Module 2 - Lesson 1-3
Module 2 - Lesson 1-3
Module 2 - Lesson 1-3
ACTIVITY
Task 1: Pre- Assessment
Direction: Complete the sentences below.
LANGUAGE
ACQUISITION
Analysis
Checkpoint!
Knowing that we live in a judgmental society, how can you control not to
discriminate nor condemn others culture or language?
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
Abstraction
• Sapir (1956): “every cultural pattern and every single act of social behavior involves communication in either
an explicit or implicit sense” (p. 104).
• The tool for this communication is language: Language is an instrument for humans' communications,
• It is due to language that human talents grow and develop since they exchange and transfer their experiences,
and on the whole, for formation of society,
• Through centuries, people and their living practices have evolved, resulting in wide-reaching changes in
societal culture.
• While it is impossible to separate language and culture, one has to question the validity and implications such
separation brings.
• Wardhaugh introduced the concepts of language and culture and explored the viability of their relationship
based on the three possible criteria:
The importance of cultural competency is considered for its importance to language education and the
implications it holds for language learning.
An understanding of the relationship between language and culture is important for language learners,
users, and for all those involved in language education.
Such insights open the door for a consideration of how both language and culture influence people’s life
perceptions and how people make use of their pre- acquainted linguistic and cultural knowledge to assess
those perceptions.
The relationship between language and culture is a complex one due largely in part to the great difficulty in
understanding people’s cognitive processes when they communicate.
Wardhaugh and Thanasoulas defined language in a somewhat different way, with the former explaining it
for what it does, and the latter viewing it as it relates to culture.
Wardhaugh (2002, p. 2): a knowledge of rules and principles and of the ways of saying and doing things
with sounds, words, and sentences rather than just knowledge of specific sounds, words, and sentences.
Wardhaugh does not mention culture; the speech acts we perform are inevitably connected with the
environment they are performed in, and therefore he appears to define language with consideration for
context.
Thanasoulas (2001): … (l)anguage does not exist apart from culture, that is, from the socially inherited
assemblage of practices and beliefs that determines the texture of our lives (Sapir, 1970, p. 207). In a sense,
it is ‘a key to the cultural past of a society’ (Salzmann, 1998, p. 41), a guide to ‘social reality’ (Sapir, 1929,
p. 209, cited in Salzmann, 1998, p. 41).
What is culture?
• Goodenough (1957, p. 167) explained culture in terms of the participatory responsibilities of its members.
• The concept is often better understood in the context of how the members of a culture operate, both
individually and as a group.
• It is, therefore, clear how important it is for members of any society to understand the actual power of their
words and actions when they interact.
• Thanasoulas (as cited in Salzmann): ‘language is a key to the cultural past’, but it is also a key to the cultural
present in its ability to express what is (and has been) thought, believed, and understood by its members.
• “It was not possible to understand or appreciate one without knowledge of the other” (taken from Wardhaugh,
2002, p. 220).
• Wardhaugh (2002, pp. 219- 220): There appears to be three claims to the relationship between language and
culture: The structure of a language determines the way in which speakers of that language view the world, or
the structure does not determine the world- view but is still extremely influential in predisposing speakers of a
language toward adopting their world- view.
The culture of a people finds reflection in the language they employ because they value certain things and do
them in a certain way, they come to use their language in ways that reflect what they value and what they do.
• The Sapir– Whorf Hypothesis: the way we think and view the world is determined by our language (Anderson
& Lightfoot, 2002; Crystal, 1987; Hayes, Ornstein, & Gage, 1987).
• Instances of cultural language differences are evidenced in that some languages have specific words for
concepts whereas other languages use several words to represent a specific concept.
• The Arabic language includes many specific words for designating a certain type of lion or camel: Lion
• In the English language, where specific words do not exist, adjectives would be used preceding the concept
label; such as, quarter horse or dray horse.
We are, in all our thinking and forever, at the understanding of the particular language which has
become the means of expression for our society, we experience and practice our expression by means
of the characteristics, peculiarities, and sometimes literary words encoded in our language;
The characteristics, peculiarities, and literary words encoded in one language system are distinctive,
typical, and unique to that system and they are dissimilar as well as incomparable with those of other
systems;
Since the culture of a particular place or nation is different from others, sometimes the
misunderstanding and misconception occurs when one from another nation uses the language of that
nation;
In order to understand the specific words, literary terms, and even sometimes the simple words in one
language, we must be familiar with the culture of that nation.
In consideration of the various research, it does appear that the structure of a language determines how
speakers of that language view their world.
A look at how users of different languages view color, linguistic etiquette and kinship systems helps to
illustrate this point.
• Wardhaugh (2002, p. 225): When needs for lexical items arise, … cultures possess the ability and are free to
create or to borrow them as needed.
• Wardhaugh: people who speak languages with different structures (e.g. Germans and Hungarians) can share
similar cultural characteristics, and people who have different cultures can also possess similar structures in
language (e.g. Hungarians and Finnish).
L Learning Function
So The initial state of the learner
E Experience in the environment
ST The terminal state
• Various theories and approaches have been emerged over the years to study and analyze the process of
language acquisition.
BEHAVIORIST
THEORIES
SCHUMANN’S
UNIVERSAL
ACCULTURATI
ON THEORIES
GRAMMAR
THEORIES OF THEORY
LANGUAGE
ACQUISITION
CONVERSATION KRASHEN’S
THEORIES MONITOR
THEORY
COGNITIVE
THEORY
Behaviorist Theory
Based on Skinner
The idea that animal and human learning are similar based on Darwin’s theory.
All behavior is a response to stimuli.
No innate pre-programming for language learning at birth (Hadley 2001, pg. 57)
Learning can also occur via imitation.
Corrective feedback corrects bad habits
Language is learned just as another behavior
• Skinner in Verbal Behavior (1957) differentiated between two types of verbal responses that a child makes: -
Verbal behaviour that is reinforced by the child receiving something it wants. - Verbal behaviour caused by
imitating others. Imitation
Operant conditioning
• Operant conditioning: 'voluntary behavior'
• It is the result of learner's own free-will and is not forced by any outside person or thing.
• The learner demonstrates the new behavior first as a response to a system of reward or punishment, and finally
as an automatic response.
Activity Type
The hunger or loneliness Stimulus
The baby cries Response
The mother comforts him Reinforcement
The same process happens again Repetition
The baby cries whenever hungry New behavior
Universal Grammar Theory
• The idea that of Chomsky that all children are born with Language Acquisition Device (Hadley 2001 pg 58).
• The principles that children discover represent their “core grammar” which relates to general principles that
correspond to all languages.
• All human brain contains language universals that direct language acquisition (Horwitz 2008)
• It can be tested
• Chomsky believes that there are structures of the brain that control the interpretation and production of speech.
There is an optimal learning age. Between the ages 3 to 10 a child is the most likely to learn a language
in its entirety and grasp fluency.
The child does not need a trigger to begin language acquisition, it happens on its own. The parent does
not need to coax the child to speak, if it around language production, the child will work to produce
that language on its own
It does not matter if a child is corrected, they still grasp the language in the same manner and speak the
same way. During one stage, a child will make things plural that are already plural.
Chomsky: Language is so complex that it is almost incredible that it can be acquired by a child in so
short a time;
A child is born with some innate mental capacity which helps him to process all the language heard. i.
e. "Language Acquisition Device" (LAD);
Language is governed by rules, and is not a haphazard thing, as Skinner and his followers would claim.
The unconscious rules in a child's mind: A child constructs his own mental grammar which is a part of
his cognitive framework.
These rules enable him to produce grammatical sentences in his own language.
Chomsky does not mean that child can describe these rules explicitly. For instance, a four- or five-year-
old child can produce a sentence like, I have taken meal, he can do that because he has a 'mental
grammar' which enables him to form correct present perfect structures and also to use such structures in
the right or appropriate situation.
• The natural order hypothesis: acquisition of grammatical structures follows a predicable order when is
natural (Hadley 2001).
• The monitor Hypothesis: Acquisition is responsible for all second language utterances and fluency. On the
contrary, learning is the “editor” and “monitor” for the output (Hadley 2001).
• The input hypothesis: speaking fluency emerges over time. Acquisition on language will happen when we are
exposed to the language that is beyond our level.
• Error correction should be minimized and only use when the goal is learning.
• Students should not be required to produce speech until they are ready.
Cognitive Theory
• Focuses on transferring, simplification, generalization, and restructuring that involve second language
acquisition.
• Language learning is the result from internal mental activity. Emphasizes that knowledge and new learning is
organized in a mental structure.
• Ausubel emphasizes that learning language needs to be meaningful in order to be effective and permanent
(Hadley 2001, pg 69).
Conversation Theories
• Success and failure, especially concerning learning, revolves around the actions of that individual and are not
tied to a group.
• Collectivist Cultures: these kinds of cultures emphasize family and group goals above individual needs as
well as success and failure.
• In all cultures, children are born with the capability for language acquisition;
Imitating the sounds and learn the Experimenting with syntax and Being able to speak with
vocabulary of adults grammar fluency
Environmental factors including culture, socioeconomic status and parenting styles play a major role in
child language development.
Baby Talk
• When parents use baby talk with their children, it helps to reinforce child language acquisition by providing
positive feedback for the child.
• However, in some cultures, parents may choose to use baby talk long after it is useful, when children should be
learning how to use the correct grammar and syntax instead of the incorrect version that results from child
experimentation during acquisition.
• Parents should stop using baby talk with their children after age 6 at the latest.
• Baby talk and similar styles of language acquisition are similarities shared by all cultures
• Children whose mothers reported that they frequently read to them, went to the library and puppet theater or
cinema, were involved in the process of joint reading, and stimulated their reading and learning of the letters,
and guided them to the zone of proximal development achieved higher scores on the Language Development
Scale and told more coherent stories with a text less picture book (Fekonja, Podlesek, & Umek, 2005).
• These children are getting all of the essentials to prepare them for preschool and most likely be more
successful than the children that did not receive this stimulus the beginning years of life, or will not require
assistants to catch them up with the peers.
• Not only should parents expose their children early and in a variety of ways, but they should also begin their
children's phonological awareness correctly in a standard form.
• Liow (2005): the families speak a non- standard form of language at home, yet the children learn to read and
write the standard form at school. When given a spelling test at school from a tape recorder of words verbally
• McHale and Cowan (1996) proved that conversations with all three components father, mother, and child are
most beneficial. Conversations are the most effortless involvement; they can be done while driving in the car,
shopping, or even while cooking dinner.
• This study was complicated by socioeconomic status and race, with European American children performing
higher with language acquisition than African American children.
• Researchers concluded that the correlation between low socioeconomic status and race in the U.S. often leads
to higher rates of depression in African American mothers, which led to more negative parenting styles than
those of affluent European Americans.
• Socioeconomic status also correlates with fewer literacy resources in the home and a lower rate of literacy
among adults, so that children born into a family of low socio- economic status tend to learn fewer vocabulary
words before preschool than affluent children.
• Often, the difference in language acquisition between children is not about culture, but about socio- economic
status and the many factors associated with disempowerment
Vygotsky's Theory
• Vygotsky: Although children are born with the skills for language development, development is affected and
shaped by cultural and social experiences.
• The culture in which a person develops will have its own values, beliefs and tools of intellectual adaptation.
• Vygotsky: Language is a result of social interactions and that language is responsible for the development of
thought.
• The significance of learning in behavior varies from species to species and is closely linked to processes of
communication.
• Only human beings are capable of elaborate symbolic communication and of structuring their behavior in
terms of abstract preferences that we have called values.
• Social life, including language use, is governed by norms— socially shared concepts of appropriate and
expected behavior.
• The most basic of these concepts are acquired in early childhood through socialization.
• Each society makes up its own rules for behavior and decides when those rules have been violated and what to
do about it.
• Some norms are defined by individuals and societies as crucial to the society.
• Such "musts" are often labeled "mores", a term coined by the American sociologist William
Graham Sumner.
• Karlsson (1995): ‘… they are more numerous, acquired earlier in life and mastered by all
native speakers. They also historically precede the norms of the standard language and in
communities without a written language they are the only norms available ’ (p. 170).
• Social norms or mores are the rules of behavior that are considered acceptable in a group or
society.
• People who do not follow these norms may be shunned or suffer some kind of consequence.
• Norms change according to the environment or situation and may change or be modified over
time.
The speech community is not defined by any marked agreement in the use of
• Speech community: A group of people who share who set a group of rules and norms for
DIFFERENT
SETTINGS
NORMS
• Use of the same language speak differently from each other: The kind of language each of them chooses to use
is in part determined by his social background.
• Language & society: exploration of bidirectional relationship between language and its users.
Pioneering the study of the relationship Focus on poetics ( poetic organization of Native
between language and social context American oral narratives)
HYMES
Communicative Competence
Sometimes referred to as pragmatic or sociolinguistic competence
• Coined by DELL HYMES (1966) in reaction to Noam Chomsky’s notion of “linguistic competence” (1965)
“…a normal child acquires knowledge of sentences not only as grammatical, but also as appropriate. He /or she
acquires competence as to when to speak, when not, and as to what to talk about with whom, when, where, in
what manner. In short, a child becomes able to accomplish a repertoire of speech acts, to take part in speech
events, and to evaluate their accomplishment by others.” (Hymes 1972, 277)
– A language learner/user needs to use the language not only CORRECTLY but also APPROPRIATELY.
linguistic discourse
• Linguistic competence: is the knowledge of the language code, i.e. its grammar and vocabulary, and also of
the conventions of its written representation (script and orthography).
• Sociolinguistic competence: the knowledge of sociocultural rules of use, i.e. knowing how to use and respond
to language appropriately.
• appropriateness depends on: – setting of the communication – Topic – relationships among the people
communicating – knowing what the taboos are – what politeness indices are used – what the politically correct
term would be for something – how a specific attitude (authority, friendliness, courtesy, irony etc.) is expressed
• Discourse competence: the knowledge of how to produce and comprehend oral or written texts in the modes
of speaking/writing and listening/ reading respectively. It is knowing how to combine language structures into a
cohesive and coherent oral or written text of different types.
• discourse competence deals with: – organizing words, phrases and sentences in order to create conversations,
speeches, poetry, email messages, newspaper articles etc.
• Strategic competence: the ability to recognize and repair communication breakdowns before, during, or after
they occur.
• For instance: – the speaker may not know a certain word, thus will plan to either paraphrase, or ask what that
word is in the target language. – During the conversation, background noise or other factors may hinder
communication; thus the speaker must know how to keep the communication channel open. – After,
clarifications can be made if the presentation of the topic was not clear enough.
• Hymes constructed the acronym SPEAKING, under which he grouped the sixteen components within eight
divisions:
Participants
• Speaker and audience - Audience can be distinguished as ADDRESSEES and OTHER HEARERS
• Key –Clues that establish the "tone, manner, or spirit" of the speech act
• Norms –Social rules governing the event and the participants' actions and reaction.
• Genre –The kind of speech act or event; for the example used here, the kind of story.
Application
TASK 1. fill in the blank
________________________8. According to him “every cultural pattern and every single act of social behavior
involves communication in either an explicit or implicit sense”
________________________9. A child goes through trial-and error in other words; it tries and fails to use
correct language until it succeeds; with reinforcement and shaping provided by the parent’s gestures (smiles,
attention and approval) which are pleasant to the child.
_______________________15. It is the place they are introduced to interactions, activities, involvement and
communication.
TASK 2: Discussions
Discuss the following:
1. Are the theories discuss help you to understand the culture and language
development? Why or why not?
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
______
2. Is it important to study the connections between the language and culture
in our society? Why or why not?
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
______
Closure
16 | P a g e Module 2: Culture and language Development
Congratulations! You have accomplished the lesson 1-3 of Module 2. Just keep it
up and continue learning!
Module Assessment
Rubrics:
Creativity (CHOICE OF 30%
WORDS)
Originality 50%
Formation of Words and 20%
Grammar
Total: 100%
“Language is the road map of a culture. It tells you where its people
come from and where they are going”
- Rita Mae Brown
References
https://www2.slideshare.net/BoutkhilGuemide1/culture-language-development