and Liquidity at
Risk (LAR)
■ Describe the components of the contents used for internal and external
liquidity reporting
This section is focused on 3 papers from financial authorities and regulators found at http://www.prmia.org/prm-
exam/casestudies-standards:
■ Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System – The Supervisory Capital Assessment Program;
■ Financial Services Authority (FSA) – Stress and scenario testing; and
■ Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) – Principles for sound stress testing practices and supervi
sion. They contain guidelines and recommendations for an effective and firm-wide stress, and scenario, test
ing regime.
resource projections
■ Demonstrate an understanding of the SCAP capital buffer
testing
■ Describe the clarifications to Pillar I and II proposed by the FSA
■ Explain the findings of the BCBS relative to the performance of stress testing
CREDIT RISK
CHAPTER 6 (III.B.1) introduces the sphere of credit risk management. Some fundamental tools for managing
credit risk are explained here, including the use of collateral, credit limits and credit derivatives.
■ Describe Provisioning
■ Describe Documentation
Foundations for credit risk modelling are laid in CHAPTER 7 (III.B.2), which explains the three basic components
of a credit loss: the exposure, the default probability and loss given default. The product of these three, which can
be defined as random processes, is the credit loss distribution.
CHAPTER 8 (III.B.3) takes a more detailed look at the exposure amount. While relatively simple to define for
standard loans, assessment of the exposure amount can present challenges for other credit sensitive instru-
ments such as derivatives, whose values are a function of market movements.
CHAPTER 9 (III.B.4) examines in detail the default probability and how it can evolve over time. It also discusses
the relationship between credit ratings and credit spreads, and credit scoring models.
Default Rates
■ Define Credit Ratings
CHAPTER 10 (III.B.5) tackles one of the most crucial issues for credit risk modelling: how to model credit risk in a
portfolio context and thereby estimate credit VaR. Since diversification is one of the most important tools for the
management of credit risk, risk measures on a portfolio basis are fundamental. A number of tools are examined,
including the credit migration approach, the contingent claim or structural approach, and the actuarial approach.
CREDI T RISK 9
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CHAPTER 11 (III.B.6) extends the discussion of credit VaR models to examine credit risk capital. It compares
both economic capital and regulatory capital for credit risk as defined under the new Basel Accord.
Portfolio Models
■ Demonstrate Minimum Credit Capital Requirements under Basel I
■ Describe the Internal Ratings Based Approach (IRB) for Corporate, Bank and
Sovereign Exposures
■ Describe the Internal Ratings Based Approach (IRB) for Retail Exposures
■ Describe the Internal Ratings Based Approach (IRB) for SME Exposures
■ Describe the Internal Ratings Based Approach (IRB) for Specialised Lending
TM
10 PRM SELF -ST UDY GUI DE — E XAM I I I
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPERATIONAL RISK
The framework for managing operational risk is first established in CHAPTER 12 (III.C.1). After defining opera-
tional risk, it explains how it may be identified, assessed and controlled.
(AMA) Framework
■ List the objectives of an operational risk management function
CHAPTER 13 (III.C.2) discusses operational risk process models. By better understanding business processes we
can find the sources of risk and often take steps to re-engineer these processes for greater efficiency and lower
risk.
CREDI T RISK 11
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One of the most perplexing issues for risk managers is to determine appropriate capital buffers for operational
risks. Operational VaR is the subject of CHAPTER 14 (III.C.3), including discussion of loss models, standard
functional forms, both analytical and simulation methods, and the aggregation of operational risk over all busi-
ness lines and event types.
Read Enterprise Risk Information Management found in “My Library” of the PRMIA website. This paper intro-
duces the candidate to the dangers of not having up-to-date, clean, and available data in order to make
risk management decisions, and a remedial path to achieving the best possible assurance of accurate
data. Must purchase PRM Handbook Volume III to receive access to paper.
■ Explain, and demonstrate, the need for holistic Risk Information Management
Environments
■ Describe the 7 components of a Data Management Framework, and a Logical
Data Model
■ Discuss the 5 Critical Success Factors of implementing a Risk Information
Management Environment
■ Identify the 4 components of AS-IS to TO-BE environments
TM
12 PRM SELF -ST UDY GUI DE — E XAM I I I
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This section consists of 2 papers found in “My Library” of the PRMIA website:
■ Why Banks Failed the Stress Test
These papers provide details of factors inherent in the financial crisis of 2007-9 and identify some of the causes, and
suggestions for remedial actions. Must purchase PRM Handbook Volume III to receive access to papers.
engineering.
■ Discuss the function of the intermediaries of the financial system
■ Explain the importance of the balance of the component parts of the financial
services industry
■ Describe how “uncertainty” can unbalance the financial system
■ Discuss how infusions of cash into the monetary system stopped the system
from seizing up
■ Demonstrate how limited memory, and disaster myopia, were prevalent in
of time
■ Discuss the apparent role conflicts between risk managers and risk takers,
O PERATION AL RISK 13
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STUDY QUESTIONS
MARKET RISK
Implied Volatility, Smirk Q: Does the volatility smile come from theory or market practice?
and Smile
The commonly used option pricing models assume normal returns, hence
log-normal distribution of prices, with no account for kurtosis. Practice and
empirical studies, show that returns are distributed differently from the
assummed normal distributions, with ‘fat tails’. Hence the probability of a far
out-of-the-money option to be exercised is higher than suggested by a model
using flat volatilities. Hence the volatility smile is a market practice solution to
an incomplete model.
Value at Risk (VaR) Q: How does VaR change if the holding period goes from 1 to 10 days, under
the usual set of assumptions?
Historical Calculation of VaR, Q: When is a Monte Carlo approach most advantageous for computing VaR
Monte Carlo
a) In volatile markets
b) When the markets expected behaviour is non-normally distributed
c) When quick calculations are requested
d) When regulators are getting nervous about VaR calculations
TM
14 PRM SELF -ST UDY GUI DE — E XAM I I I
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Covariance Matrix Construction Q: For EWMA (Exponentially Weighted Moving Average), using a decay fator
of 0.94 and a tolerance level of 1% (i.e. excluding exponential weights below
1%), the effective number of data points used to estimate the covariance
matrix is:
a) 74
b) 150
c) 100
d) 250
The decay factor compounds by day, hence we have: 0.94x = 0.01. Using
natural logarithms, x Log(0.94) = Log (0.01). Hence x =74.4, a). We shall note
that 250 appeared as the most plausible answer, as this represents one year
of daily prices.
Market Risk Limits Q: What should happen if a successful trader consistently uses between
80% and 95% of his trading limit?
The trader has not exceeded his trading limits, so he has not transgressed,
however one would expect to see his risk rise and fall with market opportu-
nities, and if the market had an unexpected move, he may well exceed his
limits. The type of trading and risk needs to be more closely examined and the
trader reminded of the need not to exceed limits, even for an unusual market
move. If after review the risk / reward ratio in his trading is favourable, it may
be applicable to increase his limits so that his normal position size now
represents 50-60% of limits.
Stress Testing and Q: Which of the elements below argue for the use of stress-tests?
Scenario Analysis
I) Natural catastrophes
II) Presence of long options in the portfolio
III) Terrorist networks
IV) Fat tails
Natural catastrophes are seldom included in VaR frameworks, let alone in our
thought processes. Long options immunise a portfolio against extreme move-
ments, so they are helpful not hurtful to the portfolio. Terrorist attacks provide
possibility of shocks that are potentially correlated, hence even worse against
VaR. Fat tails belie normality assumptions: c).
Regulatory capital is based upon the aim to avoid systemic risk: this is not
directly an internal concern (obviously the bank must however be compliant),
the institution should be concerned about economic capital per se. Liquidity
risk is a component of market risk, although at the end of a chain of events.
The key to allocate capital should be kept as managerial information rather
than used to create tensions between capital-envious departments. Raroc
should be arbitrage-free: c).
Alternative Risk Measures Q: Which of the following are typical functions of the market risk
and Advanced VaR management department?
I) Identification
II) Assessment
III) Monitoring
IV) Control/Mitigation
V) Collateral Documentation
I, II, III and IV are all functions of the typical market risk management depart-
ment. In IV, we include selective hedging of exposures related to market
movements. While the market risk management department may assist with
collateral valuation, the legal or credit risk department will typically deal with
collateral documentation.
TM
16 PRM SELF -ST UDY GUI DE — E XAM I I I
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CREDIT RISK
Types of Credit Risk Q: Why has the development of derivatives necessitated credit risk
regulations, when these instruments are designed to deal with market risk?
Actuarial Methods Q: What are the main limitations of standard deviation as an indicator of
credit risk?
Exposure, Loss Given Default Q: How is the loss given default incorporated in the CreditMetrics
(LGD) and Exposure Technical Document?
Although the document does not mention the term of loss given default, this
concept is handled in chapter 7 (pp. 77-80) through recovery rates. The
rationale is that recovery rates are ‘highly uncertain’, but can be assessed
through beta distributions (p. 80), with different parameters for different
seniority classes: b).
Rating Agencies and Q: What are the main limitations of an assessment exclusively based on
The Enron case highlights enough that the statement is true. In less dramatic
cases, however, the following reasons can be alleged:
■ accounting figures, by nature, are based on the past, while a rating is aimed
at informing about future possible events
■ the possibility of a firm to access cash through capital markets can
change daily
■ accounting figures must be used with judgement whenever possible
Marginal and Cumulative Q: The default rates on a portfolio have been estimated at 2% for the coming
Default Risk year and 4% for next year. What is the expected payment of 2-year obligtions?
Transition Matrix Q: Given a one-year probability of default of 20%, what would be the
cumulative probability of default for the bond for the three years?
a) 45.4%
b) 48.8%
c) 60.5%
d) None of the above
TM
18 PRM SELF -ST UDY GUI DE — E XAM I I I
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint Transition Matrices Q: The portfolio contains one risky bond from company A. Company A is a
and Correlated Migrations subsidiary of XYZ and if XYZ defaults, company A does so too. The probability
of default of XYZ is 0.3 and the probability of company A going into bank-
ruptcy without XYZ defaulting is 0.5. What is the probability of having a
default on the risky bond?
a) Cannot be determined
b) 0.60
c) 0.70
d) None of the above
Implied Default Probability Q: What is the probability of default of the issuer of a zero-coupon 1-year
bond trading at 80 b.p. above the yield curve, if the expected recovery rate is
50% and risk-free interest rate is 5%?
p= probability of default
r= risk-free rate
s= spread
The expected value of the cash flows from the risky bond is: 100 * ((1-p) +p/2).
This discounted value, at the rate of 1+r+s, equates that of the risk-free bond.
100*(1+p/2)/(1+r+s)=100/(1+r). Hence p=1.5%.
Merton and KMV Models Q: The Merton (1974) model implies that a position in a credit-sensitive
bond is equivalent to:
a) A long position in the firm’s equity and a short position in a risk-free bond
b) A long put and a long call position on the firm’s assets
c) A long position in a credit-risk-free bond and a short put on the firm’s assets
d) An up-and-in call on a credit-risk-free bond and a short call on the firm’s equity
A long position on a bond means a short cash position. If the bond issuer
defaults, the bondholder is left with a bad loss, hence the position equates to
shorting something. Hence only c) remains. A more thorough way to address
this question is as follows:
■ a short position on a risk-free bond means a borrowing; this is not the case
of a long bond position: a) falls
■ such a position as in b) would make the put very valuable in case of issuers’
default: b) falls
■ if the firm’s (net) assets are worth nothing, a short put represents a loss
(as with a risky bond)
■ an up-and-in call (besides the fact that this exotic was unknown in 1974)
gives the holder, after the bond has gone higher than a certain level, the
right to purchase the bond: this does not equate a risky bond.
RAROC and Economic Q: Which of the following is an appropriate way to measure operational risk?
Capital Allocation
a) VaR
b) Notional exposure
c) Loss data distribution
d) Insurance values
VaR is a market risk management tool, notional exposures are related to credit
risk, insurance values show only insured assets instead of operations. Loss
distribution data record the history of operational losses: c).
TM
20 PRM SELF -ST UDY GUI DE — E XAM I I I
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPERATIONAL RISK
Typologies of Operational Risk Q: Which one of the following is a risk driver rather than a risk indicator?
a) Staff turnover
b) Product complexity
c) Systems downtime
d) Model errors
Indicators are response variables, while drivers are decision variables, so the
answer is b).
Insurance and Re-insurance Q: What is the main hurdle seen by the Basel Committee in fully recognising
the use of insurance?
The market for insurance products for banking operations is ‘still developing’,
which means the products are not yet widespread enough and not standardised.
Besides, quantification is arduous. Another reason is that the presence of
insurance may replace an operational risk with a counterparty risk. Insurance
companies do not usually pay up “on the nail,” they generally seek to reduce a
claim through loss adjustment and litigation and hence have a different “risk
model” from the banking sector.
Causal Models Q: Which of the following principles does not help in an operational risk
measurement process:
a) Consistency
b) Transparency
c) Timeliness
d) Relevance
Risk Management Processes Q: When used to protect against catastrophic risks, Insurance:
a) Reduces the need for capital by more than 50%
b) Transforms catastrophic risk into counterparty risk
c) Is always too expensive, as actuaries price to a certain return for
the insurance companies
d) Eliminates default risk
Insurance is a way to transform a more esoteric and less measurable risk into
something more widely understood like counterparty risk, b).
The data in external databases are edited so that names and other means of
identification of the origin are deleted. Moreover, these databases are not
designed for mutual spying, but for common progress. Every institution
should design and structure these databases at the outset so that they can
stand the test of time as well as external databases. A badly structured internal
database is likely to be a costly and useless exercise. Internal databases
should be, at the outset, regulation-compliant, as regulation is flexible enough
to allow tools that are compliant as well as internally useful. For high-impact
low-frequency data, internal data are likely to be too succinct. The collated
data of several institutions are likely to be a much better guide to the future: a).
RAROC and Economic Q: What could be the most effective hedge of a portfolio of weather derivatives?
Capital Allocation
a) Back-to-back matching
b) Global diversification
c) Catastrophe bonds
d) Equity sector equity index futures
Weather derivatives are not likely to find perfect hedges, as these instruments
are new, fragmented and thinly traded. Back-to-back matching (buying
protection from winter sports resorts, selling to beach resorts, or similar
approaches) is of limited application. Hedging with a position on a particular
sector, if there were enough of these instruments, would be similarly insufficient.
Catastrophe bonds would matter only for extreme weather. Global diversifica-
tion can help compensate the effect of dry weather in a region with excessive
rain in another one: b).
TM
22 PRM SELF -ST UDY GUI DE — E XAM I I I
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||