Expt 3&4 - Peroxidase From Radish
Expt 3&4 - Peroxidase From Radish
Expt 3&4 - Peroxidase From Radish
ID NUMBER : 09ANB07210
OBJECTIVES:
In plant systems, peroxidase is likely to play a role in synthesis of the plant cell wall.
Here, the enzyme cross-links phenolic residues of cell wall polysaccharides and glycoproteins,
which serve to strengthen the cell wall components. This action may represent part of a wound-
healing response because some peroxidase isoenzymes are induced by stress such as that caused
by high salt, physical wounding and microorganisms.
That is, the enzyme converts hydrogen peroxide to water, obtaining the two hydrogen
atoms it needs for this from a “donor” molecule—called ZH2 in this example. Thus, at the same
time that hydrogen peroxide is being reduced, ZH2 is oxidized to Z. In this example, the letter
"Z" is not the symbol for a specific chemical; rather, it indicates that the enzyme can use several
different molecules as the source of the hydrogen atoms. For our experiments, we will use a
chemical that does not occur in plants, but that changes color—a fact that makes the reactions
very easy to monitor.
For example, horseradish peroxidase can use a variety of organic compounds as electron
donors and acceptors. Horseradish peroxidase has an accessible active site, and many compounds
can reach the site of the reaction.
For an enzyme such as cytochrome c peroxidase, the compounds that donate electrons are
very specific, because there is a much closed active site.
For many of these enzymes the optimal substrate is hydrogen peroxide, but others are
more active with organic hydroperoxides such as lipid peroxides. Peroxidases can contain a
heme cofactor in their active sites, or a redox active cysteine or selenocysteine residues. The
nature of the electron donor is very dependent on the structure of the enzyme.
RESULTS:
Table 1: Optical Density Readings over Time Obtained from Spectrophotometer on Five
Test Tubes
CALCULATIONS:
Tube 1
= (0.068-0.025) / (180-0)s
=2.389×10-4 As-1
Tube 2
= (0.030-0.008)/(180-0)s
=1.222×10-4 As-1
Tube 3
= (0.012-0.003)/(180-0)s
=5.000×10-5 As-1
Tube 4
= (0.002-0)/(180-0)s
=1.111×10-5 As-1
Tube 5
= (0.044-0.027)/(180-0)s
=9.44×10-5 As-1
=0.43mg/ml
Tube 1
= (0.43mg)(2ml)=(M2)(3.2)
=0.2687 mg/ml
Tube2
= (0.43mg)(1.5ml)=(M2)(3.2)
=0.2015 mg/ml
Tube 3
=(0.43mg)(0.5ml)=( M2)(3.2)
=0.0672 mg/ml
Tube 4
Tube 5
=(0.43mg)(1.0ml)=( M2)(3.2ml)
=0.1343 mg/ml
= 0.1mg/ml
Table 2: The concentration of peroxidase and zero order reaction rate for different tubes.
DISCUSSION:
From the zero order reaction rates, we obtained the highest rate is tube 1 because it has
two-fold more peroxidase than tube 2 and tube 3. Second highest is tube 2 followed by tube 5
which has commercial peroxidase in it. Fourth is tube 3 and the lowest rate is tube 4. Tube 4 has
no added peroxidase. But however it still has some reaction because hydrogen peroxide can
react with phenylenediamine alone without enzymes. Tube 1 with 2ml of crude peroxidase has
highest zero order rate compared to tube 5 which used commercial peroxidase. Commercial
peroxidase is a pure form of peroxidase and it is better and more reactive and our crude
peroxidase. Supposedly, tube 5 should show the highest rate but it did not. This might be due to
only 1 ml of commercial peroxidase added to tube 5 whereas 2ml of crude peroxidase was
added to tube 1 which speeds the reaction. When comparing the crude peroxide in test tube 1
and 2, the peroxidase concentration in Test tube 1 was two-fold than that of in Test Tube 2.
However, the zero order reaction rate calculated in Test Tube 1 was only slightly higher than
that of Test Tube 2. This might cause by the limitation effect of the concentration of either
hydrogen peroxide or o-phenylenediamine or both of them. Peroxidase might be needed in little
amount to catalyze the reaction, over excess of quantity of peroxidase did not further increased
their action rate.
The only possible errors that might have occurs must be only in tube 4. A little increase
in optical density obtained from the spectrophotometer indicated that there was still reaction of
hydrogen peroxide and p-phenylenediamine, even though lack with peroxidase. One of the
possible errors might be the contamination of cuvette by peroxidase from test tube 1 and 2. The
structure of cuvette tends to trap some solution inside it even after rinsed with distilled water.
Additional of peroxidase in little amount in cuvette can cause high increase in reaction rate as
enzyme is only needed in little quantity.
CONCLUSION:
As the concentration of peroxidase increases, the zero order reaction also increases. But if
compared with commercial peroxidase which is in pure form and our experimentally extracted
crude peroxidase, the reaction should be higher in commercial peroxidase.
REFERENCES:
• Campbell, N.A. & Reece, J.B., 2005.Biology. 7th ed. CA: Pearson Benjamin Cummings.
• Voet, D.J., Voet, J.G., & Pratt, C.W., 2008. Principles of Biochemistry. 3rd ed. NJ: John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Wikipedia 2009, Hydrogen Peroxide, online, retrieved 25 March 2011, from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_peroxide
• Wikipedia 2009,Peroxidase, online, retrieved 25 March 2011, from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peroxidase