This document summarizes a Supreme Court case regarding a dispute between two local manning agencies. Dante Jimenez, president of Unlad Shipping, filed a complaint against Socrates Antzoulatos, Carmen Alamil, Marceli Gaza, and Markos Avgoustis, incorporators of Tsakos Maritime Services, alleging false representations in Tsakos' articles of incorporation. While Antzoulatos and Gaza filed counter-affidavits, Alamil did not. The issue was whether Alamil submitted to the jurisdiction of the regional trial court by filing motions seeking dismissal. The Supreme Court ruled that by filing several motions before the RTC, Alamil voluntarily submitted to its jurisdiction, as one who
This document summarizes a Supreme Court case regarding a dispute between two local manning agencies. Dante Jimenez, president of Unlad Shipping, filed a complaint against Socrates Antzoulatos, Carmen Alamil, Marceli Gaza, and Markos Avgoustis, incorporators of Tsakos Maritime Services, alleging false representations in Tsakos' articles of incorporation. While Antzoulatos and Gaza filed counter-affidavits, Alamil did not. The issue was whether Alamil submitted to the jurisdiction of the regional trial court by filing motions seeking dismissal. The Supreme Court ruled that by filing several motions before the RTC, Alamil voluntarily submitted to its jurisdiction, as one who
This document summarizes a Supreme Court case regarding a dispute between two local manning agencies. Dante Jimenez, president of Unlad Shipping, filed a complaint against Socrates Antzoulatos, Carmen Alamil, Marceli Gaza, and Markos Avgoustis, incorporators of Tsakos Maritime Services, alleging false representations in Tsakos' articles of incorporation. While Antzoulatos and Gaza filed counter-affidavits, Alamil did not. The issue was whether Alamil submitted to the jurisdiction of the regional trial court by filing motions seeking dismissal. The Supreme Court ruled that by filing several motions before the RTC, Alamil voluntarily submitted to its jurisdiction, as one who
This document summarizes a Supreme Court case regarding a dispute between two local manning agencies. Dante Jimenez, president of Unlad Shipping, filed a complaint against Socrates Antzoulatos, Carmen Alamil, Marceli Gaza, and Markos Avgoustis, incorporators of Tsakos Maritime Services, alleging false representations in Tsakos' articles of incorporation. While Antzoulatos and Gaza filed counter-affidavits, Alamil did not. The issue was whether Alamil submitted to the jurisdiction of the regional trial court by filing motions seeking dismissal. The Supreme Court ruled that by filing several motions before the RTC, Alamil voluntarily submitted to its jurisdiction, as one who
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
DANTE LA.
JIMENEZ, in his capacity as President and
representative of UNLAD SHIPPING & MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, -versus- HON. EDWIN SORONGON (in his capacity as Presiding Judge of Branch 214 of the Regional Trial Court of Mandaluyong City), SOCRATES ANTZOULATOS, CARMEN ALAMIL, MARCELl GAZA and MARKOS A VGOUSTIS, Respondents. G.R. No. 178607 : December 5, 2012 Ponente: Associate Justice Brion
FACTS:
The petitioner is the president of Unlad Shipping &
Management Corporation, a local manning agency, while Socrates Antzoulatos, Carmen Alamil, Marceli Gaza, and Markos Avgoustis (respondents) are some of the listed incorporators of Tsakos Maritime Services, Inc. (TMSI), another local manning agency.
On August 19, 2003, the petitioner filed a complaint-affidavit
with the Office of the City Prosecutor of Mandaluyong City against the respondents for syndicated and large scale illegal recruitment. The petitioner alleged that the respondents falsely represented their stockholdings in TMSIs articles of incorporation secure a license to operate as a recruitment agency from the Philippine Overseas Employment Agency (POEA).
On October 9, 2003, respondents Antzoulatos and Gaza filed
their joint counter-affidavit denying the complaint-affidavits allegations.Respondents Avgoustis and Alamil did not submit any counter-affidavit.
ISSUE:
WON Alamil submitted to the jurisdiction of the RTC.
RULING:
Respondent Alamil voluntarily submitted to the RTCs
jurisdiction.
As a rule, one who seeks an affirmative relief is deemed to
have submitted to the jurisdiction of the court. Filing pleadings seeking affirmative relief constitutes voluntary appearance, and the consequent jurisdiction of one's person to the jurisdiction of the court.
Thus, by filing several motions before the RTC seeking the
dismissal of the criminal case, respondent Alamil voluntarily submitted to the jurisdiction of the RTC. Custody of the law is not required for the adjudication of reliefs other than an application for bail.
WHEREFORE, we hereby DENY the appeal. The twin
resolutions of the Court of Appeals dated November 23, 2006 and June 28, 2007 in CA-G.R. SP No. 96584 are AFFIRMED. Costs against the petitioner.