This document is a summary of an external factor evaluation (EFE) matrix for Apple Co. The highest weighted score of 0.68 was for the threat of the contract with the main customer expiring soon. The lowest weighted score of 0.09 was for the threat of natural disasters. The total average weighted score was 2.43, indicating Apple Co.'s strategies effectively address opportunities and threats.
This document is a summary of an external factor evaluation (EFE) matrix for Apple Co. The highest weighted score of 0.68 was for the threat of the contract with the main customer expiring soon. The lowest weighted score of 0.09 was for the threat of natural disasters. The total average weighted score was 2.43, indicating Apple Co.'s strategies effectively address opportunities and threats.
This document is a summary of an external factor evaluation (EFE) matrix for Apple Co. The highest weighted score of 0.68 was for the threat of the contract with the main customer expiring soon. The lowest weighted score of 0.09 was for the threat of natural disasters. The total average weighted score was 2.43, indicating Apple Co.'s strategies effectively address opportunities and threats.
This document is a summary of an external factor evaluation (EFE) matrix for Apple Co. The highest weighted score of 0.68 was for the threat of the contract with the main customer expiring soon. The lowest weighted score of 0.09 was for the threat of natural disasters. The total average weighted score was 2.43, indicating Apple Co.'s strategies effectively address opportunities and threats.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2
KOLEHIYO NG LUNGSOD NG LIPA
Marawoy, Lipa City, Batangas 4217
Name: TARROZA, JONH CHRISTIAN F. Score/Rating_________ Date: MAY 12, 2021
ACTIVITY – D EXTERNAL FACTOR EVALUATION (EFE) Directions: Compute for the weighted score of Apple Co. and explain the result of the matrix.
Key External Factors Weight Rating Weighted
Score Opportunities 1. New trade agreement that lifts the ban of imported food 0.11 3 0.33 is signed with a neighboring country. 2. Signing a contract with a new supplier. 0.09 1 0.09 3. Processed food market growing by 15% next year in our 0.24 2 0.48 largest market. 4. Incorporating a new company in neighboring country, 0.10 1 0.10 where the tax rate is decreasing by 3% next year. Threats 5. The contract with the main customer expires in 2 0.17 4 0.68 months. 6. Extreme cases of natural disasters occurring next year. 0.03 3 0.09 7. New law, requiring decreasing the amount of sugar in 0.14 3 0.42 the food by 20%, could be passed next year. 8. Competitors opening 3 new stores in the town. 0.12 2 0.24 Total 1.00 - 2.43
Evaluation (4)
The highest weighted score is 0.68 which is under of Threats number 5. ”The contract with the main customer expires in 2 months.” While the lowest weighted score is 0.9 which is also under of Threats number 6.” Extreme cases of natural disasters occurring next year.” Then the total average weighted scores is 2.43 which mean the firm’s strategies effectively take advantage of existing opportunities and minimize the potential adverse of external threats.
1 ACTIVITY – E
COMPETITIVE PROFILE MATRIX Directions: Identify Critical Success Factors (CSF) for your chosen business and its two other competitor. Prepare a Comparative Profile Matrix (CPM) and infer a conclusion from the result of the Matrix
Name of Chosen Business: Cleene Philusa Corporattion and Hygienix Splash Corporation
Factor Inc. Philusa Splash Corporattion Corporation Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score 1. New Technology 0.10 3 1 3 0.20 4 0.20 2. Large number of customer. 0.10 4 1 3 0.20 3 0.10 3. Lowering price 0.10 3 1 1 0.00 1 0.10 4. Adding new products. 0.30 3 3 3 0.20 2 0.20 5. Maintained its clients. 0.40 4 4 4 0.40 4 0.40 Total 1.00 10 1.00 1.00
COMPETITIVE PROFILE MATRIX (CPM)RESULT (4 pts.)
In comparison of the three company Cleene Philusa Corporattion and Hygienix Splash Corporation got the lowest rating of 1 while MCLean Mfg. Inc. only got lowest rating of 3 but nevertheless they got all highest rating of 4. In contrast all company got the highest score of 0.40 in Critical Success Factor number 5. While Cleene Philusa Corporattion is the only one who got lowest score which is 0.00 in Critical Success Factor number 4. Over all, the three company got a different average in all Critical Success Factor, proof that all company have their own strategies to how effectively deal in the different factors and how their business make it successful.
