Chapter Six: Fresh Concrete: "Workability"
Chapter Six: Fresh Concrete: "Workability"
Chapter Six: Fresh Concrete: "Workability"
6.1 Introduction
The potential strength and durability of concrete of a given mix proportion is very dependent on
the degree of its compaction.
It is vital, therefore, that the consistency of the mix (consistency: ability to flow) be such that the
concrete can be transported, placed, and finished sufficiently early and easily enough to attain the
expected strength and durability without segregation or bleeding.
Therefore, the main properties of fresh concrete during mixing, transporting, placing and
compacting are:
1. Fluidity or consistency: capability of being handled and of flowing into formwork and
around any reinforcement, with assistance of compacting equipment.
2. Compact ability: air entrapped during mixing and handling should be easily removed by
compaction equipment, such as vibrators.
3. Stability or cohesiveness: fresh concrete should remain homogenous and uniform. No
segregation of cement paste from aggregates (especially coarse ones).
Fluidity, compact-ability and stability is represented by the term "workability".
6.2 Definition of Workability
1- The amount of useful internal work necessary to produce full compaction without occurrence
of the known concrete problems. The useful internal work is the work or energy required to
overcome the internal friction between the individual particles in the concrete.
In practice, however, additional energy is required to overcome the surface friction between
concrete and the framework or the reinforcement. Thus, in practice, it is difficult to measure
the workability as defined above, and what we measure is workability which is applicable to
particular method adopted.
2- This term is defined in ASTM C 125 as the property determining the effort required to
manipulate a freshly mixed quantity of concrete with minimum loss of homogeneity. The
term manipulate includes the operations of placing, compacting and finishing the concrete.
1. Water Content of the Mix. This is the most important fact for governing workability of
concrete. A group of particles requires a certain amount of water. Water is absorbed on
the particle surface, in the volumes between particles, and provides "lubrication" to
help the particles move past one another more easily. Therefore, finer particles require
more water. Side-effects of increased water are loss of strength and possible segregation.
3. Aggregate Properties. The ratio of coarse/fine aggregate is not the only factor affecting
workability. The gradation and particle size of sands are important. Shape and texture of
aggregate will also affect workability.
Spherical shaped particles will not have the interaction problems associated with more
angular particles. Also, spherical shapes have a low surface/volume ratio, therefore, less
cement will be required to coat each particle and more will be available to contribute to
the workability of the concrete.
Aggregate which is porous will absorb more water leaving less to provide workability. It
is important to distinguish between total water content, which includes absorbed water,
and free water which is available for improving workability.
Use of larger maximum size of aggregate gives less surface area to be wetted and more
water in medium, and hence improvement in workability.
4. Time and Temperature. In general, increasing temperature will cause an increase in the
rate of hydration and evaporation. Both of these effects lead to a loss of workability.
5. Loss of Workability. Workability will decrease with time due to several factors; continued
slow hydration of C3S and C3A during dormant period, loss of water through evaporation
and absorption, increased particle interaction due to the formation of hydration products
on the particle surface. Loss of workability is measured as "slump loss" with time. Due to
absorption of water by cement (and aggregates if absorbent) workability may decrease
rapidly after mixing.
Unfortunately, there is no accepted test, which measure directly the workability. There are
numerous attempts to correlate workability with some easily determinable physical
measurements, but none of these is fully satisfactory, although they may provide useful
information within a range of variation in workability.
Different empirical measurements of workability have been developed over the years. None of
these tests measure workability in terms of the fundamental properties of concrete.
However, the following tests have been developed:
6.4.1 Subjective Assessment. The oldest way of measuring workability based on the
judgement and experience of the engineer. Unfortunately, different people see things, in
this case concrete, differently.
6.4.2 Slump Test. The oldest, most widely used test for determining workability. The device is
a hollow cone-shaped mold. The mold is filled in three layers of each volume. Each layer
is rodded with a 16mm steel rod 25 times. The mold is then lifted away and the change in
the height of the concrete is measured against the mold. The slump test is a measure of
the resistance of concrete to flow under its own weight. There are three classifications of
slump; "true" slump, shear slump, and collapse slump. Slump test gives good results for
rich mixes.
True slump is a general reduction in height of the mass without any breaking up. Shear
slump indicates a lack of cohesion, tends to occur in harsh mixes. This type of result
implies the concrete is not suitable for placement. Collapse slump generally indicates a
very wet mix.
6.4.3 Compacting Factor Test. Concrete strength is proportional to its relative density. A test
to determine the compaction factor was developed in 1947. It involves dropping a volume
of concrete from one hopper to another and measuring the volume of concrete in the final
hopper to that of a fully compacted volume. This test is difficult to run in the field and is
not practical for large aggregates (over 1 in.). Compacting factor test is used for low
workable concretes.
6.4.4 Flow Table Test. It measures a concretes ability to flow under vibration and provides
information on its tendency to segregate. There are a number of tests available but none
are recognized by ASTM. However, the flow table test described for mortar flows is
occasionally used. It is usually used for high workable concretes.
The table top is cleaned of all gritty material and is wetted. The mold is kept on the center
of the table, firmly held and is filled in two layers.
Each layer is rodded 25 times with a tamping rod 1.6 cm in diameter and 61 cm long
rounded at the lower tamping end. The mold is lifted vertically upward and the concrete
stands on its own without support. The table is then raised and dropped 12.5 mm 15 times
in about 15 seconds. The diameter of the spread concrete is measured in about 6 directions
to the nearest 5 mm and the average spread is noted. The Flow is the average diameter
of the concrete
6.4.5 Remolding Tests. It developed to measure the work required to cause concrete not only
to flow but also to conform to a new shape.
1- Vebe Test - A standard slump cone is cast, the mold removed, and a transparent disk
placed on top of the cone. The sample is then vibrated till the disk is completely covered
with mortar. The time required for this is called the Vebe time. It is used for low
workable concretes (fiber reinforced concrete).
6.5 Segregation
Segregation can be defined as separation of the constituents of a heterogeneous mixture so that
their distribution is no longer uniform. Also, Segregation refers to a separation of the
components of fresh concrete, resulting in a non-uniform mix. This can be seen as a separation
of coarse aggregate from the mortar, caused from either the settling of heavy aggregate to the
bottom or the separation of the aggregate from the mix due to improper placement.
1. Larger maximum particle size (25mm) and proportion of the larger particles.
2. High specific gravity of coarse aggregate.
3. Decrease in the amount of fine particles.
4. Particle shape and texture.
5. Water/cement ratio.
Good handling and placement techniques are most important in prevention of segregation.
2. The delivery end of chute should be as close as possible to the point of deposit.
3. The concrete does not have to travel too far and to be transferred directly from the wheel-
barrow to the position in the form, the danger of segregation is small.
4. Concrete should always be placed direct in the position in which it is to remain and must
not be allowed to flow or be worked along the form.
The upper layers will become too rich in cement with a high w/c ratio causing a weak, porous
structure. On the other hand, if the rising water carries with it a considerable amount of the finer
cement particles a layer of scum will be formed. At the top of a slab, a porous surface will form
and result with a permanently dusty surface. At the top of a lift a plane of weakness would form
and the bond with the next lift would be inadequate. For this reason, scum should always be
removed by brushing and washing.
On a site, there is often a tendency to mix concrete as rapidly as possible, and therefore, it is
important to know what is the minimum mixing time necessary to produce a concrete uniform in
composition and as result of satisfactory strength.
For a given mixer, there exists a relation between mixing time and uniformity of the mix. It is
apparent that mixing for less than 1 to l ¼ minutes produces an appreciably more variably
concrete, but prolonging the mixing time beyond these values results in no significant
improvement in uniformity.
Recommended minimum mixing times
6.8 Compaction of Concrete
This is a very significant stage of concrete production. The process of compacting the concrete
consists essentially of the elimination of entrapped air in concrete. It can be achieved either by
ramming or by vibration. In any case, the particles are so separated that a compact mass is
obtained.
The use of vibration as a mean of compaction makes it possible to use drier mixes that for a given
strength concrete can be made with lower cement content. But, vibration must be applied
uniformly to the entire concrete mass so that, for some parts of it will not be left without
compaction while others are segregated owing to over-vibration.
The two basic methods of compaction require mixes of different workabilities: too dry mix cannot
be sufficiently worked by hand; and, conversely, too wet mix should not be vibrated as
segregation may result.
6.9 Curing of Concrete
Curing of Concrete is a method by which the concrete is protected against loss of moisture
required for hydration and kept within the recommended temperature range. Curing will increase
the strength and decrease the permeability of hardened concrete. Curing is also helps in
mitigating (reduction) thermal and plastic cracks, which can severely impact durability of
structures.
A curing practice involves keeping the concrete damp or moist until the hydration of concrete is
complete and strength is attained. Curing of concrete should begin soon after final setting time
of concrete or formwork/shuttering is removed and must continue for a reasonable period of time
as per the specified standards, for the concrete to achieve its desired strength and durability.
1. Ponding
2. Sprinkling, fogging & mist curing
3. Wet coverings
Membrane curing lessens moisture loss from the concrete surface by wrapping it with an
impermeable membrane. Curing compounds are wax, acrylic and water based liquids. These are
sprayed over fresh concreting to create an impermeable membrane this will reduces the loss of
wetness from the concrete.
Note:
It is witnessed that at construction sites, curing of concrete is left to the decision and comfort of
the unskilled manual worker. Site engineers and supervisors should put additional effort to
guarantee that curing is not overlooked at site. They should arrange for the essential resources to
retain satisfactory levels of curing, by using best techniques available.
Student Activity
1. Study the various operation of concrete making (mixing, transportation, pumping, casting,
etc).
2. What is internal Curing and how it works.
3. find other methods, techniques, tests or approaches for measuring or calculating the
workability of concrete.