MM5005

PEOPLE IN ORGANIZATION
Lecturer : Dr. Ir. Yuni Ros Bangun, MBA.
Ir. John Welly, MSc.

Take-home Midterm
BLEMBA 27 ANGGA NOVIANSYAH
29319402
 assessor 1 assessor 2 assessor 3
Ir. IRMAN INDRAYADI, MM. DODI ARDIANTO, ST, MT. SELLY INDRAWATI, ST, MSc.
President Director Director Senior Manager Division

assessee

THE ASSESSMENT
ANGGA NOVIANSYAH, ST
NIM 29319402
Manager Operational Division

PT. Bina Karya (Persero)

BLEMBA 27 – MM5006 – BUSINESS ECONOMICS – SYNDICATE 9

01 PERSONAL BEHAVIOR
• Leadership behavioral assessment analysis

• Personal positioning based on assessment result

BLEMBA 27 – MM5006 – BUSINESS ECONOMICS – SYNDICATE 9

 Leadership behavior assessment
Leadership attributes online
assessment from SBM-ITB
& UID

In order to get a true

picture of personal
strengths and weakness
and areas of the field needs
to be improved

Ratio “average” values :

77,51 (sum of average value) = 4,82
16 (sum of values)

Ratio “series 2” values :

69,07 (sum of average value)
= 4,32
16 (sum of values)
From result of behavioral assessment chart above, we can see “series 2 line” as indicator of my personal
line is close to average values.
Ratio “average” vs “series 2”
If we try to calculate the ratio between the average number of all people (4,82) and the average number
4,82 – 4,32 = 0,5 < 1 all of series 2 obtained (4,32), shown the difference only 0,5 which is less than 1.

Assumed as “average position” My personal leadership behavior position can be assumed in position “MEDIOCRE/AVERAGE” with
strengths needs to improve and on the other hand someBLEMBA
weakness needs– to
27 – MM5006 handled.
BUSINESS ECONOMICS – SYNDICATE 9
02 ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
• Organization growth-size compared to other comparable company

• Organization position analysis

BLEMBA 27 – MM5006 – BUSINESS ECONOMICS – SYNDICATE 9

 Comparison of Organization

Comparison between 5 PT. Bina Karya (Persero) PT. Indra Karya (Persero) PT. Indah Karya (Persero) PT. Virama Karya (Persero) PT. Yodya Karya (Persero)
SOEs organization, with OWNERSHIP 100% Government of 100% Government of 100% Government of 100% Government of 100% Government of
same scope of business. Indonesia (SOEs) Indonesia (SOEs) Indonesia (SOEs) Indonesia (SOEs) Indonesia (SOEs)
SCOPE OF BUSINESS Technical planning, Engineering and Engineering and Consulting services, Engineering and
construction supervision Management Consultant Management Consultant supervision and Management Consultant
and management Services Services management Services
consultant construction
ASSET (2018) 142,800,000,000 180,770,260,254 507,221,000,000 394,112,470,455 496,578,665,306
LIABILITY 96,071,000,000 109,829,153,060 340,242,000,000 215,541,633,072 274,295,164,618
PT. Bina Karya (Persero) is a EQUITY 46,729,000,000 72,941,107,194 166,979,000,000 178,570,837,383 222,283,500,688
Consulting Service Company REVENUE (IDR) 90,929,000,000 164,747,962,138 195,583,000,000 462,259,429,379 518,069,095,397
PROFIT AFTER TAX 11,640,000,000 10,017,845,537 22,738,000,000 38,424,936,857 122,024,901,889
of State-Owned Enterprises PERSONEL COST 15,857,800,000 23,209,517,490 25,926,750,000 43,375,662,512 114,458,000,000
(SOEs) as a multi- NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 625 505 538 765 1,490
disciplinary Engineering and (INC. OTSOURCHING+FIELD
PERSONEL)
Management Consultant
ROA 8.15% 5.54% 4.48% 9.75% 24.57%
Services Provider that is fully PROFIT/EMPLOYEE 18,624,000 19,837,318 42,263,941 50,228,676 81,895,907
supported by the PERSONEL 25,372,480 45,959,441 48,190,985 56,700,212 76,817,450
participation of Experts / COST/EMPLOYEE
PERSONEL
Professionals and Skilled COST/PROFITIBILITY 0.73 0.43 0.88 0.89 1.07
Personnel in their fields. INDEX
BRANCH NETWORK 1 Head office 1 Head office 1 Head office 1 Head office 1 Head office
6 Regional office 5 Unit division 5 Unit division 6 Regional office 7 Regional office
3 Unit division 5 Unit division 4 Unit division
CORPORATE VALUE Pro fesional, F ocus Clean, Commercial,
Customer, I novatif, Competitive, Confident,
Always inspiring more Growth through Innovation Come with Solution
T rust, Integrity (PROFIT- Customer
Integrity) focus,Capable (6C) BLEMBA 27 – MM5006 – BUSINESS ECONOMICS – SYNDICATE 9
*) only for academic purposes
Organization Position
In IDR

From the data, PT. Bina Karya (Persero) is the smallest asset, revenue and profit, however in the numbers
of employee the company is in the third position with 625 personnel include outshourching and field
personnel.

If we compare with personnel cost and number of employees, the company in fourth position with index
profitability 0,73 (18%).

From my analysis and assumption, my company, PT. Bina Karya (Persero) fall in “AVERAGE” organization
position growth.
BLEMBA 27 – MM5006 – BUSINESS ECONOMICS – SYNDICATE 9
03 OBJECTIVES IN NEXT 5 YEARS
• Personal objectives in next 5 years in connection
with and organizational behavior analysis

BLEMBA 27 – MM5006 – BUSINESS ECONOMICS – SYNDICATE 9

 People in Organization Matrix
People
Compare to
others
Comparison between
personal position and
organization position.
In POI matrix shown people position

Higher compare to others (average) is in

OKEY WOW EXCELLENT MEDIOCRE position, and Organization
In 5 years
Personal objectives in 5 growth position is in AVERAGE
years ahead : position, than the current position of
Current Position In 5 years
○ Put my capability and those comparison take place in the
Mediocre
position into higher PPPPPP OKEY WOW middle position, which is OKEY
level. position.

○ Put my company growth

size into higher level.
Below POOR PPPPPP OKEY
Organization Growth
Compare to others
Lower Average Higher

My objectives plan: to stay and reach my personal target in 5 years, that is to upgrade my position and
capability into WOW position (higher level) and if I have the strategic position that could make any
decisions, I would try to upgrade my company into WOW BLEMBA 27 –too,
position MM5006 – BUSINESS
in term ECONOMICS
of growth size. – SYNDICATE 9
04 THE SUGGESTIONS
• Suggestions to the organization regarding
current conditions related to “business issues”
and “people issues”

BLEMBA 27 – MM5006 – BUSINESS ECONOMICS – SYNDICATE 9

 Business issues

Basically, with ROA 8,15%, the company not the lowest ROA compared to others,
Suggestion to business but on the other hand, the profit is become the lowest with average numbers of
issues that facing the employees.
organization
With the lowest total asset compared to others, the organization not well-
developed over the past few years.

In short, as my conclusion, that the company not effective and efficient, in term of
organization operational management, the company could be growth by size but
not agile and sustain by continuity.

The suggestions :

1. Developing the company’s market activities and achieving a new market.

2. New organization entity, through product uniqueness and innovations.

3. Operational effectiveness through clear employee’s task and reward.

4. Employee positioning, based on capability and integrity to put the right

people in the right positions.

BLEMBA 27 – MM5006 – BUSINESS ECONOMICS – SYNDICATE 9

 People issues

Suggestion people issues that The issues :

related to organization
performance & effectiveness 1. Ability

2. Motivation

3. Role perception

4. Situational factors

The suggestions :

1. Developing the company’s market activities and achieving a new market.

2. New organization entity, through product uniqueness and innovations.

3. Operational effectiveness through clear employee’s task and reward.

4. Employee positioning, based on capability and integrity to put the right people
in the right positions.

BLEMBA 27 – MM5006 – BUSINESS ECONOMICS – SYNDICATE 9

BLEMBA 27
MM5005 - PEOPLE IN ORGANIZATION