Handout 4 2018
Handout 4 2018
Handout 4 2018
Based on Section 1613.1 of IBC 2015, “Every structure, and portion thereof, including
nonstructural components that are permanently attached to structures and their supports
and attachments, shall be designed and constructed to resist the effects of earthquake
motions in accordance with ASCE 7, excluding Chapter 14 and Appendix 11A. The
seismic design category for a structure is permitted to be determined in accordance with
Section 1613 or ASCE 7”.
Exceptions:
1. Detached one- and two-family dwellings, assigned to Seismic Design Category A, B
or C, or located where the mapped short-period spectral response acceleration, SS, is less
than 0.4 g.
IBC 2015 intends to design structures for “collapse prevention” in the event of an
earthquake with a 2 % probability of being exceeded in 50 years
94
Introduction
Figure (1) shows six inverted, damped pendulums, each of which has a different
fundamental period of vibration. To derive a point on a response spectrum, one of these
pendulum structures is analytically subjected to the vibrations recorded during a
particular earthquake. The largest acceleration of this pendulum structure during the
entire record of a particular earthquake can be plotted as shown in Figure 1(b).
Repeating this for each of the other pendulum structures shown in Figure 1(a) and
plotting and connecting the peak values for each of the pendulum structures produces an
acceleration response spectrum.
Generally, the vertical axis of the spectrum is normalized by expressing the computed
accelerations in terms of the acceleration due to gravity g .
In Figure (2), displacement, velocity, and acceleration spectra for a given earthquake are
shown. In this figure, structures with short periods of 0.2 to 0.5 seconds are almost rigid
and are most affected by ground accelerations. Structures with medium periods ranging
from 0.5 to 2.5 seconds are affected most by velocities. Structures with long periods
greater than 2.5 seconds, such as tall buildings or long span bridges, are most affected
by displacements.
95
Reference:
Wight, J. and MacGregor, J "Reinforced Concrete Mechanics and Design" 6th
Edition, Pearson, NJ, 2012.
Viscous damping
0.5% Damping
Accele 3
ration
Sa 2% Damping
2
5% Damping
96
Figure (2): (a) displacement, (b) velocity and (c) acceleration spectra for a given
earthquake
97
Analysis Procedure
Determine the site class based on the soil properties. The site shall be classified as
Site Class A, B, C, D, E or F in accordance with Chapter 20 of ASCE 7. Where
the soil properties are not known in sufficient detail to determine the site class,
Site Class D shall be used unless the geotechnical data determines Site Class E or
F soils are present at the site.
98
Figure (3): Long period spectral acceleration for Palestine
99
Figure (4): Short period spectral acceleration for Palestine
100
Determine the 5% damped design spectral response accelerations S DS at short
period and S D1 at long period in accordance with IBC 1613.3.4.
S DS (2 / 3) S MS
SD1 (2 / 3) SM 1
where:
S MS = The maximum considered earthquake spectral response accelerations for
short period as determined in section 1613.3.3.
SM 1 = The maximum considered earthquake spectral response accelerations for
long period as determined in section 1613.3.3.
2- Determination of seismic design category and Importance factor:
Risk categories of buildings and other structures are shown in IBC Table 1604.5.
Importance factors, Ie , are shown in ASCE 7-10 Table 1.5-2. Structures classified as
Risk Category I, II or III that are located where the mapped spectral response
acceleration parameter at 1-second period, S1 , is greater than or equal to 0.75 shall be
assigned to Seismic Design Category E. Structures classified as Risk Category IV that
are located where the mapped spectral response acceleration parameter at 1-second
101
period, S1 , is greater than or equal to 0.75 shall be assigned to Seismic Design Category
F. All other structures shall be assigned to a seismic design category based on their risk
category and the design spectral response acceleration parameters, S DS and S D1 ,
determined in accordance with Section 1613.3.4 or the site-specific procedures of ASCE
7. Each building and structure shall be assigned to the more severe seismic design
category in accordance with Table 1613.3.5(1) or 1613.5.5(2), irrespective of the
fundamental period of vibration of the structure.
102
3- Determination of the Seismic Base Shear:
The structural analysis shall consist of one of the types permitted in ASCE 7-10 Table
12.6-1, based on the structure’s seismic design category, structural system, dynamic
properties, and regularity, or with the approval of the authority having jurisdiction, an
alternative generally accepted procedure is permitted to be used. The analysis procedure
selected shall be completed in accordance with the requirements of the corresponding
section referenced in Table 12.6-1. Structural Irregularities are shown in Tables 12.3.1,
and Table 12.3.2 and Figures (5) and (6).
103
104
Figure (5): Horizontal Structural Irregularities
105
106
Figure (6): Vertical Structural Irregularities
107
3.1 Equivalent Lateral Force Analysis:
V Cs W
where:
W = effective seismic weight
The effective seismic weight, W, of a structure shall include the dead load above the
base and other loads above the base as listed below:
1. In areas used for storage, a minimum of 25 percent of the floor live load shall be
included.
Exceptions
a. Where the inclusion of storage loads adds no more than 5% to the effective seismic
weight at that level, it need not be included in the effective seismic weight.
b. Floor live load in public garages and open parking structures need not be included.
2. Where provision for partitions is required in the floor load design, the actual
S DS
R / I e
R = response modification factor, given in ASCE 7-10 Table 12.2-1
Ie
= importance factor
The value of Cs shall not exceed the following:
S D1
Cs for T TL
T R / I e
108
S D1 TL
Cs for T TL
T R / I e
2
For structures located where S1 is equal to or greater than 0.6g, Cs shall not be less than
0.5 S1
Cs
R / I e
where:
T = fundamental period of the structure
TL = long-period transition period, which is the transition period between the
velocity and displacement-controlled portions of the design spectrum (given in
Figure 7 for Palestine).
An approximate value of Ta may be obtained from:
Ta Ct hn
x
where:
hn = height of the building above the base in meters
Ct = building period coefficient given in Table 12.8-2
x = constant given in Table 12.8-2
The calculated fundamental period, T , cannot exceed the product of the coefficient, Cu ,
in Table 12.8-1 times the approximate fundamental period, Ta .
109
110
111
112
113
114
Figure (7): Long-period transition period for Palestine
115
Table 12.8-1: Coefficient for upper limit on calculated period
Design Spectral Response, S D1 Coefficient Cu
0.4 1.4
0.3 1.4
0.2 1.5
0.15 1.6
0.1 1.7
In cases where moment resisting frames do not exceed twelve stories in height and
having an average story height of 3 m, an approximate period Ta in seconds in the
following form can be used:
Ta 0.1 N
116
3.2 Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces:
Fx Cvx V F
wn
and n
k
wx hx
Cvx wx
n F
w h
i 1
i
k
i
x h
h n
w1
F x
h
1
1
where:
Fx
= Lateral force at level x
Cvx = Vertical distribution factor
V = total design lateral force or shear at the base of the building
wx and wi = the portions of W assigned to levels x and i
hx and hi = the height from base to level x or i
k = an exponent related to the structure period as follows:
k = 1 for buildings with T less than or equal to 0.5 seconds
k = 2 for buildings with T more than or equal to 2.5 seconds
Interpolate between k = 1 and k = 2 for buildings with T between 0.5 and 2.5
where:
Fi = portion of the seismic base shear, V , induced at level i
Accidental Torsion, M ta
M ta = Vx 0.05 B
Where B is the building dimension perpendicular to the direction of seismic force
Total Torsion, M T M t M ta
Where earthquake forces are applied concurrently in two orthogonal directions, the
required 5 percent displacement of the center of mass need not applied in both of the
orthogonal directions at the same time, but shall be applied in the direction that
produces the greater effect.
117
3.4 Story Drift:
The design story drift, , is defined as the difference between the deflection of the
center of mass at the top and bottom of the story being considered.
Cd xe
x
Ie
Where:
When the stability coefficient, , is greater than 0.10 but less than or equal to max , P-
delta effects are to be considered. To obtain the story drift for including the P-delta
effects, the design story drift shall be multiplied by 1.0 /(1 ) .
When is greater than max , the structure is potentially unstable and has to be
redesigned.
Where the p-delta effect is included in an automated analysis, the equation for
evaluating max shall still be satisfied, but the value of in the first equation using the
results of the p-delta analysis is permitted to be divided by 1 before checking the
second equation.
118
3.6 Redundancy:
The value of ρ is permitted to equal 1.0 for the following:
1. Structures assigned to Seismic Design Category B or C.
2. Drift calculation and P-delta effects.
3. Design of diaphragm collector elements.
4. Design of members or connections where the seismic load effects including over-
strength factor are required for design.
5. Diaphragm loads.
119
4.1 Basic combinations
5. 1.2 0.2 S DS D QE L 0.2 S
6. 0.9 0.2 S DS D QE 1.6 H
Notes:
1-The load factor on L in combination 5 is permitted to equal 0.5 for all occupancies in
which L in Table 4-1 of ASCE 7-10 is less than or equal to 480 kg/m2, with the
exception of garages or areas occupied as places of public assembly.
2- The load on H shall be set equal to zero in combination 6 if the structural action due
to H counteracts that due to E . Where lateral earth pressure provides resistance to
structural actions from other forces, it shall not be included in H but shall be included in
the design resistance.
4.3 Minimum upward force for horizontal cantilevers for seismic design categories
D through F
In structures assigned to Seismic Design Category D, E, or F, horizontal cantilever
structural members shall be designed for a minimum net upward force of 0.2 times the
dead load in addition to the applicable load combinations.
120
Example (3):
For the same building shown in Example (2), evaluate the seismic forces at floor levels
in the direction of shear walls A, B and C, using IBC 2015/ASCE 7-10. Note that the
soil is dense with an average SPT value of 35 blows/foot.
Solution:
Based on IS 413-5 (2013), S1 0.06 , S S 0.10 (Figures 3 and 4).
Using Tables 1613.3.3(1) and 1613.3.3(2), for site class "D", short-period site
coefficient Fa 1.6 and long-period site coefficient Fv 2.4 .
S DS S MS 0.16 g 0.107g
2 2
3 3
S D1 S M 1 0.144 g 0.096 g
2 2
3 3
Occupancy importance factor, I e as evaluated from IBC 2015 Table 1604.5 and
ASCE 7-10 Table 1.5.2 (risk category II).
For ordinary shear walls and using ASCE 7-10 Table 12.2-1, response
modification coefficient R 5.0 .
V Cs W
121
The value of Cs shall not exceed the following:
From example (2), T 1.293sec.
From Table 12.8-2, approximate period Ta 0.0488240.75 0.529 sec.
Cu Ta 1.70 0.529 0.90 sec.
i.e., T 0.90 sec.
S DS 0.107
Cs 0.0214
R / I e 5
S D1
Cs , max for T TL ( TL 13.0 sec. , Figure 7)
T R / I e
0.096
Cs , max 0.0213
0.9 5.0
Cs , min 0.044 SDS I e 0.01
i.e., Cs 0.0213
The seismic base shear V 0.0213W
V 0.02132160 46.0 tons
k
w x hx
Cvx n
w i hk i
i 1 and
122
Vertical Distribution of Forces:
wx hx
1.2 Cvx
Level wi hx Fx
8 270.0 24 12235.37 0.241293 11.10
7 270.0 21 10423.82 0.205567 9.46
6 270.0 18 8663.448 0.170851 7.86
5 270.0 15 6961.026 0.137278 6.31
4 270.0 12 5325.756 0.105029 4.83
3 270.0 9 3770.985 0.074367 3.42
2 270.0 6 2318.17 0.045716 2.10
1 270.0 3 1009.042 0.019899 0.92
0 2160.0
50707.62 1.00 46.00
123