Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

The Case of Bench Management

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

The case of Bench Management

Trust them with knee-jerk reactions,” said Vikram Koshy, CEO, Delta Software India, as he
looked at the quarterly report of Topline Securities, a well known equity research firm. The
firm had announced a downgrade od Delta, a company listed both on Indian Bonuses & the
Nasdaq. The reason? “One out of every six development engineers in the company is likely to
be benched during the remaining part of the year.”

Three analysts from Topline had spent some time at Delta three weeks ago. Koshy & his team
had explained how benching was no different from the problems of excess inventory, idle time
& surplus capacity that firms in the manufacturing sector face on a regular basis, “Delta has
witnessed a scorching pace of 30 percent growth during the last five years in a row,” Koshy
had said, “What is happening is a corrective phase.” But, evidently, the analysis were
unconvinced.

Of course, the Topline report went on to cite several other “signals,” as it said: the rate of
annual hike in salaries at Delta would come down to 5% (from between 20 & 30% last year),
the entry-level intake of engineers from campuses in June 2001, would decline to 5%(unlike
the traditional 30% addition to manpower every year); and earnings for the next two years
could dip by between 10 & 12%. And the loftiest of them all: “The meltdown at Nasdaq is
unlikely to reverse in the near future.”

“Some of the signals are no doubt valid. And ominous,” Said Koshy, addressing his A-team,
which had assembled for the routine morning meeting. “But clearly, everyone is reading too
much into this business of benching. In fact, benching is one of the many options that our
principles in the US have been pursuing as part of cutting costs right since September, 2000.
they are also expanding the share of off-shore jobs. Five of our principals have confirmed that
they would outsource more from Delta in India-which is likely to hike their billings by about
30%. At one level, this is an opportunity for us. At another, of course, I am not sure if we
should be jubilant, because they have asked for a 25-30% cut in billing rates. Our margins will
take a hit, unless we cut costs & improve productivity.”

“Productivity, is clearly a matter of priority now,” said Vivek Vardan, Vice-


President(Operations). “If you consider benching as a non-earning mode, we do have large
patches of it at Delta. As you are aware, it has not been easy to secure 70% utilization of our
manpower, even in normal times. I think we need to look at why we have 30% bench before
examining how to turn it into an asset.”

“There are several reasons,” remarked Achyut Patwardhan, Vice-President(HR). “And a lot of
it has to do with the nature of our business, which is more project-driven than product-driven.
When you are managing a number of overseas & domestic projects simultaneously, as we do at
Delta, people tend to go on the bench. They wait, as they complete one project, and are
assigned the next. There are problems of coordination between projects, related to the logistics
of moving people & resources from one customer to another
In fact, I am fine-tuning our monthly manpower utilisation report to provide breakup of bench
costs into specifics-leave period, training programmes, travel time, buffers.”

“It would be worthwhile following the business model used by US principal Techno Inc, “said
Aveek Mohanty, Director(Finance). “The company has a pipeline of projects, but it does not
manage project by project. What it does is to slice each project into what it calls ‘activities’.
For eg, communication networking; user interface development; scheduling of processes are
activities common to all projects. People move from one project to another. It is somewhat like
the Activity based costing. It throws up the bench time straightaway, which helps us control
costs & revenue better.”

“I also think we should reduce our dependence on projects & move into products, “ said Pravin
Kumar, Director(Marketing). “That is where lies the opportunity for brand building. In fact,
now is the time to get our technology guys involved in marketing. Multiskilling helps reduce
the bench time.”

“Benching has an analogy in the manufacturing sector,” said Girish Shahane, Vice-
President(Services). “We could look for learning there. Many firms have adopted Just-in-
Time(JIT) Inventory as part of eliminating idle time. It would be worthwhile exploring the
possibility of JIT. But the real learning lies in standardisation of work. It is linked to what
Mohanty said about managing by activities.”

“At a broader level, I see several other opportunities ,”said Koshy, “We can fill in the space
vacated by US firms & move up the value chain. But before we do so, Delta should consolidate
its position as the premier outsourcing centre. Since there are only two ways in which we can
generate revenue-sell expertise or sell products-we should move towards a mix of both. Tie-
ups with global majors will help. Now is the time to look beyond the US & strike alliances
with firms in Europe-and also Japan- as part of developing new products for global markets.”

QUESTIONS

1. Should benching be a matter of concern at Delta?


2. How can it convert bench into capital?
3. What are the risks involved in moving from a project-centric mode to a mix of projects
& products? (OPTIONAL TO ANSWER)
Why Bench?
Clients
suddenly decide
to cut back on
IT spends
Project mix gets
skewed,
affecting work
allocation
Employee
productivity is
let to fall,
creating slack
High degree of
job
specialisation
leads to
redundancy
What are the
options?
Quickly cut
costs in areas
which are non-
core
Look for
learning from
the
manufacturing
sector
Focus on
alternative
markets like
Europe and
Japan
Move into
products, where
margins are
better

You might also like