A Case Study Concerning The 5S Lean Technique in A Scientific Equipment Manufacturing Company
A Case Study Concerning The 5S Lean Technique in A Scientific Equipment Manufacturing Company
A Case Study Concerning The 5S Lean Technique in A Scientific Equipment Manufacturing Company
https://www.emerald.com/insight/2043-9377.htm
Abstract
Purpose – This paper’s purpose is to help a scientific equipment company make use of the 5S tool on the shop
floor so that the organization can become progressively beneficial and increasingly productive.
Design/methodology/approach – The organization has adopted a simple approach for making a suitable
team for 5S tool implementation at the workplace. After that, they have used three types of data-collection
methods so that these methods could help in the correct introduction of the 5S tool in the business workplace.
They have also analysed the regression analysis with the genetic algorithm for the audit scores to predict the
behaviour of 5S implementation in the coming weeks.
Findings – In this case study, it has been found after the suitable analysis that the 5S tool implementation has
resulted in the overall benefits of the workplace. The major benefit achieved with the 5S tool is that the
searching time for the tool in the workplace has been improved significantly. Also, the safety level is increased.
The 5S audit has been carried out in the workplace and the audit score has been improved from the level of 6
scores (in week 1) to 72 score (in week 24).
Practical implications – 5S tool has emerged as an incredible asset and it tends to be actualized in any of the
ventures whether it is of a miniature, small, medium or large scale industry. The 5S tool can be applied
horizontally at a large scale and it can be applied to almost all the workstations in the workplace.
Originality/value – The presented productions and contextual investigation for the 5S tool will be helpful
and useful for all the analysts, experts and all other people who are worried about this subject of the 5S tool and
its implementation in the organization.
Keywords Practical applications of grey models, Lean manufacturing, 5S
Paper type Case study
1. Introduction
1.1 Introduction to lean manufacturing
Lean simply means to minimize or eliminate wastes and enable proper utilisation of resources
which in turn adds value to customers (Markova and Markov, 2017). Inventory is considered
as a significant source so a company should eradicate or minimize work-in-process or
completed parts of inventory because these do not add any cost to the product and when
inventory is minimized the problems which were unseen can be solved easily.
Seven types of wastes were being identified as a result of the production process in Toyota
which are discussed further (El-Namrouty, 2013):
(1) Overproduction: Overproduction is a kind of waste. When one produces more than the
requirements of the customer then it is termed as overproduction. Overproduction of
materials can take up storage and space and if not stored properly may get damaged.
Grey Systems: Theory and
(2) Defects: When a defective product has been created the materials that were used will Application
be a complete waste. Also, there will be late delivery of products because the product Vol. 10 No. 3, 2020
pp. 339-357
will need to be produced again which in turn also use labour so defects are also © Emerald Publishing Limited
2043-9377
considered as waste. DOI 10.1108/GS-01-2020-0004
GS (3) Inventory: The raw resources which are stocked work-in-process and stocked finished
10,3 goods are inventory. Extra inventory always results in higher inventory costs as
extra storage space is required and therefore it is also considered as a waste.
(4) Transportation: Sometimes transportation is difficult due to the distance and many
products get damaged because of not handling them properly.
(5) Waiting: When time is not being used effectively then one has to wait for the products
340 to get delivered. Workers do not do work on time and there are delays in processing so
this is a waste. This wasting of time can be overcome by giving the employees proper
training sessions from time to time.
(6) Motion: Motion is considered as waste because sometimes workers may move around
other places without doing their own work and as a result, there is a delay in
production.
(7) Over-processing: Over-processing refers to unnecessary polishing of finished goods
which are not required and which even customers will not notice. So, this is also
considered as waste.
1.2 Introduction to 5S
5S is a very useful manufacturing tool for an organization. It is easy in implementation and
leads to successful results or outcomes to the company. This helps the company in
organizing, maintaining cleanliness, standardization of work and smooth functioning of
work. All these activities are important activities for any manufacturing industry. The
organization implementing this tool is considered as superior to others present in the market
and attracts more projects and investment in an organization (Gupta and Chandna, 2019).
5S lean manufacturing tool stands for:
(1) Sort
(2) Set in order
(3) Shine
(4) Standardize
(5) Sustain
Let us now understand in brief about all these 5S tools or steps that are as follows (Gupta and
Jain, 2015):
(1) Sort: Before going in the depth into the meaning of this term let us understand the
basic meaning which says that, “it is a set of things or people belonging to the same
category or nature.”. This is explained as everything belonging to the same nature
should be categorised at one place which reduces the time of moving and shifting of
people and material as well as reduces wastage.
(2) Set in order: Now, the next step is to set all the things in order. This leads to setting a
specific place for everything and all the things in its place. This helps the employees
and its users in getting things or materials at one place and in easy terms. It also
reduces the mess of things and work. It also increases the effectiveness of
performance as the work is now visible in more easy terms and avoids its repetition.
(3) Shine: Shine means to glow or something which is sparkling. This can only be
achieved through cleanliness. Like anything, this is clean or kept in a clean place; this
also increases its demand and also reduces any other damage. In an organization, The 5S lean
cleanliness is very important. At the workplace, people working on the machine or at technique
the field should be clean. This helps in the protection of workers from any type of
infection as well protecting the material from damage.
(4) Standardize: The term standardize means setting the bar or benchmark by
organizations to maintain the quality of their products. In manufacturing, the
material bought to manufacture or for processing should be according to the 341
organization standards. These standards help the organization in maintaining
quality. This also helps the company in achieving the trust of the company. These
standards are mostly fixed by the company but at times for the protection of the
consumers from adulteration, these standards are set by the governing authority.
These standards help in maintaining and improving the standard of living of the
society.
(5) Sustain: The term sustains means to strengthen something or someone.
In manufacturing terms, sustain is to continuously follow the same thing again
and again. For any organization to work it is very important that it does not change
its methods of doing work very frequently. Thus, in this step, the organization should
on a daily or routine basis follow all the 5S steps for better results and outcomes in an
organization.
2. Literature review
2.1 Lean manufacturing
Lean manufacturing assists in improving the production process and increase the Employee
Job Satisfaction (Minh et al., 2019). Lean Manufacturing is different from Traditional
Manufacturing. Traditional Manufacturing depends on the Inventory of the System while the
Lean Manufacturing considers inventory as the waste. Knowing the difference between Lean
and Traditional Manufacturing is very necessary for the Organization to apply lean
practices. The market is becoming flexible every day, to know the market dynamics is a very
necessary factor. The Lean Manufacturing believes that the customers will pay for the
services they receive, not for the mistakes (Mascarenhas et al., 2019).
Chadha et al. (2012) in his studies on Lean implementation in the healthcare in Hospitals
witnessed an advanced technique drift, increased ability and reduced emergency department
period of life for all patient lessons. No modifications in resource availability and protection or
high-quality troubles occurred in the course of the implementation of the lean method.
Jimenez et al. (2012) in his examination stated that Lean production was a step closer to a
new generation in production structures. It is a far running philosophy designed to supply
higher merchandise with few available resources to live in this cut-throat opposition. At the
start, LM was designed to produce motors in Japan, but its foremost strategies have been
implemented to an extensive variety of other processes in both offerings and production.
Lean production with Value stream mapping has been applied to the Rioja wine area. The
operating plan is categorized into degrees of changes to be made. In the first loop, the
regulator manner is stepped forward, then the second loop is used to design the uncooked-
materials reception structures with suppliers, and the closing loop improves the drift between
reception in the vineyard and bottling method. The study results in inventory discount
from 8 to 16%, production lead time discount from 50 to 65%, appropriate information
management and removal of the redundant statistics, and the usage of superior technologies.
Muslimen et al. (2011) in his studies on lean production implementation in a Malaysian
automobile additives producer centred on reducing the level of stock. After lowering the
inventory stage, the business enterprise was able to lessen different varieties of wastes.
GS Rose et al. (2011) in his research on Lean production implementation in SMEs witnessed
10,3 that there had been 17 lean practices that will be taken into consideration are possible and
relevant to the SME traits. The proposed practices had been based on three categories: least
investment, possible to apply in SME and encouraged by means of researchers. The practices
are 5s, visual manipulation and show, SPC, pleasant circle observed with other practices
along with Kanban and small lot sizes.
Mehta et al. (2012) in his observation for Gajara Gears Ltd found that Lean production
342 device Kaizen reduced the problem of wastage of broaching oil in the course of reloading
in the trolley after broaching. 5s, every other device of lean production focuses on
powerful workplace company which includes arranging the document of the accounting
section, arranging exchange gear in a separate rack and tool association in separate
hangers. The benefits achieved by using imposing this have been discounted in seek
time, travel time and visual manipulate. The success of Lean production relies upon
coordination and combination of various equipment and strategies. There are sure
obstacles inside the implementation of Lean production which may be conquered by
means of successful planning. The biggest obstacle is the non-recognition of Lean
manufacturing as an effective tool. Inside the international of globalization, all groups
attempt to enhance productiveness and increase the usage of commercial engineering
techniques. It is very crucial to understand the economic benefits of Lean production by
the businesses.
Apreutesei et al. (2010) concluded that Lean production is a supplement to fixed gear and
techniques. It requires a brand new, non-traditional manner of searching for things. This
involves adopting the philosophy and way of life of lean, in which all employees constantly
search for methods of enhancement. It also stated that agencies have to keep inventories on
the minimum level because excess inventories will result in better carrying fees and wastes.
Therefore, Lean tools along with Kanban, Poka-yoke and Kaizen are used to reduce seven
kinds of wastes (Muda) at some point of a manufacturing system.
Behrouzi and Wong (2011) in their look on lean performance assessment of manufacturing
systems by way of using Fuzzy membership values witnessed that Waste elimination and
J1T had been recognized because of the most critical additives of lean performance.
Vera et al. (2011) concluded that converting marketplace needs and reducing
competing manufacturing corporations to keep their manufacturing strategies green by
using steady enhancements of their businesses. Operating from the angle of the client
who consumes products or services, “value” is described as any action or system that a
purchaser might be willing to pay for. Lean manufacturing is a usual system control
philosophy derived ordinarily from the Toyota manufacturing machine. This results in a
boom in safety, space utilization, production, and drastic reduction waste, defects and
errors.
Singh et al. (2009) found in their investigation that recessionary time is the ideal
opportunity for enterprises to pursue lean rules and to investigate their business affix from
crude material to the end client so as to expel a wide range of waste. A portion of the rules
were: diminished piece and waste which unquestionably improves efficiency, TQM can be
embraced to diminish dismissal because of low quality and it can increase benefits, Pareto’s
standards can be received for stratification and distinguishing proof of products with the
most waste to cut expense and six sigma procedures can be utilized in an administration
industry to chop down expenses.
Singh et al. (2010) conducted his review on the degree for lean execution in 127 Indian
enterprises. In the wake of getting a reaction from 127 ventures, factor investigation was
conducted and 26 lean issues were diminished into five general classifications and were
positioned in diminishing request of their use in the Indian business: market issues, client
issues, provider issues, authoritative issues and top administration issues.
2.2 5S The 5S lean
5S is a lean method framework that is used to optimize productivity and simultaneously technique
reduce the waste from processes by maintaining the workplace in an orderly manner
(Tkhorikov and Zakharov, 2019). 5S is used to maintain a consistent operational outcome and
implementation of their lean method leads to having an organized and waste-free workplace
(Katare and Yadav, 2019).
Rahimi et al. (2013) utilized 5s segments for the division of youth and sports of Isfahan
physical training association. The examination showed that the organization needs to 343
improve the degree of systemization in the workplace. Systemization is the organization
prompts increment in the resisting condition and reduction of the unsafe advantages. So as
indicated by the significant job of this subject and as a result of the lower level of
institutionalization in the workplace of game and energy of Isfahan and for improving the
nature of the work and expanding the viability of the organs, this office needs to utilize the
new and successful approaches to build the degree of institutionalization.
Young (2014) actualized 5S in medicinal services administrations. The insightful writing
up to June 2014 was searched through the ProQuest, PubMed Google Scholar databases. Data
around 5S, Lean, approaches to execute 5S in medicinal services settings, utilization of 5S in
social insurance, blends of 5S and different apparatuses and recommendations to upgrade
achievement of 5S in human services administrations were assessed. Results demonstrated
that 5S can be connected to social insurance administrations with useful impacts, for
example, cleaner, sorted out, effective work environments for improved security and
expanded efficiency; the decrease of stock and supply expenses and recovering of profitable
spaces and limiting overhead expenses and keeping up 5s is a key to progress.
Gupta and Jain (2014) showed the utilization of 5s and Kaizen in a little scale fabricating
association. Usage of 5s and Kaizen brings about expanded proficiency and adequacy in the
procedures, improved perceived ability of the procedure, improved assurance and well-being
of the workers, decreased deferrals, looking through time and hazardous conditions.
Therefore to make fruitful 5S and kaizen framework the most significant components are
interest, responsibility and backing from the top-level administration.
Rosas et al. (2010) implemented 5s in 66 Mexican businesses and found that greater
dedication from the top control is vital to guide inside the creation of an organizational
tradition and 5S exercise must be covered inside the strategic making plans of the business
enterprise. In addition, education aims to beautify the notion of 5S practice and undertakes it
as a way of life in place of a management device. Furthermore, to enhance the 5S
implementation the following features must be included: employees’ dedication with the 5S
practice; the layout of official verbal exchange channels to recognize personnel suggestions to
enhance their jobs; great and continuous improvement orientation of all sports and
operations is vital.
Khamis et al. (2009) showed the use of 5s in two medium-scale organizations, A and B, in
Malaysia and overviewed that 5S practice is a viable system that can improve housekeeping,
ecological execution and well-being and security models in a coordinated all-encompassing
way. Powerful usage of the 5S action relies upon the responsibility of the top-level
administration, all-out contribution of the staff at all levels inside the organization, capacity
and foundation of the business, attention is given to the 5S movement and lastly the
preparation directed at the association in executing the 5S rehearses.
Kumar et al. (2007) led an examination in the Grindwell Norton Company. The information
on the exhibition of 5-S groups from Grindwell Norton was accumulated. This information
was substituted in the Questionnaire for Corrective Feedback Approaches (QCFAs) and the
money related bookkeeping articulations were created. The writing audit prompted the
finding that 5-S could be utilized as an intertwining gadget for conglomerating world-class
ideal models, for example, all-out quality administration (TQM) and quality circles (QCs). The
GS pragmatic usage study uncovered the similarity of utilizing QCFAS for monetarily
10,3 bookkeeping 5-S groups.
Ho and Cicmil (1996) depicted the use of the 5s approach in two organizations. The SIRIM
organization case exhibits how the 5s was effectively actualized in an enormous association
which therefore turned into a benchmark for others to pursue. The Wellex organization case
demonstrates that the 5s culture is widespread and can be identified with any work if there is
a pledge to the normal target and furthermore its profitability expanded by 26% with
344 turnover surpassing US$23 million.
(1) The objectives and research questions:
The organization chosen for this study is located in Saha, Haryana, India. The organization is
a leading manufacturer of scientific equipments. The main products of the company are
aerosol disinfectors and autoclaves. The company turnover is around 100 million and
potential customers include many leading hospitals around India. The major objective behind
conducting the research is to ensure that the 5S method is successfully implemented in the
company’s shop floor. It has to be ensured that the 5S method and lean structure are
incorporated in the daily routine work of employees once it is implemented. As far as the
concept of going lean, it can be better understood through going through these essential
questions and finding the answers of the same. These questions include:
Q.1. Formation of the lean working environment inside the organization?
Q.2. How the incorporation of lean structure into the routine-based operation of
employees will be done?
Q.3. How employees will be involved in the creation of the 5S method and how it will be
made to pertain and continue to last for long?
Q.4. How beneficial will 5S prove for the business?
3. Methodology
A “research method” can be defined as the systematically taken and orderly approach in
order to collect and analyse the data and extract the information from the data. As per the
definition given by Kothari (2011)), these are the methods or techniques that are used for
research purpose. These include analytical tools and questionnaire etc. The research
methodology can be seen as not only talking about the methods but also the realization of
their positive results over a wider scope while understanding the logic used. It includes
knowing why a particular method is used or not used. The research may be evaluated by its
researcher or an external agent too.
The action-based approach is being used in this methodology as theory is practically done
immediately after coming across. It was January 2019 when the idea for the project was first
generated by the researchers while attempting to find a topic for the research. And it was in
ending June 2019, when the project idea was finally presented to the company’s manager who
responded in positive. This gave the breakthrough to the project and a 5S specialist was
communicated the main goals expected. The organizational expert in the 5S method was
made to hold a seminar demonstrating the 5S method to the researchers and other concerned
stakeholders. The seminar provided a clear understanding to researchers about the main
concepts of 5S and how the system was to be implemented into the shop floor environment.
The creation of a project plan started along with the organization of the project in July 2019.
Tools like SWOT analysis and stakeholders’ chart, to identify the related parties, were
prescribed to be created by the researcher for the 5S method while conducting the research.
Even though the 5S method required the main practical part, but research was also used for The 5S lean
lean to be able to gain a better understanding of lean thinking and its related aspects. technique
3.1 Data collection in the organization
Data has been collected by personal interaction with a person related to working on the shop
floor, checking of previous records and performance of activities has been observed.
345
4. 5S implementation steps
Steps taken for the implementation of 5S are discussed further.
5. Case study
Tables 1–4 represents before and after pictures of 5S implementation on the shop floor in the
organisation.
5S sheet
Company name ABC
Benefits
Direct: - Indirect: -
Table 1. (1) Safety of worker increased (1) Safer work environment
5S sheet 1 (2) Chance of short circuiting reduces (2) Accident rate decreases
5S sheet
The 5S lean
Company name ABC technique
Objective To protect the material from damage and avoid mixing of
semi-finish
Problem Wastage of time in identifying the needed material because
finished and non-finished materials get mixed. The finished
work pieces also sometimes get damage on their finished 349
surfaces while lying on the floor or when they come in contact
with the rough non-finished work pieces
Problem analysis Difficulty in identifying the finished and non-finished work
pieces because both get mixed together when they are lying at
same place on floor
Root cause There is no bin for finished and non-finished material. They
are just lying on the floor
Remedy Place separate bins for finished and non- finished materials
Action Use bins for proper keeping
Before After
Benefits
Direct: - Indirect: -
(1) Material search time is eliminated (1) Safe work environment
(2) Better housekeeping (2) Cleanliness in the machine shop increases
(3) Easy in material handling (3) Material rejection is also eliminated
Horizontal development Table 2.
1. Implement for all work stations 5S sheet 2
6. 5S audit
For better execution of 5S exercises under the organization and the presentation of controls in
a normal way, the quality administration division’s architects have been charged. 5S
exercises connected in the get together branch of the peered toward organization have been
assessed for about six months and the structures have been filled because of the week-by-
week schedule controls. Scores of all weeks are summed up. So week after week complete
evaluation scores are gotten and the appraisals are made through mirroring the week by
week scores on the designs. In the examination, the information on these structures has been
utilized and the investigation is attempted to be performed through watching the applications
inside, the organization. The five evaluation inquiries have been readied and 5S appraisal
structure has been readied. For answers to be given to these inquiries in every week, appraisal
scores as 0 5 Very awful, 1 5 Bad 2 5 Average 3 5 Good and 4 5 Very great have been
determined.
GS 5S sheet
10,3 Company name ABC
Benefits
Direct: - Indirect: -
(1) Tool search time is eliminated (1) safer work environment
(2) Better housekeeping (2) Cleanliness in the machine shop increase
(3) Easy in material handling (3) Employee motivation and moral is increased
Benefits
Direct: - Indirect: -
(1) Search time is eliminated (1) Effective use of space
(2) Better housekeeping (2) Cleanliness in the machine shop increases
(3) Clean work table (3) Employee motivation and moral are increased
Horizontal deployment Table 4.
I. Implement for all work stations 5S sheet 4
this analysis is to find the equation which suggests as no of week’s increases, the 5S score
gets improved. It means we get better 5S implementation results as the number of weeks
increases.
Total Score ¼ 20:43 þ 1:742 ðweekÞ (1)
Figure 1 represents the normality plot, residual versus fit value, histogram and time variance
study. It is evident from the figure that all the residuals fall on the straight line that verifies
the normality test for regression. Other tests are also found to represent the goodness of
results.
GS 5S activities (in Sort Set in order Shine Standardize Sustain Total
10,3 Weeks) score score score score score score
1 1 1 2 1 1 6
2 1 1 3 2 3 10
3 2 3 4 3 5 17
4 4 3 6 7 9 29
352 5 6 3 7 8 9 33
6 8 6 8 8 9 39
7 11 8 10 9 9 47
8 13 9 10 10 10 52
9 13 10 12 10 10 55
10 13 12 12 10 10 57
11 12 9 9 8 9 47
12 12 8 8 8 8 44
13 11 8 7 7 7 40
14 6 6 7 7 7 33
15 6 7 7 6 7 33
16 6 7 6 6 7 32
17 6 7 6 6 6 31
18 9 10 9 9 8 45
19 10 11 9 10 8 48
20 10 12 9 12 9 52
21 12 13 10 13 9 57
22 15 14 14 14 9 66
Table 5. 23 15 14 15 14 10 68
5S weekly total scores 24 15 16 17 14 10 72
Scores
5S No Check point 0 1 2 3 4
Sort 1 Materials U
2 Instruments U
3 Connection apparatus U
4 Visual control U
5 Written standards U
Set in order 6 Quantity indicators U
7 Item indicators U
8 Location indicators U
9 Separation lines U
10 Connection apparatus U
Shine 11 Machines U
12 Floors U
13 Cleaning and control U
14 Cleaning responsibility U
15 Cleaning habit U
Standardize 16 Ventilation U
17 Lighting U
18 Working clothes U
19 Protection from dirt U
20 First 3S U
Sustain 21 Training U
22 Tools and parts U
Table 6. 23 Stock control U
5S audit check sheet 24 Activity boards U
form of week 4 25 Procedures U
Residual Plots for Total Score The 5S lean
Normal Probability Plot Versus Fits technique
99 20
90
10
Residual
Percent
50 0
10 -10 353
1 -20
-30 -15 0 15 30 20 30 40 50 60
Residual Fied Value
10
3.6
Frequency
Residual
0
2.4
1.2 -10
Figure 1.
0.0 -20 Plots of residuals for
-20 -10 0 10 20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
total score
Residual Observaon Order
8. Outcome of 5S
The 5S event was used to optimise workplace conditions in the manufacturing shop floor
facility. As a part of undertaking this event, changes were made to tool organisation, cleaning
schedules and other areas that needed better organisation.
The 5S event was kick-started with sorting. This phase resulted in the removal of items
that were no longer needed. This helped eliminate clutter and ensure that an untidy
workplace does not affect efficiency. Necessary items were stored where they could be
GS
10,3
354
Figure 2.
Range plot for
total score
accessed easily for the use which resulted in a reduction in floor space needed. Unnecessary
items were disposed of.
Sorting was followed by straightening. This stage helped organise the items to optimise
efficiency and flow. Every equipment placement was marked. Tools were colour coded and
placed on clamps. Nothing was to be placed on the floor. Frequently used parts were placed in
bins to enable easy access.
Sorting was followed by the third stage which is sweep or shine. The focus was placed on
keeping the workplace clean. Unwanted and unnecessary items were removed so that the
focus could be placed on other elements.
A 5S event can be quite rewarding by clearing cluttered workplaces and organising the
environment. However, if not maintained, the 5S event will be futile. This is where the fourth
stage comes in, which is standardisation. Through standardization, the best practices are
compared and agreed upon. Such practices are then followed throughout the organisation. Some
standards developed by the manufacturing facility were tools assignment and organisation,
placing tools on clamps instead of on the floor and immediate reporting of missing tools.
The fifth phase is sustained or control phase. The success of the 5S initiative depends
primarily on its maintenance. Assembly employees were responsible for conducting weekly
audits to point out activities which needed improvements. Results were put up on information
boards so that workers could be made aware of the improvements required in their
workstation.
9. Conclusion
It is easily known from the case study that lean manufacturing 5S is flexible. It can be easily
applied in all kinds of organizations. It focuses on eliminating waste and creating value in a
process. A small improvement in a firm can bring big changes to the firm. 5S are always
beneficial; they simply imitate the fact that the firm is now on the right track which in turn is
giving them the best profits. Benefits achieved from 5S events should never be doubted
because the success rate of the 5S application is too high. Both direct and indirect benefits are
achieved by implementing 5S events. We need to take 5S activities as a long-term thinking
process which should be employed by every person for the betterment of the company.
9.1 Managerial implications The 5S lean
The managerial implications are highly concerned with the relation between the employees technique
and the manager. Employees can help management and management can help employees to
improve productivity, improve performance and profitability by reducing manufacturing as
well as service cost. When there is no connection between the manager and the employee then
we find that workplaces face production of more waste, poor morale of workers which leads to
negative impression of workers on management and the situation gets worse where
employees may face termination of employment and the manager may face issues like 355
unionization.
References
Apreutesei, M., Suciu, E. and Arvinte, I.R. (2010), “Lean manufacturing - a powerful tool for reducing
waste during the processes”, Eftimie Murgu, Resita, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 1453-7397.
Behrouzi, F. and Wong, K.Y. (2011), “Lean performance evaluation of manufacturing systems: a
dynamic and innovative approach”, Procedoia Computer Science, Vol. 3, pp. 388-395.
Cetin, M.H., Ozcelik, B., Kuram, E. and Demirbas, E. (2011), “Evaluation of vegetable based cutting
fluids with extreme pressure and cutting parameters in turning of AISI 304L by Taguchi
method”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 19, pp. 2049-2056.
Chadha, R., Singh, A. and Kalra, j. (2012), “Lean and queuing integration for the transformation of
health care processes: a lean health care model”, Clinical Governance: An International Journal,
Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 191-199.
De Jong, K.A. (1975), “An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems”, Doctoral
dissertation, Department of Computer and Communications Sciences, University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor.
El-Namrouty, K. (2013), “Seven wastes elimination targeted by lean manufacturing case study ‘Gaza
strip manufacturing firms’”, International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management
Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 2, p. 68, doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20130102.12.
Goldberg, D.E. (1989), Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison
Wesley Publishing Reading, Massachusetts.
Gupta, S. and Chandna, P. (2019), “Implementation of 5S in scientific equipment company”,
International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 107-111, doi: 10.
35940/ijrte.c3894.098319.
Gupta, S. and Jain, S. (2015), “An application of 5S concept to organize the workplace at a scientific
instruments manufacturing company”, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 6 No. 1,
pp. 73-88, doi: 10.1108/ijlss-08-2013-0047.
GS Gupta, S. and Jain, S.K. (2014), “The 5S and kaizen concept for overall improvement of the organization:
a case study”, International Journal of Lean Enterprise Research, Vol. 1 No. 1, p. 2014.
10,3
Ho, S.K. and Cicmil, S. (1996), “Japanese 5-S practice”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 45-53.
Holland, J.H. (1975), Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Jimenez, E., Tejeda, A., Perez, M., Blanco, J. and Martinez, E. (2012), “Applicability of lean production
with VSM to the Rioja wine sector”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 50 No. 7,
356 pp. 1890-1904.
Katare, S. and Yadav, T. (2019), “Implementation of lean manufacturing tool 5s to improve
productivity in btirt campus”, International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and
Technology, Vol. 04 No. 04, pp. 55-62, doi: 10.33564/ijeast.2019.v04i04.009.
Khamis, N., Rahman, N.M.A., Jamaludin, K.R., Ismail, A.R., Ghani, J.A. and Zulkifli, R. (2009),
“Development of 5S practice checklist for manufacturing industry”, Proceedings of the World
Congress on Engineering, Vol. I, ISBN: 978-988-17012-5-1, London, pp. 545-549.
Kothari, C. (2011), Research Methodology, New Age International Ltd, New Delhi.
Kumar, R.S.P., Sudhahar, C., Dickson, J.F., Senthil, V. and Devadasan, S.R. (2007), “Performance
analysis of 5-S teams using quality circle financial accounting system”, The TQM Magazine,
Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 483-496.
Li, S., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Landers, R.G. and Tang, L. (2013), “Process planning optimization for parallel
drilling of blind holes using a two phase genetic algorithm”, Journal of Intelligent
Manufacturing, Vol. 24, pp. 791-804.
Markova, N. and Markov, D. (2017), “The oretical aspects of «lean enterprise» definition. Bulletin of
Ural Federal university”, Series Economics And Management, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 858-879, doi: 10.
15826/vestnik.2017.16.6.041.
Mascarenhas, R., Pimentel, C. and Rosa, M. (2019), “The way lean starts – a different approach to
introduce lean culture and changing process with people’s involvement”, Procedia
Manufacturing, Vol. 38, pp. 948-956, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.178.
Mehta, R.K., Mehta, D. and Mehta, N.K. (2012), “Lean manufacturing practices: problems and
prospects”, International Journal of Engineering, Vol. X No. 3, pp. 119-124.
Minh, K., Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M. and Heidari, S. (2019), “Do lean manufacturing practices have
negative impact on job satisfaction?”, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 10 No. 1,
pp. 257-274, doi: 10.1108/ijlss-11-2016-0072.
Muslimen, R., Yusof, S.M. and Abidin, A.S.Z. (2011), “Lean manufacturing implementation in
Malaysian automotive components manufacturer: a case study”, Proceedings of the World
Congress on Engineering, Vol. I, ISSN: 2078-0966, London, pp. 772-776.
Rahimi, G., Ghodusi, N., Zamani, A. and Goli, M. (2013), “Compare the application of symmetry
elements (5s) in the department of youth and sports, Isfahan Province”, International Journal of
Scientific Research in Knowledge, Vol. 1 No. 6, pp. 148-153.
Rosas, J.H.A., Alidaee, B., Moreno, J.C. and Urbina, J. (2010), “Quality improvement supported by the
5S, an empirical case study of Mexican organizations”, International Journal of Production
Research, Vol. 48 No. 23, pp. 7063-7087.
Rose, A.M.N., Deros, B.M., Rahman, M.N.A. and Nordin, N. (2011), “Lean manufacturing best practices
in SMEs”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations
Management, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 872-877.
Sharma, N., Khanna, R. and Gupta, R.D. (2015), “WEDM process variables investigation for HSLA by
response surface methodology and genetic algorithm”, Engineering Science and Technology:
International Journal, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 171-177.
Sharma, N., Kumar, K., Raj, T. and Kumar, V. (2019), “Porosity exploration of SMA by Taguchi,
regression analysis and genetic programming”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 30
No. 1, pp. 139-146, doi: 10.1007/s10845-016-1236-8.
Singh, B., Garg, S.K. and Sharma, S.K. (2009), “Lean can be a survival strategy during recessionary The 5S lean
times”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 58 No. 8,
pp. 803-808. technique
Singh, B., Garg, S.K., Sharma, S.K. and Grewal, C. (2010), “Lean implementation and its benefits to
production industry”, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 157-168.
Tkhorikov, B. and Zakharov, V. (2019), “Tools for lean production management of the university
department: the 5s system, kanban. research result”, Economic Research, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 60-76,
doi: 10.18413/2409-1634-2019-5-1-0-7. 357
Veza, I., Gjeldum, N. and Celent, L. (2011), “Lean manufacturing implementation problems in beverage
production systems”, International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (IJIEM),
Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 21-26.
Young, F.Y.F. (2014), “The use of 5S in healthcare services: a literature review”, International Journal
of Business and Social Science, Vol. 5 No. 10, p. 1.
Corresponding author
Shaman Gupta can be contacted at: shamangupta9@gmail.com
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com